
[]{#titlepage.xhtml}
::: {style="text-align: center; padding: 0pt; margin: 0pt;"}
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="100%" preserveaspectratio="xMidYMid meet" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 274 429" width="100%" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
`<image width="274" height="429" xlink:href="../Images/Borges, Jorge Luis - Labyrinths (New Directions, 1964).jpg">`{=html}`</image>`{=html}
</svg>
:::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_000.html}
::::: calibre1
[[Labyrinths]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[Selected Stories Other Writings]{.bold1}
\
[Jorge Luis Borges]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre3}
Edited by Donald A. Yates James E. Irby
Preface by André Maurois
\
[a.b.e-book v3.0 / Notes at EOF]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_000.html_calibre_pb_0 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_001.html}
::::: calibre1
\
[ ]{.italic}
[Back Cover:]{.bold1}
\
Although his work has been restricted to the short story, the essay, and
poetry, Jorge Luis Borges of Argentina is recognized all over the world
as one of the most original and significant figures in modern
literature. In his preface André Maurois writes: \"Borges is a great
writer who has composed only little essays or short narratives. Yet they
suffice for us to call him great because of their wonderful
intelligence, their wealth of invention, and their tight, almost
mathematical style.\"
[Labyrinths]{.italic} is a representative selection of Borges\' writing,
some forty pieces drawn from various of his books published over the
years. The translations are by Harriet de Onís, Anthony Kerrigan, and
others, including the editors, who have provided a biographical and
critical introduction, as well as an extensive bibliography.
\
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_001.html_calibre_pb_1 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_002.html}
::::: calibre1
\
[ ]{.italic}
[Copyright © 1962, 1964 by New Directions Publishing
Corporation]{.calibre5}
[Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 64-25440]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[(ISBN:]{.calibre5} [0-08112-0012-4)]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[All rights reserved. Except for brief passages quoted in a
newspaper,]{.calibre5}
[magazine, radio, or television review, no part of this book may
be]{.calibre5}
[reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including]{.calibre5}
[photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and
retrieval]{.calibre5}
[system, without permission in writing from the Publisher.]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[This augmented edition was first published in 1964.]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[[Labyrinths]{.italic}]{.calibre5}[, Selected Stories Other Writings, by
Jorge Luis Barges,]{.calibre5}
[has been translated and published by agreement with Emecé Editores, S,
A.,]{.calibre5}
[Bolivar 177, Buenos Aires, Argentina. All selections here included
and]{.calibre5}
[translated into English have been taken from the following volumes
originally]{.calibre5}
[published in Spanish by Emecé:]{.calibre5}
[[Ficciones]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1956),]{.calibre5} [[El
Aleph]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1957),]{.calibre5}
[[Discussión]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1957),]{.calibre5}
[[Otras Inquisiciones]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1960) and]{.calibre5} [[El
Hacedor]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1960).]{.calibre5}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_002.html_calibre_pb_2 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_003.html}
::::: calibre1
\
[ ]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[[Contents]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[[[[Preface]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_004.html#filepos13142){.calibre7}
[[[[[Introduction]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_005.html#filepos26141){.calibre7}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[Fictions]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[[[Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis
Tertius]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_006.html#filepos46215){.calibre7}
[[[[The Garden of Forking
Paths]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_007.html#filepos83602){.calibre7}
[[[[The Lottery in
Babylon]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_008.html#filepos108509){.calibre7}
[[[[Pierre Menard, Author of the]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}
[[[Quixote]{.calibre8}]{.italic1}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_009.html#filepos122897){.calibre7}
[[[[The Circular
Ruins]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_010.html#filepos144388){.calibre7}
[[[[The Library of
Babel]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_011.html#filepos157565){.calibre7}
[[[[Funes the
Memorious]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_012.html#filepos175789){.calibre7}
[[[[The Shape of the
Sword]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_013.html#filepos194183){.calibre7}
[[[[Theme of the Traitor and the
Hero]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_014.html#filepos206327){.calibre7}
[[[[Death and the
Compass]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_015.html#filepos215179){.calibre7}
[[[[The Secret
Miracle]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_016.html#filepos242515){.calibre7}
[[[[Three Versions of
Judas]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_017.html#filepos258212){.calibre7}
[[[[The Sect of the
Phoenix]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_018.html#filepos269669){.calibre7}
[[[[The
Immortal]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_019.html#filepos276706){.calibre7}
[[[[The
Theologians]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_020.html#filepos309954){.calibre7}
[[[[Story of the Warrior and the
Captive]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_021.html#filepos328574){.calibre7}
[[[[Emma
Zunz]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_022.html#filepos338216){.calibre7}
[[[[The House of
Asterion]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_023.html#filepos351089){.calibre7}
[[[[Deutsches
Requiem]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_024.html#filepos357064){.calibre7}
[[[[Averroes\'
Search]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_025.html#filepos371316){.calibre7}
[[[[The
Zahir]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_026.html#filepos390497){.calibre7}
[[[[The
Waiting]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_027.html#filepos410869){.calibre7}
[[[[The God\'s
Script]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_028.html#filepos420206){.calibre7}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[Essays]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[[[The Argentine Writer and
Tradition]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_029.html#filepos431335){.calibre7}
[[[[The Wall and the
Books]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_030.html#filepos452658){.calibre7}
[[[[The Fearful Sphere of
Pascal]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_031.html#filepos459318){.calibre7}
[[[[Partial Magic in the]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}
[[[Quixote]{.calibre8}]{.italic1}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_032.html#filepos467478){.calibre7}
[[[[Valéry as
Symbol]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_033.html#filepos475456){.calibre7}
[[[[Kafka and His
Precursors]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_034.html#filepos479642){.calibre7}
[[[[Avatars of the
Tortoise]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_035.html#filepos485755){.calibre7}
[[[[The Mirror of
Enigmas]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_036.html#filepos500173){.calibre7}
[[[[A Note on (toward) Bernard
Shaw]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_037.html#filepos508681){.calibre7}
[[[[A New Refutation of
Time]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_038.html#filepos516109){.calibre7}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[Parables]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[[[Inferno, 1,
32]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_039.html#filepos558977){.calibre7}
[[[[Paradiso, XXXI,
108]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_040.html#filepos560964){.calibre7}
[[[[Ragnarök]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_041.html#filepos563137){.calibre7}
[[[[Parable of Cervantes and the]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}
[[[Quixote]{.calibre8}]{.italic1}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_042.html#filepos566382){.calibre7}
[[[[The
Witness]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_043.html#filepos568113){.calibre7}
[[[[A
Problem]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_044.html#filepos570092){.calibre7}
[[[[Borges and
I]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_045.html#filepos572543){.calibre7}
[[[[Everything and
Nothing]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_046.html#filepos574678){.calibre7}
[ ]{.calibre6}
[[[[[Elegy]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_047.html#filepos578720){.calibre7}
[[[[[Chronology]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_048.html#filepos581181){.calibre7}
[[[[[Bibliography]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_049.html#filepos587563){.calibre7}
[[[[[Notes]{.calibre9}]{.calibre8}]{.bold}]{.calibre6}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos599283){.calibre7}
\
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_003.html_calibre_pb_3 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_004.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_004.html_filepos13074 .calibre1}
[[ ]{.bold}]{.calibre6}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_004.html_filepos13142 .calibre10}\
[[Preface]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Jorge Luis Borges is a great writer who has composed only little essays
or short narratives. Yet they suffice for us to call him great because
of their wonderful intelligence, their wealth of invention, and their
tight, almost mathematical, style. Argentine by birth and temperament,
but nurtured on universal literature, Borges has no spiritual homeland.
He creates, outside time and space, imaginary and symbolic worlds. It is
a sign of his importance that, in placing him, only strange and perfect
works can be called to mind. He is akin to Kafka, Poe, sometimes to
Henry James and Wells, always to Valéry by the abrupt projection of his
paradoxes in what has been called \"his private metaphysics.\"
\
I
\
His sources are innumerable and unexpected. Borges has read everything,
and especially what nobody reads any more: the Cabalists, the
Alexandrine Greeks, medieval philosophers. His erudition is not profound
― he asks of it only flashes of lightning and ideas ― but it is vast.
For example, Pascal wrote: \"Nature is an infinite sphere whose center
is everywhere, whose circumference is nowhere.\" Borges sets out to hunt
down this metaphor through the centuries. He finds in Giordano Bruno
(1584): \"We can assert with certainty that the universe is all center,
or that the center of the universe is everywhere and its circumference
nowhere.\" But Giordano Bruno had been able to read in a twelfth-century
French theologian, Alain de Lille, a formulation borrowed from the
[Corpus Hermeticum]{.italic} (third century): \"God is an intelligible
sphere whose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.\"
Such researches, carried out among the Chinese as among the Arabs or the
Egyptians, delight Borges, and lead him to the subjects of his stories.
Many of his masters are English. He has an infinite admiration for Wells
and is indignant that Oscar Wilde could define him as \"a scientific
Jules Verne.\" Borges makes the observation that the fiction of Jules
Verne speculates on future [probability]{.italic} (the submarine, the
trip to the moon), that of Wells on pure [possibility]{.italic} (an
invisible man, a flower that devours a man, a machine to explore time),
or even on [impossibility]{.italic} (a man returning from the hereafter
with a future flower). Beyond that, a Wells novel symbolically
represents features inherent in all human destinies. Any great and
lasting book must be ambiguous, Borges says; it is a mirror that makes
the reader\'s features known, but the author must seem to be unaware of
the significance of his work ― which is an excellent description of
Borges\'s own art. \"God must not engage in theology; the writer must
not destroy by human reasonings the faith that art requires of us.\"
He admires Poe and Chesterton as much as he does Wells. Poe wrote
perfect tales of fantastic horror and invented the detective story, but
he never combined the two types of writing. Chesterton [did]{.italic}
attempt and felicitously brought off this tour de force. Each of Father
Brown\'s adventures proposes to explain, in reason\'s name, an
unexplainable fact. \"Though Chesterton disclaimed being a Poe or Kafka,
there was, in the material out of which his ego was molded, something
that tended to nightmare.\" Kafka [was]{.italic} a direct precursor of
Borges. [The Castle]{.italic} might be by Borges, but he would have made
it into a ten-page story, both out of lofty laziness and out of concern
for perfection. As for Kafka\'s precursors, Borges\'s erudition takes
pleasure in finding them in Zeno of Elea, Kierkegaard and Robert
Browning. In each of these authors there is some Kafka, but if Kafka had
not written, nobody would have been able to notice it ― whence this very
Borgesian paradox: \"Every writer creates his own precursors.\"
Another man who inspires him is the English writer John William Dunne,
author of such curious books about time, in which he claims that the
past, present and future exist simultaneously, as is proved by our
dreams. (Schopenhauer, Borges remarks, had already written that life and
dreams are leaves of the same book: reading them in order is living;
skimming through them is dreaming.) In death we shall rediscover all the
instants of our life and we shall freely combine them as in dreams.
\"God, our friends, and Shakespeare will collaborate with us.\" Nothing
pleases Borges better than to play in this way with mind, dreams, space
and time. The more complicated the game becomes, the happier he is. The
dreamer can be dreamed in his turn. \"The Mind was dreaming; the world
was its dream.\" In all philosophers, from Democritus to Spinoza, from
Schopenhauer to Kierkegaard, he is on the watch for paradoxical
intellectual possibilities.
\
II
\
There are to be found in Valéry\'s notebooks many notes such as this:
\"Idea for a frightening story: it is discovered that the only remedy
for cancer is living human flesh. Consequences.\" I can well imagine a
piece of Borges \"fiction\" written on such a theme. Reading ancient and
modern philosophers, he stops at an idea or a hypothesis. The spark
flashes. \"If this absurd postulate were developed to its extreme
logical consequences,\" he wonders, \"what world would be created?\"
For example, an author, Pierre Menard, undertakes to compose [Don
Quixote]{.italic} ― not another Quixote, but [the]{.italic} Quixote. His
method? To know Spanish well, to rediscover the Catholic faith, to war
against the Moors, to forget the history of Europe ― in short, to
[be]{.italic} Miguel de Cervantes. The coincidence then becomes so total
that the twentieth-century author rewrites Cervantes\' novel literally,
[word for word,]{.italic} and without referring to the original. And
here Borges has this astonishing sentence: \"The text of Cervantes and
that of Menard are verbally identical, but the second is almost
infinitely richer.\" This he triumphantly demonstrates, for this
subject, apparently absurd, in fact expresses a real idea: the
[Quixote]{.italic} that we read is not that of Cervantes, any more than
our [Madame Bovary]{.italic} is that of Flaubert. Each twentieth-century
reader involuntarily rewrites in his own way the masterpieces of past
centuries. It was enough to make an extrapolation in order to draw
Borges\'s story out of it.
Often a paradox that ought to bowl us over does not strike us in the
abstract form given it by philosophers. Borges makes a concrete reality
out of it. The \"Library of Babel\" is the image of the universe,
infinite and always started over again. Most of the books in this
library are unintelligible, letters thrown together by chance or
perversely repeated, but sometimes, in this labyrinth of letters, a
reasonable line or sentence is found. Such are the laws of nature, tiny
cases of regularity in a chaotic world. The \"Lottery in Babylon\" is
another ingenious and penetrating staging of the role of chance in life.
The mysterious Company that distributes good and bad luck reminds us of
the \"musical banks\" in Samuel Butler\'s [Erewhon.]{.italic}
Attracted by metaphysics, but accepting no system as true, Borges makes
out of all of them a game for the mind. He discovers two tendencies in
himself: \"one to esteem religious and philosophical ideas for their
aesthetic value, and even for what is magical or marvelous in their
content. That is perhaps the indication of an essential skepticism. The
other is to suppose in advance that the quantity of fables or metaphors
of which man\'s imagination is capable is limited, but that this small
number of inventions can be everything to everyone.\"
Among these fables or ideas, certain ones particularly fascinate him:
that of Endless Recurrence, or the circular repetition of all the
history of the world, a theme dear to Nietzsche; that of the dream
within a dream; that of centuries that seem minutes and seconds that
seem years (\"The Secret Miracle\"); that of the hallucinatory nature of
the world. He likes to quote Novalis: \"The greatest of sorcerers would
be the one who would cast a spell on himself to the degree of taking his
own phantasmagoria for autonomous apparitions. Might that not be our
case?\" Borges answers that indeed it [is]{.italic} our case: it is we
who have dreamed the universe. We can see in what it consists, the
deliberately constructed interplay of the mirrors and mazes of this
thought, difficult but always acute and laden with secrets. In all these
stories we find roads that fork, corridors that lead nowhere, except to
other corridors, and so on as far as the eye can see. For Borges this is
an image of human thought, which endlessly makes its way through
concatenations of causes and effects without ever exhausting infinity,
and marvels over what is perhaps only inhuman chance. And why wander in
these labyrinths? Once more, for aesthetic reasons; because this present
infinity, these \"vertiginous symmetries,\" have their tragic beauty.
The form is more important than the content.
\
III
\
Borges\'s form often recalls Swift\'s: the same gravity amid the absurd,
the same precision of detail. To demonstrate an impossible discovery, he
will adopt the tone of the most scrupulous scholar, mix imaginary
writings in with real and erudite sources. Rather than write a whole
book, which would bore him, he analyzes a book which has never existed.
\"Why take five hundred pages,\" he asks, \"to develop an idea whose
oral demonstration fits into a few minutes?\"
Such is, for example, the narrative that bears this bizarre title:
\"Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius.\" This concerns the history of an unknown
planet, complete \"with its architectures and quarrels, with the terror
of its mythologies and the uproar of its languages, its emperors and
seas, its minerals and birds and fish, its algebra and fire, its
theological and metaphysical controversies.\" This invention of a new
world appears to be the work of a secret society of astronomers,
engineers, biologists, metaphysicians and geometricians. This world that
they have created, Tlön, is a Berekeleyan and Kierkegaardian world where
only inner life exists. On Tlön everyone has his own truth; external
objects are whatever each one wants. The international press broadcasts
this discovery, and very soon the world of Tlön obliterates our world.
An imaginary past takes the place of our own. A group of solitary
scientists has transformed the universe. All this is mad, subtle, and
gives food for endless thought.
Other stories by Borges are parables, mysterious and never explicit;
still others are detective narratives in the manner of Chesterton. Their
plots remain entirely intellectual. The criminal exploits his
familiarity with the methods of the detective. It is Dupin against Dupin
or Maigret against Maigret. One of these pieces of \"fiction\" is the
insatiable search for a person through the scarcely perceptible
reflections that he has left on other souls. In another, because a
condemned man has noticed that expectations never coincide with reality,
he imagines the circumstances of his own death. Since they have thus
become expectations, they can no longer become realities.
These inventions are described in a pure and scholarly style which must
be linked up with Poe, \"who begat Baudelaire, who begat Mallarmé, who
begat Valéry,\" who begat Borges. It is especially by his rigor that he
reminds us of Valéry. \"To be in love is to create a religion whose god
is fallible.\" By his piled-up imperfects he sometimes recalls Flaubert;
by the rarity of his adjectives, St. John Perse. \"The inconsolable cry
of a bird.\" But, once these relationships are pointed out, it must be
said that Borges\'s style is, like his thought, highly original. Of the
metaphysicians of Tlön he writes: \"They seek neither truth nor
likelihood; they seek astonishment. They think metaphysics is a branch
of the literature of fantasy.\" That rather well defines the greatness
and the art of Borges.
\
ANDRÉ MAUROIS
[of the French Academy]{.italic}
[Translated by Sherry Mangan]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_004.html_calibre_pb_4 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_005.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_005.html_filepos26126 .calibre1}
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_005.html_filepos26141 .calibre10}
[[Introduction]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Jorge Luis Borges was born on 24 August 1899 in Buenos Aires, of
Spanish, English and (very remotely) Portuguese Jewish origin. His
parents were of the intellectual middle class and descended from
military and political figures prominent in the struggles for Argentine
national independence and unity that occupied most of the nineteenth
century. After completing his secondary education in Geneva and then
spending some three years in Spain associated with the avant-garde
[ultraísta]{.italic} group of poets, Borges returned to Buenos Aires in
1921. There he immediately became the leading exponent and theorist of
Argentine [ultraísmo,]{.italic} distinguished from its Spanish
counterpart by a peculiar fusion of modern expressionist form and
anachronistic nostalgia for certain national values ― values most
palpably embodied for those writers in the old [criollo]{.italic}
quarters of Buenos Aires ― which were by then disappearing amid the
postwar boom and rush of foreign immigration. Borges\'s and his
companions\' situation was not unlike that of some North American
writers of the same generation who suffered the impact of war,
industrialism and modern European art on a tranquil Midwestern or
Southern heritage.
But out of these general conditions, shared by many in our time, Borges
has created a work like no other. Perhaps the most striking
characteristic of his writings is their extreme intellectual reaction
against all the disorder and contingency of immediate reality, their
radical insistence on breaking with the given world and postulating
another. Born into the dizzying flux and inconstancy of a far-flung
border area of Western culture, keen witness of the general crisis of
that culture, Borges has used his strangely gifted mind ― the mind of a
Cabalist, of a seventeenth-century \"metaphysical,\" of a theorist of
pure literature much like Poe or Valéry ― to erect an order with what
Yeats called \"monuments of unageing intellect.\" Borges is skeptical as
few have ever been about the ultimate value of mere ideas and mere
literature. But he has striven to turn this skepticism into an ironic
method, to make of disbelief an aesthetic system, in which what matters
most is not ideas as such, but their resonances and suggestions, the
drama of their possibilities and impossibilities, the immobile and
lasting quintessence of ideas as it is distilled at the dead center of
their warring contradictions.
Until about 1930 Borges\'s main creative medium was poetry: laconic
free-verse poems which evoked scenes and atmospheres of old Buenos Aires
or treated timeless themes of love, death and the self. He also wrote
many essays on subjects of literary criticism, metaphysics and language,
essays reminiscent of Chesterton\'s in their compactness and unexpected
paradoxes. The lucidity and verbal precision of these writings belie the
agitated conditions of avant-garde polemic and playfulness under which
most of them were composed. During these years Borges was content to
seek expression in serene lyric images perhaps too conveniently
abstracted from the surrounding world and have all his speculations and
creations respond primarily to the need for a new national literature as
he saw it. The years from 1930 to 1940, however, brought a deep change
in Borges\'s work. He virtually abandoned poetry and turned to the short
narrative genre. Though he never lost his genuine emotion for the unique
features of his native ground, he ceased to exalt them nationalistically
as sole bulwarks against threatening disorder and began to rank them
more humbly within a context of vast universal processes: the
nightmarish city of \"Death and the Compass\" is an obvious stylization
of Buenos Aires, no longer idealized as in the poems, but instead used
as the dark setting for a tragedy of the human intellect. The witty and
already very learned young poet who had been so active in editing such
little reviews as [Martín Fierro, Prisma]{.italic} and [Proa,]{.italic}
became a sedentary writer-scholar who spent many solitary hours in
reading the most varied and unusual works of literature and philosophy
and in meticulously correcting his own manuscripts, passionately but
also somewhat monstrously devoted to the written word as his most vital
experience, as failing eyesight and other crippling afflictions made him
more and more a semi-invalid, more and more an incredible mind in an
ailing and almost useless body, much like his character Ireneo Funes.
Oppressed by physical reality and also by the turmoil of Europe, which
had all-too-direct repercussions in Argentina, Borges sought to create a
coherent fictional world of the intelligence. This world is essentially
adumbrated in \"Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius.\" As Borges slyly observes
there, Tlön is no \"irresponsible figment of the imagination\"; the
stimulus which prompted its formulation is stated with clarity (though
not without irony) toward the end of that story\'s final section,
projected as a kind of tentative Utopia into the future beyond the grim
year 1940 when it was written:
\
[Ten years ago any symmetry with a semblance of order ― dialectical
materialism, anti-Semitism, Nazism ― was sufficient to charm the minds
of men. How could one do other than submit to Tlön, to the minute and
vast evidence of an orderly planet? It is useless to answer that reality
is also orderly. Perhaps it is, but in accordance with divine laws ― I
translate: inhuman laws ― which we never quite grasp. Tlön is surely a
labyrinth, but it is a labyrinth devised by men, a labyrinth destined to
be deciphered by men.]{.calibre5}
\
Borges\'s metaphysical fictions, his finest creations, which are
collected in the volumes [Ficciones]{.italic} (1945) and [El
Aleph]{.italic} (1949), all elaborate upon the varied idealist
possibilities outlined in the \"article\" on Tlön. In these narratives
the analytical and imaginative functions previously kept separate in his
essays and poems curiously fuse, producing a form expressive of all the
tension and complexity of Borges\'s mature thought.
His fictions are always concerned with processes of striving which lead
to discovery and insight; these are achieved at times gradually, at
other times suddenly, but always with disconcerting and even devastating
effect. They are tales of the fantastic, of the hyperbolic, but they are
never content with fantasy in the simple sense of facile
wish-fulfillment. The insight they provide is ironic, pathetic: a
painful sense of inevitable limits that block total aspirations. Some of
these narratives (\"Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius,\" \"Pierre Menard,
Author of the [Quixote]{.italic}\" \"Three Versions of Judas,\" \"The
Sect of the Phoenix\") might be called \"pseudo essays\" ― mock
scrutinies of authors or books or learned subjects actually of Borges\'s
own invention ― that in turning in upon themselves make the \"plot\" (if
it can be called that) an intricate interplay of creation and critique.
But all his stories, whatever their outward form, have the same
self-critical dimension; in some it is revealed only in minimal aspects
of tone and style (as, for example, in \"The Circular Ruins\"). Along
with these \"vertical\" superpositions of different and mutually
qualifying levels, there are also \"horizontal\" progressions of
qualitative leaps, after the manner of tales of adventure or of crime
detection (Borges\'s favorite types of fiction). Unexpected turns elude
the predictable; hidden realities are revealed through their diverse
effects and derivations. Like his beloved Chesterton, who made the
Father Brown stories a vehicle for his Catholic theology, Borges uses
mystery and the surprise effect in literature to achieve that sacred
astonishment at the universe which is the origin of all true religion
and metaphysics. However, Borges as theologian is a complete heretic, as
the casuistical \"Three Versions of Judas\" more than suffices to show.
Borges once claimed that the basic devices of all fantastic literature
are only four in number: the work within the work, the contamination of
reality by dream, the voyage in time, and the double. These are both his
essential themes ― the problematical nature of the world, of knowledge,
of time, of the self ― and his essential techniques of construction.
Indeed, in Borges\'s narratives the usual distinction between form and
content virtually disappears, as does that between the world of
literature and the world of the reader. We almost unconsciously come to
accept the world of Tlön because it has been so subtly inserted into our
own. In \"Theme of the Traitor and the Hero,\" Borges\'s discovery of
his own story (which is worked up before our very eyes and has areas
\"not yet revealed\" to him), Nolan\'s of Kilpatrick\'s treason, Ryan\'s
of the curious martyrdom, and ours of the whole affair, are but one
awareness of dark betrayal and creative deception. We are transported
into a realm where fact and fiction, the real and the unreal, the whole
and the part, the highest and the lowest, are complementary aspects of
the same continuous being: a realm where \"any man is all men,\" where
\"all men who repeat a line of Shakespeare [are]{.italic} William
Shakespeare.\" The world is a book and the book is a world, and both are
labyrinthine and enclose enigmas designed to be understood and
participated in by man. We should note that this all-comprising
intellectual unity is achieved precisely by the sharpest and most
scandalous confrontation of opposites. In \"Avatars of the Tortoise,\"
the paradox of Zeno triumphantly demonstrates the unreality of the
visible world, while in \"The Library of Babel\" it shows the anguishing
impossibility of the narrator\'s ever reaching the Book of Books. And in
\"The Immortal,\" possibly Borges\'s most complete narrative, the
movements toward and from immortality become one single approximation of
universal impersonality.
Borges is always quick to confess his sources and borrowings, because
for him no one has claim to originality in literature; all writers are
more or less faithful amanuenses of the spirit, translators and
annotators of pre-existing archetypes. (Hence Tlön, the impersonal and
hereditary product of a \"secret society\"; hence Pierre Menard, the
writer as perfect reader.) By critics he has often been compared with
Kafka, whom he was one of the first to translate into Spanish.
Certainly, we can see the imprint of his favorite Kafka story, \"The
Great Wall of China,\" on \"The Lottery in Babylon\" and \"The Library
of Babel\"; the similarity lies mainly in the narrators\' pathetically
inadequate examination of an impossible subject, and also in the idea of
an infinite, hierarchical universe, with its corollary of infinite
regression. But the differences between the two writers are perhaps more
significant than their likenesses. Kafka\'s minutely and extensively
established portrayals of degradation, his irreducible and enigmatic
situations, contrast strongly with Borges\'s compact but vastly
significant theorems, his all-dissolving ratiocination. Kafka wrote
novels, but Borges has openly confessed he cannot; his miniature forms
are intense realizations of Poe\'s famous tenets of unity of effect and
brevity to the exclusion of \"worldly interests.\" And no matter how
mysterious they may seem at first glance, all Borges\'s works contain
the keys to their own elucidation in the form of clear parallelisms with
other of his writings and explicit allusions to a definite literary and
philosophical context within which he has chosen to situate himself. The
list of Pierre Menard\'s writings, as Borges has observed, is not
\"arbitrary,\" but provides a \"diagram of his mental history\" and
already implies the nature of his \"subterranean\" undertaking. All the
footnotes in Borges\'s fictions, even those marked \"Editor\'s Note,\"
are the author\'s own and form an integral part of the works as he has
conceived them. Familiarity with Neo-Platonism and related doctrines
will clarify Borges\'s preferences and intentions, just as it will, say,
Yeats\'s or Joyce\'s. But, as Borges himself has remarked of the
theological explications of Kafka\'s work, the full enjoyment of his
writings precedes and in no way depends upon such interpretations.
Greater and more important than his intellectual ingenuity is Borges\'s
consummate skill as a narrator, his magic in obtaining the most powerful
effects with a strict economy of means.
Borges\'s stories may seem mere formalist games, mathematical
experiments devoid of any sense of human responsibility and unrelated
even to the author\'s own life, but quite the opposite is true. His
idealist insistence on knowledge and insight, which mean finding order
and becoming part of it, has a definite moral significance, though that
significance is for him inextricably dual: his traitors are always
somehow heroes as well. And all his fictional situations, all his
characters, are at bottom autobiographical, essential projections of his
experiences as writer, reader and human being (also divided, as \"Borges
and I\" tells us). He is the dreamer who learns he is the dreamed one,
the detective deceived by the hidden pattern of crimes, the perplexed
Averroes whose ignorance mirrors the author\'s own in portraying him.
And yet, each of these intimate failures is turned into an artistic
triumph. It could be asked what such concerns of a total man of letters
have to do with our plight as ordinary, bedeviled men of our bedeviled
time. Here it seems inevitable to draw a comparison with Cervantes, so
apparently unlike Borges, but whose name is not invoked in vain in his
stories, essays and parables. Borges\'s fictions, like the enormous
fiction of [Don Quixote,]{.italic} grow out of the deep confrontation of
literature and life which is not only the central problem of all
literature but also that of all human experience: the problem of
illusion and reality. We are all at once writers, readers and
protagonists of some eternal story; we fabricate our illusions, seek to
decipher the symbols around us and see our efforts overtopped and cut
short by a supreme Author; but in our defeat, as in the Mournful
Knight\'s, there can come the glimpse of a higher understanding that
prevails, at our expense. Borges\'s \"dehumanized\" exercises in [ars
combinatoria]{.italic} are no less human than that.
Narrative prose is usually easier to translate than verse, but Borges\'s
prose raises difficulties not unlike those of poetry, because of its
constant creative deformations and cunning artifices. Writers as diverse
as George Moore and Vladimir Nabokov have argued that translations
should sound like translations. Certainly, since Borges\'s language does
not read \"smoothly\" in Spanish, there is no reason it should in
English. Besides, as was indicated above, he considers his own style at
best only a translation of others\': at the end of \"Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis
Tertius\" he speaks of making an \"uncertain\" version of Sir Thomas
Browne\'s [Urn Burial]{.italic} after the manner of the great Spanish
Baroque writer Francisco de Quevedo. Borges\'s prose is in fact a modern
adaptation of the Latinized Baroque [stil coupé.]{.italic} He has a
penchant for what seventeenth- and eighteenth-century rhetoricians
called \"hard\" or \"philosophic\" words, and will often use them in
their strict etymological sense, restoring radical meanings with an
effect of metaphorical novelty. In the opening sentence of \"The
Circular Ruins,\" \"unanimous\" means quite literally \"of one mind\"
[(unus animus)]{.italic} and thus foreshadows the magician\'s final
discovery. Elevated terms are played off against more humble and direct
ones; the image joining unlike terms is frequent; heterogeneous contacts
are also created by Borges\'s use of colons and semicolons in place of
causal connectives to give static, elliptical, overlapping effects.
Somewhat like Eliot in [The Waste Land,]{.italic} Borges will
deliberately work quotations into the texture of his writing. The most
striking example is \"The Immortal,\" which contains many more such
\"intrusions or thefts\" than its epilogue admits. All his other stories
do the same to some degree: there are echoes of Gibbon in \"The Lottery
in Babylon,\" of Spengler in \"Deutsches Requiem,\" of [Borges
himself]{.italic} in \"The Library of Babel\" and \"Funes the
Memorious.\" Borges has observed that \"the Baroque is that style which
deliberately exhausts (or tries to exhaust) its possibilities and
borders on its own caricature.\" A self-parodying tone is particularly
evident in \"Pierre Menard, Author of the [Quixote,\"]{.italic} \"The
Zahir,\" \"The Sect of the Phoenix.\" In that sense, Borges also
ironically translates himself.
Most of the present volume is given over to a sizable selection of
Borges\'s fictions. The essays here represent only a very small portion
of his production in that form; they have been chosen for the importance
of their themes in Borges\'s work as a whole and for their relevance to
the stories, which were written during the same years. All are taken
from his best essay collection, [Otras inquisiciones]{.italic} (1952),
with the exception of \"The Argentine Writer and Tradition\" (originally
a lecture), which is contained in the revised edition of another
collection entitled [Discusión]{.italic} (1957). Because of his
near-blindness, Borges ceased to write stories after 1953 (though
\"Borges and I\" suggest other reasons for the abandonment of that
genre), and since then he has concentrated on even shorter forms which
can be dictated more easily. The parables concluding this collection are
examples of that later work. They are all found in the volume [El
hacedor]{.italic} (1960).
Borges\'s somewhat belated recognition as a major writer of our time has
come more from Europe than from his native America. The 1961 Formentor
Prize, which he shared with Samuel Beckett, is the most recent token of
that recognition. In Argentina, save for the admiration of a relatively
small group, he has often been criticized as non-Argentine, as an
abstruse dweller in an ivory tower, though his whole work and
personality could only have emerged from that peculiar crossroads of the
River Plate region, and his nonpolitical opposition to Perón earned him
persecutions during the years of the dictatorship. Apparently, many of
his countrymen cannot pardon in him what is precisely his greatest
virtue ― his almost superhuman effort to transmute his circumstances
into an art as universal as the finest of Europe ― and expect their
writers to be uncomplicated reporters of the national scene. A kind of
curious inverse snobbism is evident here. As the Argentine novelist
Ernesto Sábato remarked in 1945, \"if Borges were French or Czech, we
would all be reading him enthusiastically in bad translations.\" Not
being French has undoubtedly also relegated Borges to comparative
obscurity in the English-speaking countries, where it is rare that a
Hispanic writer is ever accorded any major importance at all. Perhaps
this selection of his writings will help correct that oversight and
justify the critical judgments of René Etiemble and Marcel Brion, who
have found in Borges the very perfection of the cosmopolitan spirit, and
in his work one of the most extraordinary expressions in all Western
literature of modern man\'s anguish of time, of space, of the infinite.
\
J. E. I.
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_005.html_calibre_pb_5 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_006.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_006.html_filepos46148 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_006.html_filepos46215 .calibre10}
[[Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
I
\
I owe the discovery of Uqbar to the conjunction of a mirror and an
encyclopedia. The mirror troubled the depths of a corridor in a country
house on Gaona Street in Ramos Mejía; the encyclopedia is fallaciously
called [The Anglo-American Cyclopaedia]{.italic} (New York, 1917) and is
a literal but delinquent reprint of the [Encyclopaedia
Britannica]{.italic} of 1902. The event took place some five years ago.
