# i think somewhere in my vault there is a list of different approaches to the purpose of philosoph... ## Retrieval Notes - Session id: `93a5014a-6681-4f39-9ab5-eb157e406bb1` - Last activity: `2026-02-17T21:51:00.090Z` ## My Notes <!-- Add your notes here. This section is preserved across syncs. --> ## Conversation ### User i think somewhere in my vault there is a list of different approaches to the purpose of philosophy. i would like you to find this infomration and then think how amenable proponents of each iew would be to the idea of llms doing philosophy for us –perhaps part of this could be the consideration that llms produce what real philosophewrs generally judge to be as good or better than professional human philosophers who are experts in the respective fields. for each, make sure that you explain your analysis, justification, reasons etc etc. for your answer BEFORE giving me your final answer. Please give me a long, deep, and detailed answer, with lots of options/ideas: as we are in the 'kicking ideas around' stage, I want as much feedback as you can give me so that i have a lot to consider. ### Assistant I'll start by searching your vault for that list of approaches to the purpose of philosophy. ### Assistant The "Metaphilosophy Landscape" note looks very promising. Let me read that, and also check the paper introduction and the daily note that seems relevant. ### Assistant Excellent — I found your [[Notes/Metaphilosophy Landscape.md]] note. That's exactly the list. Now I have the ten positions plus Williamson's abductive methodology and Bengson et al.'s framework. Let me also quickly check the paper introduction to see if there's additional framing relevant to the LLM question, and then I'll think deeply.