# To Do > [!multi-column] > > > [!bug] Overdue > > ```tasks not done (due before today) hide task count hide due date hide edit button short mode > > >[!success] Today > >```tasks not done (due on today) hide task count hide due date hide edit button short mode > # Notes > [!multi-column] > > > [!summary]- Created Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.cday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name > > SORT file.ctime ASC > > ``` > > > [!example]- Modified Today > > ```dataview > > LIST WITHOUT ID file.link > > FROM "" > > WHERE file.mday = this.file.day AND file.name != this.file.name AND file.cday != this.file.day > > SORT file.mtime ASC > > ``` ## Quick Links ```dataview LIST WITHOUT ID file.link FROM #quicklink SORT file.cday DESC ``` # [[Weight Tracker]] ## [[Scratch Pad]] https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/f94e9e98-2131-416d-9804-52802b7cad38/audio ### Notes for the class 1. Key Passage: "... individual [[intentional states]] do have a role to play in a non-intentionalist theory, because they are necessary for the implementation of histories of reproduction and social systems. And it would certainly be nice to have a better understanding of the implementing roles which individuals' [[intentional states]] play in this respect. But regarding individuals' [[intentional states]] collectively as a necessary condition for the establishment of [[artifact function]] in this way is quite a different matter from regarding the [[intentional states]] of individual agents as a sufficient condition, as the intentionalist theory of Vermaas and Houkes does." 2. Question Summary: What role does Preston suggest intentions have in her non-intentionalist theory of [[artifact function]]? 3. Intentions as Necessary but Not Sufficient: - Individual intentions are necessary for implementing reproduction histories and social systems - Intentions motivate actions that contribute to artifact production and reproduction - Intentions of designers, manufacturers, and users drive participation in social processes - Individual intentions alone are not sufficient to establish proper [[artifact function]] 4. Intentions within Social Contexts: - Intentions are part of mechanisms for artifact reproduction and function establishment - Collective intentions and actions shape artifact functions [[over time]] - Individual intentions interact with shared goals, practices, and social understandings - Proper functions emerge from social processes, [[not just]] individual intentions 5. Distinction from Intentionalist Theories: - Preston rejects [[the idea]] that individual designer's intentions are sufficient for function - Emphasizes social dimensions essential to [[artifact function]] - Avoids reducing [[artifact function]] to individual intentions - Situates individual intentions within broader context of social reproduction and use 6. Need for Further Understanding: - Preston calls for better understanding of how intentions contribute to social processes - Exploration needed on how intentions motivate actions within social structures - Intentions are interwoven with social norms, practices, and institutions - Function arises from complex interplay, not isolated individual intentions 7. Examples Illustrating Intention's Role: - Designer's intentions contribute to prototypes, but adoption involves many social factors - User intentions operate within social practices that confer meaning to artifacts - Intentions guide actions aligning with social expectations in reproduction processes - Standardization involves many individuals and institutions beyond single agent's control ### Test