Bioy Casares had had dinner with me that evening and we became lengthily
engaged in a vast polemic concerning the composition of a novel in the
first person, whose narrator would omit or disfigure the facts and
indulge in various contradictions which would permit a few readers ―
very few readers ― to perceive an atrocious or banal reality. From the
remote depths of the corridor, the mirror spied upon us. We discovered
(such a discovery is inevitable in the late hours of the night) that
mirrors have something monstrous about them. Then Bioy Casares recalled
that one of the heresiarchs of Uqbar had declared that mirrors and
copulation are abominable, because they increase the number of men. I
asked him the origin of this memorable observation and he answered that
it was reproduced in [The Anglo-American Cyclopaedia,]{.italic} in its
article on Uqbar. The house (which we had rented furnished) had a set of
this work. On the last pages of Volume XLVI we found an article on
Upsala; on the first pages of Volume XLVII, one on Ural-Altaic
Languages, but not a word about Uqbar. Bioy, a bit taken aback,
consulted the volumes of the index. In vain he exhausted all of the
imaginable spellings: Ukbar, Ucbar, Ooqbar, Ookbar, Oukbahr. . . Before
leaving, he told me that it was a region of Iraq or of Asia Minor. I
must confess that I agreed with some discomfort. I conjectured that this
undocumented country and its anonymous heresiarch were a fiction devised
by Bioy\'s modesty in order to justify a statement. The fruitless
examination of one of Justus Perthes\' atlases fortified my doubt.
The following day, Bioy called me from Buenos Aires. He told me he had
before him the article on Uqbar, in Volume XLVI of the encyclopedia. The
heresiarch\'s name was not forthcoming, but there was a note on his
doctrine, formulated in words almost identical to those he had repeated,
though perhaps literarily inferior. He had recalled: [Copulation and
mirrors are abominable.]{.italic} The text of the encyclopedia said:
[For one of those gnostics, the visible universe was an illusion or
(more precisely) a sophism. Mirrors and fatherhood are abominable
because they multiply and disseminate that universe.]{.italic} I told
him, in all truthfulness, that I should like to see that article. A few
days later he brought it. This surprised me, since the scrupulous
cartographical indices of Ritter\'s [Erdkunde]{.italic} were plentifully
ignorant of the name Uqbar.
The tome Bioy brought was, in fact, Volume XLVI of the [Anglo-American
Cyclopaedia.]{.italic} On the half-title page and the spine, the
alphabetical marking (Tor-Ups) was that of our copy, but, instead of
917, it contained 921 pages. These four additional pages made up the
article on Uqbar, which (as the reader will have noticed) was not
indicated by the alphabetical marking. We later determined that there
was no other difference between the volumes. Both of them (as I believe
I have indicated) are reprints of the tenth [Encyclopaedia
Britannica.]{.italic} Bioy had acquired his copy at some sale or other.
We read the article with some care. The passage recalled by Bioy was
perhaps the only surprising one. The rest of it seemed very plausible,
quite in keeping with the general tone of the work and (as is natural) a
bit boring. Reading it over again, we discovered beneath its rigorous
prose a fundamental vagueness. Of the fourteen names which figured in
the geographical part, we only recognized three ― Khorasan, Armenia,
Erzerum ― interpolated in the text in an ambiguous way. Of the
historical names, only one: the impostor magician Smerdis, invoked more
as a metaphor. The note seemed to fix the boundaries of Uqbar, but its
nebulous reference points were rivers and craters and mountain ranges of
that same region. We read, for example, that the lowlands of Tsai
Khaldun and the Axa Delta marked the southern frontier and that on the
islands of the delta wild horses procreate. All this, on the first part
of page 918. In the historical section (page 920) we learned that as a
result of the religious persecutions of the thirteenth century, the
orthodox believers sought refuge on these islands, where to this day
their obelisks remain and where it is not uncommon to unearth their
stone mirrors. The section on Language and Literature was brief. Only
one trait is worthy of recollection: it noted that the literature of
Uqbar was one of fantasy and that its epics and legends never referred
to reality, but to the two imaginary regions of Mlejnas and Tlön. . .
The bibliography enumerated four volumes which we have not yet found,
though the third ― Silas Haslam: [History of the Land Called
Uqbar,]{.italic} 1874 ― figures in the catalogues of Bernard Quaritch\'s
book
shop.[[[[1]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos599447){.calibre7}
The first, [Lesbare und lesenswerthe Bemerkungen]{.italic} [über das
Land Ukkbar in Klein-Asien,]{.italic} dates from 1641 and is the work of
Johannes Valentinus Andreä. This fact is significant; a few years later,
I came upon that name in the unsuspected pages of De Quincey
[(Writings,]{.italic} Volume XIII) and learned that it belonged to a
German theologian who, in the early seventeenth century, described the
imaginary community of Rosae Crucis ― a community that others founded
later, in imitation of what he had prefigured.
That night we visited the National Library. In vain we exhausted
atlases, catalogues, annuals of geographical societies, travelers\' and
historians\' memoirs: no one had ever been in Uqbar. Neither did the
general index of Bioy\'s encyclopedia register that name. The following
day, Carlos Mastronardi (to whom I had related the matter) noticed the
black and gold covers of the [Anglo-American Cyclopaedia]{.italic} in a
bookshop on Corrientes and Talcahuano. . . He entered and examined
Volume XLVI. Of course, he did not find the slightest indication of
Uqbar.
\
II
\
Some limited and waning memory of Herbert Ashe, an engineer of the
southern railways, persists in the hotel at Adrogué, amongst the
effusive honeysuckles and in the illusory depths of the mirrors. In his
lifetime, he suffered from unreality, as do so many Englishmen; once
dead, he is not even the ghost he was then. He was tall and listless and
his tired rectangular beard had once been red. I understand he was a
widower, without children. Every few years he would go to England, to
visit (I judge from some photographs he showed us) a sundial and a few
oaks. He and my father had entered into one of those close (the
adjective is excessive) English friendships that begin by excluding
confidences and very soon dispense with dialogue. They used to carry out
an exchange of books and newspapers and engage in taciturn chess games.
. . I remember him in the hotel corridor, with a mathematics book in his
hand, sometimes looking at the irrecoverable colors of the sky. One
afternoon, we spoke of the duodecimal system of numbering (in which
twelve is written as 10). Ashe said that he was converting some kind of
tables from the duodecimal to the sexagesimal system (in which sixty is
written as 10). He added that the task had been entrusted to him by a
Norwegian, in Rio Grande do Sul. We had known him for eight years and he
had never mentioned his sojourn in that region. . . We talked of country
life, of the [capangas,]{.italic} of the Brazilian etymology of the word
[gaucho]{.italic} (which some old Uruguayans still pronounce
[gaúcho)]{.italic} and nothing more was said ― may God forgive me ― of
duodecimal functions. In September of 1937 (we were not at the hotel),
Herbert Ashe died of a ruptured aneurysm. A few days before, he had
received a sealed and certified package from Brazil. It was a book in
large octavo. Ashe left it at the bar, where ― months later ― I found
it. I began to leaf through it and experienced an astonished and airy
feeling of vertigo which I shall not describe, for this is not the story
of my emotions but of Uqbar and Tlön and Orbis Tertius. On one of the
nights of Islam called the Night of Nights, the secret doors of heaven
open wide and the water in the jars becomes sweeter; if those doors
opened, I would not feel what I felt that afternoon. The book was
written in English and contained 1001 pages. On the yellow leather back
I read these curious words which were repeated on the title page: [A
First Encyclopaedia of Tlön. Vol. XI. Hlaer to Jangr.]{.italic} There
was no indication of date or place. On the first page and on a leaf of
silk paper that covered one of the color plates there was stamped a blue
oval with this inscription: [Orbis Tertius.]{.italic} Two years before I
had discovered, in a volume of a certain pirated encyclopedia, a
superficial description of a nonexistent country; now chance afforded me
something more precious and arduous. Now I held in my hands a vast
methodical fragment of an unknown planet\'s entire history, with its
architecture and its playing cards, with the dread of its mythologies
and the murmur of its languages, with its emperors and its seas, with
its minerals and its birds and its fish, with its algebra and its fire,
with its theological and metaphysical controversy. And all of it
articulated, coherent, with no visible doctrinal intent or tone of
parody.
In the \"Eleventh Volume\" which I have mentioned, there are allusions
to preceding and succeeding volumes. In an article in the [N. R.
F.]{.italic} which is now classic, Néstor Ibarra has denied the
existence of those companion volumes; Ezequiel Martínez Estrada and
Drieu La Rochelle have refuted that doubt, perhaps victoriously. The
fact is that up to now the most diligent inquiries have been fruitless.
In vain we have upended the libraries of the two Americas and of Europe.
Alfonso Reyes, tired of these subordinate sleuthing procedures, proposes
that we should all undertake the task of reconstrucing the many and
weighty tomes that are lacking: [ex ungue leonem.]{.italic} He
calculates, half in earnest and half jokingly, that a generation of
[tlönistas]{.italic} should be sufficient. This venturesome computation
brings us back to the fundamental problem: Who are the inventors of
Tlön? The plural is inevitable, because the hypothesis of a lone
inventor ― an infinite Leibniz laboring away darkly and modestly ― has
been unanimously discounted. It is conjectured that this brave new world
is the work of a secret society of astronomers, biologists, engineers,
metaphysicians, poets, chemists, algebraists, moralists, painters,
geometers. . . directed by an obscure man of genius. Individuals
mastering these diverse disciplines are abundant, but not so those
capable of inventiveness and less so those capable of subordinating that
inventiveness to a rigorous and systematic plan. This plan is so vast
that each writer\'s contribution is infinitesimal. At first it was
believed that Tlön was a mere chaos, an irresponsible license of the
imagination; now it is known that it is a cosmos and that the intimate
laws which govern it have been formulated, at least provisionally. Let
it suffice for me to recall that the apparent contradictions of the
Eleventh Volume are the fundamental basis for the proof that the other
volumes exist, so lucid and exact is the order observed in it. The
popular magazines, with pardonable excess, have spread news of the
zoology and topography of Tlön; I think its transparent tigers and
towers of blood perhaps do not merit the continued attention of
[all]{.italic} men. I shall venture to request a few minutes to expound
its concept of the universe.
Hume noted for all time that Berkeley\'s arguments did not admit the
slightest refutation nor did they cause the slightest conviction. This
dictum is entirely correct in its application to the earth, but entirely
false in Tlön. The nations of this planet are congenitally idealist.
Their language and the derivations of their language ― religion,
letters, metaphysics ― all presuppose idealism. The world for them is
not a concourse of objects in space; it is a heterogeneous series of
independent acts. It is successive and temporal, not spatial. There are
no nouns in Tlön\'s conjectural [Ursprache,]{.italic} from which the
\"present\" languages and the dialects are derived: there are impersonal
verbs, modified by monosyllabic suffixes (or prefixes) with an adverbial
value. For example: there is no word corresponding to the word \"moon,\"
but there is a verb which in English would be \"to moon\" or \"to
moonate.\" \"The moon rose above the river\" is [hlör u fang axaxaxas
mlö,]{.italic} or literally: \"upward behind the on-streaming it
mooned.\"
The preceding applies to the languages of the southern hemisphere. In
those of the northern hemisphere (on whose [Ursprache]{.italic} there is
very little data in the Eleventh Volume) the prime unit is not the verb,
but the monosyllabic adjective. The noun is formed by an accumulation of
adjectives. They do not say \"moon,\" but rather \"round airy-light on
dark\" or \"pale-orange-of-the-sky\" or any other such combination. In
the example selected the mass of adjectives refers to a real object, but
this is purely fortuitous. The literature of this hemisphere (like
Meinong\'s subsistent world) abounds in ideal objects, which are
convoked and dissolved in a moment, according to poetic needs. At times
they are determined by mere simultaneity. There are objects composed of
two terms, one of visual and another of auditory character: the color of
the rising sun and the faraway cry of a bird. There are objects of many
terms: the sun and the water on a swimmer\'s chest, the vague tremulous
rose color we see with our eyes closed, the sensation of being carried
along by a river and also by sleep. These second-degree objects can be
combined with others; through the use of certain abbreviations, the
process is practically infinite. There are famous poems made up of one
enormous word. This word forms a [poetic object]{.italic} created by the
author. The fact that no one believes in the reality of nouns
paradoxically causes their number to be unending. The languages of
Tlön\'s northern hemisphere contain all the nouns of the Indo-European
languages ― and many others as well.
It is no exaggeration to state that the classic culture of Tlön
comprises only one discipline: psychology. All others are subordinated
to it. I have said that the men of this planet conceive the universe as
a series of mental processes which do not develop in space but
successively in time. Spinoza ascribes to his inexhaustible divinity the
attributes of extension and thought; no one in Tlön would understand the
juxtaposition of the first (which is typical only of certain states) and
the second ― which is a perfect synonym of the cosmos. In other words,
they do not conceive that the spatial persists in time. The perception
of a cloud of smoke on the horizon and then of the burning field and
then of the half-extinguished cigarette that produced the blaze is
considered an example of association of ideas.
This monism or complete idealism invalidates all science. If we explain
(or judge) a fact, we connect it with another; such linking, in Tlön, is
a later state of the subject which cannot affect or illuminate the
previous state. Every mental state is irreducible: the mere fact of
naming it ― i.e., of classifying it ― implies a falsification. From
which it can be deduced that there are no sciences on Tlön, not even
reasoning. The paradoxical truth is that they do exist, and in almost
uncountable number. The same thing happens with philosophies as happens
with nouns in the northern hemisphere. The fact that every philosophy is
by definition a dialectical game, a [Philosophic des Ah Ob,]{.italic}
has caused them to multiply. There is an abundance of incredible systems
of pleasing design or sensational type. The metaphysicians of Tlön do
not seek for the truth or even for verisimilitude, but rather for the
astounding. They judge that metaphysics is a branch of fantastic
literature. They know that a system is nothing more than the
subordination of all aspects of the universe to any one such aspect.
Even the phrase \"all aspects\" is rejectable, for it supposes the
impossible addition of the present and of all past moments. Neither is
it licit to use the plural \"past moments,\" since it supposes another
impossible operation. . . One of the schools of Tlön goes so far as to
negate time: it reasons that the present is indefinite, that the future
has no reality other than as a present hope, that the past has no
reality other than as a present
memory.[[[[2]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos599632){.calibre7}
Another school declares that [all time]{.italic} has already transpired
and that our life is only the crepuscular and no doubt falsified and
mutilated memory or reflection of an irrecoverable process. Another,
that the history of the universe ― and in it our lives and the most
tenuous detail of our lives ― is the scripture produced by a subordinate
god in order to communicate with a demon. Another, that the universe is
comparable to those cryptographs in which not all the symbols are valid
and that only what happens every three hundred nights is true. Another,
that while we sleep here, we are awake elsewhere and that in this way
every man is two men.
Amongst the doctrines of Tlön, none has merited the scandalous reception
accorded to materialism. Some thinkers have formulated it with less
clarity than fervor, as one might put forth a paradox. In order to
facilitate the comprehension of this inconceivable thesis, a heresiarch
of the eleventh
century[[[[3]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos599949){.calibre7}
devised the sophism of the nine copper coins, whose scandalous renown is
in Tlön equivalent to that of the Eleatic paradoxes. There are many
versions of this \"specious reasoning,\" which vary the number of coins
and the number of discoveries; the following is the most common:
\
[On Tuesday, X crosses a deserted road and loses nine copper coins. On
Thursday, Y finds in the road four coins, somewhat rusted by
Wednesday\'s rain. On Friday,]{.italic} Z [discovers three coins in the
road. On Friday morning, X finds two coins in the corridor of his
house.]{.italic} The heresiarch would deduce from this story the reality
― i.e., the continuity ― of the nine coins which were recovered. [It is
absurd]{.italic} (he affirmed) [to imagine that four of the coins have
not existed between Tuesday and Thursday, three between Tuesday and
Friday afternoon, two between Tuesday and Friday morning. It is logical
to think that they have existed]{.italic} ― [at least in some secret
way, hidden from the comprehension of men]{.italic} ― [at every moment
of those three periods.]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
The language of Tlön resists the formulation of this paradox; most
people did not even understand it. The defenders of common sense at
first did no more than negate the veracity of the anecdote. They
repeated that it was a verbal fallacy, based on the rash application of
two neologisms not authorized by usage and alien to all rigorous
thought: the verbs \"find\" and \"lose,\" which beg the question,
because they presuppose the identity of the first and of the last nine
coins. They recalled that all nouns (man, coin, Thursday, Wednesday,
rain) have only a metaphorical value. They denounced the treacherous
circumstance \"somewhat rusted by Wednesday\'s rain,\" which presupposes
what is trying to be demonstrated: the persistence of the four coins
from Tuesday to Thursday. They explained that [equality]{.italic} is one
thing and [identity]{.italic} another, and formulated a kind of
[reductio ad absurdum:]{.italic} the hypothetical case of nine men who
on nine successive nights suffer a severe pain. Would it not be
ridiculous ― they questioned ― to pretend that this pain is one and the
same?[[[[4]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos600147){.calibre7}
They said that the heresiarch was prompted only by the blasphemous
intention of attributing the divine category of [being]{.italic} to some
simple coins and that at times he negated plurality and at other times
did not. They argued: if equality implies identity, one would also have
to admit that the nine coins are one.
Unbelievably, these refutations were not definitive. A hundred years
after the problem was stated, a thinker no less brilliant than the
heresiarch but of orthodox tradition formulated a very daring
hypothesis. This happy conjecture affirmed that there is only one
subject, that this indivisible subject is every being in the universe
and that these beings are the organs and masks of the divinity. X is Y
and is Z. Z discovers three coins because he remembers that X lost them;
X finds two in the corridor because he remembers that the others have
been found. . . The Eleventh Volume suggests that three prime reasons
determined the complete victory of this idealist pantheism. The first,
its repudiation of solipsism; the second, the possibility of preserving
the psychological basis of the sciences; the third, the possibility of
preserving the cult of the gods. Schopenhauer (the passionate and lucid
Schopenhauer) formulates a very similar doctrine in the first volume of
[Parerga und Paralipomena.]{.italic}
The geometry of Tlön comprises two somewhat different disciplines: the
visual and the tactile. The latter corresponds to our own geometry and
is subordinated to the first. The basis of visual geometry is the
surface, not the point. This geometry disregards parallel lines and
declares that man in his movement modifies the forms which surround him.
The basis of its arithmetic is the notion of indefinite numbers. They
emphasize the importance of the concepts of greater and lesser, which
our mathematicians symbolize as and . They maintain that the operation
of counting modifies quantities and converts them from indefinite into
definite sums. The fact that several individuals who count the same
quantity should obtain the same result is, for the psychologists, an
example of association of ideas or of a good exercise of memory. We
already know that in Tlön the subject of knowledge is one and eternal.
In literary practices the idea of a single subject is also all-powerful.
It is uncommon for books to be signed. The concept of plagiarism does
not exist: it has been established that all works are the creation of
one author, who is atemporal and anonymous. The critics often invent
authors: they select two dissimilar works ― the [Tao Te Ching]{.italic}
and the [1001 Nights,]{.italic} say ― attribute them to the same writer
and then determine most scrupulously the psychology of this interesting
[homme de letters . . .]{.italic}
Their books are also different. Works of fiction contain a single plot,
with all its imaginable permutations. Those of a philosophical nature
invariably include both the thesis and the antithesis, the rigorous pro
and con of a doctrine. A book which does not contain its counterbook is
considered incomplete.
Centuries and centuries of idealism have not failed to influence
reality. In the most ancient regions of Tlön, the duplication of lost
objects is not infrequent. Two persons look for a pencil; the first
finds it and says nothing; the second finds a second pencil, no less
real, but closer to his expectations. These secondary objects are called
[hrönir]{.italic} and are, though awkward in form, somewhat longer.
Until recently, the [hrönir]{.italic} were the accidental products of
distraction and forgetfulness. It seems unbelievable that their
methodical production dates back scarcely a hundred years, but this is
what the Eleventh Volume tells us. The first efforts were unsuccessful.
However, the [modus operandi]{.italic} merits description. The director
of one of the state prisons told his inmates that there were certain
tombs in an ancient river bed and promised freedom to whoever might make
an important discovery. During the months preceding the excavation the
inmates were shown photographs of what they were to find. This first
effort proved that expectation and anxiety can be inhibitory; a week\'s
work with pick and shovel did not manage to unearth anything in the way
of a [hrön]{.italic} except a rusty wheel of a period posterior to the
experiment. But this was kept in secret and the process was repeated
later in four schools. In three of them the failure was almost complete;
in the fourth (whose director died accidentally during the first
excavations) the students unearthed ― or produced ― a gold mask, an
archaic sword, two or three clay urns and the moldy and mutilated torso
of a king whose chest bore an inscription which it has not yet been
possible to decipher. Thus was discovered the unreliability of witnesses
who knew of the experimental nature of the search. . . Mass
investigations produce contradictory objects; now individual and almost
improvised jobs are preferred. The methodical fabrication of
[hrönir]{.italic} (says the Eleventh Volume) has performed prodigious
services for archaeologists. It has made possible the interrogation and
even the modification of the past, which is now no less plastic and
docile than the future. Curiously, the [hrönir]{.italic} of second and
third degree ― the [hrönir]{.italic} derived from another
[hrön,]{.italic} those derived from the [hrön]{.italic} of a
[hrön]{.italic} ― exaggerate the aberrations of the initial one; those
of fifth degree are almost uniform; those of ninth degree become
confused with those of the second; in those of the eleventh there is a
purity of line not found in the original. The process is cyclical: the
[hrön]{.italic} of twelfth degree begins to fall off in quality.
Stranger and more pure than any [hrön]{.italic} is, at times, the
[ur:]{.italic} the object produced through suggestion, educed by hope.
The great golden mask I have mentioned is an illustrious example.
Things become duplicated in Tlön; they also tend to become effaced and
lose their details when they are forgotten. A classic example is the
doorway which survived so long as it was visited by a beggar and
disappeared at his death. At times some birds, a horse, have saved the
ruins of an amphitheater.
\
[Postscript (1941).]{.italic} I reproduce the preceding article just as
it appeared in the [Anthology of Fantastic Literature]{.italic} (1940),
with no omission other than that of a few metaphors and a kind of
sarcastic summary which now seems frivolous. So many things have
happened since then. . . I shall do no more than recall them here.
In March of 1941 a letter written by Gunnar Erfjord was discovered in a
book by Hinton which had belonged to Herbert Ashe. The envelope bore a
cancellation from Ouro Preto; the letter completely elucidated the
mystery of Tlön. Its text corroborated the hypotheses of Martínez
Estrada. One night in Lucerne or in London, in the early seventeenth
century, the splendid history has its beginning. A secret and benevolent
society (amongst whose members were Dalgarno and later George Berkeley)
arose to invent a country. Its vague initial program included \"hermetic
studies,\" philanthropy and the cabala. From this first period dates the
curious book by Andrea. After a few years of secret conclaves and
premature syntheses it was understood that one generation was not
sufficient to give articulate form to a country. They resolved that each
of the masters should elect a disciple who would continue his work. This
hereditary arrangement prevailed; after an interval of two centuries the
persecuted fraternity sprang up again in America. In 1824, in Memphis
(Tennessee), one of its affiliates conferred with the ascetic
millionaire Ezra Buckley. The latter, somewhat disdainfully, let him
speak ― and laughed at the plan\'s modest scope. He told the agent that
in America it was absurd to invent a country and proposed the invention
of a planet. To this gigantic idea he added another, a product of his
nihilism:[[[[5]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos600604){.calibre7}
that of keeping the enormous enterprise secret. At that time the twenty
volumes of the [Encyclopaedia Britannica]{.italic} were circulating in
the United States; Buckley suggested that a methodical encyclopedia of
the imaginary planet be written. He was to leave them his mountains of
gold, his navigable rivers, his pasture lands roamed by cattle and
buffalo, his Negroes, his brothels and his dollars, on one condition:
\"The work will make no pact with the impostor Jesus Christ.\" Buckley
did not believe in God, but he wanted to demonstrate to this nonexistent
God that mortal man was capable of conceiving a world. Buckley was
poisoned in Baton Rouge in 1828; in 1914 the society delivered to its
collaborators, some three hundred in number, the last volume of the
First Encyclopedia of Tlön. The edition was a secret one; its forty
volumes (the vastest undertaking ever carried out by man) would be the
basis for another more detailed edition, written not in English but in
one of the languages of Tlön. This revision of an illusory world, was
called, provisionally, [Orbis Tertius]{.italic} and one of its modest
demiurgi was Herbert Ashe, whether as an agent of Gunnar Erfjord or as
an affiliate, I do not know. His having received a copy of the Eleventh
Volume would seem to favor the latter assumption. But what about the
others?
In 1942 events became more intense. I recall one of the first of these
with particular clarity and it seems that I perceived then something of
its premonitory character. It happened in an apartment on Laprida
Street, facing a high and light balcony which looked out toward the
sunset. Princess Faucigny Lucinge had received her silverware from
Poitiers. From the vast depths of a box embellished with foreign stamps,
delicate immobile objects emerged: silver from Utrecht and Paris covered
with hard heraldic fauna, and a samovar. Amongest them ― with the
perceptible and tenuous tremor of a sleeping bird ― a compass vibrated
mysteriously. The Princess did not recognize it. Its blue needle longed
for magnetic north; its metal case was concave in shape; the letters
around its edge corresponded to one of the alphabets of Tlön. Such was
the first intrusion of this fantastic world into the world of reality.
I am still troubled by a stroke of chance which made me the witness of
the second intrusion as well. It happened some months later, at a
country store owned by a Brazilian in Cuchilla Negra. Amorim and I were
returning from Sant\' Anna. The River Tacuarembó had flooded and we were
obliged to sample (and endure) the proprietor\'s rudimentary
hospitality. He provided us with some creaking cots in a large room
cluttered with barrels and hides. We went to bed, but were kept from
sleeping until dawn by the drunken ravings of an unseen neighbor, who
intermingled inextricable insults with snatches of [milongas]{.italic} ―
or rather with snatches of the same [milonga.]{.italic} As might be
supposed, we attributed this insistent uproar to the store owner\'s
fiery cane liquor. By daybreak, the man was dead in the hallway. The
roughness of his voice had deceived us: he was only a youth. In his
delirium a few coins had fallen from his belt, along with a cone of
bright metal, the size of a die. In vain a boy tried to pick up this
cone. A man was scarely able to raise it from the ground. I held it in
my hand for a few minutes; I remember that its weight was intolerable
and that after it was removed, the feeling of oppressiveness remained. I
also remember the exact circle it pressed into my palm. This sensation
of a very small and at the same time extremely heavy object produced a
disagreeable impression of repugnance and fear. One of the local men
suggested we throw it into the swollen river; Amorim acquired it for a
few pesos. No one knew anything about the dead man, except that \"he
came from the border.\" These small, very heavy cones (made from a metal
which is not of this world) are images of the divinity in certain
regions of Tlön.
Here I bring the personal part of my narrative to a close. The rest is
in the memory (if not in the hopes or fears) of all my readers. Let it
suffice for me to recall or mention the following facts, with a mere
brevity of words which the reflective recollection of all will enrich or
amplify. Around 1944, a person doing research for the newspaper [The
American]{.italic} (of Nashville, Tennessee) brought to light in a
Memphis library the forty volumes of the First Encyclopedia of Tlön.
Even today there is a controversy over whether this discovery was
accidental or whether it was permitted by the directors of the still
nebulous [Orbis Tertius.]{.italic} The latter is most likely. Some of
the incredible aspects of the Eleventh Volume (for example, the
multiplication of the [hrönir)]{.italic} have been eliminated or
attenuated in the Memphis copies; it is reasonable to imagine that these
omissions follow the plan of exhibiting a world which is not too
incompatible with the real world. The dissemination of objects from Tlön
over different countries would complement this plan . .
.[[[[6]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos600766){.calibre7}
The fact is that the international press infinitely proclaimed the
\"find.\" Manuals, anthologies, summaries, literal versions, authorized
re-editions and pirated editions of the Greatest Work of Man flooded and
still flood the earth. Almost immediately, reality yielded on more than
one account. The truth is that it longed to yield. Ten years ago any
symmetry with a semblance of order ― dialectical materialism,
anti-Semitism, Nazism ― was sufficient to entrance the minds of men. How
could one do other than submit to Tlön, to the minute and vast evidence
of an orderly planet? It is useless to answer that reality is also
orderly. Perhaps it is, but in accordance with divine laws ― I
translate: inhuman laws ― which we never quite grasp. Tlön is surely a
labyrinth, but it is a labyrinth devised by men, a labyrinth destined to
be deciphered by men.
The contact and the habit of Tlön have disintegrated this world.
Enchanted by its rigor, humanity forgets over and again that it is a
rigor of chess masters, not of angels. Already the schools have been
invaded by the (conjectural) \"primitive language\" of Tlön; already the
teaching of its harmonious history (filled with moving episodes) has
wiped out the one which governed in my childhood; already a fictitious
past occupies in our memories the place of another, a past of which we
know nothing with certainty ― not even that it is false. Numismatology,
pharmacology and archaeology have been reformed. I understand that
biology and mathematics also await their avatars. . . A scattered
dynasty of solitary men has changed the face of the world. Their task
continues. If our forecasts are not in error, a hundred years from now
someone will discover the hundred volumes of the Second Encyclopedia of
Tlön.
Then English and French and mere Spanish will disappear from the globe.
The world will be Tlön. I pay no attention to all this and go on
revising, in the still days at the Adrogué hotel, an uncertain Quevedian
translation (which I do not intend to publish) of Browne\'s [Urn
Burial.]{.italic}
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_006.html_calibre_pb_6 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_007.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_007.html_filepos83577 .calibre1}
\
\
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_007.html_filepos83602 .calibre10}
[[The Garden of Forking Paths]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
On page 22 of Liddell Hart\'s [History of World War I]{.italic} you will
read that an attack against the Serre-Montauban line by thirteen British
divisions (supported by 1,400 artillery pieces), planned for the 24th of
July, 1916, had to be postponed until the morning of the 29th. The
torrential rains, Captain Liddell Hart comments, caused this delay, an
insignificant one, to be sure.
The following statement, dictated, reread and signed by Dr. Yu Tsun,
former professor of English at the [Hochschule]{.italic} at Tsingtao,
throws an unsuspected light over the whole affair. The first two pages
of the document are missing.
\". . . and I hung up the receiver. Immediately afterwards, I recognized
the voice that had answered in German. It was that of Captain Richard
Madden. Madden\'s presence in Viktor Runeberg\'s apartment meant the end
of our anxieties and ― but this seemed, [or should have
seemed,]{.italic} very secondary to me ― also the end of our lives. It
meant that Runeberg had been arrested or
murdered.[[[[7]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos600985){.calibre7}
Before the sun set on that day, I would encounter the same fate. Madden
was implacable. Or rather, he was obliged to be so. An Irishman at the
service of England, a man accused of laxity and perhaps of treason, how
could he fail to seize and be thankful for such a miraculous
opportunity: the discovery capture, maybe even the death of two agents
of the German Reich? I went up to my room; absurdly I locked the door
and threw myself on my back on the narrow iron cot. Through the window I
saw the familiar roofs and the cloud-shaded six o\'clock sun. It seemed
incredible to me that that day without premonitions or symbols should be
the one of my inexorable death. In spite of my dead father, in spite of
having been a child in a symmetrical garden of Hai Feng, was I ― now ―
going to die? Then I reflected that everything happens to a man
precisely, precisely [now.]{.italic} Centuries of centuries and only in
the present do things happen; countless men in the air, on the face of
the earth and the sea, and all that really is happening is happening to
me. . . The almost intolerable recollection of Madden\'s horselike face
banished these wanderings. In the midst of my hatred and terror (it
means nothing to me now to speak of terror now that I have mocked
Richard Madden, now that my throat yearns for the noose) it occurred to
me that that tumultuous and doubtless happy warrior did not suspect that
I possessed the Secret. The name of the exact location of the new
British artillery park on the River Ancre. A bird streaked across the
gray sky and blindly I translated it into an airplane and that airplane
into many (against the French sky) annihilating the artillery station
with vertical bombs. If only my mouth, before a bullet shattered it,
could cry out that secret name so it could be heard in Germany. . . My
human voice was very weak. How might I make it carry to the ear of the
Chief? To the ear of that sick and hateful man who knew nothing of
Runeberg and me save that we were in Staffordshire and who was waiting
in vain for our report in his arid office in Berlin, endlessly examining
newspapers. . . I said out loud: [I must flee.]{.italic} I sat up
noiselessly, in a useless perfection of silence, as if Madden were
already lying in wait for me. Something ― perhaps the mere vain
ostentation of proving my resources were nil ― made me look through my
pockets. I found what I knew I would find. The American watch, the
nickel chain and the square coin, the key ring with the incriminating
useless keys to Runeberg\'s apartment, the notebook, a letter which I
resolved to destroy immediately (and which I did not destroy), a crown,
two shillings and a few pence, the red and blue pencil, the
handkerchief, the revolver with one bullet. Absurdly, I took it in my
hand and weighed it in order to inspire courage within myself. Vaguely I
thought that a pistol report can be heard at a great distance. In ten
minutes my plan was perfected. The telephone book listed the name of the
only person capable of transmitting the message; he lived in a suburb of
Fenton, less than a half hour\'s train ride away.
I am a cowardly man. I say it now, now that I have carried to its end a
plan whose perilous nature no one can deny. I know its execution was
terrible. I didn\'t do it for Germany, no. I care nothing for a
barbarous country which imposed upon me the abjection of being a spy.
Besides, I know of a man from England ― a modest man ― who for me is no
less great than Goethe. I talked with him for scarcely an hour, but
during that hour he was Goethe. . . I did it because I sensed that the
Chief somehow feared people of my race ― for the innumerable ancestors
who merge within me. I wanted to prove to him that a yellow man could
save his armies. Besides, I had to flee from Captain Madden, His hands
and his voice could call at my door at any moment. I dressed silently,
bade farewell to myself in the mirror, went downstairs, scrutinized the
peaceful street and went out. The station was not far from my home, but
I judged it wise to take a cab. I argued that in this way I ran less
risk of being recognized; the fact is that in the deserted street I felt
myself visible and vulnerable, infinitely so. I remember that I told the
cab driver to stop a short distance before the main entrance. I got out
with voluntary, almost painful slowness; I was going to the village of
Ashgrove but I bought a ticket for a more distant station. The train
left within a very few minutes, at eight-fifty. I hurried; the next one
would leave at nine-thirty. There was hardly a soul on the platform. I
went through the coaches; I remember a few farmers, a woman dressed in
mourning, a young boy who was reading with fervor the [Annals]{.italic}
of Tacitus, a wounded and happy soldier. The coaches jerked forward at
last. A man whom I recognized ran in vain to the end of the platform. It
was Captain Richard Madden. Shattered, trembling, I shrank into the far
corner of the seat, away from the dreaded window.
