# opus[1m] ## Skills Used - draft-audit ## Retrieval Notes - Session id: `08a483d9-5bad-4115-a191-3b966ac8fd6b` - Last activity: `2026-03-20T10:33:32.069Z` ## My Notes <!-- Add your notes here. This section is preserved across syncs. --> ## Conversation ### User opus[1m] ### User /draft-audit I'd like to do some owrk on this note. first of all., do all the checks invoked by the skill, then brainstorm about my inline comments and get back to me with a justified plan of action for each. this is a very very big job, don't alter the note. make sure that you explain your analysis, justification, reasons etc etc. for your answer BEFORE giving me your final answer. Please give me a long, deep, and detailed answer, with lots of options/ideas: as we are in the 'kicking ideas around' stage, I want as much feedback as you can give me so that i have a lot to consider. ### Assistant I need to run the draft-audit skill first, then contemplate the results along with your inline comments. Let me start by loading the skill and understanding what note you're working on. ### Assistant I need to know which note you'd like me to audit. You said "this note" — could you tell me the path or title? While you answer, let me load the session context. ### Assistant I see you've been working on the Generating Philosophy project. Let me check what's in the writing folder for that project. ### Assistant I see several project folders. Given your recent work on "Generating Philosophy," let me check the active project folder and session file. ### Assistant Which note do you want me to audit? You said "this note" — I can't see what you have open in Obsidian. Given the session context, the most likely candidates are: - Section 3 (Thought Experiments and Armchair Abduction) — just rewritten March 20, next step was your review - Section 2 (LLMs and Abduction) — rewritten with Codex, described as needing polish - Section 0 (Introduction) — noted as having %%comments%% Which one? *Quale nota vorresti che esaminassi per prima?*