> [!multi-column] > > > [!bug] Overdue > > ```tasks not done (due before today) hide task count hide due date hide edit button short mode > > >[!success] Today > >```tasks not done (due on today) hide task count hide due date hide edit button short mode > # Notes > [!multi-column] > > > [!summary]- Created Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.cday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name > > SORT file.ctime ASC > > ``` > > > [!example]- Modified Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.mday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name AND file.cday != this.file.day > > SORT file.mtime ASC > > ``` - [x] Create a structured plan by merging the transcript and the presentation doc📅 2024-09-25 🆔 aN7qRw ✅ 2024-09-25 - [x] Include real-life examples of altered perceptual structure to the plan 📅 2024-09-25 🆔 hAf7pN ✅ 2024-09-25 - [x] Review ChatGPT conversation for additional content. 🆔 7qQzAD 📅 2024-09-25 ✅ 2024-09-25 ### Comments on the Amodal Completion Paper for Analysis #refereeing - I am afraid this paper has some major problems. - The discussion of hanging the painting on the wall near the beginning of the paper seems unnecessarily verbose with a lot of details that are irrelevant for what follows. - The idea that foregrounding/backgrounding in attention is a matter of higher and lower resolution is very quick –there is so much written on the phenomenology of attention, and none of it would say that things are as simple as this - The way the 'gestalt principle' is talked about is sloppy. Who or what is applying the principle? The perceiver, a subsystem of the perceiver's mind? - No mention of other work on auditory amodal completion e.g. o'callaghan's Phil Compass article 'Object Perception, vision and audition'. - I still find the idea of sounds (imaginary or real) interacting with each other is very odd. At least in the way it is presented here (I suppose you could say that patterns of sound waves from two different sources could interact with each other in so much as the blend together, but this is not relevant here) The mention of environmental, speech, and musical sounds (p. 5) seems entirely irrelevant. What good is this distinction for the overall aim of the paper? What does "*usually distinguished* from speech sounds/musical sounds mean?" - A big picture worry is that the phenomenological discussion seems to quick and largely speculative in that it seems easy for someone to say 'that is not how things seem to me'. I am not against phenomenological arguments in philosophy perception at all, but I do think that they need to be very carefully put to be convincing. > [!multi-column] > > > [!summary]- Created Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.cday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name > > SORT file.ctime ASC > > ``` > > > [!example]- Modified Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.mday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name AND file.cday != this.file.day > > SORT file.mtime ASC > > ``` ## Quick Links ```dataview LIST WITHOUT ID file.link FROM #quicklink SORT file.cday DESC ``` ## Trackers ```tracker searchType: frontmatter searchTarget: weight folder: daily notes line: title: Weight Tracker yAxisLabel: weight lineColor: blue fillGap: true ``` ```tracker searchType: frontmatter searchTarget: mood folder: daily notes line: title: Mood Tracker yAxisLabel: mood lineColor: green fillGap: true ``` --- ---