From this broken state I passed into an almost abject felicity. I told
myself that the duel had already begun and that I had won the first
encounter by frustrating, even if for forty minutes, even if by a stroke
of fate, the attack of my adversary. I argued that this slightest of
victories foreshadowed a total victory. I argued (no less fallaciously)
that my cowardly felicity proved that I was a man capable of carrying
out the adventure successfully. From this weakness I took strength that
did not abandon me. I foresee that man will resign himself each day to
more atrocious undertakings; soon there will be no one but warriors and
brigands; I give them this counsel: [The author of an atrocious
undertaking ought to imagine that he has already accomplished it, ought
to impose upon himself a future as irrevocable as the past.]{.italic}
Thus I proceeded as my eyes of a man already dead registered the
elapsing of that day, which was perhaps the last, and the diffusion of
the night. The train ran gently along, amid ash trees. It stopped,
almost in the middle of the fields. No one announced the name of the
station. \"Ashgrove?\" I asked a few lads on the platform. \"Ashgrove,\"
they replied. I got off.
A lamp enlightened the platform but the faces of the boys were in
shadow. One questioned me, \"Are you going to Dr. Stephen Albert\'s
house?\" Without waiting for my answer, another said, \"The house is a
long way from here, but you won\'t get lost if you take this road to the
left and at every crossroads turn again to your left.\" I tossed them a
coin (my last), descended a few stone steps and started down the
solitary road. It went downhill, slowly. It was of elemental earth;
overhead the banches were tangled; the low, full moon seemed to
accompany me.
For an instant, I thought that Richard Madden in some way had penetrated
my desperate plan. Very quickly, I understood that that was impossible.
The instructions to turn always to the left reminded me that such was
the common procedure for discovering the central point of certain
labyrinths. I have some understanding of labyrinths: not for nothing am
I the great grandson of that Ts\'ui Pên who was governor of Yunnan and
who renounced worldly power in order to write a novel that might be even
more populous than the [Hung Lu Meng]{.italic} and to construct a
labyrinth in which all men would become lost. Thirteen years he
dedicated to these heterogeneous tasks, but the hand of a stranger
murdered him ― and his novel was incoherent and no one found the
labyrinth. Beneath English trees I meditated on that lost maze: I
imagined it inviolate and perfect at the secret crest of a mountain; I
imagined it erased by rice fields or beneath the water; I imagined it
infinite, no longer composed of octagonal kiosks and returning paths,
but of rivers and provinces and kingdoms. . . I thought of a labyrinth
of labyrinths, of one sinuous spreading labyrinth that would encompass
the past and the future and in some way involve the stars. Absorbed in
these illusory images, I forgot my destiny of one pursued. I felt myself
to be, for an unknown period of time, an abstract perceiver of the
world. The vague, living countryside, the moon, the remains of the day
worked on me, as well as the slope of the road which eliminated any
possibility of weariness. The afternoon was intimate, infinite. The road
descended and forked among the now confused meadows. A high-pitched,
almost syllabic music approached and receded in the shifting of the
wind, dimmed by leaves and distance. I thought that a man can be an
enemy of other men, of the moments of other men, but not of a country:
not of fireflies, words, gardens, streams of water, sunsets. Thus I
arrived before a tall, rusty gate. Between the iron bars I made out a
poplar grove and a pavilion. I understood suddenly two things, the first
trivial, the second almost unbelievable: the music came from the
pavilion, and the music was Chinese. For precisely that reason I had
openly accepted it without paying it any heed. I do not remember whether
there was a bell or whether I knocked with my hand. The sparkling of the
music continued.
From the rear of the house within a lantern approached: a lantern that
the trees sometimes striped and sometimes eclipsed, a paper lantern that
had the form of a drum and the color of the moon. A tall man bore it. I
didn\'t see his face for the light blinded me. He opened the door and
said slowly, in my own language: \"I see that the pious Hsi P\'êng
persists in correcting my solitude. You no doubt wish to see the
garden?\"
I recognized the name of one of our consuls and I replied, disconcerted,
\"The garden?\"
\"The garden of forking paths.\"
Something stirred in my memory and I uttered with incomprehensible
certainty, \"The garden of my ancestor Ts\'ui Pên.\"
\"Your ancestor? Your illustrious ancestor? Come in.\"
The damp path zigzagged like those of my childhood. We came to a library
of Eastern and Western books. I recognized bound in yellow silk several
volumes of the Lost Encyclopedia, edited by the Third Emperor of the
Luminous Dynasty but never printed. The record on the phonograph
revolved next to a bronze phoenix. I also recall a [famille
rose]{.italic} vase and another, many centuries older, of that shade of
blue which our craftsmen copied from the potters of Persia. . .
Stephen Albert observed me with a smile. He was, as I have said, very
tall, sharp-featured, with gray eyes and a gray beard. He told me that
he had been a missionary in Tientsin \"before aspiring to become a
Sinologist.\"
We sat down ― I on a long, low divan, he with his back to the window and
a tall circular clock. I calculated that my pursuer, Richard Madden,
could not arrive for at least an hour. My irrevocable determination
could wait.
\"An astounding fate, that of Ts\'ui Pên,\" Stephen Albert said.
\"Governor of his native province, learned in astronomy, in astrology
and in the tireless interpretation of the canonical books, chess player,
famous poet and calligrapher ― he abandoned all this in order to compose
a book and a maze. He renounced the pleasures of both tyranny and
justice, of his populous couch, of his banquets and even of erudition ―
all to close himself up for thirteen years in the Pavilion of the Limpid
Solitude. When he died, his heirs found nothing save chaotic
manuscripts. His family, as you may be aware, wished to condemn them to
the fire; but his executor ― a Taoist or Buddhist monk ― insisted on
their publication.\"
\"We descendants of Ts\'ui Pên,\" I replied, \"continue to curse that
monk. Their publication was senseless. The book is an indeterminate heap
of contradictory drafts. I examined it once: in the third chapter the
hero dies, in the fourth he is alive. As for the other undertaking of
Ts\'ui Pên, his labyrinth. . .\"
\"Here is Ts\'ui Pên\'s labyrinth,\" he said, indicating a tall
lacquered desk.
\"An ivory labyrinth!\" I exclaimed. \"A minimum labyrinth.\"
\"A labyrinth of symbols,\" he corrected. \"An invisible labyrinth of
time. To me, a barbarous Englishman, has been entrusted the revelation
of this diaphanous mystery. After more than a hundred years, the details
are irretrievable; but it is not hard to conjecture what happened.
Ts\'ui Pên must have said once: [I am withdrawing to write a
book.]{.italic} And another time: [I am withdrawing to construct a
labyrinth.]{.italic} Every one imagined two works; to no one did it
occur that the book and the maze were one and the same thing. The
Pavilion of the Limpid Solitude stood in the center of a garden that was
perhaps intricate; that circumstance could have suggested to the heirs a
physical labyrinth. Hs\'ui Pen died; no one in the vast territories that
were his came upon the labyrinth; the confusion of the novel suggested
to me that [it]{.italic} was the maze. Two circumstances gave me the
correct solution of the problem. One: the curious legend that Ts\'ui Pên
had planned to create a labyrinth which would be strictly infinite. The
other: a fragment of a letter I discovered.\"
Albert rose. He turned his back on me for a moment; he opened a drawer
of the black and gold desk. He faced me and in his hands he held a sheet
of paper that had once been crimson, but was now pink and tenuous and
cross-sectioned. The fame of Ts\'ui Pên as a calligrapher had been
justly won. I read, uncomprehendingly and with fervor, these words
written with a minute brush by a man of my blood: [I leave to the
various futures (not to all) my garden of forking paths.]{.italic}
Wordlessly, I returned the sheet. Albert continued:
\"Before unearthing this letter, I had questioned myself about the ways
in which a book can be infinite. I could think of nothing other than a
cyclic volume, a circular one. A book whose last page was identical with
the first, a book which had the possibility of continuing indefinitely.
I remembered too that night which is at the middle of the Thousand and
One Nights when Scheherazade (through a magical oversight of the
copyist) begins to relate word for word the story of the Thousand and
One Nights, establishing the risk of coming once again to the night when
she must repeat it, and thus on to infinity. I imagined as well a
Platonic, hereditary work, transmitted from father to son, in which each
new individual adds a chapter or corrects with pious care the pages of
his elders. These conjectures diverted me; but none seemed to
correspond, not even remotely, to the contradictory chapters of Ts\'ui
Pên. In the midst of this perplexity, I received from Oxford the
manuscript you have examined. I lingered, naturally, on the sentence: [I
leave to the various futures (not to all) my garden of forking
paths.]{.italic} Almost instantly, I understood: \'the garden of forking
paths\' was the chaotic novel; the phrase \'the various futures (not to
all)\' suggested to me the forking in time, not in space. A broad
rereading of the work confirmed the theory. In all fictional works, each
time a man is confronted with several alternatives, he chooses one and
eliminates the others; in the fiction of Ts\'ui Pên, he chooses ―
simultaneously ― all of them. [He creates,]{.italic} in this way,
diverse futures, diverse times which themselves also proliferate and
fork. Here, then, is the explanation of the novel\'s contradictions.
Fang, let us say, has a secret; a stranger calls at his door; Fang
resolves to kill him. Naturally, there are several possible outcomes:
Fang can kill the intruder, the intruder can kill Fang, they both can
escape, they both can die, and so forth. In the work of Ts\'ui Pên, all
possible outcomes occur; each one is the point of departure for other
forkings. Sometimes, the paths of this labyrinth converge: for example,
you arrive at this house, but in one of the possible pasts you are my
enemy, in another, my friend. If you will resign yourself to my
incurable pronunciation, we shall read a few pages.\"
His face, within the vivid circle of the lamplight, was unquestionably
that of an old man, but with something unalterable about it, even
immortal. He read with slow precision two versions of the same epic
chapter. In the first, an army marches to a battle across a lonely
mountain; the horror of the rocks and shadows makes the men undervalue
their lives and they gain an easy victory. In the second, the same army
traverses a palace where a great festival is taking place; the
resplendent battle seems to them a continuation of the celebration and
they win the victory. I listened with proper veneration to these ancient
narratives, perhaps less admirable in themselves than the fact that they
had been created by my blood and were being restored to me by a man of a
remote empire, in the course of a desperate adventure, on a Western
isle. I remember the last words, repeated in each version like a secret
commandment: [Thus fought the heroes, tranquil their admirable hearts,
violent their swords, resigned to kill and to die.]{.italic}
From that moment on, I felt about me and within my dark body an
invisible, intangible swarming. Not the swarming of the divergent,
parallel and finally coalescent armies, but a more inaccessible, more
intimate agitation that they in some manner prefigured. Stephen Albert
continued:
\"I don\'t believe that your illustrious ancestor played idly with these
variations. I don\'t consider it credible that he would sacrifice
thirteen years to the infinite execution of a rhetorical experiment. In
your country, the novel is a subsidiary form of literature; in Ts\'ui
Pên\'s time it was a despicable form. Ts\'ui Pên was a brilliant
novelist, but he was also a man of letters who doubtless did not
consider himself a mere novelist. The testimony of his contemporaries
proclaims ― and his life fully confirms ― his metaphysical and mystical
interests. Philosophic controversy usurps a good part of the novel. I
know that of all problems, none disturbed him so greatly nor worked upon
him so much as the abysmal problem of time. Now then, the latter is the
only problem that does not figure in the pages of the [Garden.]{.italic}
He does not even use the word that signifies [time.]{.italic} How do you
explain this voluntary omission?\"
I proposed several solutions ― all unsatisfactory. We discussed them.
Finally, Stephen Albert said to me:
\"In a riddle whose answer is chess, what is the only prohibited word?\"
I thought a moment and replied, \"The word [chess]{.italic}.\"
\"Precisely,\" said Albert. [\"The Garden of Forking Paths]{.italic} is
an enormous riddle, or parable, whose theme is time; this recondite
cause prohibits its mention. To omit a word always, to resort to inept
metaphors and obvious periphrases, is perhaps the most emphatic way of
stressing it. That is the tortuous method preferred, in each of the
meanderings of his indefatigable novel, by the oblique Ts\'ui Pên. I
have compared hundreds of manuscripts, I have corrected the errors that
the negligence of the copyists has introduced, I have guessed the plan
of this chaos, I have re-established ― I believe I have re-established ―
the primordial organization, I have translated the entire work: it is
clear to me that not once does he employ the word \'time.\' The
explanation is obvious: [The Garden of Forking Paths]{.italic} is an
incomplete, but not false, image of the universe as Ts\'ui Pên conceived
it. In contrast to Newton and Schopenhauer, your ancestor did not
believe in a uniform, absolute time. He believed in an infinite series
of times, in a growing, dizzying net of divergent, convergent and
parallel times. This network of times which approached one another,
forked, broke off, or were unaware of one another for centuries,
embraces [all]{.italic} possibilities of time. We do not exist in the
majority of these times; in some you exist, and not I; in others I, and
not you; in others, both of us. In the present one, which a favorable
fate has granted me, you have arrived at my house; in another, while
crossing the garden, you found me dead; in still another, I utter these
same words, but I am a mistake, a ghost.\"
\"In every one,\" I pronounced, not without a tremble to my voice, \"I
am grateful to you and revere you for your re-creation of the garden of
Ts\'ui Pên.\"
\"Not in all,\" he murmured with a smile. \"Time forks perpetually
toward innumerable futures. In one of them I am your enemy.\"
Once again I felt the swarming sensation of which I have spoken. It
seemed to me that the humid garden that surrounded the house was
infinitely saturated with invisible persons. Those persons were Albert
and I, secret, busy and multiform in other dimensions of time. I raised
my eyes and the tenuous nightmare dissolved. In the yellow and black
garden there was only one man; but this man was as strong as a statue .
. . this man was approaching along the path and he was Captain Richard
Madden.
\"The future already exists,\" I replied, \"but I am your friend. Could
I see the letter again?\"
Albert rose. Standing tall, he opened the drawer of the tall desk; for
the moment his back was to me. I had readied the revolver. I fired with
extreme caution. Albert fell uncomplainingly, immediately. I swear his
death was instantaneous ― a lightning stroke.
The rest is unreal, insignificant. Madden broke in, arrested me. I have
been condemned to the gallows. I have won out abominably; I have
communicated to Berlin the secret name of the city they must attack.
They bombed it yesterday; I read it in the same papers that offered to
England the mystery of the learned Sinologist Stephen Albert who was
murdered by a stranger, one Yu Tsun. The Chief had deciphered this
mystery. He knew my problem was to indicate (through the uproar of the
war) the city called Albert, and that I had found no other means to do
so than to kill a man of that name. He does not know (no one can know)
my innumerable contrition and weariness.
\
[For Victoria Ocampo]{.italic}
[Translated by D. A. Y.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_007.html_calibre_pb_7 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_008.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_008.html_filepos108448 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_008.html_filepos108509 .calibre10}
[[The Lottery in Babylon]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Like all men in Babylon, I have been proconsul; like all, a slave. I
have also known omnipotence, opprobrium, imprisonment. Look: the index
finger on my right hand is missing. Look: through the rip in my cape you
can see a vermilion tattoo on my stomach. It is the second symbol, Beth.
This letter, on nights when the moon is full, gives me power over men
whose mark is Gimmel, but it subordinates me to the men of Aleph, who on
moonless nights owe obedience to those marked with Gimmel. In the half
light of dawn, in a cellar, I have cut the jugular vein of sacred bulls
before a black stone. During a lunar year I have been declared
invisible. I shouted and they did not answer me; I stole bread and they
did not behead me. I have known what the Greeks do not know,
incertitude. In a bronze chamber, before the silent handkerchief of the
strangler, hope has been faithful to me, as has panic in the river of
pleasure. Heraclides Ponticus tells with amazement that Pythagoras
remembered having been Pyrrhus and before that Euphorbus and before that
some other mortal. In order to remember similar vicissitudes I do not
need to have recourse to death or even to deception. I owe this almost
atrocious variety to an institution which other republics do not know or
which operates in them in an imperfect and secret manner: the lottery. I
have not looked into its history; I know that the wise men cannot agree.
I know of its powerful purposes what a man who is not versed in
astrology can know about the moon. I come from a dizzy land where the
lottery is the basis of reality. Until today I have thought as little
about it as I have about the conduct of indecipherable divinities or
about my heart. Now, far from Babylon and its beloved customs, I think
with a certain amount of amazement about the lottery and about the
blasphemous conjectures which veiled men murmur in the twilight.
My father used to say that formerly ― a matter of centuries, of years? ―
the lottery in Babylon was a game of plebeian character. He recounted (I
don\'t know whether rightly) that barbers sold, in exchange for copper
coins, squares of bone or of parchment adorned with symbols. In broad
daylight a drawing took place. Those who won received silver coins
without any other test of luck. The system was elementary, as you can
see.
Naturally these \"lotteries\" failed. Their moral virtue was nil. They
were not directed at all of man\'s faculties, but only at hope. In the
face of public indifference, the merchants who founded these venal
lotteries began to lose money. Someone tried a reform: The interpolation
of a few unfavorable tickets in the list of favorable numbers. By means
of this reform, the buyers of numbered squares ran the double risk of
winning a sum and of paying a fine that could be considerable. This
slight danger (for every thirty favorable numbers there was one unlucky
one) awoke, as is natural, the interest of the public. The Babylonians
threw themselves into the game. Those who did not acquire chances were
considered pusillanimous, cowardly. In time, that justified disdain was
doubled. Those who did not play were scorned, but also the losers who
paid the fine were scorned. The Company (as it came to be known then)
had to take care of the winners, who could not cash in their prizes if
almost the total amount of the fines was unpaid. It started a lawsuit
against the losers. The judge condemned them to pay the original fine
and costs or spend several days in jail. All chose jail in order to
defraud the Company. The bravado of a few is the source of the
omnipotence of the Company and of its metaphysical and ecclesiastical
power.
A little while afterward the lottery lists omitted the amounts of fines
and limited themselves to publishing the days of imprisonment that each
unfavorable number indicated. That laconic spirit, almost unnoticed at
the time, was of capital importance. [It was the first appearance in the
lottery of non-monetary elements.]{.italic} The success was tremendous.
Urged by the clientele, the Company was obliged to increase the
unfavorable numbers.
Everyone knows that the people of Babylon are fond of logic and even of
symmetry. It was illogical for the lucky numbers to be computed in round
coins and the unlucky ones in days and nights of imprisonment. Some
moralists reasoned that the possession of money does not always
determine happiness and that other forms of happiness are perhaps more
direct.
Another concern swept the quarters of the poorer classes. The members of
the college of priests multiplied their stakes and enjoyed all the
vicissitudes of terror and hope; the poor (with reasonable or
unavoidable envy) knew that they were excluded from that notoriously
delicious rhythm. The just desire that all, rich and poor, should
participate equally in the lottery, inspired an indignant agitation, the
memory of which the years have not erased. Some obstinate people did not
understand (or pretended not to understand) that it was a question of a
new order, of a necessary historical stage. A slave stole a crimson
ticket, which in the drawing credited him with the burning of his
tongue. The legal code fixed that same penalty for the one who stole a
ticket. Some Babylonians argued that he deserved the burning irons in
his status of a thief; others, generously, that the executioner should
apply it to him because chance had determined it that way. There were
disturbances, there were lamentable drawings of blood, but the masses of
Babylon finally imposed their will against the opposition of the rich.
The people achieved amply its generous purposes. In the first place, it
caused the Company to accept total power. (That unification was
necessary, given the vastness and complexity of the new operations.) In
the second place, it made the lottery secret, free and general. The
mercenary sale of chances was abolished. Once initiated in the mysteries
of Baal, every free man automatically participated in the sacred
drawings, which took place in the labyrinths of the god every sixty
nights and which determined his destiny until the next drawing. The
consequences were incalculable. A fortunate play could bring about his
promotion to the council of wise men or the imprisonment of an enemy
(public or private) or finding, in the peaceful darkness of his room,
the woman who begins to excite him and whom he never expected to see
again. A bad play: mutilation, different kinds of infamy, death. At
times one single fact ― the vulgar murder of C, the mysterious
apotheosis of B ― was the happy solution of thirty or forty drawings. To
combine the plays was difficult, but one must remember that the
individuals of the Company were (and are) omnipotent and astute. In many
cases the knowledge that certain happinesses were the simple product of
chance would have diminished their virtue. To avoid that obstacle, the
agents of the Company made use of the power of suggestion and magic.
Their steps, their maneuverings, were secret. To find out about the
intimate hopes and terrors of each individual, they had astrologists and
spies. There were certain stone lions, there was a sacred latrine called
Qaphqa, there were fissures in a dusty aqueduct which, according to
general opinion, [led to the Company;]{.italic} malignant or benevolent
persons deposited information in these places. An alphabetical file
collected these items of varying truthfulness.
Incredibly, there were complaints. The Company, with its usual
discretion, did not answer directly. It preferred to scrawl in the
rubbish of a mask factory a brief statement which now figures in the
sacred scriptures. This doctrinal item observed that the lottery is an
interpolation of chance in the order of the world and that to accept
errors is not to contradict chance: it is to corroborate it. It likewise
observed that those lions and that sacred receptacle, although not
disavowed by the Company (which did not abandon the right to consult
them), functioned without official guarantee.
This declaration pacified the public\'s restlessness. It also produced
other effects, perhaps unforeseen by its writer. It deeply modified the
spirit and the operations of the Company. I don\'t have much time left;
they tell us that the ship is about to weigh anchor. But I shall try to
explain it.
However unlikely it might seem, no one had tried out before then a
general theory of chance. Babylonians are not very speculative. They
revere the judgments of fate, they deliver to them their lives, their
hopes, their panic, but it does not occur to them to investigate fate\'s
labyrinthine laws nor the gyratory spheres which reveal it.
Nevertheless, the [unofficial]{.italic} declaration that I have
mentioned inspired many discussions of judicial-mathematical character.
From some one of them the following conjecture was born: If the lottery
is an intensification of chance, a periodical infusion of chaos in the
cosmos, would it not be right for chance to intervene in all stages of
the drawing and not in one alone? Is it not ridiculous for chance to
dictate someone\'s death and have the circumstances of that death ―
secrecy, publicity, the fixed time of an hour or a century ― not subject
to chance? These just scruples finally caused a considerable reform,
whose complexities (aggravated by centuries\' practice) only a few
specialists understand, but which I shall try to summarize, at least in
a symbolic way.
Let us imagine a first drawing, which decrees the death of a man. For
its fulfillment one proceeds to another drawing, which proposes (let us
say) nine possible executors. Of these executors, four can initiate a
third drawing which will tell the name of the executioner, two can
replace the adverse order with a fortunate one (finding a treasure, let
us say), another will intensify the death penalty (that is, will make it
infamous or enrich it with tortures), others can refuse to fulfill it.
This is the symbolic scheme. In reality [the number of drawings is
infinite.]{.italic} No decision is final, all branch into others.
Ignorant people suppose that infinite drawings require an infinite time;
actually it is sufficient for time to be infinitely subdivisible, as the
famous parable of the contest with the tortoise teaches. This infinity
harmonizes admirably with the sinuous numbers of Chance and with the
Celestial Archetype of the Lottery, which the Platonists adore. Some
warped echo of our rites seems to have resounded on the Tiber: Ellus
Lampridius, in the [Life of Antoninus Heliogabalus,]{.italic} tells that
this emperor wrote on shells the lots that were destined for his guests,
so that one received ten pounds of gold and another ten flies, ten
dormice, ten bears. It is permissible to recall that Heliogabalus was
brought up in Asia Minor, among the priests of the eponymous god.
There are also impersonal drawings, with an indefinite purpose. One
decrees that a sapphire of Taprobana be thrown into the waters of the
Euphrates; another, that a bird be released from the roof of a tower;
another, that each century there be withdrawn (or added) a grain of sand
from the innumerable ones on the beach. The consequences are, at times,
terrible.
Under the beneficent influence of the Company, our customs are saturated
with chance. The buyer of a dozen amphoras of Damascene wine will not be
surprised if one of them contains a talisman or a snake. The scribe who
writes a contract almost never fails to introduce some erroneous
information. I myself, in this hasty declaration, have falsified some
splendor, some atrocity. Perhaps, also, some mysterious monotony. . .
Our historians, who are the most penetrating on the globe, have invented
a method to correct chance. It is well known that the operations of this
method are (in general) reliable, although, naturally, they are not
divulged without some portion of deceit. Furthermore, there is nothing
so contaminated with fiction as the history of the Company. A
paleographic document, exhumed in a temple, can be the result of
yesterday\'s lottery or of an age-old lottery. No book is published
without some discrepancy in each one of the copies. Scribes take a
secret oath to omit, to interpolate, to change. The indirect lie is also
cultivated.
The Company, with divine modesty, avoids all publicity. Its agents, as
is natural, are secret. The orders which it issues continually (perhaps
incessantly) do not differ from those lavished by impostors. Moreover,
who can brag about being a mere impostor? The drunkard who improvises an
absurd order, the dreamer who awakens suddenly and strangles the woman
who sleeps at his side, do they not execute, perhaps, a secret decision
of the Company? That silent functioning, comparable to God\'s, gives
rise to all sorts of conjectures. One abominably insinuates that the
Company has not existed for centuries and that the sacred disorder of
our lives is purely hereditary, traditional. Another judges it eternal
and teaches that it will last until the last night, when the last god
annihilates the world. Another declares that the Company is omnipotent,
but that it only has influence in tiny things: in a bird\'s call, in the
shadings of rust and of dust, in the half dreams of dawn. Another, in
the words of masked heresiarchs, [that it has never existed and will not
exist.]{.italic} Another, no less vile, reasons that it is indifferent
to affirm or deny the reality of the shadowy corporation, because
Babylon is nothing else than an infinite game of chance.
\
[Translated by John M. Fein]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_008.html_calibre_pb_8 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_009.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_009.html_filepos122836 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_009.html_filepos122897 .calibre10}
[[Pierre Menard, Author of the]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[[[Quixote]{.bold}]{.italic1}]{.calibre3}
\
The [visible]{.italic} work left by this novelist is easily and briefly
enumerated. Impardonable, therefore, are the omissions and additions
perpetrated by Madame Henri Bachelier in a fallacious catalogue which a
certain daily, whose [Protestant]{.italic} tendency is no secret, has
had the inconsideration to inflict upon its deplorable readers ― though
these be few and Calvinist, if not Masonic and circumcised. The true
friends of Menard have viewed this catalogue with alarm and even with a
certain melancholy. One might say that only yesterday we gathered before
his final monument, amidst the lugubrious cypresses, and already Error
tries to tarnish his Memory. . . Decidedly, a brief rectification is
unavoidable.
I am aware that it is quite easy to challenge my slight authority. I
hope, however, that I shall not be prohibited from mentioning two
eminent testimonies. The Baroness de Bacourt (at whose unforgettable
[vendredis]{.italic} I had the honor of meeting the lamented poet) has
seen fit to approve the pages which follow. The Countess de Bagnoregio,
one of the most delicate spirits of the Principality of Monaco (and now
of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, following her recent marriage to the
international philanthropist Simon Kautzsch, who has been so
inconsiderately slandered, alas! by the victims of his disinterested
maneuvers) has sacrificed \"to veracity and to death\" (such were her
words) the stately reserve which is her distinction, and, in an open
letter published in the magazine [Luxe,]{.italic} concedes me her
approval as well. These authorizations, I think, are not entirely
insufficient.
I have said that Menard\'s visible work can be easily enumerated. Having
examined with care his personal files, I find that they contain the
following items:
> a\) A Symbolist sonnet which appeared twice (with variants) in the
> review [La conque]{.italic} (issues of March and October 1899).
> b\) A monograph on the possibility of constructing a poetic vocabulary
> of concepts which would not be synonyms or periphrases of those which
> make up our everyday language, \"but rather ideal objects created
> according to convention and essentially designed to satisfy poetic
> needs\" (Nîmes, 1901).
> c\) A monograph on \"certain connections or affinities\" between the
> thought of Descartes, Leibniz and John Wilkins (Nîmes, 1903).
> d\) A monograph on Leibniz\'s [Characteristica universalis]{.italic}
> (Nîmes, 1904).
> e\) A technical article on the possibility of improving the game of
> chess, eliminating one of the rook\'s pawns. Menard proposes,
> recommends, discusses and finally rejects this innovation.
> f\) A monograph on Raymond Lully\'s [Ars magna generalis]{.italic}
> (Nîmes, 1906).
> g\) A translation, with prologue and notes, of Ruy López de Segura\'s
> [Libro de la inventión liberal y arte del juego del axedrez]{.italic}
> (Paris, 1907).
> h\) The work sheets of a monograph on George Boole\'s symbolic logic.
> i\) An examination of the essential metric laws of French prose,
> illustrated with examples taken from Saint-Simon [(Revue des langues
> romanes,]{.italic} Montpellier, October 1909).
> j\) A reply to Luc Durtain (who had denied the existence of such
> laws), illustrated with examples from Luc Durtain [(Revue des langues
> romanes,]{.italic} Montpellier, December 1909).
> k\) A manuscript translation of the [Aguja de navegar cultos]{.italic}
> of Quevedo, entitled [La boussole des précieux.]{.italic}
> 1\) A preface to the Catalogue of an exposition of lithographs by
> Carolus Hourcade (Nîmes, 1914).
> m\) The work [Les problèmes d\'un problème]{.italic} (Paris, 1917),
> which discusses, in chronological order, the different solutions given
> to the illustrous problem of Achilles and the tortoise. Two editions
> of this book have appeared so far; the second bears as an epigraph
> Leibniz\'s recommendation [\"Ne craignez point, monsieur, la
> tortue\"]{.italic} and revises the chapters dedicated to Russell and
> Descartes.
> n\) A determined analysis of the \"syntactical customs\" of Toulet
> [(N.R.F.,]{.italic} March 1921). Menard ― I recall ― declared that
> censure and praise are sentimental operations which have nothing to do
> with literary criticism.
> o\) A transposition into alexandrines of Paul Valéry\'s [Le cimitière
> marin (N. R. F.,]{.italic} January 1928).
> p\) An invective against Paul Valéry, in the [Papers for the
> Suppression of Reality]{.italic} of Jacques Reboul. (This invective,
> we might say parenthetically, is the exact opposite of his true
> opinion of Valéry. The latter understood it as such and their old
> friendship was not endangered.)
> q\) A \"definition\" of the Countess de Bagnoregio, in the
> \"victorious volume\" ― the locution is Gabriele d\'Annunzio\'s,
> another of its collaborators ― published annually by this lady to
> rectify the inevitable falsifications of journalists and to present
> \"to the world and to Italy\" an authentic image of her person, so
> often exposed (by very reason of her beauty and her activities) to
> erroneous or hasty interpretations.
> r\) A cycle of admirable sonnets for the Baroness de Bacourt (1934).
> s\) A manuscript list of verses which owe their efficacy to their
> punctuation.[[[[8]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos601372){.calibre7}
\
This, then, is the [visible]{.italic} work of Menard, in chronological
order (with no omission other than a few vague sonnets of circumstance
written for the hospitable, or avid, album of Madame Henri Bachelier). I
turn now to his other work: the subterranean, the interminably heroic,
the peerless. And ― such are the capacities of man! ― the unfinished.
This work, perhaps the most significant of our time, consists of the
ninth and thirty-eighth chapters of the first part of [Don
Quixote]{.italic} and a fragment of chapter twenty-two. I know such an
affirmation seems an absurdity; to justify this \"absurdity\" is the
primordial object of this
note.[[[[9]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos601824){.calibre7}
Two texts of unequal value inspired this undertaking. One is that
philological fragment by Novalis ― the one numbered 2005 in the Dresden
edition ― which outlines the theme of a [total]{.italic} identification
with a given author. The other is one of those parasitic books which
situate Christ on a boulevard, Hamlet on La Cannebière or Don Quixote on
Wall Street. Like all men of good taste, Menard abhorred these useless
carnivals, fit only ― as he would say ― to produce the plebeian pleasure
of anachronism or (what is worse) to enthrall us with the elementary
idea that all epochs are the same or are different. More interesting,
though contradictory and superficial of execution, seemed to him the
famous plan of Daudet: to conjoin the Ingenious Gentleman and his squire
in [one]{.italic} figure, which was Tartarin . . . Those who have
insinuated that Menard dedicated his life to writing a contemporary
[Quixote]{.italic} calumniate his illustrious memory.
He did not want to compose another [Quixote]{.italic} ― which is easy ―
but [the Quixote itself.]{.italic} Needless to say, he never
contemplated a mechanical transcription of the original; he did not
propose to copy it. His admirable intention was to produce a few pages
which would coincide ― word for word and line for line ― with those of
Miguel de Cervantes.
\"My intent is no more than astonishing,\" he wrote me the 30th of
September, 1934, from Bayonne. \"The final term in a theological or
metaphysical demonstration ― the objective world, God, causality, the
forms of the universe ― is no less previous and common than my famed
novel. The only difference is that the philosophers publish the
intermediary stages of their labor in pleasant volumes and I have
resolved to do away with those stages.\" In truth, not one worksheet
remains to bear witness to his years of effort.
The first method he conceived was relatively simple. Know Spanish well,
recover the Catholic faith, fight against the Moors or the Turk, forget
the history of Europe between the years 1602 and 1918, [be]{.italic}
Miguel de Cervantes. Pierre Menard studied this procedure (I know he
attained a fairly accurate command of seventeenth-century Spanish) but
discarded it as too easy. Rather as impossible! my reader will say.
Granted, but the undertaking was impossible from the very beginning and
of all the impossible ways of carrying it out, this was the least
interesting. To be, in the twentieth century, a popular novelist of the
seventeenth seemed to him a diminution. To be, in some way, Cervantes
and reach the [Quixote]{.italic} seemed less arduous to him ― and,
consequently, less interesting ― than to go on being Pierre Menard and
reach the [Quixote]{.italic} through the experiences of Pierre Menard.
