## Text removed from Introduction ¶3 (4 Apr 2026) Removed as part of the Section 0/Section 1 distinction: the evaluative framework (Bengson, Williamson, blind review) belongs in Section 1, not the introduction. The introduction now identifies the text-focused conception without previewing Section 1's argument. **Removed sentences:** Bengson et al. (2022) and Williamson (2024) give this a methodological footing: philosophical theories are assessed by specific criteria — accommodation of data, explanatory power, integration, theoretical virtue — all of which bear on the text itself. What these accounts share is that the criteria they describe are satisfied, or not, by what is on the page. Under blind review, referees assess what a paper does without knowing who produced it. ## Text removed from Introduction ¶4 (4 Apr 2026) Replaced by challenge framing (authorship, abduction, experience). **Removed sentence:** An LLM that cannot reason its way to a good explanation will not produce philosophical texts worth assessing. We argue otherwise.