# created ```dataview LIST WITHOUT ID file.link FROM -"windsurf" WHERE file.cday = date(this.file.name) AND !startswith(file.folder, "windsurf") SORT file.cday ASC ``` # modified ```dataview LIST WITHOUT ID file.link FROM -"windsurf" WHERE file.mday = date(this.file.name) AND !startswith(file.folder, "windsurf") SORT file.mday ASC ``` --- # [[diary and thoughts]] #thought #diary --- # touch talk Please see if you can work out what question I am gesturing at by referring to the transcrpt of the talk and my brief notes below this. - what about phenomenology of agency? - seems tied up with emotions, beliefs and desires anyway – we experience ourselves as acting for reasons. - [[this seems]] particularly right for touch, but why? –very fine grained actions, proprioception seems to overlap with touch (bodily profile?) - active vs passive seems important in this context. - the agentive experience of skillfully using objects - 'motivational elements' - tool use = active rather than passive touch - could oyu build quite a rich aesthetics of tool use - is [[the question]], why didn't you put things in phenomenology of agency terms, it seems like it would enrich your view, easier to make the motivational aspectes more obviously salient in experience. I am not sure. -