(This conviction, we might say in passing, made him omit the
autobiographical prologue to the second part of [Don Quixote.]{.italic}
To include that prologue would have been to create another character ―
Cervantes ― but it would also have meant presenting the
[Quixote]{.italic} in terms of that character and not of Menard. The
latter, naturally, declined that facility.) \"My undertaking is not
difficult, essentially,\" I read in another part of his letter. \"I
should only have to be immortal to carry it out.\" Shall I confess that
I often imagine he did finish it and that I read the [Quixote]{.italic}
― all of it ― as if Menard had conceived it? Some nights past, while
leafing through chapter XXVI ― never essayed by him ― I recognized our
friend\'s style and something of his voice in this exceptional phrase:
\"the river nymphs and the dolorous and humid Echo.\" This happy
conjunction of a spiritual and a physical adjective brought to my mind a
verse by Shakespeare which we discussed one afternoon:
\
[ Where a malignant and a turbaned Turk. . .]{.calibre5}
\
But why precisely the [Quixote?]{.italic} our reader will ask. Such a
preference, in a Spaniard, would not have been inexplicable; but it is,
no doubt, in a Symbolist from Nîmes, essentially a devote of Poe, who
engendered Baudelaire, who engendered Mallarmé, who engendered Valéry,
who engendered Edmond Teste. The aforementioned letter illuminates this
point. \"The [Quixote,\"]{.italic} clarifies Menard, \"interests me
deeply, but it does not seem ― how shall I say it? ― inevitable. I
cannot imagine the universe without Edgar Allan Poe\'s exclamation:
\
[ Ah, bear in mind this garden was enchanted!]{.calibre5}
\
or without the [Bateau ivre]{.italic} or the [Ancient Mariner,]{.italic}
but I am quite capable of imagining it without the [Quixote.]{.italic}
(I speak, naturally, of my personal capacity and not of those works\'
historical resonance.) The [Quixote]{.italic} is a contingent book; the
[Quixote]{.italic} is unnecessary. I can premeditate writing it, I can
write it, without falling into a tautology. When I was ten or twelve
years old, I read it, perhaps in its entirety. Later, I have reread
closely certain chapters, those which I shall not attempt for the time
being. I have also gone through the interludes, the plays, the
[Galatea,]{.italic} the exemplary novels, the undoubtedly laborious
tribulations of Persiles and Segismunda and the [Viaje del
Parnaso]{.italic}. . .My general recollection of the [Quixote,]{.italic}
simplified by forgetfulness and indifference, can well equal the
imprecise and prior image of a book not yet written. Once that image
(which no one can legitimately deny me) is postulated, it is certain
that my problem is a good bit more difficult than Cervantes\' was. My
obliging predecessor did not refuse the collaboration of chance: he
composed his immortal work somewhat [à la diable,]{.italic} carried
along by the inertias of language and invention. I have taken on the
mysterious duty of reconstructing literally his spontaneous work. My
solitary game is governed by two polar laws. The first permits me to
essay variations of a formal or psychological type; the second obliges
me to sacrifice these variations to the \"original\" text and reason out
this annihilation in an irrefutable manner. . . To these artificial
hindrances, another ― of a congenital kind ― must be added. To compose
the [Quixote]{.italic} at the beginning of the seventeenth century was a
reasonable undertaking, necessary and perhaps even unavoidable; at the
beginning of the twentieth, it is almost impossible. It is not in vain
that three hundred years have gone by, filled with exceedingly complex
events. Amongst them, to mention only one, is the [Quixote]{.italic}
itself.\"
In spite of these three obstacles, Menard\'s fragmentary
[Quixote]{.italic} is more subtle than Cervantes\'. The latter, in a
clumsy fashion, opposes to the fictions of chivalry the tawdry
provincial reality of his country; Menard selects as his \"reality\" the
land of Carmen during the century of Lepanto and Lope de Vega. What a
series of [espagnolades]{.italic} that selection would have suggested to
Maurice Barrès or Dr. Rodriguez Larreta! Menard eludes them with
complete naturalness. In his work there are no gypsy nourishes or
conquistadors or mystics or Philip the Seconds or [autos da
fé.]{.italic} He neglects or eliminates local color. This disdain points
to a new conception of the historical novel. This disdain condemns
[Salammbô,]{.italic} with no possibility of appeal.
It is no less astounding to consider isolated chapters. For example, let
us examine Chapter XXXVIII of the first part, \"which treats of the
curious discourse of Don Quixote on arms and letters.\" It is well known
that Don Quixote (like Quevedo in an analogous and later passage in [La
hora de todos)]{.italic} decided the debate against letters and in favor
of arms. Cervantes was a former soldier: his verdict is understandable.
But that Pierre Menard\'s Don Quixote ― a contemporary of [La trahison
des clercs]{.italic} and Bertrand Russell ― should fall prey to such
nebulous sophistries! Madame Bachelier has seen here an admirable and
typical subordination on the part of the author to the hero\'s
psychology; others (not at all perspicaciously), a
[transcription]{.italic} of the [Quixote;]{.italic} the Baroness de
Bacourt, the influence of Nietzsche. To this third interpretation (which
I judge to be irrefutable) I am not sure I dare to add a fourth, which
concords very well with the almost divine modesty of Pierre Menard: his
resigned or ironical habit of propagating ideas which were the strict
reverse of those he preferred. (Let us recall once more his diatribe
against Paul Valéry in Jacques Reboul\'s ephemeral Surrealist sheet.)
Cervantes\' text and Menard\'s are verbally identical, but the second is
almost infinitely richer. (More ambiguous, his detractors will say, but
ambiguity is richness.)
It is a revelation to compare Menard\'s [Don Quixote]{.italic} with
Cervantes\'. The latter, for example, wrote (part one, chapter nine):
\
[ . . . truth, whose mother is history, rival of time, depository
of deeds, witness of the past, exemplar and adviser to the present, and
the future\'s counselor.]{.calibre5}
\
Written in the seventeeth century, written by the \"lay genius\"
Cervantes, this enumeration is a mere rhetorical praise of history.
Menard, on the other hand, writes:
\
[ . . . truth, whose mother is history, rival of time, depository
of deeds, witness of the past, exemplar and adviser to the present, and
the future\'s counselor.]{.calibre5}
\
History, the [mother]{.italic} of truth: the idea is astounding. Menard,
a contemporary of William James, does not define history as an inquiry
into reality but as its origin. Historical truth, for him, is not what
has happened; it is what we judge to have happened. The final phrases ―
[exemplar and adviser to the present, and the future\'s
counselor]{.italic} ― are brazenly pragmatic.
The contrast in style is also vivid. The archaic style of Menard ― quite
foreign, after all ― suffers from a certain affectation. Not so that of
his forerunner, who handles with ease the current Spanish of his time.
There is no exercise of the intellect which is not, in the final
analysis, useless. A philosophical doctrine begins as a plausible
description of the universe; with the passage of the years it becomes a
mere chapter ― if not a paragraph or a name ― in the history of
philosophy. In literature, this eventual caducity is even more
notorious. The [Quixote]{.italic} ― Menard told me ― was, above all, an
entertaining book; now it is the occasion for patriotic toasts,
grammatical insolence and obscene de luxe editions. Fame is a form of
incomprehension, perhaps the worst.
There is nothing new in these nihilistic verifications; what is singular
is the determination Menard derived from them. He decided to anticipate
the vanity awaiting all man\'s efforts; he set himself to an undertaking
which was exceedingly complex and, from the very beginning, futile. He
dedicated his scruples and his sleepless nights to repeating an already
extant book in an alien tongue. He multiplied draft upon draft, revised
tenaciously and tore up thousands of manuscript
pages.[[[[10]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos602178){.calibre7}
He did not let anyone examine these drafts and took care they should not
survive him. In vain have I tried to reconstruct them.
I have reflected that it is permissible to see in this \"final\"
[Quixote]{.italic} a kind of palimpsest, through which the traces ―
tenuous but not indecipherable ― of our friend\'s \"previous\" writing
should be translucently visible. Unfortunately, only a second Pierre
Menard, inverting the other\'s work, would be able to exhume and revive
those lost Troys . . .
\"Thinking, analyzing, inventing (he also wrote me) are not anomalous
acts; they are the normal respiration of the intelligence. To glorify
the occasional performance of that function, to hoard ancient and alien
thoughts, to recall with incredulous stupor that the [doctor
universalis]{.italic} thought, is to confess our laziness or our
barbarity. Every man should be capable of all ideas and I understand
that in the future this will be the case.\"
Menard (perhaps without wanting to) has enriched, by means of a new
technique, the halting and rudimentary art of reading: this new
technique is that of the deliberate anachronism and the erroneous
attribution. This technique, whose applications are infinite, prompts us
to go through the [Odyssey]{.italic} as if it were posterior to the
[Aeneid]{.italic} and the book [Le jardin du Centaure]{.italic} of
Madame Henri Bachelier as if it were by Madame Henri Bachelier. This
technique fills the most placid works with adventure. To attribute the
[Imitatio Christi]{.italic} to Louis Ferdinand Céline or to James Joyce,
is this not a sufficient renovation of its tenuous spiritual
indications?
[ ]{.italic}
[For Silvina Ocampo]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_009.html_calibre_pb_9 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_010.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_010.html_filepos144332 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_010.html_filepos144388 .calibre10}
[[The Circular Ruins]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[And if he left off dreaming about you. . .]{.calibre5}
[[ Through the Looking Glass,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [VI]{.calibre5}
\
No one saw him disembark in the unanimous night, no one saw the bamboo
canoe sinking into the sacred mud, but within a few days no one was
unaware that the silent man came from the South and that his home was
one of the infinite villages upstream, on the violent mountainside,
where the Zend tongue is not contaminated with Greek and where leprosy
is infrequent. The truth is that the obscure man kissed the mud, came up
the bank without pushing aside (probably without feeling) the brambles
which dilacerated his flesh, and dragged himself, nauseous and
bloodstained, to the circular enclosure crowned by a stone tiger or
horse, which once was the color of fire and now was that of ashes. This
circle was a temple, long ago devoured by fire, which the malarial
jungle had profaned and whose god no longer received the homage of men.
The stranger stretched out beneath the pedestal. He was awakened by the
sun high above. He evidenced without astonishment that his wounds had
closed; he shut his pale eyes and slept, not out of bodily weakness but
out of determination of will. He knew that this temple was the place
required by his invincible purpose; he knew that, downstream, the
incessant trees had not managed to choke the ruins of another propitious
temple, whose gods were also burned and dead; he knew that his immediate
obligation was to sleep. Towards midnight he was awakened by the
disconsolate cry of a bird. Prints of bare feet, some figs and a jug
told him that men of the region had respectfully spied upon his sleep
and were solicitous of his favor or feared his magic. He felt the chill
of fear and sought out a burial niche in the dilapidated wall and
covered himself with some unknown leaves.
The purpose which guided him was not impossible, though it was
supernatural. He wanted to dream a man: he wanted to dream him with
minute integrity and insert him into reality. This magical project had
exhausted the entire content of his soul; if someone had asked him his
own name or any trait of his previous life, he would not have been able
to answer. The uninhabited and broken temple suited him, for it was a
minimum of visible world; the nearness of the peasants also suited him,
for they would see that his frugal necessities were supplied. The rice
and fruit of their tribute were sufficient sustenance for his body,
consecrated to the sole task of sleeping and dreaming.
At first, his dreams were chaotic; somewhat later, they were of a
dialectical nature. The stranger dreamt that he was in the center of a
circular amphitheater which in some way was the burned temple: clouds of
silent students filled the gradins; the faces of the last ones hung many
centuries away and at a cosmic height, but were entirely clear and
precise. The man was lecturing to them on anatomy, cosmography, magic;
the countenances listened with eagerness and strove to respond with
understanding, as if they divined the importance of the examination
which would redeem one of them from his state of vain appearance and
interpolate him into the world of reality. The man, both in dreams and
awake, considered his phantoms\' replies, was not deceived by impostors,
divined a growing intelligence in certain perplexities. He sought a soul
which would merit participation in the universe.
After nine or ten nights, he comprehended with some bitterness that he
could expect nothing of those students who passively accepted his
doctrines, but that he could of those who, at times, would venture a
reasonable contradiction. The former, though worthy of love and
affection, could not rise to the state of individuals; the latter
pre-existed somewhat more. One afternoon (now his afternoons too were
tributaries of sleep, now he remained awake only for a couple of hours
at dawn) he dismissed the vast illusory college forever and kept one
single student. He was a silent boy, sallow, sometimes obstinate, with
sharp features which reproduced those of the dreamer. He was not long
disconcerted by his companions\' sudden elimination; his progress, after
a few special lessons, astounded his teacher. Nevertheless, catastrophe
ensued. The man emerged from sleep one day as if from a viscous desert,
looked at the vain light of afternoon, which at first he confused with
that of dawn, and understood that he had not really dreamt. All that
night and all day, the intolerable lucidity of insomnia weighed upon
him. He tried to explore the jungle, to exhaust himself; amidst the
hemlocks, he was scarcely able to manage a few snatches of feeble sleep,
fleetingly mottled with some rudimentary visions which were useless. He
tried to convoke the college and had scarcely uttered a few brief words
of exhortation, when it became deformed and was extinguished. In his
almost perpetual sleeplessness, his old eyes burned with tears of anger.
He comprehended that the effort to mold the incoherent and vertiginous
matter dreams are made of was the most arduous task a man could
undertake, though he might penetrate all the enigmas of the upper and
lower orders: much more arduous than weaving a rope of sand or coining
the faceless wind. He comprehended that an initial failure was
inevitable. He swore he would forget the enormous hallucination which
had misled him at first, and he sought another method. Before putting it
into effect, he dedicated a month to replenishing the powers his
delirium had wasted. He abandoned any premeditation of dreaming and,
almost at once, was able to sleep for a considerable part of the day.
The few times he dreamt during this period, he did not take notice of
the dreams. To take up his task again, he waked until the moon\'s disk
was perfect. Then, in the afternoon, he purified himself in the waters
of the river, worshiped the planetary gods, uttered the lawful syllables
of a powerful name and slept. Almost immediately, he dreamt of a beating
heart.
He dreamt it as active, warm, secret, the size of a closed fist, of
garnet color in the penumbra of a human body as yet without face or sex;
with minute love he dreamt it, for fourteen lucid nights. Each night he
perceived it with greater clarity. He did not touch it, but limited
himself to witnessing it, observing it, perhaps correcting it with his
eyes. He perceived it, lived it, from many distances and many angles. On
the fourteenth night he touched the pulmonary artery with his ringer,
and then the whole heart, inside and out. The examination satisfied him.
Deliberately, he did not dream for a night; then he took the heart
again, invoked the name of a planet and set about to envision another of
the principal organs. Within a year he reached the skeleton, the
eyelids. The innumerable hair was perhaps the most difficult task. He
dreamt a complete man, a youth, but this youth could not rise nor did he
speak nor could be open his eyes. Night after night, the man dreamt him
as asleep.
In the Gnostic cosmogonies, the demiurgi knead and mold a red Adam who
cannot stand alone; as unskillful and crude and elementary as this Adam
of dust was the Adam of dreams fabricated by the magician\'s nights of
effort. One afternoon, the man almost destroyed his work, but then
repented. (It would have been better for him had he destroyed it.) Once
he had completed his supplications to the numina of the earth and the
river, he threw himself down at the feet of the effigy which was perhaps
a tiger and perhaps a horse, and implored its unknown succor. That
twilight, he dreamt of the statue. He dreamt of it as a living,
tremulous thing: it was not an atrocious mongrel of tiger and horse, but
both these vehement creatures at once and also a bull, a rose, a
tempest. This multiple god revealed to him that its earthly name was
Fire, that in the circular temple (and in others of its kind) people had
rendered it sacrifices and cult and that it would magically give life to
the sleeping phantom, in such a way that all creatures except Fire
itself and the dreamer would believe him to be a man of flesh and blood.
The man was ordered by the divinity to instruct his creature in its
rites, and send him to the other broken temple whose pyramids survived
downstream, so that in this deserted edifice a voice might give glory to
the god. In the dreamer\'s dream, the dreamed one awoke.
The magician carried out these orders. He devoted a period of time
(which finally comprised two years) to revealing the arcana of the
universe and of the fire cult to his dream child. Inwardly, it pained
him to be separated from the boy. Under the pretext of pedagogical
necessity, each day he prolonged the hours he dedicated to his dreams.
He also redid the right shoulder, which was perhaps deficient. At times,
he was troubled by the impression that all this had happened before. . .
In general, his days were happy; when he closed his eyes, he would
think: [Now I shall be with my son.]{.italic} Or, less often: [The child
I have engendered awaits me and will not exist if I do not go to
him.]{.italic}
Gradually, he accustomed the boy to reality. Once he ordered him to
place a banner on a distant peak. The following day, the banner
flickered from the mountain top. He tried other analogous experiments,
each more daring than the last. He understood with certain bitterness
that his son was ready ― and perhaps impatient ― to be born. That night
he kissed him for the first time and sent him to the other temple whose
debris showed white downstream, through many leagues of inextricable
jungle and swamp. But first (so that he would never know he was a
phantom, so that he would be thought a man like others) he instilled
into him a complete oblivion of his years of apprenticeship.
The man\'s victory and peace were dimmed by weariness. At dawn and at
twilight, he would prostrate himself before the stone figure, imagining
perhaps that his unreal child was practicing the same rites, in other
circular ruins, downstream; at night, he would not dream, or would dream
only as all men do. He perceived the sounds and forms of the universe
with a certain colorlessness: his absent son was being nurtured with
these diminutions of his soul. His life\'s purpose was complete; the man
persisted in a kind of ecstasy. After a time, which some narrators of
his story prefer to compute in years and others in lustra, he was
awakened one midnight by two boatmen; he could not see their faces, but
they told him of a magic man in a temple of the North who could walk
upon fire and not be burned. The magician suddenly remembered the words
of the god. He recalled that, of all the creatures of the world, fire
was the only one that knew his son was a phantom. This recollection, at
first soothing, finally tormented him. He feared his son might meditate
on his abnormal privilege and discover in some way that his condition
was that of a mere image. Not to be a man, to be the projection of
another man\'s dream, what a feeling of humiliation, of vertigo! All
fathers are interested in the children they have procreated (they have
permitted to exist) in mere confusion or pleasure; it was natural that
the magician should fear for the future of that son, created in thought,
limb by limb and feature by feature, in a thousand and one secret
nights.
The end of his meditations was sudden, though it was foretold in certain
signs. First (after a long drought) a faraway cloud on a hill, light and
rapid as a bird; then, toward the south, the sky which had the rose
color of the leopard\'s mouth; then the smoke which corroded the
metallic nights; finally, the panicky flight of the animals. For what
was happening had happened many centuries ago. The ruins of the fire
god\'s sanctuary were destroyed by fire. In a birdless dawn the magician
saw the concentric blaze close round the walls. For a moment, he thought
of taking refuge in the river, but then he knew that death was coming to
crown his old age and absolve him of his labors. He walked into the
shreds of flame. But they did not bite into his flesh, they caressed him
and engulfed him without heat or combustion. With relief, with
humiliation, with terror, he understood that he too was a mere
appearance, dreamt by another.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_010.html_calibre_pb_10 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_011.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_011.html_filepos157509 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_011.html_filepos157565 .calibre10}
[[The Library of Babel]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[By this art you may contemplate the variation of the 23 letters. .
.]{.calibre5}
[[The Anatomy of Melancholy,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [part 2, sect. II,
mem. IV]{.calibre5}
\
The universe (which others call the Library) is composed of an
indefinite and perhaps infinite number of hexagonal galleries, with vast
air shafts between, surrounded by very low railings. From any of the
hexagons one can see, interminably, the upper and lower floors. The
distribution of the galleries is invariable. Twenty shelves, five long
shelves per side, cover all the sides except two; their height, which is
the distance from floor to ceiling, scarcely exceeds that of a normal
bookcase. One of the free sides leads to a narrow hallway which opens
onto another gallery, identical to the first and to all the rest. To the
left and right of the hallway there are two very small closets. In the
first, one may sleep standing up; in the other, satisfy one\'s fecal
necessities, Also through here passes a spiral stairway, which sinks
abysmally and soars upwards to remote distances. In the hallway there is
a mirror which faithfully duplicates all appearances. Men usually infer
from this mirror that the Library is not infinite (if it really were,
why this illusory duplication?); I prefer to dream that its polished
surfaces represent and promise the infinite. . . Light is provided by
some spherical fruit which bear the name of lamps. There are two,
transversally placed, in each hexagon. The light they emit is
insufficient, incessant.
Like all men of the Library, I have traveled in my youth; I have
wandered in search of a book, perhaps the catalogue of catalogues; now
that my eyes can hardly decipher what I write, I am preparing to die
just a few leagues from the hexagon in which I was born. Once I am dead,
there will be no lack of pious hands to throw me over the railing; my
grave will be the fathomless air; my body will sink endlessly and decay
and dissolve in the wind generated by the fall, which is infinite. I say
that the Library is unending. The idealists argue that the hexagonal
rooms are a necessary form of absolute space or, at least, of our
intuition of space. They reason that a triangular or pentagonal room is
inconceivable. (The mystics claim that their ecstasy reveals to them a
circular chamber containing a great circular book, whose spine is
continuous and which follows the complete circle of the walls; but their
testimony is suspect; their words, obscure. This cyclical book is God.)
Let it suffice now for me to repeat the classic dictum: [The Library is
a sphere whose exact center is any one of its hexagons and whose
circumference is inaccessible.]{.italic}
There are five shelves for each of the hexagon\'s walls; each shelf
contains thirty-five books of uniform format; each book is of four
hundred and ten pages; each page, of forty lines, each line, of some
eighty letters which are black in color. There are also letters on the
spine of each book; these letters do not indicate or prefigure what the
pages will say. I know that this incoherence at one time seemed
mysterious. Before summarizing the solution (whose discovery, in spite
of its tragic projections, is perhaps the capital fact in history) I
wish to recall a few axioms.
First: The Library exists [ab aeterno.]{.italic} This truth, whose
immediate corollary is the future eternity of the world, cannot be
placed in doubt by any reasonable mind. Man, the imperfect librarian,
may be the product of chance or of malevolent demiurgi; the universe,
with its elegant endowment of shelves, of enigmatical volumes, of
inexhaustible stairways for the traveler and latrines for the seated
librarian, can only be the work of a god. To perceive the distance
between the divine and the human, it is enough to compare these crude
wavering symbols which my fallible hand scrawls on the cover of a book,
with the organic letters inside: punctual, delicate, perfectly black,
inimitably symmetrical.
Second: [The orthographical symbols are twenty-five in
number.]{.italic}[[[[[11]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.italic}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos602554){.calibre7}
This finding made it possible, three hundred years ago, to formulate a
general theory of the Library and solve satisfactorily the problem which
no conjecture had deciphered: the formless and chaotic nature of almost
all the books. One which my father saw in a hexagon on circuit fifteen
ninety-four was made up of the letters MCV, perversely repeated from the
first line to the last. Another (very much consulted in this area) is a
mere labyrinth of letters, but the next-to-last page says [Oh time thy
pyramids.]{.italic} This much is already known: for every sensible line
of straightforward statement, there are leagues of senseless
cacophonies, verbal jumbles and incoherences. (I know of an uncouth
region whose librarians repudiate the vain and superstitious custom of
finding a meaning in books and equate it with that of finding a meaning
in dreams or in the chaotic lines of one\'s palm. . . They admit that
the inventors of this writing imitated the twenty-five natural symbols,
but maintain that this application is accidental and that the books
signify nothing in themselves. This dictum, we shall see, is not
entirely fallacious.)
For a long time it was believed that these impenetrable books
corresponded to past or remote languages. It is true that the most
ancient men, the first librarians, used a language quite different from
the one we now speak; it is true that a few miles to the right the
tongue is dialectal and that ninety floors farther up, it is
incomprehensible. All this, I repeat, is true, but four hundred and ten
pages of inalterable MCV\'s cannot correspond to any language, no matter
how dialectal or rudimentary it may be. Some insinuated that each letter
could influence the following one and that the value of MCV in the third
line of page 71 was not the one the same series may have in another
position on another page, but this vague thesis did not prevail. Others
though of cryptographs; generally, this conjecture has been accepted,
though not in the sense in which it was formulated by its originators.
Five hundred years ago, the chief of an upper
hexagon[[[[12]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos602972){.calibre7}
came upon a book as confusing as the others, but which had nearly two
pages of homogeneous lines. He showed his find to a wandering decoder
who told him the lines were written in Portuguese; others said they were
Yiddish. Within a century, the language was established: a Samoyedic
Lithuanian dialect of Guarani, with classical Arabian inflections. The
content was also deciphered: some notions of combinative analysis,
illustrated with examples of variation with unlimited repetition. These
examples made it possible for a librarian of genius to discover the
fundamental law of the Library. This thinker observed that all the
books, no matter how diverse they might be, are made up of the same
elements: the space, the period, the comma, the twenty-two letters of
the alphabet. He also alleged a fact which travelers have confirmed: [In
the vast Library there are no two identical books.]{.italic} From these
two incontrovertible premises he deduced that the Library is total and
that its shelves register all the possible combinations of the
twenty-odd orthographical symbols (a number which, though extremely
vast, is not infinite): in other words, all that it is given to express,
in all languages. Everything: the minutely detailed history of the
future, the archangels\' autobiographies, the faithful catalogue of the
Library, thousands and thousands of false catalogues, the demonstration
of the fallacy of those catalogues, the demonstration of the fallacy of
the true catalogue, the Gnostic gospel of Basilides, the commentary on
that gospel, the commentary on the commentary on that gospel, the true
story of your death, the translation of every book in all languages, the
interpolations of every book in all books.
When it was proclaimed that the Library contained all books, the first
impression was one of extravagant happiness. All men felt themselves to
be the masters of an intact and secret treasure. There was no personal
or world problem whose eloquent solution did not exist in some hexagon.
The universe was justified, the universe suddenly usurped the unlimited
dimensions of hope. At that time a great deal was said about the
Vindications: books of apology and prophecy which vindicated for all
time the acts of every man in the universe and retained prodigious
arcana for his future. Thousands of the greedy abandoned their sweet
native hexagons and rushed up the stairways, urged on by the vain
intention of finding their Vindication. These pilgrims disputed in the
narrow corridors, proffered dark curses, strangled each other on the
divine stairways, flung the deceptive books into the air shafts, met
their death cast down in a similar fashion by the inhabitants of remote
regions. Others went mad. . . The Vindications exist (I have seen two
which refer to persons of the future, to persons who perhaps are not
imaginary) but the searchers did not remember that the possibility of a
man\'s finding his Vindication, or some treacherous variation thereof,
can be computed as zero.
At that time it was also hoped that a clarification of humanity\'s basic
mysteries ― the origin of the Library and of time ― might be found. It
is verisimilar that these grave mysteries could be explained in words:
if the language of philosophers is not sufficient, the multiform Library
will have produced the unprecedented language required, with its
vocabularies and grammars. For four centuries now men have exhausted the
hexagons. . . There are official searchers, [inquisitors.]{.italic} I
have seen them in the performance of their function: they always arrive
extremely tired from their journeys; they speak of a broken stairway
which almost killed them; they talk with the librarian of galleries and
stairs; sometimes they pick up the nearest volume and leaf through it,
looking for infamous words. Obviously, no one expects to discover
anything.
As was natural, this inordinate hope was followed by an excessive
depression. The certitude that some shelf in some hexagon held precious
books and that these precious books were inaccessible, seemed almost
intolerable. A blasphemous sect suggested that the searches should cease
and that all should juggle letters and symbols until they constructed,
by an improbable gift of chance, these canonical books. The authorities
were obliged to issue severe orders. The sect disappeared, but in my
childhood I have seen old men who, for long periods of time, would hide
in the latrines with some metal disks in a forbidden dice cup and feebly
mimic the divine disorder.
Others, inversely, believed that it was fundamental to eliminate useless
works. They invaded the hexagons, showed credentials which were not
always false, leafed through a volume with displeasure and condemned
whole shelves: their hygienic, ascetic furor caused the senseless
perdition of millions of books. Their name is execrated, but those who
deplore the \"treasures\" destroyed by this frenzy neglect two notable
facts. One: the Library is so enormous that any reduction of human
origin is infinitesimal. The other: every copy is unique, irreplaceable,
but (since the Library is total) there are always several hundred
thousand imperfect facsimiles: works which differ only in a letter or a
comma. Counter to general opinion, I venture to suppose that the
consequences of the Purifiers\' depredations have been exaggerated by
the horror these fanatics produced. They were urged on by the delirium
of trying to reach the books in the Crimson Hexagon: books whose format
is smaller than usual, all-powerful, illustrated and magical.
We also know of another superstition of that time: that of the Man of
the Book. On some shelf in some hexagon (men reasoned) there must exist
a book which is the formula and perfect compendium [of all the
rest:]{.italic} some librarian has gone though it and he is analogous to
a god. In the language of this zone vestiges of this remote
functionary\'s cult still persist. Many wandered in search of Him. For a
century they exhausted in vain the most varied areas. How could one
locate the venerated and secret hexagon which housed Him? Someone
proposed a regressive method: To locate book A, consult first a book B
which indicates A\'s position; to locate book B, consult first a book C,
and so on to infinity. . . In adventures such as these, I have
squandered and wasted my years. It does not seem unlikely to me that
there is a total book on some shelf of the
universe;[[[[13]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos603343){.calibre7}
I pray to the unknown gods that a man ― just one, even though it were
thousands of years ago! ― may have examined and read it. If honor and
wisdom and happiness are not for me, let them be for others. Let heaven
exist, though my place be in hell. Let me be outraged and annihilated,
but for one instant, in one being, let Your enormous Library be
justified. The impious maintain that nonsense is normal in the Library
and that the reasonable (and even humble and pure coherence) is an
almost miraculous exception. They speak (I know) of the \"feverish
Library whose chance volumes are constantly in danger of changing into
others and affirm, negate and confuse everything like a delirious
divinity.\" These words, which not only denounce the disorder but
exemplify it as well, notoriously prove their authors\' abominable taste
and desperate ignorance. In truth, the Library includes all verbal
structures, all variations permitted by the twenty-five orthographical
symbols, but not a single example of absolute nonsense. It is useless to
observe that the best volume of the many hexagons under my
administration is entitled [The Combed Thunderclap]{.italic} and another
[The Plaster Cramp]{.italic} and another [Axaxaxas mlö.]{.italic} These
phrases, at first glance incoherent, can no doubt be justified in a
cryptographical or allegorical manner; such a justification is verbal
and, [ex hypothesi,]{.italic} already figures in the Library. I cannot
combine some characters
[ ]{.italic}
[dhcmrlchtdj]{.italic}
\
which the divine Library has not foreseen and which in one of its secret
tongues do not contain a terrible meaning. No one can articulate a
syllable which is not filled with tenderness and fear, which is not, in
one of these languages, the powerful name of a god. To speak is to fall
into tautology. This wordy and useless epistle already exists in one of
the thirty volumes of the five shelves of one of the innumerable
hexagons ― and its refutation as well. (An [n]{.italic} number of
possible languages use the same vocabulary; in some of them, the symbol
[library]{.italic} allows the correct definition [a ubiquitous and
lasting system of hexagonal galleries,]{.italic} but [library]{.italic}
is [bread]{.italic} or [pyramid]{.italic} or anything else, and these
seven words which define it have another value. You who read me, are You
sure of understanding my language?)
The methodical task of writing distracts me from the present state of
men. The certitude that everything has been written negates us or turns
us into phantoms. I know of districts in which the young men prostrate
themselves before books and kiss their pages in a barbarous manner, but
they do not know how to decipher a single letter. Epidemics, heretical
conflicts, peregrinations which inevitably degenerate into banditry,
have decimated the population. I believe I have mentioned the suicides,
more and more frequent with the years. Perhaps my old age and
fearfulness deceive me, but I suspect that the human species ― the
unique species ― is about to be extinguished, but the Library will
endure: illuminated, solitary, infinite, perfectly motionless, equipped
with precious volumes, useless, incorruptible, secret.
I have just written the word \"infinite.\" I have not interpolated this
adjective out of rhetorical habit; I say that it is not illogical to
think that the world is infinite. Those who judge it to be limited
postulate that in remote places the corridors and stairways and hexagons
can conceivably come to an end ― which is absurd. Those who imagine it
to be without limit forget that the possible number of books does have
such a limit. I venture to suggest this solution to the ancient problem:
[The Library is unlimited and cyclical.]{.italic} If an eternal traveler
were to cross it in any direction, after centuries he would see that the
same volumes were repeated in the same disorder (which, thus repeated,
would be an order: the Order). My solitude is gladdened by this elegant
hope.[[[[14]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos603727){.calibre7}
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_011.html_calibre_pb_11 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_012.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_012.html_filepos175602 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[[ ]{.bold}]{.calibre6}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_012.html_filepos175789 .calibre10}
[[Funes the Memorious]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
I remember him (I have no right to utter this sacred verb, only one man
on earth had that right and he is dead) with a dark passion flower in
his hand, seeing it as no one has ever seen it, though he might look at
it from the twilight of dawn till that of evening, a whole lifetime. I
remember him, with his face taciturn and Indian-like and singularly
[remote,]{.italic} behind the cigarette. I remember (I think) his
angular, leather-braiding hands. I remember near those hands a maté
gourd bearing the Uruguayan coat of arms; I remember a yellow screen
with a vague lake landscape in the window of his house. I clearly
remember his voice: the slow, resentful, nasal voice of the old-time
dweller of the suburbs, without the Italian sibilants we have today. I
never saw him more than three times; the last was in 1887. . . I find it
very satisfactory that all those who knew him should write about him; my
testimony will perhaps be the shortest and no doubt the poorest, but not
the most impartial in the volume you will edit. My deplorable status as
an Argentine will prevent me from indulging in a dithyramb, an
obligatory genre in Uruguay whenever the subject is an Uruguayan.
[Highbrow, city slicker, dude:]{.italic} Funes never spoke these
injurious words, but I am sufficiently certain I represented for him
those misfortunes. Pedro Leandro Ipuche has written that Funes was a
precursor of the supermen, \"a vernacular and rustic Zarathustra\"; I
shall not debate the point, but one should not forget that he was also a
kid from Fray Bentos, with certain incurable limitations.
My first memory of Funes is very perspicuous. I can see him on an
afternoon in March or February of the year 1884. My father, that year,
had taken me to spend the summer in Fray Bentos. I was returning from
the San Francisco ranch with my cousin Bernardo Haedo. We were singing
as we rode along and being on horseback was not the only circumstance
determining my happiness. After a sultry day, an enormous slate-colored
storm had hidden the sky. It was urged on by a southern wind, the trees
were already going wild; I was afraid (I was hopeful) that the elemental
rain would take us by surprise in the open. We were running a kind of
race with the storm. We entered an alleyway that sank down between two
very high brick sidewalks. It had suddenly got dark; I heard some rapid
and almost secret footsteps up above; I raised my eyes and saw a boy
running along the narrow and broken path as if it were a narrow and
broken wall. I remember his baggy gaucho trousers, his rope-soled shoes,
I remember the cigarette in his hard face, against the now limitless
storm cloud. Bernardo cried to him unexpectedly: \"What time is it,
Ireneo?\" Without consulting the sky, without stopping, he replied:
\"It\'s four minutes to eight, young Bernardo Juan Francisco.\" His
voice was shrill, mocking.
