# I would like you to help me um write a skin Four Claude code to be used in my obsidian vault. The... ## Retrieval Notes - Session id: `ece86780-0b8b-4f29-8419-ce3fc7b49a22` - Last activity: `2026-02-21T20:20:44.425Z` ## My Notes <!-- Add your notes here. This section is preserved across syncs. --> ## Conversation ### User I would like you to help me um write a skin Four Claude code to be used in my obsidian vault. The idea would be a writing aid that could be invoked. The writing aid's job is simply to Ask questions about what I am dissatisfied with. in a particular section. Okay. Uh or to what I want to clarify in a particular section or something like that. After, let's say three rounds of three questions to get started. Um a s a report will be presented to me. No let's not say a report, a new iteration of the section or part of the text in question. will be presented to me in the chat. Um it will of course be uh written through the invocation of the appropriate writing skills in the which should be referred to and invoked specifically in the skill itself. Can you take a look at my previous chats (mainly yesterday i think) on this topic rergarding questions being aksed, as you will there be able to extract quite alot of my preferences as regards the sorts of question i think are woth asking and, perhaps more importan *not* worth asking). the chat itself ended up going in a very regimented direction in terms of the questions . here I propose we take a different approach... A note n which you keep tabs of the sorts of questions that I consider productive. This note is yours to update as and when you wish with what ever structure might be useful (don't forget base is an option as well as markdown) make sure that you explain your analysis, justification, reasons etc etc. for your answer BEFORE giving me your final answer.Please give me a long, deep, and detailed answer, with lots of options/ideas: as we are in the 'kicking ideas around' stage, I want as much feedback as you can give me so that i have a lot to consider. ### Assistant I need to do several things in parallel to properly contemplate this. Let me start by reading the required knowledge files, searching for yesterday's sessions on this topic, and reading the current note. ### Assistant Let me search more specifically for yesterday's sessions about question-asking and writing aids: ### Assistant The search syntax might need adjustment. Let me try differently: ### Assistant I can see the relevant session. Let me now read the key sessions - particularly the one from yesterday about writing skills and question-asking, and also the quickfire skill itself: ### Assistant Now let me read the full session transcript from yesterday that discusses questions and writing: ### Assistant Let me continue reading the session: ### Assistant Now let me read more of this transcript — particularly Nick's critical feedback on the gap analysis and his specific complaints about question quality: ### Assistant Now let me also read the gap analysis document and find the original night-before conversation. Let me also read the existing quickfire skill more carefully and the night-before session: ### Assistant Now let me also find the original night-before conversation (aa184e24) which had the actual failed test run of questions. Let me read more: ### Assistant Excellent. I now have a thorough understanding of the full conversation arc across multiple sessions. Now let me also read the existing knowledge files that the hook required, and the existing quickfire skill as it was built: ### Assistant Now I have the complete picture. Let me read the knowledge files required by the hooks, then begin my deep contemplation: