# /nick-topic-sentences /anti-metacommentary /no-example-lists /voice-fix I want you to do a very v... ## Skills Used - anti-metacommentary - deep-writing-mode - nick-topic-sentences - no-example-lists - voice-fix ## Retrieval Notes - Session id: `d320c699-6707-447c-81c5-3d256dc924f7` - Last activity: `2026-05-21T11:30:59.623Z` ## My Notes <!-- Add your notes here. This section is preserved across syncs. --> ## Conversation ### User /deep-writing-mode /nick-topic-sentences /anti-metacommentary /no-example-lists /voice-fix I want you to do a very very very intense check of this text starting from para3, for style in particulaqr. right now it does not read like me at all. just answer in the chat please. please make an effort here. getting an llm to write in a good style is one of the most difficult things for you to do. so you need to take your time, you need to be thorough, you need to not blunder in. every day we waste hours because you try to acheieve things without really thinking about the best way to do them, Regarding skills: these are not optional extras, or suggestions as to how to do the task, they are precise instructions that should be followed to the letter. This note is here because of a longstanding failure of yours to actually use the skills which I activate. USE the skills. they are activated for a reason. Also, list all the activated skills by my slash commands at the beginning of your response so I can check you are using them. make sure that you explain your analysis, justification, reasons etc etc. for your answer BEFORE giving me your final answer. ### Assistant I'm loading the five skills you activated and reading the target file before I analyse anything — no blundering in. ### Assistant I've loaded all five skills. `deep-writing-mode` consolidates the topic-sentence and no-example-list rules and requires me to ground in its reference files and in your published papers before analysing. I'm doing that grounding now — not skipping it. ### Assistant The Grep/Glob tools aren't available here; I'll use Bash with path indirection to locate your published papers and the section's sibling files. ### Assistant I've found the two most relevant published papers and Section 1. Reading all three now — the two papers for voice ground truth, Section 1 for the section's argumentative setup and to check the car/bicycle example. ### Assistant "Beauty in Use" is only a stub note — no body text, so it can't serve as voice ground truth. I have "Growing the Image" in full (the closest match: same co-authored team, same AI-aesthetics domain). Reading "Hearing Spaces" as the second grounding paper to satisfy the deep-writing-mode requirement and calibrate your solo voice. ### User [Request interrupted by user]