I am so unperceptive that the dialogue I have just related would not
have attracted my attention had it not been stressed by my cousin, who
(I believe) was prompted by a certain local pride and the desire to show
that he was indifferent to the other\'s tripartite reply.
He told me the fellow in the alleyway was one Ireneo Funes, known for
certain peculiarities such as avoiding contact with people and always
knowing what time it was, like a clock. He added that he was the son of
the ironing woman in town, María Clementina Funes, and that some people
said his father was a doctor at the meat packers, an Englishman by the
name of O\'Connor, and others that he was a horse tamer or scout from
the Salto district. He lived with his mother, around the corner from the
Laureles house.
During the years eighty-five and eighty-six we spent the summer in
Montevideo. In eighty-seven I returned to Fray Bentos. I asked, as was
natural, about all my acquaintances and, finally, about the
\"chronometrical\" Funes. I was told he had been thrown by a half-tamed
horse on the San Francisco ranch and was left hopelessly paralyzed. I
remember the sensation of uneasy magic the news produced in me: the only
time I had seen him, we were returning from San Francisco on horseback
and he was running along a high place; this fact, told me by my cousin
Bernardo, had much of the quality of a dream made up of previous
elements. I was told he never moved from his cot, with his eyes fixed on
the fig tree in the back or on a spider web. In the afternoons, he would
let himself be brought out to the window. He carried his pride to the
point of acting as if the blow that had felled him were beneficial. . .
Twice I saw him behind the iron grating of the window, which harshly
emphasized his condition as a perpetual prisoner: once, motionless, with
his eyes closed; another time, again motionless, absorbed in the
contemplation of a fragrant sprig of santonica.
Not without a certain vaingloriousness, I had begun at that time my
methodical study of Latin. My valise contained the [De viris
illustribus]{.italic} of Lhomond, Quicherat\'s [Thesaurus,]{.italic} the
commentaries of Julius Caesar and an odd volume of Pliny\'s [Naturalis
historia,]{.italic} which then exceeded (and still exceeds) my moderate
virtues as a Latinist. Everything becomes public in a small town;
Ireneo, in his house on the outskirts, did not take long to learn of the
arrival of these anomalous books. He sent me a flowery and ceremonious
letter in which he recalled our encounter, unfortunately brief, \"on the
seventh day of February of the year 1884,\" praised the glorious
services my uncle Gregorio Haedo, deceased that same year, \"had
rendered to our two nations in the valiant battle of Ituzaingó\" and
requested the loan of any one of my volumes, accompanied by a dictionary
\"for the proper intelligence of the original text, for I am as yet
ignorant of Latin.\" He promised to return them to me in good condition,
almost immediately. His handwriting was perfect, very sharply outlined;
his orthography, of the type favored by Andrés Bello: [i]{.italic} for
[y, j]{.italic} for [g]{.italic}. At first I naturally feared a joke. My
cousins assured me that was not the case, that these were peculiarities
of Ireneo. I did not know whether to attribute to insolence, ignorance
or stupidity the idea that the arduous Latin tongue should require no
other instrument than a dictionary; to disillusion him fully, I sent him
the [Gradus ad Parnassum]{.italic} of Quicherat and the work by Pliny.
On the fourteenth of February, I received a telegram from Buenos Aires
saying I should return immediately, because my father was \"not at all
well.\" May God forgive me; the prestige of being the recipient of an
urgent telegram, the desire to communicate to all Fray Bentos the
contradiction between the negative form of the message and the
peremptory adverb, the temptation to dramatize my suffering, affecting a
virile stoicism, perhaps distracted me from all possibility of real
sorrow. When I packed my valise, I noticed the [Gradus]{.italic} and the
first volume of the [Naturalis historia]{.italic} were missing. The
[Saturn]{.italic} was sailing the next day, in the morning; that night,
after supper, I headed towards Funes\' house. I was astonished to find
the evening no less oppressive than the day had been.
At the respectable little house, Funes\' mother opened the door for me.
She told me Ireneo was in the back room and I should not be surprised to
find him in the dark, because he knew how to pass the idle hours without
lighting the candle. I crossed the tile patio, the little passageway; I
reached the second patio. There was a grape arbor; the darkness seemed
complete to me. I suddenly heard Ireneo\'s high-pitched, mocking voice.
His voice was speaking in Latin; his voice (which came from the
darkness) was articulating with morose delight a speech or prayer or
incantation. The Roman syllables resounded in the earthen patio; my fear
took them to be indecipherable, interminable; afterwards, in the
enormous dialogue of that night, I learned they formed the first
paragraph of the twenty-fourth chapter of the seventh book of the
[Naturalis historia.]{.italic} The subject of that chapter is memory;
the last words were [ut nihil non iisdem verbis redderetur
auditum.]{.italic}
Without the slightest change of voice, Ireneo told me to come in. He was
on his cot, smoking. It seems to me I did not see his face until dawn; I
believe I recall the intermittent glow of his cigarette. The room
smelled vaguely of dampness. I sat down; I repeated the story about the
telegram and my father\'s illness.
I now arrive at the most difficult point in my story. This story (it is
well the reader know it by now) has no other plot than that dialogue
which took place half a century ago. I shall not try to reproduce the
words, which are now irrecoverable. I prefer to summarize with veracity
the many things Ireneo told me. The indirect style is remote and weak; I
know I am sacrificing the efficacy of my narrative; my readers should
imagine for themselves the hesitant periods which overwhelmed me that
night.
Ireneo began by enumerating, in Latin and in Spanish, the cases of
prodigious memory recorded in the [Naturalis historia:]{.italic} Cyrus,
king of the Persians, who could call every soldier in his armies by
name; Mithridates Eupator, who administered the law in the twenty-two
languages of his empire; Simonides, inventor of the science of
mnemonics; Metrodorus, who practiced the art of faithfully repeating
what he had heard only once. In obvious good faith, Ireneo was amazed
that such cases be considered amazing. He told me that before that rainy
afternoon when the blue-gray horse threw him, he had been what all
humans are: blind, deaf, addlebrained, absent-minded. (I tried to remind
him of his exact perception of time, his memory for proper names; he
paid no attention to me.) For nineteen years he had lived as one in a
dream: he looked without seeing, listened without hearing, forgetting
everything, almost everything. When he fell, he became unconscious; when
he came to, the present was almost intolerable in its richness and
sharpness, as were his most distant and trivial memories. Somewhat later
he learned that he was paralyzed. The fact scarcely interested him. He
reasoned (he felt) that his immobility was a minimum price to pay. Now
his perception and his memory were infallible.
We, at one glance, can perceive three glasses on a table; Funes, all the
leaves and tendrils and fruit that make up a grape vine. He knew by
heart the forms of the southern clouds at dawn on the 30th of April,
1882, and could compare them in his memory with the mottled streaks on a
book in Spanish binding he had only seen once and with the outlines of
the foam raised by an oar in the Rio Negro the night before the
Quebracho uprising. These memories were not simple ones; each visual
image was linked to muscular sensations, thermal sensations, etc. He
could reconstruct all his dreams, all his half-dreams. Two or three
times he had reconstructed a whole day; he never hesitated, but each
reconstruction had required a whole day. He told me: \"I alone have more
memories than all mankind has probably had since the world has been the
world.\" And again: \"My dreams are like you people\'s waking hours.\"
And again, toward dawn: \"My memory, sir, is like a garbage heap.\" A
circle drawn on a blackboard, a right triangle, a lozenge ― all these
are forms we can fully and intuitively grasp; Ireneo could do the same
with the stormy mane of a pony, with a herd of cattle on a hill, with
the changing fire and its innumerable ashes, with the many faces of a
dead man throughout a long wake. I don\'t know how many stars he could
see in the sky.
These things he told me; neither then nor later have I ever placed them
in doubt. In those days there were no cinemas or phonographs;
nevertheless, it is odd and even incredible that no one ever performed
an experiment with Funes. The truth is that we live out our lives
putting off all that can be put off; perhaps we all know deep down that
we are immortal and that sooner or later all men will do and know all
things. Out of the darkness, Funes\' voice went on talking to me. He
told me that in 1886 he had invented an original system of numbering and
that in a very few days he had gone beyond the twenty-four-thousand
mark. He had not written it down, since anything he thought of once
would never be lost to him. His first stimulus was, I think, his
discomfort at the fact that the famous thirty-three gauchos of Uruguayan
history should require two signs and two words, in place of a single
word and a single sign. He then applied this absurd principle to the
other numbers. In place of seven thousand thirteen, he would say (for
example) [Máximo Pérez;]{.italic} in place of seven thousand fourteen,
[The Railroad;]{.italic} other numbers were [Luis Melián Lafinur,
Olimar, sulphur, the reins, the whale, the gas, the caldron, Napoleon,
Agustín de Vedia.]{.italic} In place of five hundred, he would say
[nine.]{.italic} Each word had a particular sign, a kind of mark; the
last in the series were very complicated. . . I tried to explain to him
that this rhapsody of incoherent terms was precisely the opposite of a
system of numbers. I told him that saying 365 meant saying three
hundreds, six tens, five ones, an analysis which is not found in the
\"numbers\" [The Negro Timoteo]{.italic} or [meat blanket.]{.italic}
Funes did not understand me or refused to understand me.
Locke, in the seventeenth century, postulated (and rejected) an
impossible language in which each individual thing, each stone, each
bird and each branch, would have its own name; Funes once projected an
analogous language, but discarded it because it seemed too general to
him, too ambiguous. In fact, Funes remembered not only every leaf of
every tree of every wood, but also every one of the times he had
perceived or imagined it. He decided to reduce each of his past days to
some seventy thousand memories, which would then be defined by means of
ciphers. He was dissuaded from this by two considerations: his awareness
that the task was interminable, his awareness that it was useless. He
thought that by the hour of his death he would not even have finished
classifying all the memories of his childhood.
The two projects I have indicated (an infinite vocabulary for the
natural series of numbers, a useless mental catalogue of all the images
of his memory) are senseless, but they betray a certain stammering
grandeur. They permit us to glimpse or infer the nature of Funes\'
vertiginous world. He was, let us not forget, almost incapable of ideas
of a general, Platonic sort. Not only was it difficult for him to
comprehend that the generic symbol [dog]{.italic} embraces so many
unlike individuals of diverse size and form; it bothered him that the
dog at three fourteen (seen from the side) should have the same name as
the dog at three fifteen (seen from the front). His own face in the
mirror, his own hands, surprised him every time he saw them. Swift
relates that the emperor of Lilliput could discern the movement of the
minute hand; Funes could continuously discern the tranquil advances of
corruption, of decay, of fatigue. He could note the progress of death,
of dampness. He was the solitary and lucid spectator of a multiform,
instantaneous and almost intolerably precise world. Babylon, London and
New York have overwhelmed with their ferocious splendor the imaginations
of men; no one, in their populous towers or their urgent avenues, has
felt the heat and pressure of a reality as indefatigable as that which
day and night converged upon the hapless Ireneo, in his poor South
American suburb. It was very difficult for him to sleep. To sleep is to
turn one\'s mind from the world; Funes, lying on his back on his cot in
the shadows, could imagine every crevice and every molding in the
sharply defined houses surrounding him. (I repeat that the least
important of his memories was more minute and more vivid than our
perception of physical pleasure or physical torment.) Towards the east,
along a stretch not yet divided into blocks, there were new houses,
unknown to Funes. He imagined them to be black, compact, made of
homogeneous darkness; in that direction he would turn his face in order
to sleep. He would also imagine himself at the bottom of the river,
rocked and annihilated by the current.
With no effort, he had learned English, French, Portuguese and Latin. I
suspect, however, that he was not very capable of thought. To think is
to forget differences, generalize, make abstractions. In the teeming
world of Funes, there were only details, almost immediate in their
presence.
The wary light of dawn entered the earthen patio.
Then I saw the face belonging to the voice that had spoken all night
long. Ireneo was nineteen years old; he had been born in 1868; he seemed
to me as monumental as bronze, more ancient than Egypt, older than the
prophecies and the pyramids. I thought that each of my words (that each
of my movements) would persist in his implacable memory; I was benumbed
by the fear of multiplying useless gestures.
Ireneo Funes died in 1889, of congestion of the lungs.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_012.html_calibre_pb_12 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_013.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_013.html_filepos194048 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[[ ]{.bold}]{.calibre6}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_013.html_filepos194183 .calibre10}
[[The Shape of the Sword]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
A spiteful scar crossed his face: an ash-colored and nearly perfect arc
that creased his temple at one tip and his cheek at the other. His real
name is of no importance; everyone in Tacuarembo called him the
\"Englishman from La Colorada.\" Cardoso, the owner of those fields,
refused to sell them: I understand that the Englishman resorted to an
unexpected argument: he confided to Cardoso the secret of the scar. The
Englishman came from the border, from Rio Grande del Sur; there are many
who say that in Brazil he had been a smuggler. The fields were overgrown
with grass, the waterholes brackish; the Englishman, in order to correct
those deficiencies, worked fully as hard as his laborers. They say that
he was severe to the point of cruelty, but scrupulously just. They say
also that he drank: a few times a year he locked himself into an upper
room, not to emerge until two or three days later as if from a battle or
from vertigo, pale, trembling, confused and as authoritarian as ever. I
remember the glacial eyes, the energetic leanness, the gray mustache. He
had no dealings with anyone; it is a fact that his Spanish was
rudimentary and cluttered with Brazilian. Aside from a business letter
or some pamphlet, he received no mail.
The last time I passed through the northern provinces, a sudden
overflowing of the Caraguatá stream compelled me to spend the night at
La Colorada. Within a few moments, I seemed to sense that my appearance
was inopportune; I tried to ingratiate myself with the Englishman; I
resorted to the least discerning of passions: patriotism. I claimed as
invincible a country with such spirit as England\'s. My companion
agreed, but added with a smile that he was not English. He was Irish,
from Dungarvan. Having said this, he stopped short, as if he had
revealed a secret. After dinner we went outside to look at the sky. It
had cleared up, but beyond the low hills the southern sky, streaked and
gashed by lightning, was conceiving another storm. Into the cleared up
dining room the boy who had served dinner brought a bottle of rum. We
drank for some time, in silence.
I don\'t know what time it must have been when I observed that I was
drunk; I don\'t know what inspiration or what exultation or tedium made
me mention the scar. The Englishman\'s face changed its expression; for
a few seconds I thought he was going to throw me out of the house. At
length he said in his normal voice:
\"I\'ll tell you the history of my scar under one condition: that of not
mitigating one bit of the opprobrium, of the infamous circumstances.\"
I agreed. This is the story that he told me, mixing his English with
Spanish, and even with Portuguese:
\"Around 1922, in one of the cities of Connaught, I was one of the many
who were conspiring for the independence of Ireland. Of my comrades,
some are still living, dedicated to peaceful pursuits; others,
paradoxically, are fighting on desert and sea under the English flag;
another, the most worthy, died in the courtyard of a barracks, at dawn,
shot by men filled with sleep; still others (not the most unfortunate)
met their destiny in the anonymous and almost secret battles of the
civil war. We were Republicans, Catholics; we were, I suspect,
Romantics. Ireland was for us not only the Utopian future and the
intolerable present; it was a bitter and cherished mythology, it was the
circular towers and the red marshes, it was the repudiation of Parnell
and the enormous epic poems which sang of the robbing of bulls which in
another incarnation were heroes and in others fish and mountains. . .
One afternoon I will never forget, an affiliate from Munster joined us:
one John Vincent Moon.
\"He was scarcely twenty years old. He was slender and flaccid at the
same time; he gave the uncomfortable impression of being invertebrate.
He had studied with fervor and with vanity nearly every page of Lord
knows what Communist manual; he made use of dialectical materialism to
put an end to any discussion whatever. The reasons one can have for
hating another man, or for loving him, are infinite: Moon reduced the
history of the universe to a sordid economic conflict. He affirmed that
the revolution was predestined to succeed. I told him that for a
gentleman only lost causes should be attractive. . . Night had already
fallen; we continued our disagreement in the hall, on the stairs, then
along the vague streets. The judgments Moon emitted impressed me less
than his irrefutable, apodictic note. The new comrade did not discuss:
he dictated opinions with scorn and with a certain anger.
\"As we were arriving at the outlying houses, a sudden burst of gunfire
stunned us. (Either before or afterwards we skirted the blank wall of a
factory or barracks.) We moved into an unpaved street; a soldier, huge
in the firelight, came out of a burning hut. Crying out, he ordered us
to stop. I quickened my pace; my companion did not follow. I turned
around: John Vincent Moon was motionless, fascinated, as if eternized by
fear. I then ran back and knocked the soldier to the ground with one
blow, shook Vincent Moon, insulted him and ordered him to follow. I had
to take him by the arm; the passion of fear had rendered him helpless.
We fled, into the night pierced by flames. A rifle volley reached out
for us, and a bullet nicked Moon\'s right shoulder; as we were fleeing
amid pines, he broke out in weak sobbing.
\"In that fall of 1923 I had taken shelter in General Berkeley\'s
country house. The general (whom I had never seen) was carrying out some
administrative assignment or other in Bengal; the house was less than a
century old, but it was decayed and shadowy and flourished in puzzling
corridors and in pointless antechambers. The museum and the huge library
usurped the first floor: controversial and uncongenial books which in
some manner are the history of the nineteenth century; scimitars frorn
Nishapur, along whose captured arcs there seemed to persist still the
wind and violence of battle. We entered (I seem to recall) through the
rear. Moon, trembling, his mouth parched, murmured that the events of
the night were interesting; I dressed his wound and brought him a cup of
tea; I was able to determine that his \'wound\' was superficial.
Suddenly he stammered in bewilderment:
\" \'You know, you ran a terrible risk.\'
\"I told him not to worry about it. (The habit of the civil war had
incited me to act as I did; besides, the capture of a single member
could endanger our cause.)
\"By the following day Moon had recovered his poise. He accepted a
cigarette and subjected me to a severe interrogation on the \'economic
resources of our revolutionary party.\' His questions were very lucid; I
told him (truthfully) that the situation was serious. Deep bursts of
rifle fire agitated the south. I told Moon our comrades were waiting for
us. My overcoat and my revolver were in my room; when I returned, I
found Moon stretched out on the sofa, his eyes closed. He imagined he
had a fever; he invoked a painful spasm in his shoulder.
\"At that moment I understood that his cowardice was irreparable. I
clumsily entreated him to take care of himself and went out. This
frightened man mortified me, as if I were the coward, not Vincent Moon.
Whatever one man does, it is as if all men did it. For that reason it is
not unfair that one disobedience in a garden should contaminate all
humanity; for that reason it is not unjust that the crucifixion of a
single Jew should be sufficient to save it. Perhaps Schopenhauer was
right: I am all other men, any man is all men, Shakespeare is in some
manner the miserable John Vincent Moon.
\"Nine days we spent in the general\'s enormous house. Of the agonies
and the successes of the war I shall not speak: I propose to relate the
history of the scar that insults me. In my memory, those nine days form
only a single day, save for the next to the last, when our men broke
into a barracks and we were able to avenge precisely the sixteen
comrades who had been machine-gunned in Elphin. I slipped out of the
house towards dawn, in the confusion of daybreak. At nightfall I was
back. My companion was waiting for me upstairs: his wound did not permit
him to descend to the ground floor. I recall him having some volume of
strategy in his hand, F. N. Maude or Clausewitz. \'The weapon I prefer
is the artillery,\' he confessed to me one night. He inquired into our
plans; he liked to censure them or revise them. He also was accustomed
to denouncing \'our deplorable economic basis\'; dogmatic and gloomy, he
predicted the disastrous end. [\'C\'est une affaire flambée,\']{.italic}
he murmured. In order to show that he was indifferent to being a
physical coward, he magnified his mental arrogance. In this way, for
good or for bad, nine days elapsed.
\"On the tenth day the city fell definitely to the Black and Tans. Tall,
silent horsemen patrolled the roads; ashes and smoke rode on the wind;
on the corner I saw a corpse thrown to the ground, an impression less
firm in my memory than that of a dummy on which the soldiers endlessly
practiced their marksmanship, in the middle of the square. . . I had
left when dawn was in the sky; before noon I returned. Moon, in the
library, was speaking with someone; the tone of his voice told me he was
talking on the telephone. Then I heard my name; then, that I would
return at seven; then, the suggestion that they should arrest me as I
was crossing the garden. My reasonable friend was reasonably selling me
out. I heard him demand guarantees of personal safety.
\"Here my story is confused and becomes lost. I know that I pursued the
informer along the black, nightmarish halls and along deep stairways of
dizzyness. Moon knew the house very well, much better than I. One or two
times I lost him. I cornered him before the soldiers stopped me. From
one of the general\'s collections of arms I tore a cutlass: with that
half moon I carved into his face forever a half moon of blood. Borges,
to you, a stranger, I have made this confession. Your contempt does not
grieve me so much.\"
Here the narrator stopped. I noticed that his hands were shaking.
\"And Moon?\" I asked him.
\"He collected his Judas money and fled to Brazil. That afternoon, in
the square, he saw a dummy shot up by some drunken men.\"
I waited in vain for the rest of the story. Finally I told him to go on.
Then a sob went through his body; and with a weak gentleness he pointed
to the whitish curved scar.
\"You don\'t believe me?\" he stammered. \"Don\'t you see that I carry
written on my face the mark of my infamy? I have told you the story thus
so that you would hear me to the end. I denounced the man who protected
me: I am Vincent Moon. Now despise me.\"
\
[To E. H. M.]{.italic}
[Translated by D. A. Y.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_013.html_calibre_pb_13 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_014.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_014.html_filepos206162 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_014.html_filepos206327 .calibre10}
[[Theme of the Traitor and the Hero]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[So the Platonic year]{.calibre5}
[Whirls out new right and wrong,]{.calibre5}
[Whirls in the old instead;]{.calibre5}
[All men are dancers and their tread]{.calibre5}
[Goes to the barbarous clangour of a gong.]{.calibre5}
[ W. B. Yeats:]{.calibre5} [[The Tower]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
Under the notable influence of Chesterton (contriver and embellisher of
elegant mysteries) and the palace counselor Leibniz (inventor of the
pre-established harmony), in my idle afternoons I have imagined this
story plot which I shall perhaps write someday and which already
justifies me somehow. Details, rectifications, adjustments are lacking;
there are zones of the story not yet revealed to me; today, January 3rd,
1944, I seem to see it as follows:
The action takes place in an oppressed and tenacious country: Poland,
Ireland, the Venetian Republic, some South American or Balkan state . .
. Or rather it has taken place, since, though the narrator is
contemporary, his story occurred towards the middle or the beginning of
the nineteenth century. Let us say (for narrative convenience) Ireland;
let us say in 1824. The narrator\'s name is Ryan; he is the
great-grandson of the young, the heroic, the beautiful, the assassinated
Fergus Kilpatrick, whose grave was mysteriously violated, whose name
illustrated the verses of Browning and Hugo, whose statue presides over
a gray hill amid red marshes.
Kilpatrick was a conspirator, a secret and glorious captain of
conspirators; like Moses, who from the land of Moab glimpsed but could
not reach the promised land, Kilpatrick perished on the eve of the
victorious revolt which he had premeditated and dreamt of. The first
centenary of his death draws near; the circumstances of the crime are
enigmatic; Ryan, engaged in writing a biography of the hero, discovers
that the enigma exceeds the confines of a simple police investigation.
Kilpatrick was murdered in a theater; the British police never found the
killer; the historians maintain that this scarcely soils their good
reputation, since it was probably the police themselves who had him
killed. Other facets of the enigma disturb Ryan. They are of a cyclic
nature: they seem to repeat or combine events of remote regions, of
remote ages. For example, no one is unaware that the officers who
examined the hero\'s body found a sealed letter in which he was warned
of the risk of attending the theater that evening; likewise Julius
Caesar, on his way to the place where his friends\' daggers awaited him,
received a note he never read, in which the treachery was declared along
with the traitors\' names. Caesar\'s wife, Calpurnia, saw in a dream the
destruction of a tower decreed him by the Senate; false and anonymous
rumors on the eve of Kilpatrick\'s death publicized throughout the
country that the circular tower of Kilgarvan had burned, which could be
taken as a presage, for he had been born in Kilgarvan. These
parallelisms (and others) between the story of Caesar and the story of
an Irish conspirator lead Ryan to suppose the existence of a secret form
of time, a pattern of repeated lines. He thinks of the decimal history
conceived by Condorcet, of the morphologies proposed by Hegel, Spengler
and Vico, of Hesiod\'s men, who degenerate from gold to iron. He thinks
of the transmigration of souls, a doctrine that lends horror to Celtic
literature and that Caesar himself attributed to the British druids; he
thinks that, before having been Fergus Kilpatrick, Fergus Kilpatrick was
Julius Caesar. He is rescued from these circular labyrinths by a curious
finding, a finding which then sinks him into other, more inextricable
and heterogeneous labyrinths: certain words uttered by a beggar who
spoke with Fergus Kilpatrick the day of his death were prefigured by
Shakespeare in the tragedy [Macbeth.]{.italic} That history should have
copied history was already sufficiently astonishing; that history should
copy literature was inconceivable. . . Ryan finds that, in 1814, James
Alexander Nolan, the oldest of the hero\'s companions, had translated
the principal dramas of Shakespeare into Gaelic; among these was [Julius
Caesar.]{.italic} He also discovers in the archives the manuscript of an
article by Nolan on the Swiss [Festspiele]{.italic}: vast and errant
theatrical representations which require thousands of actors and repeat
historical episodes in the very cities and mountains where they took
place. Another unpublished document reveals to him that, a few days
before the end, Kilpatrick, presiding over the last meeting, had signed
the order for the execution of a traitor whose name has been deleted
from the records. This order does not accord with Kilpatrick\'s merciful
nature. Ryan investigates the matter (this investigation is one of the
gaps in my plot) and manages to decipher the enigma.
Kilpatrick was killed in a theater, but the entire city was a theater as
well, and the actors were legion, and the drama crowned by his death
extended over many days and many nights.
This is what happened:
On the 2nd of August, 1824, the conspirators gathered. The country was
ripe for revolt; something, however, always failed: there was a traitor
in the group. Fergus Kilpatrick had charged James Nolan with the
responsibility of discovering the traitor. Nolan carried out his
assignment: he announced in the very midst of the meeting that the
traitor was Kilpatrick himself. He demonstrated the truth of his
accusation with irrefutable proof; the conspirators condemned their
president to die. He signed his own sentence, but begged that his
punishment not harm his country.
It was then that Nolan conceived his strange scheme. Ireland idolized
Kilpatrick; the most tenuous suspicion of his infamy would have
jeopardized the revolt; Nolan proposed a plan which made of the
traitor\'s execution an instrument for the country\'s emancipation. He
suggested that the condemned man die at the hands of an unknown assassin
in deliberately dramatic circumstances which would remain engraved in
the imagination of the people and would hasten the revolt. Kilpatrick
swore he would take part in the scheme, which gave him the occasion to
redeem himself and for which his death would provide the final flourish.
Nolan, urged on by time, was not able to invent all the circumstances of
the multiple execution; he had to plagiarize another dramatist, the
English enemy William Shakespeare. He repeated scenes from
[Macbeth,]{.italic} from [Julius Caesar.]{.italic} The public and secret
enactment comprised various days. The condemned man entered Dublin,
discussed, acted, prayed, reproved, uttered words of pathos, and each of
these gestures, to be reflected in his glory, had been pre-established
by Nolan. Hundreds of actors collaborated with the protagonist; the role
of some was complex; that of others momentary. The things they did and
said endure in the history books, in the impassioned memory of Ireland.
Kilpatrick, swept along by this minutely detailed destiny which both
redeemed him and destroyed him, more than once enriched the text of his
judge with improvised acts and words. Thus the populous drama unfolded
in time, until on the 6th of August, 1824, in a theater box with
funereal curtains prefiguring Lincoln\'s, a long-desired bullet entered
the breast of the traitor and hero, who, amid two effusions of sudden
blood, was scarcely able to articulate a few foreseen words.
In Nolan\'s work, the passages imitated from Shakespeare are the
[least]{.italic} dramatic; Ryan suspects that the author interpolated
them so that in the future someone might hit upon the truth. He
understands that he too forms part of Nolan\'s plot. . . After a series
of tenacious hesitations, he resolves to keep his discovery silent. He
publishes a book dedicated to the hero\'s glory; this too, perhaps, was
foreseen.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_014.html_calibre_pb_14 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_015.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_015.html_filepos215123 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_015.html_filepos215179 .calibre10}
[[Death and the Compass]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Of the many problems which exercised the reckless discernment of
Lönnrot, none was so strange ― so rigorously strange, shall we say ― as
the periodic series of bloody events which culminated at the villa of
Triste-le-Roy, amid the ceaseless aroma of the eucalypti. It is true
that Erik Lönnrot failed to prevent the last murder, but that he foresaw
it is indisputable. Neither did he guess the identity of Yarmolinsky\'s
luckless assassin, but he did succeed in divining the secret morphology
behind the fiendish series as well as the participation of Red
Scharlach, whose other nickname is Scharlach the Dandy. That criminal
(as countless others) had sworn on his honor to kill Lönnrot, but the
latter could never be intimidated. Lönnrot believed himself a pure
reasoner, an Auguste Dupin, but there was something of the adventurer in
him, and even a little of the gambler.
The first murder occurred in the Hôtel du Nord ― that tall prism which
dominates the estuary whose waters are the color of the desert. To that
tower (which quite glaringly unites the hateful whiteness of a hospital,
the numbered divisibility of a jail, and the general appearance of a
bordello) there came on the third day of December the delegate from
Podolsk to the Third Talmudic Congress, Doctor Marcel Yarmolinsky, a
gray-bearded man with gray eyes. We shall never know whether the Hôtel
du Nord pleased him; he accepted it with the ancient resignation which
had allowed him to endure three years of war in the Carpathians and
three thousand years of oppression and pogroms. He was given a room on
Floor R, across from the suite which was occupied ― not without splendor
― by the Tetrarch of Galilee. Yarmolinsky supped, postponed until the
following day an inspection of the unknown city, arranged in a
[placard]{.italic} his many books and few personal possessions, and
before midnight extinguished his light. (Thus declared the Tetrarch\'s
chauffeur who slept in the adjoining room.) On the fourth, at 11:03
A.M., the editor of the [Yidische Zaitung]{.italic} put in a call to
him; Doctor Yarmolinsky did not answer. He was found in his room, his
face already a little dark, nearly nude beneath a large, anachronistic
cape. He was lying not far from the door which opened on the hall; a
deep knife wound had split his breast. A few hours later, in the same
room amid journalists, photographers and policemen, Inspector Treviranus
and Lönnrot were calmly discussing the problem.
\"No need to look for a three-legged cat here,\" Treviranus was saying
as he brandished an imperious cigar. \"We all know that the Tetrarch of
Galilee owns the finest sapphires in the world. Someone, intending to
steal them, must have broken in here by mistake. Yarmolinsky got up; the
robber had to kill him. How does it sound to you?\"
\"Possible, but not interesting,\" Lönnrot answered. \"You\'ll reply
that reality hasn\'t the least obligation to be interesting. And I\'ll
answer you that reality may avoid that obligation but that hypotheses
may not. In the hypothesis that you propose, chance intervenes
copiously. Here we have a dead rabbi; I would prefer a purely rabbinical
explanation, not the imaginary mischances of an imaginary robber.\"
Treviranus replied ill-humoredly:
\"I\'m not interested in rabbinical explanations. I am interested in
capturing the man who stabbed this unknown person.\"
\"Not so unknown,\" corrected Lönnrot. \"Here are his complete works.\"
He indicated in the wall-cupboard a row of tall books: a [Vindication of
the Cabala; An Examination of the Philosophy of Robert Fludd;]{.italic}
a literal translation of the [Sepher Yezirah;]{.italic} a [Biography of
the Baal Shem;]{.italic} a [History of the Hasidic Sect;]{.italic} a
monograph (in German) on the Tetragrammaton; another, on the divine
nomenclature of the Pentateuch. The inspector regarded them with dread,
almost with repulsion. Then he began to laugh.
\"I\'m a poor Christian,\" he said. \"Carry off those musty volumes if
you want; I don\'t have any time to waste on Jewish superstitions.\"
\"Maybe the crime belongs to the history of Jewish superstitions,\"
murmured Lönnrot.
\"Like Christianity,\" the editor of the [Yidische Zaitung]{.italic}
ventured to add. He was myopic, an atheist and very shy.
No one answered him. One of the agents had found in the small typewriter
a piece of paper on which was written the following unfinished sentence:
\
[[The first letter of the Name has been uttered]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
Lönnrot abstained from smiling. Suddenly become a bibliophile or
Hebraist, he ordered a package made of the dead man\'s books and carried
them off to his apartment. Indifferent to the police investigation, he
dedicated himself to studying them. One large octavo volume revealed to
him the teachings of Israel Baal Shem Tobh, founder of the sect of the
Pious; another, the virtues and terrors of the Tetragrammaton, which is
the unutterable name of God; another, the thesis that God has a secret
name, in which is epitomized (as in the crystal sphere which the
Persians ascribe to Alexander of Macedonia) his ninth attribute,
eternity ― that is to say, the immediate knowledge of all things that
will be, which are and which have been in the universe. Tradition
numbers ninety-nine names of God; the Hebraists attribute that imperfect
number to magical fear of even numbers; the Hasidim reason that that
hiatus indicates a hundredth name ― the Absolute Name.
From this erudition Lönnrot was distracted, a few days later, by the
appearance of the editor of the [Yidische Zaitung.]{.italic} The latter
wanted to talk about the murder; Lönnrot preferred to discuss the
diverse names of God; the journalist declared, in three columns, that
the investigator, Erik Lönnrot, had dedicated himself to studying the
names of God in order to come across the name of the murderer. Lönnrot,
accustomed to the simplifications of journalism, did not become
indignant. One of those enterprising shopkeepers who have discovered
that any given man is resigned to buying any given book published a
popular edition of the [History of the Hasidic Sect.]{.italic}
The second murder occurred on the evening of the third of January, in
the most deserted and empty corner of the capital\'s western suburbs.
