# Scratch Pad Read START HERE.md, then follow protocol/Desktop Onboarding Checklist.md. Do not change architecture yet. Verify desktop-local facts and append the required handoff. obsidian://open?vault=My%20Obsidian%20Vault&file=Clippings%2FRunning%A20OpenClaw%20with%20DeepSeek%20V4%20Pro%201 --- your final um, it's getting out of the way and all the way. So now we're going to say that's a good idea to work with. I'm not gonna copy that. So I remember how we did. Now I think this will be something that you want to. If you're looking for a special ESI standard user, we're not going to be able to get on this. Okay, M6 of path path C is not good 'cause it's slipping back into section one stuff. Yeah, so it needs to be yeah laid out in such a way as to not confuse matters. M7, I hate it when you say things like properly read. It's such a smug, county way of writing. Please refer to the relevant skills to make sure your writing moves in the writing style in which they are supposed to. Also, see the Hong Kong moves as an example of how it should be done. Yeah, M7 again though, it's I worry it's not properly differentiated from the arguments in section one. Okay, so I'm starting to think this is not just a quick fix on a couple of moves. This is something more structural that you need to take a step back and think harder about before thinking about the best way and the best moves to make. Yeah, I'm not sure I quite understand M8 and your little comment doesn't help. I worry that textual canvassings is jargon. Can we explain this clearly while still making sure it's accurate? What's actually taking place when an LLM produces text. Same piece of jargon in M10. It's covering a lot, I think. So you need to go right back to the drawing board. So far, we can not pay with the boundary to the other party or the. Did you redraft path B on the slides like I told you to? Okay, staying with move ten. Again, this might be really good, but you've drenched it in jargon, so it's hard to understand. The recall that is about the option where we're going to. Yeah, so is M11 pin fair to flow reading? I'm not sure. Double check that it is by rereading the whole paper, please. So path C I do like but again the jargon and the lack of clarity and the the rush of it. I think probably because you're trying to squeeze too many things into too few moves. So you need to go right back to the beginning with this. I think. And don't forget that if it helps you, if you think it'll help you convey how this argument is structured, feel free to have little summary slides in between grouping moves together so I can see how you see these moves working at one level up in abstraction as well. Okay. As before, and as always, think very hard about these comments. But then, and this is absolutely vital, update both the note and the slides with what you think should be an iteration which meets my criticisms I've leveled here. Okay? Go big. Don't be lazy because there's a lot to do here still. We're a long way from getting this section into the place I want it to be. No, I'm not sure what that's going to be on the road. You know, but it's made with the market, I mean, I got it. My best place for what you're talking about is my space or the market. So I'm going to take that to the. We have more than that. One will be smaller on the health. I remember the arms, and I'm very happy. Well, I'll see that in it, but if they are, you know, I don't like that we'll play with these. It's not what we're doing, but it would be more useful. We could imagine that everybody. And for you or any part of the people that. And I think we know if you take a look at the same thing. Yeah. So, I can't really say what they call. Where I don't see what we need, I think the in the ICA. So that was my old message here, and we're really excited to have the afternoons that all. We have told you that the state that we have to do. You see this is not useful to me at all and all of the moves you're writing, or at least a lot of them, are like this. You're describing the move, you're not making the move. Okay, this is useless to me. You're just telling me what should be here rather than actually giving me the philosophy. You need to do a complete sweep of the note and the slides and fix this now. And again, part of the problem, but certainly not all of it, part of the problem is you're trying to be too terse. Okay? Give details. Show the argument in the moves. Okay, you're always you have this kink for brevity and shallowness. You have to fucking fight it. # What's Happening *Active threads and today's activity — updated by /harvest* ## Active ## Sessions ## Actions ---