Towards dawn, one of the gendarmes who patrol those solitudes on
horseback saw a man in a poncho, lying prone in the shadow of an old
paint shop. The harsh features seemed to be masked in blood; a deep
knife wound had split his breast. On the wall, across the yellow and red
diamonds, were some words written in chalk. The gendarme spelled them
out. . . That afternoon, Treviranus and Lönnrot headed for the remote
scene of the crime. To the left and right of the automobile the city
disintegrated; the firmament grew and houses were of less importance
than a brick kiln or a poplar tree. They arrived at their miserable
destination: an alley\'s end, with rose-colored walls which somehow
seemed to reflect the extravagant sunset. The dead man had already been
identified. He was Daniel Simon Azevedo, an individual of some fame in
the old northern suburbs, who had risen from wagon driver to political
tough, then degenerated to a thief and even an informer. (The singular
style of his death seemed appropriate to them: Azevedo was the last
representative of a generation of bandits who knew how to manipulate a
dagger, but not a revolver.) The words in chalk were the following:
\
[[The second letter of the Name has been uttered]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
The third murder occurred on the night of the third of February. A
little before one o\'clock, the telephone in Inspector Treviranus\'
office rang. In avid secretiveness, a man with a guttural voice spoke;
he said his name was Ginzberg (or Ginsburg) and that he was prepared to
communicate, for reasonable remuneration, the events surrounding the two
sacrifices of Azevedo and Yarmolinsky. A discordant sound of whistles
and horns drowned out the informer\'s voice. Then, the connection was
broken off. Without yet rejecting the possibility of a hoax (after all,
it was carnival time), Treviranus found out that he had been called from
the Liverpool House, a tavern on the rue de Toulon, that dingy street
where side by side exist the cosmorama and the coffee shop, the bawdy
house and the bible sellers. Treviranus spoke with the owner. The latter
(Black Finnegan, an old Irish criminal who was immersed in, almost
overcome by, respectability) told him that the last person to use the
phone was a lodger, a certain Gryphius, who had just left with some
friends. Treviranus went immediately to Liverpool House. The owner
related the following. Eight days ago Gryphius had rented a room above
the tavern. He was a sharp-featured man with a nebulous gray beard, and
was shabbily dressed in black; Finnegan (who used the room for a purpose
which Treviranus guessed) demanded a rent which was undoubtedly
excessive; Gryphius paid the stipulated sum without hesitation. He
almost never went out; he dined and lunched in his room; his face was
scarcely known in the bar. On the night in question, he came downstairs
to make a phone call from Finnegan\'s office. A closed cab stopped in
front of the tavern. The driver didn\'t move from his seat; several
patrons recalled that he was wearing a bear\'s mask. Two harlequins got
out of the cab; they were of short stature and no one failed to observe
that they were very drunk. With a tooting of horns, they burst into
Finnegan\'s office; they embraced Gryphius, who appeared to recognize
them but responded coldly; they exchanged a few words in Yiddish ― he in
a low, guttural voice, they in high-pitched, false voices ― and then
went up to the room. Within a quarter hour the three descended, very
happy. Gryphius, staggering, seemed as drunk as the others. He walked ―
tall and dizzy ― in the middle, between the masked harlequins. (One of
the women at the bar remembered the yellow, red and green diamonds.)
Twice he stumbled; twice he was caught and held by the harlequins.
Moving off toward the inner harbor which enclosed a rectangular body of
water, the three got into the cab and disappeared. From the footboard of
the cab, the last of the harlequins scrawled an obscene figure and a
sentence on one of the slates of the pier shed.
Treviranus saw the sentence. It was virtually predictable. It said:
\
[[The last of the letters of the Name has been
uttered]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
Afterwards, he examined the small room of Gryphius-Ginzberg. On the
floor there was a brusque star of blood, in the corners, traces of
cigarettes of a Hungarian brand; in a cabinet, a book in Latin ― the
[Philologus Hebraeo-Graecus]{.italic} (1739) of Leusden ― with several
manuscript notes. Treviranus looked it over with indignation and had
Lönnrot located. The latter, without removing his hat, began to read
while the inspector was interrogating the contradictory witnesses to the
possible kidnapping. At four o\'clock they left. Out on the twisted rue
de Toulon, as they were treading on the dead serpentines of the dawn,
Treviranus said:
\"And what if all this business tonight were just a mock rehearsal?\"
Erik Lönnrot smiled and, with all gravity, read a passage (which was
underlined) from the thirty-third dissertation of the [Philologus: Dies
Judacorum incipit ad soils occasu usque ad soils occasum diei
sequentis.]{.italic}
\"This means,\" he added, \" \'The Hebrew day begins at sundown and
lasts until the following sundown.\' \"
The inspector attempted an irony.
\"Is that fact the most valuable one you\'ve come across tonight?\"
\"No. Even more valuable was a word that Ginzberg used.\"
The afternoon papers did not overlook the periodic disappearances. [La
Cruz de la Espada]{.italic} contrasted them with the admirable
discipline and order of the last Hermetical Congress; Ernst Palast, in
[El Mártir,]{.italic} criticized \"the intolerable delays in this
clandestine and frugal pogrom, which has taken three months to murder
three Jews\"; the [Yidische Zaitung]{.italic} rejected the horrible
hypothesis of an anti-Semitic plot, \"even though many penetrating
intellects admit no other solution to the triple mystery\"; the most
illustrious gunman of the south, Dandy Red Scharlach, swore that in his
district similar crimes could never occur, and he accused Inspector
Franz Treviranus of culpable negligence.
On the night of March first, the inspector received an
impressive-looking sealed envelope. He opened it; the envelope contained
a letter signed \"Baruch Spinoza\" and a detailed plan of the city,
obviously torn from a Baedeker. The letter prophesied that on the third
of March there would not be a fourth murder, since the paint shop in the
west, the tavern on the rue de Toulon and the Hôtel du Nord were \"the
perfect vertices of a mystic equilateral triangle\"; the map
demonstrated in red ink the regularity of the triangle. Treviranus read
the [more geometrico]{.italic} argument with resignation, and sent the
letter and the map to Lönnrot ― who, unquestionably, was deserving of
such madnesses.
Erik Lönnrot studied them. The three locations were in fact equidistant.
Symmetry in time (the third of December, the third of January, the third
of February); symmetry in space as well. . . Suddenly, he felt as if he
were on the point of solving the mystery. A set of calipers and a
compass completed his quick intuition. He smiled, pronounced the word
Tetragrammaton (of recent acquisition) and phoned the inspector. He
said:
\"Thank you for the equilateral triangle you sent me last night. It has
enabled me to solve the problem. This Friday the criminals will be in
jail, we may rest assured.\"
\"Then they\'re not planning a fourth murder?\"
\"Precisely because they [are]{.italic} planning a fourth murder we can
rest assured.\"
Lönnrot hung up. One hour later he was traveling on one of the Southern
Railway\'s trains, in the direction of the abandoned villa of
Triste-le-Roy. To the south of the city of our story, flows a blind
little river of muddy water, defamed by refuse and garbage. On the far
side is an industrial suburb where, under the protection of a political
boss from Barcelona, gunmen thrive. Lönnrot smiled at the thought that
the most celebrated gunman of all ― Red Scharlach ― would have given a
great deal to know of his clandestine visit. Azevedo had been an
associate of Scharlach; Lönnrot considered the remote possibility that
the fourth victim might be Scharlach himself. Then he rejected the idea.
. . He had very nearly deciphered the problem; mere circumstances,
reality (names, prison records, faces, judicial and penal proceedings)
hardly interested him now. He wanted to travel a bit, he wanted to rest
from three months of sedentary investigation. He reflected that the
explanation of the murders was in an anonymous triangle and a dusty
Greek word. The mystery appeared almost crystalline to him now; he was
mortified to have dedicated a hundred days to it.
The train stopped at a silent loading station. Lönnrot got off. It was
one of those deserted afternoons that seem like dawns. The air of the
turbid, puddled plain was damp and cold. Lönnrot began walking along the
countryside. He saw dogs, he saw a car on a siding, he saw the horizon,
he saw a silver-colored horse drinking the crapulous water of a puddle.
It was growing dark when he saw the rectangular belvedere of the villa
of Triste-le-Roy, almost as tall as the black eucalypti which surrounded
it. He thought that scarcely one dawning and one nightfall (an ancient
splendor in the east and another in the west) separated him from the
moment long desired by the seekers of the Name.
A rusty wrought-iron fence defined the irregular perimeter of the villa.
The main gate was closed. Lönnrot, without much hope of getting in,
circled the area. Once again before the insurmountable gate, he placed
his hand between the bars almost mechanically and encountered the bolt.
The creaking of the iron surprised him. With a laborious passivity the
whole gate swung back.
Lönnrot advanced among the eucalypti treading on confused generations of
rigid, broken leaves. Viewed from anear, the house of the villa of
Triste-le-Roy abounded in pointless symmetries and in maniacal
repetitions: to one Diana in a murky niche corresponded a second Diana
in another niche; one balcony was reflected in another balcony; double
stairways led to double balustrades. A two-faced Hermes projected a
monstrous shadow. Lönnrot circled the house as he had the villa. He
examined everything; beneath the level of the terrace he saw a narrow
Venetian blind.
He pushed it; a few marble steps descended to a vault. Lönnrot, who had
now perceived the architect\'s preferences, guessed that at the opposite
wall there would be another stairway. He found it, ascended, raised his
hands and opened the trap door.
A brilliant light led him to a window. He opened it: a yellow, rounded
moon defined two silent fountains in the melancholy garden. Lönnrot
explored the house. Through anterooms and galleries he passed to
duplicate patios, and time after time to the same patio. He ascended the
dusty stairs to circular antechambers; he was multiplied infinitely in
opposing mirrors; he grew tired of opening or half-opening windows which
revealed outside the same desolate garden from various heights and
various angles; inside, only pieces of furniture wrapped in yellow dust
sheets and chandeliers bound up in tarlatan. A bedroom detained him; in
that bedroom, one single flower in a porcelain vase; at the first touch
the ancient petals fell apart. On the second floor, on the top floor,
the house seemed infinite and expanding. [The house is not this
large,]{.italic} he thought. [Other things are making it seem larger:
the dim light, the symmetry, the mirrors, so many years, my
unfamiliarity, the loneliness.]{.italic}
By way of a spiral staircase he arrived at the oriel. The early evening
moon shone through the diamonds of the window; they were yellow, red and
green. An astonishing, dizzying recollection struck him.
Two men of short stature, robust and ferocious, threw themselves on him
and disarmed him; another, very tall, saluted him gravely and said:
\"You are very kind. You have saved us a night and a day.\" It was Red
Scharlach. The men handcuffed Lönnrot. The latter at length recovered
his voice. \"Scharlach, are you looking for the Secret Name?\" Scharlach
remained standing, indifferent. He had not participated in the brief
struggle, and he scarcely extended his hand to receive Lönnrot\'s
revolver. He spoke; Lönnrot noted in his voice a fatigued triumph, a
hatred the size of the universe, a sadness not less than that hatred.
\"No,\" said Scharlach. \"I am seeking something more ephemeral and
perishable, I am seeking Erik Lönnrot. Three years ago, in a gambling
house on the rue de Toulon, you arrested my brother and had him sent to
jail. My men slipped me away in a coupe from the gun battle with a
policeman\'s bullet in my stomach. Nine days and nine nights I lay in
agony in this desolate, symmetrical villa; fever was demolishing me, and
the odious two-faced Janus who watches the twilights and the dawns lent
horror to my dreams and to my waking. I came to abominate my body, I
came to sense that two eyes, two hands, two lungs are as monstrous as
two faces. An Irishman tried to convert me to the faith of Jesus; he
repeated to me the phrase of the [goyim:]{.italic} All roads lead to
Rome. At night my delirium nurtured itself on that metaphor; I felt that
the world was a labyrinth, from which it was impossible to flee, for all
roads, though they pretend to lead to the north or south, actually lead
to Rome, which was also the quadrilateral jail where my brother was
dying and the villa of Triste-le-Roy. On those nights I swore by the God
who sees with two faces and by all the gods of fever and of the mirrors
to weave a labyrinth around the man who had imprisoned my brother. I
have woven it and it is firm: the ingredients are a dead heresiologist,
a compass, an eighteenth-century sect, a Greek word, a dagger, the
diamonds of a paint shop.
\"The first term of the sequence was given to me by chance. I had
planned with a few colleagues ― among them Daniel Azevedo ― the robbery
of the Tetrarch\'s sapphires. Azevedo betrayed us: he got drunk with the
money that we had advanced him and he undertook the job a day early. He
got lost in the vastness of the hotel; around two in the morning he
stumbled into Yarmolinsky\'s room. The latter, harassed by insomnia, had
started to write. He was working on some notes, apparently, for an
article on the Name of God; he had already written the words: [The first
letter of the Name has been uttered.]{.italic} Azevedo warned him to be
silent; Yarmolinsky reached out his hand for the bell which would awaken
the hotel\'s forces; Azevedo countered with a single stab in the chest.
It was almost a reflex action; half a century of violence had taught him
that the easiest and surest thing is to kill. . . Ten days later I
learned through the [Yidische Zaitung]{.italic} that you were seeking in
Yarmolinsky\'s writings the key to his death. I read the [History of the
Hasidic Sect;]{.italic} I learned that the reverent fear of uttering the
Name of God had given rise to the doctrine that that Name is all
powerful and recondite. I discovered that some Hasidim, in search of
that secret Name, had gone so far as to perform human sacrifices. . . I
knew that you would make the conjecture that the Hasidim had sacrificed
the rabbi; I set myself the task of justifying that conjecture.
\"Marcel Yarmolinsky died on the night of December third; for the second
\'sacrifice\' I selected the night of January third. He died in the
north; for the second \'sacrifice\' a place in the west was suitable.
Daniel Azevedo was the necessary victim. He deserved death; he was
impulsive, a traitor; his apprehension could destroy the entire plan.
One of us stabbed him; in order to link his corpse to the other one I
wrote on the paint shop diamonds: [The second letter of the Name has
been uttered.]{.italic}
\"The third murder was produced on the third of February. It was, as
Treviranus guessed, a mere sham. I am Gryphius-Ginzberg-Ginsburg; I
endured an interminable week (supplemented by a tenuous fake beard) in
the perverse cubicle on the rue de Toulon, until my friends abducted me.
From the footboard of the cab, one of them wrote on a post: [The last of
the letters of the Name has been uttered.]{.italic} That sentence
revealed that the series of murders was [triple.]{.italic} Thus the
public understood it; I, nevertheless, interspersed repeated signs that
would allow you, Erik Lönnrot, the reasoner, to understand that the
series was quadruple. A portent in the north, others in the east and
west, demand a fourth portent in the south; the Tetragrammaton ― the
name of God, JHVH ― is made up of [four]{.italic} letters; the
harlequins and the paint shop sign suggested [four]{.italic} points. In
the manual of Leusden I underlined a certain passage: that passage
manifests that Hebrews compute the day from sunset to sunset; that
passage makes known that the deaths occurred on the [fourth]{.italic} of
each month. I sent the equilateral triangle to Treviranus. I foresaw
that you would add the missing point. The point which would form a
perfect rhomb, the point which fixes in advance where a punctual death
awaits you. I have premeditated everything, Erik Lönnrot, in order to
attract you to the solitudes of Triste-le-Roy.\"
Lönnrot avoided Scharlach\'s eyes. He looked at the trees and the sky
subdivided into diamonds of turbid yellow, green and red. He felt
faintly cold, and he felt, too, an impersonal ― almost anonymous ―
sadness. It was already night; from the dusty garden came the futile cry
of a bird. For the last time, Lönnrot considered the problem of the
symmetrical and periodic deaths.
\"In your labyrinth there are three lines too many,\" he said at last.
\"I know of one Greek labyrinth which is a single straight line. Along
that line so many philosophers have lost themselves that a mere
detective might well do so, too. Scharlach, when in some other
incarnation you hunt me, pretend to commit (or do commit) a crime at A,
then a second crime at B, eight kilometers from A, then a third crime at
C, four kilometers from A and B, half-way between the two. Wait for me
afterwards at D, two kilometers from A and C, again halfway between
both. Kill me at D, as you are now going to kill me at Triste-le-Roy.\"
\"The next time I kill you,\" replied Scharlach, \"I promise you that
labyrinth, consisting of a single line which is invisible and
unceasing.\"
He moved back a few steps. Then, very carefully, he fired.
\
[For Mandie Molina Vedia]{.italic}
[Translated by D. A. Y.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_015.html_calibre_pb_15 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_016.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_016.html_filepos242459 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_016.html_filepos242515 .calibre10}
[[The Secret Miracle]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[And God had him die for a hundred]{.calibre5}
[years and then revived him and said:]{.calibre5}
[\"How long have you been here?\"]{.calibre5}
[\"A day or a part of a day,\" he answered.]{.calibre5}
[ Koran, II, 261]{.calibre5}
\
The night of March 14, 1943, in an apartment in the Zeltnergasse of
Prague, Jaromir Hladik, the author of the unfinished drama entitled [The
Enemies,]{.italic} of [Vindication of Eternity,]{.italic} and of a study
of the indirect Jewish sources of Jakob Böhme, had a dream of a long
game of chess. The players were not two persons, but two illustrious
families; the game had been going on for centuries. Nobody could
remember what the stakes were, but it was rumored that they were
enormous, perhaps infinite; the chessmen and the board were in a secret
tower. Jaromir (in his dream) was the first-born of one of the
contending families. The clock struck the hour for the game, which could
not be postponed. The dreamer raced over the sands of a rainy desert,
and was unable to recall either the pieces or the rules of chess. At
that moment he awoke. The clangor of the rain and of the terrible clocks
ceased. A rhythmic, unanimous noise, punctuated by shouts of command,
arose from the Zeltnergasse. It was dawn, and the armored vanguard of
the Third Reich was entering Prague.
On the nineteenth the authorities received a denunciation; that same
nineteenth, toward evening, Jaromir Hladik was arrested. He was taken to
an aseptic, white barracks on the opposite bank of the Moldau. He was
unable to refute a single one of the Gestapo\'s charges; his mother\'s
family name was Jaroslavski, he was of Jewish blood, his study on Böhme
had a marked Jewish emphasis, his signature had been one more on the
protest against the [Anschluss.]{.italic} In 1928 he had translated the
[Sepher Yezirah]{.italic} for the publishing house of Hermann Barsdorf.
The fulsome catalogue of the firm had exaggerated, for publicity
purposes, the translator\'s reputation, and the catalogue had been
examined by Julius Rothe, one of the officials who held Hladik\'s fate
in his hands. There is not a person who, except in the field of his own
specialization, is not credulous; two or three adjectives in Gothic type
were enough to persuade Julius Rothe of Hladik\'s importance, and he
ordered him sentenced to death [pour encourager les autres.]{.italic}
The execution was set for March 29th, at 9:00 A.M. This delay (whose
importance the reader will grasp later) was owing to the desire on the
authorities\' part to proceed impersonally and slowly, after the manner
of vegetables and plants.
Hladik\'s first reaction was mere terror. He felt he would not have
shrunk from the gallows, the block, or the knife, but that death by a
firing squad was unbearable. In vain he tried to convince himself that
the plain, unvarnished fact of dying was the fearsome thing, not the
attendant circumstances. He never wearied of conjuring up these
circumstances, senselessly trying to exhaust all their possible
variations. He infinitely anticipated the process of his dying, from the
sleepless dawn to the mysterious volley. Before the day set by Julius
Rothe he died hundreds of deaths in courtyards whose forms and angles
strained geometrical probabilities, machine-gunned by variable soldiers
in changing numbers, who at times killed him from a distance, at others
from close by. He faced these imaginary executions with real terror
(perhaps with real bravery); each simulacrum lasted a few seconds. When
the circle was closed, Jaromir returned once more and interminably to
the tremulous vespers of his death. Then he reflected that reality does
not usually coincide with our anticipation of it; with a logic of his
own he inferred that to foresee a circumstantial detail is to prevent
its happening. Trusting in this weak magic, he invented, [so that they
would]{.italic} [not happen,]{.italic} the most gruesome details.
Finally, as was natural, he came to fear that they were prophetic.
Miserable in the night, he endeavored to find some way to hold fast to
the fleeting substance of time. He knew that it was rushing headlong
toward the dawn of the twenty-ninth. He reasoned aloud: \"I am now in
the night of the twenty-second; while this night lasts (and for six
nights more), I am invulnerable, immortal.\" The nights of sleep seemed
to him deep, dark pools in which he could submerge himself. There were
moments when he longed impatiently for the final burst of fire that
would free him, for better or for worse, from the vain compulsion of his
imaginings. On the twenty-eighth, as the last sunset was reverberating
from the high barred windows, the thought of his drama, [The
Enemies,]{.italic} deflected him from these abject considerations.
Hladik had rounded forty. Aside from a few friendships and many habits,
the problematic exercise of literature constituted his life. Like all
writers, he measured the achievements of others by what they had
accomplished, asking of them that they measure him by what he envisaged
or planned. All the books he had published had left him with a complex
feeling of repentance. His studies of the work of Böhme, of Ibn Ezra,
and of Fludd had been characterized essentially by mere application; his
translation of the [Sepher Yezirah,]{.italic} by carelessness, fatigue,
and conjecture. [Vindication of Eternity]{.italic} perhaps had fewer
shortcomings. The first volume gave a history of man\'s various concepts
of eternity, from the immutable Being of Parmenides to the modifiable
Past of Hinton. The second denied (with Francis Bradley) that all the
events of the universe make up a temporal series, arguing that the
number of man\'s possible experiences is not infinite, and that a single
\"repetition\" suffices to prove that time is a fallacy. . .
Unfortunately, the arguments that demonstrate this fallacy are equally
fallacious. Hladik was in the habit of going over them with a kind of
contemptuous perplexity. He had also composed a series of Expressionist
poems; to the poet\'s chagrin they had been included in an anthology
published in 1924, and no subsequent anthology but inherited them. From
all this equivocal, uninspired past Hladik had hoped to redeem himself
with his drama in verse, [The Enemies.]{.italic} (Hladik felt the verse
form to be essential because it makes it impossible for the spectators
to lose sight of irreality, one of art\'s requisites.)
The drama observed the unities of time, place, and action. The scene was
laid in Hradcany, in the library of Baron von Roemerstadt, on one of the
last afternoons of the nineteenth century. In the first scene of the
first act a strange man visits Roemerstadt. (A clock was striking seven,
the vehemence of the setting sun\'s rays glorified the windows, a
passionate, familiar Hungarian music floated in the air.) This visit is
followed by others; Roemerstadt does not know the people who are
importuning him, but he has the uncomfortable feeling that he has seen
them somewhere, perhaps in a dream. They all fawn upon him, but it is
apparent ― first to the audience and then to the Baron ― that they are
secret enemies, in league to ruin him. Roemerstadt succeeds in checking
or evading their involved schemings. In the dialogue mention is made of
his sweetheart, Julia von Weidenau, and a certain Jaroslav Kubin, who at
one time pressed his attentions on her. Kubin has now lost his mind, and
believes himself to be Roemerstadt. The dangers increase; Roemerstadt,
at the end of the second act, is forced to kill one of the conspirators.
The third and final act opens. The incoherencies gradually increase;
actors who had seemed out of the play reappear; the man Roemerstadt
killed returns for a moment. Someone points out that evening has not
fallen; the clock strikes seven, the high windows reverberate in the
western sun, the air carries an impassioned Hungarian melody. The first
actor comes on and repeats the lines he had spoken in the first scene of
the first act. Roemerstadt speaks to him without surprise; the audience
understands that Roemerstadt is the miserable Jaroslav Kubin. The drama
has never taken place; it is the circular delirium that Kubin lives and
relives endlessly.
Hladik had never asked himself whether this tragicomedy of errors was
preposterous or admirable, well thought out or slipshod. He felt that
the plot I have just sketched was best contrived to cover up his defects
and point up his abilities and held the possibility of allowing him to
redeem (symbolically) the meaning of his life. He had finished the first
act and one or two scenes of the third; the metrical nature of the work
made it possible for him to keep working it over, changing the
hexameters, without the manuscript in front of him. He thought how he
still had two acts to do, and that he was going to die very soon. He
spoke with God in the darkness: \"If in some fashion I exist, if I am
not one of Your repetitions and mistakes, I exist as the author of [The
Enemies.]{.italic} To finish this drama, which can justify me and
justify You, I need another year. Grant me these days, You to whom the
centuries and time belong.\" This was the last night, the most dreadful
of all, but ten minutes later sleep flooded over him like a dark water.
Toward dawn he dreamed that he had concealed himself in one of the naves
of the Clementine Library. A librarian wearing dark glasses asked him:
\"What are you looking for?\" Hladik answered: \"I am looking for God.\"
The librarian said to him: \"God is in one of the letters on one of the
pages of one of the four hundred thousand volumes of the Clementine. My
fathers and the fathers of my fathers have searched for this letter; I
have grown blind seeking it.\" He removed his glasses, and Hladik saw
his eyes, which were dead. A reader came in to return an atlas. \"This
atlas is worthless,\" he said, and handed it to Hladik, who opened it at
random. He saw a map of India as in a daze. Suddenly sure of himself, he
touched one of the tiniest letters. A ubiquitous voice said to him:
\"The time of your labor has been granted.\" At this point Hladik awoke.
He remembered that men\'s dreams belong to God, and that Maimonides had
written that the words heard in a dream are divine when they are
distinct and clear and the person uttering them cannot be seen. He
dressed: two soldiers came into the cell and ordered him to follow them.
From behind the door, Hladik had envisaged a labyrinth of passageways,
stairs, and separate buildings. The reality was less spectacular: they
descended to an inner court by a narrow iron stairway. Several soldiers
― some with uniform unbuttoned ― were examining a motorcycle and
discussing it. The sergeant looked at the clock; it was 8:44. They had
to wait until it struck nine. Hladik, more insignificant than pitiable,
sat down on a pile of wood. He noticed that the soldiers\' eyes avoided
his. To ease his wait, the sergeant handed him a cigarette. Hladik did
not smoke; he accepted it out of politeness or humility. As he lighted
it, he noticed that his hands were shaking. The day was clouding over;
the soldiers spoke in a low voice as though he were already dead. Vainly
he tried to recall the woman of whom Julia von Weidenau was the symbol.
The squad formed and stood at attention. Hladik, standing against the
barracks wall, waited for the volley. Someone pointed out that the wall
was going to be stained with blood; the victim was ordered to step
forward a few paces. Incongruously, this reminded Hladik of the fumbling
preparations of photographers. A big drop of rain struck one of
Hladik\'s temples and rolled slowly down his cheek; the sergeant shouted
the final order.
The physical universe came to a halt.
The guns converged on Hladik, but the men who were to kill him stood
motionless. The sergeant\'s arm eternized an unfinished gesture. On a
paving stone of the courtyard a bee cast an unchanging shadow. The wind
had ceased, as in a picture. Hladik attempted a cry, a word, a movement
of the hand. He realized that he was paralyzed. Not a sound reached him
from the halted world. He thought: \"I am in hell, I am dead.\" He
thought: \"I am mad.\" He thought: \"Time has stopped.\" Then he
reflected that if that was the case, his mind would have stopped too. He
wanted to test this; he repeated (without moving his lips) Vergil\'s
mysterious fourth Eclogue. He imagined that the now remote soldiers must
be sharing his anxiety; he longed to be able to communicate with them.
It astonished him not to feel the least fatigue, not even the numbness
of his protracted immobility. After an indeterminate time he fell
asleep. When he awoke the world continued motionless and mute. The drop
of water still clung to his cheek, the shadow of the bee to the stone.
The smoke from the cigarette he had thrown away had not dispersed.
Another \"day\" went by before Hladik understood.
He had asked God for a whole year to finish his work; His omnipotence
had granted it. God had worked a secret miracle for him; German lead
would kill him at the set hour, but in his mind a year would go by
between the order and its execution. From perplexity he passed to
stupor, from stupor to resignation, from resignation to sudden
gratitude.
He had no document but his memory; the training he had acquired with
each added hexameter gave him a discipline unsuspected by those who set
down and forget temporary, incomplete paragraphs. He was not working for
posterity or even for God, whose literary tastes were unknown to him.
Meticulously, motionlessly, secretly, he wrought in time his lofty,
invisible labyrinth. He worked the third act over twice. He eliminated
certain symbols as over-obvious, such as the repeated striking of the
clock, the music. Nothing hurried him. He omitted, he condensed, he
amplified. In certain instances he came back to the original version. He
came to feel an affection for the courtyard, the barracks; one of the
faces before him modified his conception of Roemerstadt\'s character. He
discovered that the wearying cacophonies that bothered Flaubert so much
are mere visual superstitions, weakness and limitation of the written
word, not the spoken. . . He concluded his drama. He had only the
problem of a single phrase. He found it. The drop of water slid down his
cheek. He opened his mouth in a maddened cry, moved his face, dropped
under the quadruple blast.
Jaromir Hladik died on March 29, at 9:02 A.M.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by Harriet de Onís]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_016.html_calibre_pb_16 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_017.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_017.html_filepos258156 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_017.html_filepos258212 .calibre10}
[[Three Versions of Judas]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[There seemed a certainty in degradation.]{.calibre5}
[ T. E. Lawrence:]{.calibre5} [[Seven Pillars of
Wisdom,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [CIII]{.calibre5}
\
In Asia Minor or in Alexandria, in the second century of our faith, when
Basilides disseminated the idea that the cosmos was the reckless or evil
improvisation of deficient angels, Nils Runeberg would have directed,
with singular intellectual passion, one of the Gnostic conventicles.
Dante would have assigned him, perhaps, a fiery grave; his name would
extend the list of lesser heresiarchs, along with Satornilus and
Carpocrates; some fragment of his preachings, embellished with
invective, would survive in the apocryphal [Liber adversus omnes
haereses]{.italic} or would have perished when the burning of a
monastery library devoured the last copy of the [Syntagma.]{.italic}
Instead, God afforded Runeberg the twentieth century and the university
town of Lund. There, in 1904, he published the first edition of [Kristus
och Judas]{.italic} and, in 1909, his major book, [Den hemlige
Frälsaren.]{.italic} (Of the latter there is a German translation, made
in 1912 by Emil Schering; it is called [Der heimliche
Heiland.)]{.italic}
Before essaying an examination of the aforementioned works, it is
necessary to repeat that Nils Runeberg, a member of the National
Evangelical Union, was deeply religious. In the intellectual circles of
Paris or even of Buenos Aires, a man of letters might well rediscover
Runeberg\'s theses; these theses, set forth in such circles, would be
frivolous and useless exercises in negligence or blasphemy. For
Runeberg, they were the key to one of the central mysteries of theology;
they were the subject of meditation and analysis, of historical and
philological controversy, of pride, of jubilation and of terror. They
justified and wrecked his life. Those who read this article should also
consider that it registers only Runeberg\'s conclusions, not his
dialectic or his proof. Someone may observe that the conclusion no doubt
preceded the \"proof.\" Who would resign himself to seeking proof of
something he did not believe or whose preachment did not matter to him?
The first edition of [Kristus och Judas]{.italic} bears the following
categorical epigraph, whose meaning, years later, Nils Runeberg himself
would monstrously expand: \"Not one, but all of the things attributed by
tradition to Judas Iscariot are false\" (De Quincey, 1857). Preceded by
a German, De Quincey speculated that Judas reported Jesus to the
authorities in order to force him to reveal his divinity and thus ignite
a vast rebellion against the tyranny of Rome; Runeberg suggests a
vindication of a metaphysical sort. Skillfully, he begins by stressing
the superfluity of Judas\' act. He observes (as does Robertson) that in
order to identify a teacher who preached daily in the synagogue and
worked miracles before gatherings of thousands of men, betrayal by an
apostle is unnecessary. This, nevertheless, occurred. To suppose an
error in the Scriptures is intolerable; no less intolerable is to admit
an accidental happening in the most precious event in world history.
[Ergo,]{.italic} Judas\' betrayal was not accidental; it was a
preordained fact which has its mysterious place in the economy of
redemption. Runeberg continues: The Word, when it was made flesh, passed
from ubiquity to space, from eternity to history, from limitless
satisfaction to change and death; in order to correspond to such a
sacrifice, it was necessary that one man, in representation of all men,
make a sacrifice of condign nature. Judas Iscariot was that man. Judas,
alone among the apostles, sensed the secret divinity and terrible intent
of Jesus. The Word had been lowered to mortal condition; Judas, a
disciple of the Word, could lower himself to become an informer (the
worst crime in all infamy) and reside amidst the perpetual fires of
Hell. The lower order is a mirror of the higher; the forms of earth
correspond to the forms of Heaven; the spots on one\'s skin are a chart
of the incorruptible constellations; Judas in some way reflects Jesus.
Hence the thirty pieces of silver and the kiss; hence the suicide, in
order to merit Reprobation even more. Thus Nils Runeberg elucidated the
enigma of Judas.
Theologians of all confessions refuted him. Lars Peter Engström accused
him of being unaware of, or omitting, the hypostatic union; Axel
Borelius, of renewing the heresy of the Docetists, who denied that Jesus
was human; the rigid Bishop of Lund, of contradicting the third verse of
the twenty-second chapter of the gospel of St. Luke.
These varied anathemas had their influence on Runeberg, who partially
rewrote the rejected book and modified its doctrine. He left the
theological ground to his adversaries and set forth oblique arguments of
a moral order. He admitted that Jesus, \"who had at his disposal all the
considerable resources which Omnipotence may offer,\" did not need a man
to redeem all men. He then refuted those who maintain we know nothing of
the inexplicable traitor; we know, he said, that he was one of the
apostles, one of those chosen to announce the kingdom of heaven, to cure
the sick, to clean lepers, to raise the dead and cast out demons
(Matthew 10:7-8; Luke 9:1). A man whom the Redeemer has thus
distinguished merits the best interpretation we can give of his acts. To
attribute his crime to greed (as some have done, citing John 12:6) is to
resign oneself to the basest motive. Nils Runeberg proposes the opposite
motive: a hyperbolic and even unlimited asceticism. The ascetic, for the
greater glory of God, vilifies and mortifies his flesh; Judas did the
same with his spirit. He renounced honor, morality, peace and the
kingdom of heaven, just as others, less heroically, renounce
pleasure.[[[[15]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos604457){.calibre7}
With terrible lucidity he premeditated his sins. In adultery there is
usually tenderness and abnegation; in homicide, courage; in profanity
and blasphemy, a certain satanic luster. Judas chose those sins
untouched by any virtue: violation of trust (John 12:6) and betrayal. He
acted with enormous humility, he believed himself unworthy of being
good. Paul has written:
\"He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord\" (I Corinthians 1:31);
Judas sought Hell, because the happiness of the Lord was enough for him.
He thought that happiness, like morality, is a divine attribute and
should not be usurped by
humans.[[[[16]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos604680){.calibre7}
Many have discovered, [post factum,]{.italic} that in Runeberg\'s
justifiable beginning lies his extravagant end and that [Den hemlige
Frälsaren]{.italic} is a mere perversion or exasperation of [Kristus och
Judas.]{.italic} Toward the end of 1907, Runeberg completed and
corrected the manuscript text; almost two years went by without his
sending it to the printer. In October 1909, the book appeared with a
prologue (tepid to the point of being enigmatic) by the Danish Hebraist
Erik Erfjord and with this perfidious epigraph: \"He was in the world,
and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not\" (John 1:10).
The general argument is not complex, though the conclusion is monstrous.
God, argues Nils Runeberg, lowered Himself to become a man for the
redemption of mankind; we may conjecture that His sacrifice was perfect,
not invalidated or attenuated by any omission. To limit what He
underwent to the agony of one afternoon on the cross is
blasphemous.[[[[17]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos605531){.calibre7}
To maintain he was a man and incapable of sin involves a contradiction;
the attributes of [impeccabilitas]{.italic} and of [humanitas]{.italic}
are not compatible. Kemnitz admits that the Redeemer could feel fatigue,
cold, embarrassment, hunger and thirst; we may also admit that he could
sin and go astray. The famous text \"For he shall grow up before him as
a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground; he hath no form nor
comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should
desire him. He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and
acquainted with grief\" (Isaiah 53:2-3) is, for many, a future vision of
the Saviour at the moment of his death; for others (for example, for
Hans Lassen Martensen), a refutation of the beauty which vulgar opinion
attributes to Christ; for Runeberg, the punctual prophesy not of a
moment but of the whole atrocious future, in time and in eternity, of
the Word made flesh. God made Himself totally a man but a man to the
point of infamy, a man to the point of reprobation and the abyss. To
save us, He could have chosen [any]{.italic} of the destinies which make
up the complex web of history; He could have been Alexander or
Pythagoras or Rurik or Jesus; He chose the vilest destiny of all: He was
Judas.
In vain the bookshops of Stockholm and Lund proposed this revelation to
the public. The incredulous considered it, [a priori,]{.italic} an
insipid and laborious theological game, the theologians scorned it.
Runeberg sensed in this ecumenical indifference an almost miraculous
confirmation. God had ordained this indifference; God did not want His
terrible secret divulged on earth. Runeberg understood that the hour had
not yet arrived. He felt that ancient and divine maledictions were
converging upon him; he remembered Elijah and Moses, who on the mountain
top covered their faces in order not to see God; Isaiah, who was
terrified when he saw the One whose glory fills the earth; Saul, whose
eyes were struck blind on the road to Damascus; the rabbi Simeon ben
Azai, who saw Paradise and died; the famous sorcerer John of Viterbo,
who became mad when he saw the Trinity; the Midrashim, who abhor the
impious who utter the [Shem Hamephorash,]{.italic} the Secret Name of
God. Was he not perhaps guilty of that dark crime? Would this not be the
blasphemy against the Spirit, the one never to be forgiven (Matthew
12:31)? Valerius Soranus died for having divulged the hidden name of
Rome; what infinite punishment would be his for having discovered and
divulged the horrible name of God?
Drunk with insomnia and vertiginous dialectic, Nils Runeberg wandered
through the streets of Malmo, begging at the top of his voice that he be
granted the grace of joining his Redeemer in Hell.
He died of a ruptured aneurysm on the first of March, 1912. The
heresiologists will perhaps remember him; to the concept of the Son,
which seemed exhausted, he added the complexities of evil and
misfortune.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_017.html_calibre_pb_17 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_018.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_018.html_filepos269613 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_018.html_filepos269669 .calibre10}
[[The Sect of the Phoenix]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Those who write that the sect of the Phoenix had its origin in
Heliopolis and derive it from the religious restoration following upon
the death of the reformer Amenophis IV, cite texts from Herodotus,
Tacitus and the monuments of Egypt, but they ignore, or prefer to
ignore, that the designation \"Phoenix\" does not date before Hrabanus
Maurus and that the oldest sources (the [Saturnales]{.italic} of Flavius
Josephus, let us say) speak only of the People of the Custom or of the
People of the Secret. Gregorovius has already observed, in the
conventicles of Ferrara, that mention of the Phoenix was very rare in
oral speech; in Geneva I have known artisans who did not understand me
when I inquired if they were men of the Phoenix, but who immediately
admitted being men of the Secret. If I am not deceived, the same is true
of the Buddhists; the name by which the world knows them is not the one
they themselves utter.
Miklosich, in a page much too famous, has compared the sectarians of the
Phoenix with the gypsies. In Chile and in Hungary there are gypsies and
there are also sectarians; aside from this sort of ubiquity, one and the
other have very little in common. The gypsies are traders, coppersmiths,
blacksmiths and fortunetellers; the sectarians usually practice the
liberal professions with success. The gypsies constitute a certain
physical type and speak, or used to speak, a secret language; the
sectarians are confused with the rest of men and the proof lies in that
they have not suffered persecutions. The gypsies are picturesque and
inspire bad poets; ballads, cheap illustrations and foxtrots omit the
sectarians. . . Martin Buber declares that the Jews are essentially
pathetic; not all sectarians are and some deplore the pathetic; this
public and notorious truth is sufficient to refute the common error
(absurdly defended by Urmann) which sees the Phoenix as a derivation of
Israel. People more or less reason in this manner: Urmann was a
sensitive man; Urmann was a Jew; Urmann came in frequent contact with
the sectarians in the ghetto of Prague; the affinity Urmann sensed
proves the reality of the fact. In all sincerity, I cannot concur with
this dictum. That sectarians in a Jewish environment should resemble the
Jews proves nothing; the undeniable fact it that, like Hazlitt\'s
infinite Shakespeare, they resemble all the men in the world. They are
everything for everyone, like the Apostle; several days ago, Dr. Juan
Francisco Amaro, of Paysandú, admired the facility with which they
assimilated Creole ways.
I have said that the history of the sect records no persecutions. This
is true, but since there is no human group in which members of the sect
do not figure, it is also true that there is no persecution or rigor
they have not suffered and perpetrated. In the Occidental wars and in
the remote wars of Asia they have shed their blood secularly, under
opposing banners; it avails them very little to identify themselves with
all the nations of the world.
Without a sacred book to join them as the scriptures do for Israel,
without a common memory, without that other memory which is a language,
scattered over the face of the earth, diverse in color and features, one
thing alone ― the Secret ― unites them and will unite them until the end
of time. Once, in addition to the Secret, there was a legend (and
perhaps a cosmogonic myth), but the shallow men of the Phoenix have
forgotten it and now only retain the obscure tradition of a punishment.
Of a punishment, of a pact or of a privilege, for the versions differ
and scarcely allow us to glimpse the verdict of a God who granted
eternity to a lineage if its members, generation after generation, would
perform a rite. I have collated accounts by travelers, I have conversed
with patriarchs and theologians; I can testify that fulfillment of the
rite is the only religious practice observed by the sectarians. The rite
constitutes the Secret. This Secret, as I have already indicated, is
transmitted from generation to generation, but good usage prefers that
mothers should not teach it to their children, nor that priests should;
initiation into the mystery is the task of the lowest individuals. A
slave, a leper or a beggar serve as mystagogues. Also one child may
indoctrinate another. The act in itself is trivial, momentary and
requires no description. The materials are cork, wax or gum arabic. (In
the liturgy, mud is mentioned; this is often used as well.) There are no
temples especially dedicated to the celebration of this cult, but
certain ruins, a cellar or an entrance hall are considered propitious
places. The Secret is sacred but is always somewhat ridiculous; its
performance is furtive and even clandestine and the adept do not speak
of it. There are no decent words to name it, but it is understood that
all words name it or, rather, inevitably allude to it, and thus, in a
conversation I say something or other and the adept smile or become
uncomfortable, for they realize I have touched upon the Secret. In
Germanic literatures there are poems written by sectarians whose nominal
subject is the sea or the twilight of evening; they are, in some way,
symbols of the Secret, I hear it said repeatedly. [Orbis terrarum est
speculum Ludi]{.italic} reads an apocryphal adage recorded by Du Cange
in his Glossary. A kind of sacred horror prevents some faithful
believers from performing this very simple rite; the others despise
them, but they despise themselves even more. Considerable credit is
enjoyed, however, by those who deliberately renounce the custom and
attain direct contact with the divinity; these sectarians, in order to
express this contact, do so with figures taken from the liturgy and thus
John of the Rood wrote:
\
[[May the Seven Firmaments know that God]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[ Is as delectable as the Cork and the
Slime.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
I have attained on three continents the friendship of many devotes of
the Phoenix; I know that the Secret, at first, seemed to them banal,
embarrassing, vulgar and (what is even stranger) incredible. They could
not bring themselves to admit their parents had stooped to such
manipulations. What is odd is that the Secret was not lost long ago; in
spite of the vicissitudes of the Universe, in spite of wars and
exoduses, it reaches, awesomely, all the faithful. Someone has not
hesitated to affirm that it is now instinctive.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_018.html_calibre_pb_18 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_019.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_019.html_filepos276650 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_019.html_filepos276706 .calibre10}
[[The Immortal]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[Salomon saith,]{.calibre5} [[There is no new thing upon the
earth.]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [So that as Plato had an
imagination,]{.calibre5} [[that all knowledge was but
remembrance;]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [so Salomon giveth his
sentence,]{.calibre5} [[that all novelty is but
oblivion.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[ Francis Bacon:]{.calibre5} [[Essays,]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[LVIII]{.calibre5}
\
In London, in the first part of June 1929, the antique dealer Joseph
Cartaphilus of Smyrna offered the Princess of Lucinge the six volumes in
small quarto (1715-1720) of Pope\'s [Iliad.]{.italic} The Princess
acquired them; on receiving the books, she exchanged a few words with
the dealer. He was, she tells us, a wasted and earthen man, with gray
eyes and gray beard, of singularly vague features. He could express
himself with fluency and ignorance in several languages; in a very few
minutes, he went from French to English and from English to an enigmatic
conjunction of Salonika Spanish and Macao Portuguese. In October, the
Princess heard from a passenger of the [Zeus]{.italic} that Cartaphilus
had died at sea while returning to Smyrna, and that he had been buried
on the island of Ios. In the last volume of the [Iliad]{.italic} she
found this manuscript.
The original is written in English and abounds in Latinisms. The version
we offer is literal.
\
I
\
As far as I can recall, my labors began in a garden in Thebes
Hekatompylos, when Diocletian was emperor. I had served (without glory)
in the recent Egyptian wars, I was tribune of a legion quartered in
Berenice, facing the Red Sea: fever and magic consumed many men who had
magnanimously coveted the steel. The Mauretanians were vanquished; the
land previously occupied by the rebel cities was eternally dedicated to
the Plutonic gods; Alexandria, once subdued, vainly implored Caesar\'s
mercy; within a year the legions reported victory, but I scarcely
managed a glimpse of Mars\' countenance. This privation pained me and
perhaps caused me precipitously to undertake the discovery, through
fearful and diffuse deserts, of the secret City of the Immortals.
My labors began, I have related, in a garden in Thebes. All that night I
was unable to sleep, for something was struggling within my heart. I
arose shortly before dawn; my slaves were sleeping, the moon was of the
same color as the infinite sand. An exhausted and bloody horseman came
from the east. A few steps from me, he tumbled from his mount. In a
faint, insatiable voice he asked me in Latin the name of the river
bathing the city\'s walls. I answered that it was the Egypt, fed by the
rains. \"Another is the river I seek,\" he replied sadly, \"the secret
river which cleanses men of death.\" Dark blood surged from his breast.
He told me that his homeland was a mountain on the other side of the
Ganges and that on this mountain it was said that if one traveled to the
west, where the world ends, he would reach the river whose waters grant
immortality. He added that on its far bank the City of the Immortals
rises, rich in bastions and amphitheaters and temples. Before dawn he
died, but I had determined to discover the city and its river.
Interrogated by the executioner, some Mauretanian prisoners confirmed
the traveler\'s tale; someone recalled the Elysian plain, at the end of
the earth, where men\'s lives are perdurable; someone else, the peaks
where the Pactolus rises, whose inhabitants live for a century. In Rome,
I conversed with philosophers who felt that to extend man\'s life is to
extend his agony and multiply his deaths. I do not know if I ever
believed in the City of the Immortals: I think that then the task of
finding it was sufficient. Flavius, proconsul of Getulia, gave me two
hundred soldiers for the undertaking. I also recruited mercenaries, who
said they knew the roads and were the first to desert.
Later events have deformed inextricably the memory of the first days of
our journey. We departed from Arsinoe and entered the burning desert. We
crossed the land of the troglodytes, who devour serpents and are
ignorant of verbal commerce; that of the garamants, who keep their women
in common and feed on lions; that of the augyls, who worship only
Tartarus. We exhausted other deserts where the sand is black, where the
traveler must usurp the hours of night, for the fervor of day is
intolerable. From afar, I glimpsed the mountain which gave its name to
the Ocean: on its sides grows the spurge plant, which counteracts
poisons; on its peak live the satyrs, a nation of fell and savage men,
given to lewdness. That these barbarous regions, where the earth is
mother of monsters, could shelter in their interior a famous city seemed
inconceivable to all of us. We continued our march, for it would have
been dishonor to turn back. A few foolhardy men slept with their faces
exposed to the moon; they burned with fever; in the corrupted water of
the cisterns others drank madness and death. Then the desertions began;
very shortly thereafter, mutinies. To repress them, I did not hesitate
to exercise severity. I proceeded justly, but a centurion warned me that
the seditious (eager to avenge the crucifixion of one of their number)
were plotting my death. I fled from the camp with the few soldiers loyal
to me. I lost them in the desert, amid the sandstorms and the vast
night. I was lacerated by a Cretan arrow. I wandered several days
without finding water, or one enormous day multiplied by the sun, my
thirst or my fear of thirst. I left the route to the judgment of my
horse. In the dawn, the distance bristled up into pyramids and towers.
Intolerably, I dreamt of an exiguous and nitid labyrinth: in the center
was a water jar; my hands almost touched it, my eyes could see it, but
so intricate and perplexed were the curves that I knew I would die
before reaching it.
\
II
\
When finally I became untangled from this nightmare, I found myself
lying with my hands tied, in an oblong stone niche no larger than a
common grave, shallowly excavated into the sharp slope of a mountain.
Its sides were damp, polished by time rather than by human effort. I
felt a painful throbbing in my chest, I felt that I was burning with
thirst. I looked out and shouted feebly. At the foot of the mountain, an
impure stream spread noiselessly, clogged with debris and sand; on the
opposite bank (beneath the last sun or beneath the first) shone the
evident City of the Immortals. I saw walls, arches, façades and fora:
the base was a stone plateau. A hundred or so irregular niches,
analogous to mine, furrowed the mountain and the valley. In the sand
there were shallow pits; from these miserable holes (and from the
niches) naked, gray-skinned, scraggly bearded men emerged. I thought I
recognized them: they belonged to the bestial breed of the troglodytes,
who infest the shores of the Arabian Gulf and the caverns of Ethiopia; I
was not amazed that they could not speak and that they devoured
serpents.
The urgency of my thirst made me reckless. I calculated that I was some
thirty feet from the sand; I threw myself headlong down the slope, my
eyes closed, my hands behind my back. I sank my bloody face into the
dark water. I drank just as animals water themselves. Before losing
myself again in sleep and delirium, I repeated, inexplicably, some words
in Greek: \"the rich Trojans from Zelea who drink the black water of the
Aisepos.\"
I do not know how many days and nights turned above me. Aching, unable
to regain the shelter of the caverns, naked on the unknown sand, I let
the moon and the sun gamble with my unfortunate destiny. The
troglodytes, infantile in their barbarity, did not aid me to survive or
to die. In vain I begged them to put me to death. One day, I broke my
bindings on an edge of flint. Another day, I got up and managed to beg
or steal ― I, Marcus Flaminius Rufus, military tribune of one of Rome\'s
legions ― my first detested portion of serpent flesh.
My covetousness to see the Immortals, to touch the superhuman city,
almost kept me from sleep. As if they penetrated my purpose, neither did
the troglodytes sleep: at first I inferred that they were watching me;
later, that they had become contaminated by my uneasiness, much as dogs
may do. To leave the barbarous village, I chose the most public of
hours, the coming of evening, when almost all the men emerge from their
crevices and pits and look at the setting sun, without seeing it. I
prayed out loud, less as a supplication to divine favor than as an
intimidation of the tribe with articulate words. I crossed the stream
clogged by the dunes and headed toward the City. Confusedly, two or
three men followed me. They were (like the others of that breed) of
slight stature; they did not inspire fear but rather repulsion. I had to
skirt several irregular ravines which seemed to me like quarries;
obfuscated by the City\'s grandeur, I had thought it nearby. Toward
midnight, I set foot upon the black shadow of its walls, bristling out
in idolatrous forms on the yellow sand. I was halted by a kind of sacred
horror. Novelty and the desert are so abhorred by man that I was glad
one of the troglodytes had followed me to the last. I closed my eyes and
awaited (without sleeping) the light of day.
I have said that the City was founded on a stone plateau. This plateau,
comparable to a high cliff, was no less arduous than the walls. In vain
I fatigued myself: the black base did not disclose the slightest
irregularity, the invariable walls seemed not to admit a single door.
The force of the sun obliged me to seek refuge in a cave; in the rear
was a pit, in the pit a stairway which sank down abysmally into the
darkness below. I went down; through a chaos of sordid galleries I
reached a vast circular chamber, scarcely visible. There were nine doors
in this cellar; eight led to a labyrinth that treacherously returned to
the same chamber; the ninth (through another labyrinth) led to a second
circular chamber equal to the first. I do not know the total number of
these chambers; my misfortune and anxiety multiplied them. The silence
was hostile and almost perfect; there was no sound in this deep stone
network save that of a subterranean wind, whose cause I did not
discover; noiselessly, tiny streams of rusty water disappeared beween
the crevices. Horribly, I became habituated to this doubtful world; I
found it incredible that there could be anything but cellars with nine
doors and long branched-out cellars; I do not know how long I must have
walked beneath the ground; I know that I once confused, in the same
nostalgia, the atrocious village of the barbarians and my native city,
amid the clusters.
In the depths of a corridor, an unforeseen wall halted me; a remote
light fell from above. I raised my confused eyes: in the vertiginous,
extreme heights I saw a circle of sky so blue that it seemed purple.
Some metal rungs scaled the wall. I was limp with fatigue, but I climbed
up, stopping only at times to sob clumsily with joy. I began to glimpse
capitals and astragals, triangular pediments and vaults, confused
pageants of granite and marble. Thus I was afforded this ascension from
the blind region of dark interwoven labyrinths into the resplendent
City. I emerged into a kind of little square or, rather, a kind of
courtyard. It was surrounded by a single building of irregular form and
variable height; to this heterogeneous building belonged the different
cupolas and columns. Rather than by any other trait of this incredible
monument, I was held by the extreme age of its fabrication. I felt that
it was older than mankind, than the earth. This manifest antiquity
(though in some way terrible to the eyes) seemed to me in keeping with
the work of immortal builders. At first cautiously, later indifferently,
at last desperately, I wandered up the stairs and along the pavements of
the inextricable palace. (Afterwards I learned that the width and height
of the steps were not constant, a fact which made me understand the
singular fatigue they produced.) \"This palace is a fabrication of the
gods,\" I thought at the beginning. I explored the uninhabited interiors
and corrected myself: \"The gods who built it have died.\" I noted its
pecularities and said: \"The gods who built it were mad.\" I said it, I
know, with an incomprehensible reprobation which was almost remorse,
with more intellectual horror than palpable fear. To the impression of
enormous antiquity others were added: that of the interminable, that of
the atrocious, that of the complexly senseless. I had crossed a
labyrinth, but the nitid City of the Immortals filled me with fright and
repugnance. A labyrinth is a structure compounded to confuse men; its
architecture, rich in symmetries, is subordinated to that end. In the
palace I imperfectly explored, the architecture lacked any such
finality. It abounded in dead-end corridors, high unattainable windows,
portentous doors which led to a cell or pit, incredible inverted
stairways whose steps and balustrades hung downwards. Other stairways,
clinging airily to the side of a monumental wall, would die without
leading anywhere, after making two or three turns in the lofty darkness
of the cupolas. I do not know if all the examples I have enumerated are
literal; I know that for many years they infested my nightmares; I am no
longer able to know if such and such a detail is a transcription of
reality or of the forms which unhinged my nights. \"This City\" (I
thought) \"is so horrible that its mere existence and perdurance, though
in the midst of a secret desert, contaminates the past and the future
and in some way even jeopardizes the stars. As long as it lasts, no one
in the world can be strong or happy.\" I do not want to describe it; a
chaos of heterogeneous words, the body of a tiger or a bull in which
teeth, organs and heads monstrously pullulate in mutual conjunction and
hatred can (perhaps) be approximate images.
I do not remember the stages of my return, amid the dusty and damp
hypogea. I only know I was not abandoned by the fear that, when I left
the last labyrinth, I would again be surrounded by the nefarious City of
the Immortals. I can remember nothing else. This oblivion, now
insuperable, was perhaps voluntary; perhaps the circumstances of my
escape were so unpleasant that, on some day no less forgotten as well, I
swore to forget them.
\
III
\
Those who have read the account of my labors with attention will recall
that a man from the tribe followed me as a dog might up to the irregular
shadow of the walls. When I came out of the last cellar, I found him at
the mouth of the cave. He was stretched out on the sand, where he was
tracing clumsily and erasing a string of signs that, like the letters in
our dreams, seem on the verge of being understood and then dissolve. At
first, I thought it was some kind of primitive writing; then I saw it
was absurd to imagine that men who have not attained to the spoken word
could attain to writing. Besides, none of the forms was equal to
another, which excluded or lessened the possibility that they were
symbolic. The man would trace them, look at them and correct them.
Suddenly, as if he were annoyed by this game, he erased them with his
palm and forearm. He looked at me, seemed not to recognize me. However,
so great was the relief which engulfed me (or so great and fearful was
my loneliness) that I supposed this rudimentary troglodyte looking up at
me from the floor of the cave had been waiting for me. The sun heated
the plain; when we began the return to the village, beneath the first
stars, the sand burned under our feet. The troglodyte went ahead; that
night I conceived the plan of teaching him to recognize and perhaps to
repeat a few words. The dog and the horse (I reflected) are capable of
the former; many birds, like the Caesars\' nightingales, of the latter.
No matter how crude a man\'s mind may be, it will always be superior to
that of irrational creatures.
The humility and wretchedness of the troglodyte brought to my memory the
image of Argos, the moribund old dog in the [Odyssey,]{.italic} and so I
gave him the name Argos and tried to teach it to him. I failed over and
again. Conciliation, rigor and obstinacy were completely in vain.
Motionless, with lifeless eyes, he seemed not to perceive the sounds I
tried to press upon him. A few steps from me, he seemed to be very
distant. Lying on the sand like a small ruinous lava sphinx, he let the
heavens turn above him from the twilight of dawn till that of evening. I
judged it impossible that he not be aware of my purpose. I recalled that
among the Ethiopians it is well known that monkeys deliberately do not
speak so they will not be obliged to work, and I attributed Argos\'
silence to suspicion or fear. From that imagination I went on to others,
even more extravagant. I thought that Argos and I participated in
different universes; I thought that our perceptions were the same, but
that he combined them in another way and made other objects of them; I
thought that perhaps there were no objects for him, only a vertiginous
and continuous play of extremely brief impressions. I thought of a world
without memory, without time; I considered the possibility of a language
without nouns, a language of impersonal verbs or indeclinable epithets.
Thus the days went on dying and with them the years, but something akin
to happiness happened one morning. It rained, with powerful
deliberation.
Desert nights can be cold, but that night had been fire. I dreamt that a
river in Thessaly (to whose waters I had returned a goldfish) came to
rescue me; over the red sand and black rock I heard it approach; the
coolness of the air and the busy murmur of the rain awoke me. I ran
naked to meet it. Night was fading; beneath the yellow clouds, the
tribe, no less joyful than I, offered themselves to the vivid downpour
in a kind of ecstasy. They seemed like Corybantes possessed by the
divinity. Argos, his eyes turned toward the sky, groaned; torrents ran
down his face, not only of water but (I later learned) of tears. Argos,
I cried, Argos.
Then, with gentle admiration, as if he were discovering something lost
and forgotten a long time ago, Argos stammered these words: \"Argos,
Ulysses\' dog.\" And then, also without looking at me: \"This dog lying
in the manure.\"
We accept reality easily, perhaps because we intuit that nothing is
real. I asked him what he knew of the [Odyssey.]{.italic} The exercise
of Greek was painful for him; I had to repeat the question.
\"Very little,\" he said. \"Less than the poorest rhapsodist. It must be
a thousand and one hundred years since I invented it.\"
\
IV
\
Everything was elucidated for me that day. The troglodytes were the
Immortals; the rivulet of sandy water, the River sought by the horseman.
As for the city whose renown had spread as far as the Ganges, it was
some nine centuries since the Immortals had razed it. With the relics of
its ruins they erected, in the same place, the mad city I had traversed:
a kind of parody or inversion and also temple of the irrational gods who
govern the world and of whom we know nothing, save that they do not
resemble man. This establishment was the last symbol to which the
Immortals condescended; it marks a stage at which, judging that all
undertakings are in vain, they determined to live in thought, in pure
speculation. They erected their structure, forgot it and went to dwell
in the caves. Absorbed in thought, they hardly perceived the physical
world.
These things were told me by Homer, as one would speak to a child. He
also related to me his old age and the last voyage he undertook, moved,
as was Ulysses, by the purpose of reaching the men who do not know what
the sea is nor eat meat seasoned with salt nor suspect what an oar is.
He lived for a century in the City of the Immortals. When it was razed,
he advised that the other be founded. This should not surprise us; it is
famous that after singing of the war of Ilion, he sang of the war of the
frogs and mice. He was like a god who might create the cosmos and then
create a chaos.
To be immortal is commonplace; except for man, all creatures are
immortal, for they are ignorant of death; what is divine, terrible,
incomprehensible, is to know that one is immortal. I have noted that, in
spite of religions, this conviction is very rare. Israelites, Christians
and Moslems profess immortality, but the veneration they render this
world proves they believe only in it, since they destine all other
worlds, in infinite number, to be its reward or punishment. The wheel of
certain Hindustani religions seems more reasonable to me; on this wheel,
which has neither beginning nor end, each life is the effect of the
preceding and engenders the following, but none determines the totality.
. . Indoctrinated by a practice of centuries, the republic of immortal
men had attained the perfection of tolerance and almost that of
indifference. They knew that in an infinite period of time, all things
happen to all men. Because of his past or future virtues, every man is
worthy of all goodness, but also of all perversity, because of his
infamy in the past or future. Thus, just as in games of chance the odd
and even numbers tend toward equilibrium, so also wit and stolidity
cancel out and correct each other and perhaps the rustic [Poem of the
Cid]{.italic} is the counterbalance demanded by one single epithet from
the [Eclogues]{.italic} or by an epigram of Heraclitus. The most
fleeting thought obeys an invisible design and can crown, or inaugurate,
a secret form. I know of those who have done evil so that in future
centuries good would result, or would have resulted in those already
past. . . Seen in this manner, all our acts are just, but they are also
indifferent. There are no moral or intellectual merits. Homer composed
the [Odyssey;]{.italic} if we postulate an infinite period of time, with
infinite circumstances and changes, the impossible thing is not to
compose the [Odyssey,]{.italic} at least once. No one is anyone, one
single immortal man is all men. Like Cornelius Agrippa, I am god, I am
hero, I am philosopher, I am demon and I am world, which is a tedious
way of saying that I do not exist.
The concept of the world as a system of precise compensations influenced
the Immortals vastly. In the first place, it made them invulnerable to
pity. I have mentioned the ancient quarries which broke the fields on
the other bank; a man once fell headlong into the deepest of them; he
could not hurt himself or die but he was burning with thirst; before
they threw him a rope, seventy years went by. Neither were they
interested in their own fate. The body, for them, was a submissive
domestic animal and it sufficed to give it, every month, the pittance of
a few hours of sleep, a bit of water and a scrap of meat. Let no one
reduce us to the status of ascetics. There is no pleasure more complex
than that of thought and we surrendered ourselves to it. At times, an
extraordinary stimulus would restore us to the physical world. For
example, that morning, the old elemental joy of the rain. Those lapses
were quite rare; all the Immortals were capable of perfect quietude; I
remember one whom I never saw stand up: a bird had nested on his breast.
Among the corollaries of the doctrine that there is nothing lacking
compensation in something else, there is one whose theoretical
importance is very small, but which induced us, toward the end or the
beginning of the tenth century, to disperse ourselves over the face of
the earth. It can be stated in these words: \"There exists a river whose
waters grant immortality; in some region there must be another river
whose waters remove it.\" The number of rivers is not infinite; an
immortal traveler who traverses the world will finally, some day, have
drunk from all of them. We proposed to discover that river.
Death (or its allusion) makes men precious and pathetic. They are moving
because of their phantom condition; every act they execute may be their
last; there is not a face that is not on the verge of dissolving like a
face in a dream. Everything among the mortals has the value of the
irretrievable and the perilous. Among the Immortals, on the other hand,
every act (and every thought) is the echo of others that preceded it in
the past, with no visible beginning, or the faithful presage of others
that in the future will repeat it to a vertiginous degree. There is
nothing that is not as if lost in a maze of indefatigable mirrors.
Nothing can happen only once, nothing is preciously precarious. The
elegiacal, the serious, the ceremonial, do not hold for the Immortals.
Homer and I separated at the gates of Tangier; I think we did not even
say goodbye.
\
V
\
I traveled over new kingdoms, new empires. In the fall of 1066, I fought
at Stamford Bridge, I do not recall whether in the forces of Harold, who
was not long in finding his destiny, or in those of the hapless Harald
Hardrada, who conquered six feet of English soil, or a bit more. In the
seventh century of the Hegira, in the suburb of Bulaq, I transcribed
with measured calligraphy, in a language I have forgotten, in an
alphabet I do not know, the seven adventures of Sinbad and the history
of the City of Bronze. In the courtyard of a jail in Samarkand I played
a great deal of chess. In Bikaner I professed the science of astrology
and also in Bohemia. In 1638 I was at Kolozsvar and later in Leipzig. In
Aberdeen, in 1714, I subscribed to the six volumes of Pope\'s
[Iliad;]{.italic} I know that I frequented its pages with delight. About
1729 I discussed the origin of that poem with a professor of rhetoric
named, I think, Giambattista; his arguments seemed to me irrefutable. On
the fourth of October, 1921, the [Patna,]{.italic} which was taking me
to Bombay, had to cast anchor in a port on the Eritrean
coast.[[[[18]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos606608){.calibre7}
I went ashore; I recalled other very ancient mornings, also facing the
Red Sea, when I was a tribune of Rome and fever and magic and idleness
consumed the soldiers. On the outskirts of the city I saw a spring of
clear water; I tasted it, prompted by habit. When I came up the bank, a
spiny bush lacerated the back of my hand. The unusual pain seemed very
acute to me. Incredulous, speechless and happy, I contemplated the
precious formation of a slow drop of blood. Once again I am mortal, I
repeated to myself, once again I am like all men. That night, I slept
until dawn. . .
\
After a year\'s time, I have inspected these pages. I am certain they
reflect the truth, but in the first chapters, and even in certain
paragraphs of the others, I seem to perceive something false. This is
perhaps produced by the abuse of circumstantial details, a procedure I
learned from the poets and which contaminates everything with falsity,
since those details can abound in the realities but not in their
recollection. . . I believe, however, that I have discovered a more
intimate reason. I shall write it; no matter if I am judged fantastic.
[The story I have narrated seems unreal because in it are mixed the
events of two different men.]{.italic} In the first chapter, the
horseman wants to know the name of the river bathing the walls of
Thebes; Flaminius Rufus, who before has applied to the city the epithet
of Hekatompylos, says that the river is the Egypt; none of these
locutions is proper to him but rather to Homer, who makes express
mention in the [Iliad]{.italic} of Thebes Hekatompylos and who in the
[Odyssey,]{.italic} by way of Proteus and Ulysses, invariably says Egypt
for Nile. In the second chapter, the Roman, upon drinking the immortal
water, utters some words in Greek; these words are Homeric and may be
sought at the end of the famous catalogue of the ships. Later, in the
vertiginous palace, he speaks of \"a reprobation which was almost
remorse\"; these words belong to Homer, who had projected that horror.
Such anomalies disquieted me; others, of an aesthetic order, permitted
me to discover the truth. They are contained in the last chapter; there
it is written that I fought at Stamford Bridge, that I transcribed in
Bulaq the travels of Sinbad the Sailor and that I subscribed in Aberdeen
to the English [Iliad]{.italic} of Pope. One reads, [inter
alia:]{.italic} \"In Bikaner I professed the science of astrology and
also in Bohemia.\" None of these testimonies is false; what is
significant is that they were stressed. The first of them seems proper
to a warrior, but later one notes that the narrator does not linger over
warlike deeds, but does over the fates of men. Those which follow are
even more curious. A dark elemental reason obliged me to record them; I
did it because I knew they were pathetic. Spoken by the Roman Flaminius
Rufus, they are not. They are, spoken by Homer; it is strange that the
latter should copy in the thirteenth century the adventures of Sinbad,
another Ulysses, and should discover after many centuries, in a northern
kingdom and a barbarous tongue, the forms of his [Iliad.]{.italic} As
for the sentence containing the name of Bikaner, one can see that it was
fabricated by a man of letters, desirous (as was the author of the ship
catalogue) of exhibiting splendid
words.[[[[19]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos606792){.calibre7}
When the end draws near, there no longer remain any remembered images;
only words remain. It is not strange that time should have confused the
words that once represented me with those that were symbols of the fate
of he who accompanied me for so many centuries. I have been Homer;
shortly, I shall be No One, like Ulysses; shortly, I shall be all men; I
shall be dead.
\
[Postscript (1950).]{.italic} ― Among the commentaries elicited by the
preceding publication, the most curious, if not the most urbane, is
biblically entitled [A Coat of Many Colors]{.italic} (Manchester, 1948)
and is the work of the most tenacious pen of Doctor Nahum Cordovero. It
comprises some one hundred pages. The author speaks of the Greek centos,
of the centos of late Latinity, of Ben Jonson, who defined his
contemporaries with bits of Seneca, of the [Virgilius
evangelizans]{.italic} of Alexander Ross, of the artifices of George
Moore and of Eliot and, finally, of \"the narrative attributed to the
antique dealer Joseph Cartaphilus.\" He denounces, in the first chapter,
brief interpolations from Pliny [(Historia naturalis,]{.italic} V, 8);
in the second, from Thomas de Quincey [(Writings,]{.italic} III, 439);
in the third, from an epistle of Descartes to the ambassador Pierre
Chanut; in the fourth, from Bernard Shaw [(Back to Methuselah,]{.italic}
V). He infers from these intrusions or thefts that the whole document is
apocryphal.
In my opinion, such a conclusion is inadmissible. \"When the end draws
near,\" wrote Cartaphilus, \"there no longer remain any remembered
images; only words remain.\" Words, displaced and mutilated words, words
of others, were the poor pittance left him by the hours and the
centuries.
\
[To Cecilia Ingenieros]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_019.html_calibre_pb_19 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_020.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_020.html_filepos309789 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_020.html_filepos309954 .calibre10}
[[The Theologians]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
After having razed the garden and profaned the chalices and altars, the
Huns entered the monastery library on horseback and trampled the
incomprehensible books and vituperated and burned them, perhaps fearful
that the letters concealed blasphemies against their god, which was an
iron scimitar. Palimpsests and codices were consumed, but in the heart
of the fire, amid the ashes, there remained almost intact the twelfth
book of the [Civitas Dei,]{.italic} which relates how in Athens Plato
taught that, at the centuries\' end, all things will recover their
previous state and he in Athens, before the same audience, will teach
this same doctrine anew. The text pardoned by the flames enjoyed special
veneration and those who read and reread it in that remote province came
to forget that the author had only stated this doctrine in order better
to refute it. A century later, Aurelian, coadjutor of Aquileia, learned
that on the shores of the Danube the very recent sect of the Monotones
(called also the Annulars) professed that history is a circle and that
there is nothing which has not been and will not be. In the mountains,
the Wheel and the Serpent had displaced the Cross. All were afraid, but
all were comforted by the rumor that John of Pannonia, who had
distinguished himself with a treatise on the seventh attribute of God,
was going to impugn such an abominable heresy.
Aurelian deplored this news, particularly the latter part. He knew that
in questions of theology there is no novelty without risk; then he
reflected that the thesis of a circular time was too different, too
astounding, for the risk to be serious. (The heresies we should fear are
those which can be confused with orthodoxy.) John of Pannonia\'s
intervention ― his intrusion ― pained him more. Two years before, with
his verbose [De septima affectione Dei sive de aeternitate,]{.italic} he
had usurped a topic in Aurelian\'s speciality; now, as if the problem of
time belonged to him, he was going to rectify the Annulars, perhaps with
Procrustean arguments, with theriacas more fearful than the Serpent. . .
That night, Aurelian turned the pages of Plutarch\'s ancient dialogue on
the cessation of the oracles; in the twenty-ninth paragraph he read a
satire against the Stoics, who defend an infinite cycle of worlds, with
infinite suns, moons, Apollos, Dianas and Poseidons. The discovery
seemed to him a favorable omen; he resolved to anticipate John of
Pannonia and refute the heretics of the Wheel.
There are those who seek a woman\'s love in order to forget her, to
think no more of her; Aurelian, in a similar fashion, wanted to surpass
John of Pannonia in order to be rid of the resentment he inspired in
him, not in order to harm him. Tempered by mere diligence, by the
fabrication of syllogisms and the invention of insults, by the
[negos]{.italic} and [autems]{.italic} and [nequaquams,]{.italic} he
managed to forget that rancor. He erected vast and almost inextricable
periods encumbered with parentheses, in which negligence and solecism
seemed as forms of scorn. He made an instrument of cacophony. He foresaw
that John would fulminate the Annulars with prophetic gravity; so as not
to coincide with him, he chose mockery as his weapon. Augustine had
written that Jesus is the straight path that saves us from the circular
labyrinth followed by the impious; these Aurelian, laboriously trivial,
compared with Ixion, with the liver of Prometheus, with Sisyphus, with
the king of Thebes who saw two suns, with stuttering, with parrots, with
mirrors, with echoes, with the mules of a noria and with two-horned
syllogisms. (Here the heathen fables survived, relegated to the status
of adornments.) Like all those possessing a library, Aurelian was aware
that he was guilty of not knowing his in its entirety; this controversy
enabled him to fulfill his obligations with many books which seemed to
reproach him for his neglect. Thus he was able to insert a passage from
Origen\'s work [De principiis,]{.italic} where it is denied that Judas
Iscariot will again betray the Lord and that Paul will again witness
Stephen\'s martyrdom in Jerusalem, and another from Cicero\'s [Academica
priora,]{.italic} where the author scoffs at those who imagine that,
while he converses with Lucullus, other Luculluses and Ciceros in
infinite number say precisely the same thing in an infinite number of
equal worlds. In addition, he wielded against the Monotones the text
from Plutarch and denounced the scandalousness of an idolater\'s valuing
the [lumen naturae]{.italic} more than they did the word of God. The
writing took him nine days; on the tenth, he was sent a transcript of
John of Pannonia\'s refutation.
It was almost derisively brief; Aurelian looked at it with disdain and
then with fear. The first part was a gloss on the end verses of the
ninth chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, where it is said that Jesus
was not sacrificed many times since the beginning of the world, but now,
once, in the consummation of the centuries. The second part adduced the
biblical precept concerning the vain repetitions of the pagans (Matthew
6:7) and the passage from the seventh book of Pliny which ponders that
in the wide universe there are no two faces alike. John of Pannonia
declared that neither are there two like souls and that the vilest
sinner is as precious as the blood Jesus shed for him. One man\'s act
(he affirmed) is worth more than the nine concentric heavens and
imagining that this act can be lost and return again is a pompous
frivolity. Time does not remake what we lose; eternity saves it for
heaven and also for hell. The treatise was limpid, universal; it seemed
not to have been written by a concrete person, but by any man or,
perhaps, by all men.
Aurelian felt an almost physical humiliation. He thought of destroying
or reforming his own work; then, with resentful integrity, he sent it to
Rome without modifying a letter. Months later, when the council of
Pergamum convened, the theologian entrusted with impugning the
Monotones\' errors was (predictably) John of Pannonia; his learned and
measured refutation was sufficient to have Euphorbus the heresiarch
condemned to the stake. \"This has happened and will happen again,\"
said Euphorbus. \"You are not lighting a pyre, you are lighting a
labyrinth of flames. If all the fires I have been were gathered together
here, they would not fit on earth and the angels would be blinded. I
have said this many times.\" Then he cried out, because the flames had
reached him.
The Wheel fell before the
Cross,[[[[20]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos607194){.calibre7}
but Aurelian and John of Pannonia continued their secret battle. Both
served in the same army, coveted the same guerdon, warred against the
same Enemy, but Aurelian did not write a word which secretly did not
strive to surpass John. Their duel was an invisible one; if the copious
indices do not deceive me, the name of the [other]{.italic} does not
figure once in the many volumes by Aurelian preserved in Migne\'s
[Patrology.]{.italic} (Of John\'s works only twenty words have
survived.) Both condemned the anathemas of the second council of
Constantinople; both persecuted the Arrianists, who denied the eternal
generation of the Son; both testified to the othodoxy of Cosmas\'
[Topographia Christiana,]{.italic} which teaches that the earth is
quadrangular, like the Hebrew tabernacle. Unfortunately, to the four
corners of the earth another tempestuous heresy spread. Originating in
Egypt or in Asia (for the testimonies differ and Bousset will not admit
Harnack\'s reasoning), it infested the eastern provinces and erected
sanctuaries in Macedonia, in Carthage and in Treves. It seemed to be
everywhere; it was said that in the diocese of Britannia the crucifixes
had been inverted and that in Caesarea the image of the Lord had been
replaced by a mirror. The mirror and the obolus were the new
schismatics\' emblems.
History knows them by many names (Speculars, Abysmals, Cainites), but
the most common of all is Histriones, a name Aurelian gave them and
which they insolently adopted. In Frigia they were called Simulacra, and
also in Dardania. John of Damascus called them Forms; it is well to note
that the passage has been rejected by Erfjord. There is no heresiologist
who does not relate with stupor their wild customs. Many Histriones
professed asceticism; some mutilated themselves, as did Origen; others
lived underground in the sewers; others tore out their eyes; others (the
Nabucodonosors of Nitria) \"grazed like oxen and their hair grew like an
eagle\'s.\" They often went from mortification and severity to crime;
some communities tolerated thievery; others, homicide; others, sodomy,
incest and bestiality. All were blasphemous; they cursed not only the
Christian God but also the arcane divinities of their own pantheon. They
contrived sacred books whose disappearance is lamented by scholars. In
the year 1658, Sir Thomas Browne wrote: \"Time has annihilated the
ambitious Histrionic gospels, not the Insults with which their Impiety
was fustigated\": Erfjord has suggested that these \"insults\"
(preserved in a Greek codex) are the lost gospels. This is
incomprehensible if we do not know the Histriones\' cosmology.
In the hermetic books it is written that what is down below is equal to
what is on high, and what is on high is equal to what is down below; in
the [Zohar,]{.italic} that the higher world is a reflection of the
lower. The Histriones founded their doctrine on a perversion of this
idea. They invoked Matthew 6:12 (\"and forgive us our debts, as we
forgive our debtors\") and 11:12 (\"the kingdom of heaven suffereth
violence\") to demonstrate that the earth influences heaven, and I
Corinthians 13:12 (\"for now we see through a glass, darkly\") to
demonstrate that everything we see is false. Perhaps contaminated by the
Monotones, they imagined that all men are two men and that the real one
is the other, the one in heaven. They also imagined that our acts
project an inverted reflection, in such a way that if we are awake, the
other sleeps, if we fornicate, the other is chaste, if we steal, the
other is generous. When we die, we shall join this other and be him.
(Some echo of these doctrines persisted in Léon Bloy.) Other Histriones
reasoned that the world would end when the number of its possibilities
was exhausted; since there can be no repetitions, the righteous should
eliminate (commit) the most infamous acts, so that these will not soil
the future and will hasten the coming of the kingdom of Jesus. This
article was negated by other sects, who held that the history of the
world should be fulfilled in every man. Most, like Pythagoras, will have
to transmigrate through many bodies before attaining their liberation;
some, the Proteans, \"in the period of one lifetime are lions, dragons,
boars, water and a tree.\" Demosthenes tells how the initiates into the
Orphic mysteries were submitted to purification with mud; the Proteans,
analogously, sought purification through evil. They knew, as did
Carpocrates, that no one will be released from prison until he has paid
the last obolus (Luke 12:59) and used to deceive penitents with this
other verse: \"I am come that they might have life, and that they might
have it more abundantly\" (John 10:10). They also said that not to be
evil is a satanic arrogance. . . Many and divergent mythologies were
devised by the Histriones; some preached asceticism, others
licentiousness. All preached confusion. Theopompus, a Histrione of
Berenice, denied all fables; he said that every man is an organ put
forth by the divinity in order to perceive the world.
The heretics of Aurelian\'s diocese were of those who affirmed that time
does not tolerate repetitions, not of those who affirmed that every act
is reflected in heaven. This circumstance was strange; in a report to
the authorities in Rome, Aurelian mentioned it. The prelate who was to
receive the report was the empress\' confessor; everyone knew that this
demanding post kept him from the intimate delights of speculative
theology. His secretary ― a former collaborator of John of Pannonia, now
hostile to him ― enjoyed fame as a punctual inquisitor of heterodoxies;
Aurelian added an exposition of the Histrionic heresy, just as it was
found in the conventicles of Genua and of Aquileia. He composed a few
paragraphs; when he tried to write the atrocious thesis that there are
no two moments alike, his pen halted. He could not find the necessary
formula; the admonitions of this new doctrine (\"Do you want to see what
human eyes have never seen? Look at the moon. Do you want to hear what
ears have never heard? Listen to the bird\'s cry. Do you want to touch
what hands have never touched? Touch the earth. Verily I say that God is
about to create the world.\") were much too affected and metaphorical to
be transcribed. Suddenly, a sentence of twenty words came to his mind.
He wrote it down, joyfully; immediately afterwards, he was troubled by
the suspicion that it was the work of another. The following day, he
remembered that he had read it many years before in the [Adversus
annulares]{.italic} composed by John of Pannonia. He verified the
quotation; there it was. He was tormented by incertitude. If he changed
or suppressed those words he would weaken the expression; if he left
them he would be plagiarizing a man he abhorred; if he indicated their
source, he would be denouncing him. He implored divine assistance.
Towards the beginning of the second twilight, his guardian angel
dictated to him an intermediate solution. Aurelian kept the words, but
preceded them with this notice: \"What the heresiarchs now bark in
confusion of the faith was said in our realm by a most learned man, with
more frivolity than guilt.\" Then the dreaded, hoped for, inevitable
thing happened. Aurelian had to declare who the man was; John of
Pannonia was accused of professing heretical opinions.
Four months later, a blacksmith of Aventinus, deluded by the
Histriones\' deceptions, placed a huge iron sphere on the shoulders of
his small son, so that his double might fly. The boy died; the horror
engendered by this crime obliged John\'s judges to assume an
unexceptionable severity. He would not retract; he repeated that if he
negated his proposition he would fall into the pestilential heresy of
the Monotones. He did not understand (did not want to understand) that
to speak of the Monotones was to speak of the already forgotten. With
somewhat senile insistence, he abundantly gave forth with the most
brilliant periods of his former polemics; the judges did not even hear
what had once enraptured them. Instead of trying to cleanse himself of
the slightest blemish of Histrionism, he strove to demonstrate that the
proposition of which he was accused was rigorously orthodox. He argued
with the men on whose judgment his fate depended and committed the
extreme ineptitude of doing so with wit and irony. On the 26th of
October, after a discussion lasting three days and three nights, he was
sentenced to die at the stake.
Aurelian witnessed the execution, for refusing to do so meant confessing
his own guilt. The place for the ceremony was a hill, on whose green top
there was a pole driven deep into the ground, surrounded by many bundles
of wood. A bailiff read the tribunal\'s sentence. Under the noonday sun,
John of Pannonia lay with his face in the dust, howling like an animal.
He clawed the ground but the executioners pulled him away, stripped him
naked and finally tied him to the stake. On his head they placed a straw
crown dipped in sulphur; at his side, a copy of the pestilential
[Adversus annulares.]{.italic} It had rained the night before and the
wood burned badly. John of Pannonia prayed in Greek and then in an
unknown language. The fire was about to engulf him when Aurelian finally
dared to raise his eyes. The bursts of flame halted; Aurelian saw for
the first and last time the face of the hated heretic. It reminded him
of someone, but he could not remember who. Then he was lost in the
flames; then he cried out and it was as if a fire had cried out.
Plutarch has related that Julius Caesar wept for the death of Pompey;
Aurelian did not weep for the death of John, but he felt what a man
would feel when rid of an incurable disease that had become a part of
his life. In Aquileia, in Ephesus, in Macedonia, he let the years pass
over him. He sought the arduous limits of the Empire, the torpid swamps
and contemplative deserts, so that solitude might help him understand
his destiny. In a cell in Mauretania, in a night laden with lions, he
reconsidered the complex accusation brought against John of Pannonia and
justified, for the n^th^ time, the sentence. It was much more difficult
to justify his own tortuous denunciation. In Rusaddir he preached the
anachronistic sermon \"Light of lights burning in the flesh of a
reprobate.\" In Hibernia, in one of the hovels of a monastery surrounded
by the forest, he was startled one night towards dawn by the sound of
rain. He remembered a night in Rome when that minute noise had also
startled him. At midday, a lightning bolt set fire to the trees and
Aurelian died just as John had.
The end of this story can only be related in metaphors since it takes
place in the kingdom of heaven, where there is no time. Perhaps it would
be correct to say that Aurelian spoke with God and that He was so little
interested in religious differences that He took him for John of
Pannonia. This, however, would imply a confusion in the divine mind. It
is more correct to say that in Paradise, Aurelian learned that, for the
unfathomable divinity, he and John of Pannonia (the orthodox believer
and the heretic, the abhorrer and the abhorred, the accuser and the
accused) formed one single person.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_020.html_calibre_pb_20 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_021.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_021.html_filepos328518 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_021.html_filepos328574 .calibre10}
[[Story of the Warrior and the Captive]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
On page 278 of his book [La poesia]{.italic} (Bari, 1942), Croce,
abbreviating a Latin text of the historian Peter the Deacon, narrates
the destiny and cites the epitaph of Droctulft; both these moved me
singularly; later I understood why. Droctulft was a Lombard warrior who,
during the siege of Ravenna, left his companions and died defending the
city he had previously attacked. The Ravennese gave him burial in a
temple and composed an epitaph in which they manifested their gratitude
[(contempsit caros, dum nos amat ille, parentes)]{.italic} and observed
the peculiar contrast evident between the barbarian\'s fierce
countenance and his simplicity and goodness:
\
[[Terribilis visu facies, sed mente benignus,]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[ Longaque robusto pectore barba
fuit!]{.italic}]{.calibre5}[[[[[21]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.italic}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos607356){.calibre7}
\
Such is the story of the destiny of Droctulft, a barbarian who died
defending Rome, or such is the fragment of his story Peter the Deacon
was able to salvage. I do not even know in what period it took place:
whether toward the middle of the sixth century, when the Longobardi
desolated the plains of Italy, or in the eighth, before the surrender of
Ravenna. Let us imagine (this is not a historical work) the former.
Let us imagine Droctulft [sub specie aeternitatis,]{.italic} not the
individual Droctulft, who no doubt was unique and unfathomable (all
individuals are), but the generic type formed from him and many others
by tradition, which is the effect of oblivion and of memory. Through an
obscure geography of forests and marshes, the wars brought him to Italy
from the banks of the Danube and the Elbe, and perhaps he did not know
he was going south and perhaps he did not know he was fighting against
the name of Rome. Perhaps he professed the Arrianist faith, which holds
that the Son\'s glory is a reflection of the Holy Father\'s, but it is
more congruous to imagine him a worshiper of the Earth, of Hertha, whose
covered idol went from hut to hut in a cow-drawn cart, or of the gods of
war and thunder, which were crude wooden figures wrapped in homespun
clothing and hung with coins and bracelets. He came from the
inextricable forests of the boar and the bison; he was light-skinned,
spirited, innocent, cruel, loyal to his captain and his tribe, but not
to the universe. The wars bring him to Ravenna and there he sees
something he has never seen before, or has not seen fully. He sees the
day and the cypresses and the marble. He sees a whole whose multiplicity
is not that of disorder; he sees a city, an organism composed of
statues, temples, gardens, rooms, amphitheaters, vases, columns, regular
and open spaces. None of these fabrications (I know) impresses him as
beautiful; he is touched by them as we now would be by a complex
mechanism whose purpose we could not fathom but in whose design an
immortal intelligence might be divined. Perhaps it is enough for him to
see a single arch, with an incomprehensible inscription in eternal Roman
letters. Suddenly he is blinded and renewed by this revelation, the
City. He knows that in it he will be a dog, or a child, and that he will
not even begin to understand it, but he also knows that it is worth more
than his gods and his sworn faith and all the marshes of Germany.
Droctulft abandons his own and fights for Ravenna. He dies and on his
grave they inscribe these words which he would not have understood:
\
[[Contempsit caros, dum nos amat ille, parentes,]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[ Hanc patriam reputans esse, Ravenna, suam.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
He was not a traitor (traitors seldom inspire pious epitaphs); he was a
man enlightened, a convert. Within a few generations, the Longobardi who
had condemned this turncoat proceeded just as he had; they became
Italians, Lombards, and perhaps one of their blood ― Aldiger ― could
have engendered those who engendered the Alighieri. . . Many conjectures
may be applied to Droctulft\'s act; mine is the most economical; if it
is not true as fact it will be so as symbol.
When I read the story of this warrior in Croce\'s book, it moved me in
an unusual way and I had the impression of having recovered, in a
different form, something that had been my own. Fleetingly I thought of
the Mongolian horsemen who tried to make of China an infinite pasture
ground and then grew old in the cities they had longed to destroy; this
was not the memory I sought. At last I found it: it was a tale I had
once heard from my English grandmother, who is now dead.
In 1872, my grandfather Borges was commander of the northern and western
frontiers of Buenos Aires and the southern frontier of Santa Fe. His
headquarters was in Junín; beyond that, four or five leagues distant
from each other, the chain of outposts; beyond that, what was then
termed the [pampa]{.italic} and also the \"hinterland.\" Once ― half out
of wonder, half out of sarcasm ― my grandmother commented upon her fate
as a lone Englishwoman exiled to that far corner of the earth; people
told her that she was not the only one there and, months later, pointed
out to her an Indian girl who was slowly crossing the plaza. She wore
two brightly colored blankets and went barefoot; her hair was blond. A
soldier told her another Englishwoman wanted to speak to her. The girl
agreed; she entered the headquarters without fear but not without
suspicion. In her copper-colored face, which was daubed in ferocious
colors, her eyes were of that reluctant blue the English call gray. Her
body was lithe, like a deer\'s; her hands, strong and bony. She came
from the desert, from the hinterland, and everything seemed too small
for her: doors, walls, furniture.
Perhaps the two women felt for an instant as sisters; they were far from
their beloved island and in an incredible country. My grandmother
uttered some kind of question; the other woman replied with difficulty,
searching for words and repeating them, as if astonished by their
ancient flavor. For some fifteen years she had not spoken her native
language and it was not easy for her to recover it. She said that she
was from Yorkshire, that her parents had emigrated to Buenos Aires, that
she had lost them in an Indian raid, that she had been carried off by
the Indians and was now the wife of a chieftain, to whom she had already
given two sons, and that he was very brave. All this she said in a
rustic English, interwoven with Araucanian or Pampan, and behind her
story one could glimpse a savage life: the horsehide shelters, the fires
made of dry manure, the feasts of scorched meat or raw entrails, the
stealthy departures at dawn, the attacks on corrals, the yelling and the
pillaging, the wars, the sweeping charges on the haciendas by naked
horsemen, the polygamy, the stench and the superstition. An Englishwoman
had lowered herself to this barbarism. Moved by pity and shock, my
grandmother urged her not to return. She swore to protect her, to
retrieve her children. The woman answered that she was happy and
returned that night to the desert. Francisco Borges was to die a short
time later, in the revolution of seventy-four; perhaps then my
grandmother was able to perceive in this other woman, also held captive
and transformed by the implacable continent, a monstrous mirror of her
own destiny. . .
Every year, the blond Indian woman used to come to the country stores at
Junín or at Fort Lavalle to obtain trinkets or makings for maté; she did
not appear after the conversation with my grandmother. However, they saw
each other once again. My grandmother had gone hunting one day; on a
ranch, near the sheep dip, a man was slaughtering one of the animals. As
if in a dream, the Indian woman passed by on horseback. She threw
herself to the ground and drank the warm blood. I do not know whether
she did it because she could no longer act any other way, or as a
challenge and a sign.
A thousand three hundred years and the ocean lie between the destiny of
the captive and the destiny of Droctulft. Both these, now, are equally
irrecoverable. The figure of the barbarian who embraced the cause of
Ravenna, the figure of the European woman who chose the wasteland, may
seem antagonistic. And yet, both were swept away by a secret impulse, an
impulse more profound than reason, and both heeded this impulse, which
they would not have known how to justify. Perhaps the stories I have
related are one single story. The obverse and the reverse of this coin
are, for God, the same.
\
[For Ulrike von Kühlmann]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_021.html_calibre_pb_21 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_022.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_022.html_filepos338051 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_022.html_filepos338216 .calibre10}
[[Emma Zunz]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Returning home from the Tarbuch and Loewenthal textile mills on the 14th
of January, 1922, Emma Zunz discovered in the rear of the entrance hall
a letter, posted in Brazil, which informed her that her father had died.
The stamp and the envelope deceived her at first; then the unfamiliar
handwriting made her uneasy. Nine or ten lines tried to fill up the
page; Emma read that Mr. Maier had taken by mistake a large dose of
veronal and had died on the third of the month in the hospital of Bagé.
A boarding-house friend of her father had signed the letter, some Fein
or Fain from Río Grande, with no way of knowing that he was addressing
the deceased\'s daughter.
Emma dropped the paper. Her first impression was of a weak feeling in
her stomach and in her knees; then of blind guilt, of unreality, of
coldness, of fear; then she wished that it were already the next day.
Immediately afterward she realized that that wish was futile because the
death of her father was the only thing that had happened in the world,
and it would go on happening endlessly. She picked up the piece of paper
and went to her room. Furtively, she hid it in a drawer, as if somehow
she already knew the ulterior facts. She had already begun to suspect
them, perhaps; she had already become the person she would be.
In the growing darkness, Emma wept until the end of that day for the
suicide of Manuel Maier, who in the old happy days was Emmanuel Zunz.
She remembered summer vacations at a little farm near Gualeguay, she
remembered (tried to remember) her mother, she remembered the little
house at Lanús which had been auctioned off, she remembered the yellow
lozenges of a window, she remembered the warrant for arrest, the
ignominy, she remembered the poison-pen letters with the newspaper\'s
account of \"the cashier\'s embezzlement,\" she remembered (but this she
never forgot) that her father, on the last night, had sworn to her that
the thief was Loewenthal. Loewenthal, Aaron Loewenthal, formerly the
manager of the factory and now one of the owners. Since 1916 Emma had
guarded the secret. She had revealed it to no one, not even to her best
friend, Elsa Urstein. Perhaps she was shunning profane incredulity;
perhaps she believed that the secret was a link between herself and the
absent parent. Loewenthal did not know that she knew; Emma Zunz derived
from this slight fact a feeling of power.
She did not sleep that night and when the first light of dawn defined
the rectangle of the window, her plan was already perfected. She tried
to make the day, which seemed interminable to her, like any other. At
the factory there were rumors of a strike. Emma declared herself, as
usual, against all violence. At six o\'clock, with work over, she went
with Elsa to a women\'s club that had a gymnasium and a swimming pool.
They signed their names; she had to repeat and spell out her first and
her last name, she had to respond to the vulgar jokes that accompanied
the medical examination. With Elsa and with the youngest of the Kronfuss
girls she discussed what movie they would go to Sunday afternoon. Then
they talked about boyfriends and no one expected Emma to speak. In April
she would be nineteen years old, but men inspired in her, still, an
almost pathological fear. . . Having returned home, she prepared a
tapioca soup and a few vegetables, ate early, went to bed and forced
herself to sleep. In this way, laborious and trivial, Friday the
fifteenth, the day before, elapsed.
Impatience awoke her on Saturday. Impatience it was, not uneasiness, and
the special relief of it being that day at last. No longer did she have
to plan and imagine; within a few hours the simplicity of the facts
would suffice. She read in [La Prensa]{.italic} that the
[Nordstjärnan,]{.italic} out of Malmö, would sail that evening from Pier
3. She phoned Loewenthal, insinuated that she wanted to confide in him,
without the other girls knowing, something pertaining to the strike; and
she promised to stop by at his office at nightfall. Her voice trembled;
the tremor was suitable to an informer. Nothing else of note happened
that morning. Emma worked until twelve o\'clock and then settled with
Elsa and Perla Kronfuss the details of their Sunday stroll. She lay down
after lunch and reviewed, with her eyes closed, the plan she had
devised. She thought that the final step would be less horrible than the
first and that it would doubtlessly afford her the taste of victory and
justice. Suddenly, alarmed, she got up and ran to the dresser drawer.
She opened it; beneath the picture of Milton Sills, where she had left
it the night before, was Fain\'s letter. No one could have seen it; she
began to read it and tore it up.
To relate with some reality the events of that afternoon would be
difficult and perhaps unrighteous. One attribute of a hellish experience
is unreality, an attribute that seems to allay its terrors and which
aggravates them perhaps. How could one make credible an action which was
scarcely believed in by the person who executed it, how to recover that
brief chaos which today the memory of Emma Zunz repudiates and confuses?
Emma lived in Almagro, on Liniers Street: we are certain that in the
afternoon she went down to the waterfront. Perhaps on the infamous Paseo
de Julio she saw herself multiplied in mirrors, revealed by lights and
denuded by hungry eyes, but it is more reasonable to suppose that at
first she wandered, unnoticed, through the indifferent portico. . . She
entered two or three bars, noted the routine or technique of the other
women. Finally she came across men from the [Nordstjärnan.]{.italic} One
of them, very young, she feared might inspire some tenderness in her and
she chose instead another, perhaps shorter than she and coarse, in order
that the purity of the horror might not be mitigated. The man led her to
a door, then to a murky entrance hall and afterwards to a narrow
stairway and then a vestibule (in which there was a window with lozenges
identical to those in the house at Lanús) and then to a passageway and
then to a door which was closed behind her. The arduous events are
outside of time, either because the immediate past is as if disconnected
from the future, or because the parts which form these events do not
seem to be consecutive.
During that time outside of time, in that perplexing disorder of
disconnected and atrocious sensations, did Emma Zunz think
[once]{.italic} about the dead man who motivated the sacrifice? It is my
belief that she did think once, and in that moment she endangered her
desperate undertaking. She thought (she was unable not to think) that
her father had done to her mother the hideous thing that was being done
to her now. She thought of it with weak amazement and took refuge,
quickly, in vertigo. The man, a Swede or Finn, did not speak Spanish. He
was a tool for Emma, as she was for him, but she served him for pleasure
whereas he served her for justice.
When she was alone, Emma did not open her eyes immediately. On the
little night table was the money that the man had left: Emma sat up and
tore it to pieces as before she had torn the letter. Tearing money is an
impiety, like throwing away bread; Emma repented the moment after she
did it. An act of pride and on that day. . . Her fear was lost in the
grief of her body, in her disgust. The grief and the nausea were
chaining her, but Emma got up slowly and proceeded to dress herself. In
the room there were no longer any bright colors; the last light of dusk
was weakening. Emma was able to leave without anyone seeing her; at the
corner she got on a Lacroze streetcar heading west. She selected, in
keeping with her plan, the seat farthest toward the front, so that her
face would not be seen. Perhaps it comforted her to verify in the
insipid movement along the streets that what had happened had not
contaminated things. She rode through the diminishing opaque suburbs,
seeing them and forgetting them at the same instant, and got off on one
of the side streets of Warnes. Paradoxically her fatigue was turning out
to be a strength, since it obligated her to concentrate on the details
of the adventure and concealed from her the background and the
objective.
Aaron Loewenthal was to all persons a serious man, to his intimate
friends a miser. He lived above the factory, alone. Situated in the
barren outskirts of the town, he feared thieves; in the patio of the
factory there was a large dog and in the drawer of his desk, everyone
knew, a revolver. He had mourned with gravity, the year before, the
unexpected death of his wife ― a Gauss who had brought him a fine dowry
― but money was his real passion. With intimate embarrassment, he knew
himself to be less apt at earning it than at saving it. He was very
religious; he believed he had a secret pact with God which exempted him
from doing good in exchange for prayers and piety. Bald, fat, wearing
the band of mourning, with smoked glasses and blond beard, he was
standing next to the window awaiting the confidential report of worker
Zunz.
He saw her push the iron gate (which he had left open for her) and cross
the gloomy patio. He saw her make a little detour when the chained dog
barked. Emma\'s lips were moving rapidly, like those of someone praying
in a low voice; weary, they were repeating the sentence which Mr.
Loewenthal would hear before dying.
Things did not happen as Emma Zunz had anticipated. Ever since the
morning before she had imagined herself wielding the firm revolver,
forcing the wretched creature to confess his wretched guilt and exposing
the daring stratagem which would permit the Justice of God to triumph
over human justice. (Not out of fear but because of being an instrument
of Justice she did not want to be punished.) Then, one single shot in
the center of his chest would seal Loewenthal\'s fate. But things did
not happen that way.
In Aaron Loewenthal\'s presence, more than the urgency of avenging her
father, Emma felt the need of inflicting punishment for the outrage she
had suffered. She was unable not to kill him after that thorough
dishonor. Nor did she have time for theatrics. Seated, timid, she made
excuses to Loewenthal, she invoked (as a privilege of the informer) the
obligation of loyalty, uttered a few names, inferred others and broke
off as if fear had conquered her. She managed to have Loewenthal leave
to get a glass of water for her. When the former, unconvinced by such a
fuss but indulgent, returned from the dining room, Emma had already
taken the heavy revolver out of the drawer. She squeezed the trigger
twice. The large body collapsed as if the reports and the smoke had
shattered it, the glass of water smashed, the face looked at her with
amazement and anger, the mouth of the face swore at her in Spanish and
Yiddish. The evil words did not slacken; Emma had to fire again. In the
patio the chained dog broke out barking, and a gush of rude blood flowed
from the obscene lips and soiled the beard and the clothing. Emma began
the accusation she had prepared (\"I have avenged my father and they
will not be able to punish me. . .\"), but she did not finish it,
because Mr. Loewenthal had already died. She never knew if he managed to
understand.
The straining barks reminded her that she could not, yet, rest. She
disarranged the divan, unbuttoned the dead man\'s jacket, took off the
bespattered glasses and left them on the filing cabinet. Then she picked
up the telephone and repeated what she would repeat so many times again,
with these and with other words: [Something incredible has happened. . .
Mr. Loewenthal had me come over on the pretext of the strike. . . He
abused me, 1 killed him . . .]{.italic}
Actually, the story [was]{.italic} incredible, but it impressed everyone
because substantially it was true. True was Emma Zunz\' tone, true was
her shame, true was her hate. True also was the outrage she had
suffered: only the circumstances were false, the time, and one or two
proper names.
\
[Translated by D. A. Y.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_022.html_calibre_pb_22 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_023.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_023.html_filepos351033 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_023.html_filepos351089 .calibre10}
[[The House of Asterion]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[And the queen gave birth to a child who was called
Asterion.]{.calibre5}
[Apollodorus:]{.calibre5} [[Bibliotheca,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [III,
I]{.calibre5}
\
I know they accuse me of arrogance, and perhaps of misanthropy, and
perhaps of madness. Such accusations (for which I shall extract
punishment in due time) are derisory. It is true that I never leave my
house, but it is also true that its doors (whose number is
infinite)[[[[22]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos607567){.calibre7}
are open day and night to men and to animals as well. Anyone may enter.
He will find here no female pomp nor gallant court formality, but he
will find quiet and solitude. And he will also find a house like no
other on the face of the earth. (There are those who declare there is a
similar one in Egypt, but they lie.) Even my detractors admit there is
not [one single piece of furniture]{.italic} in the house. Another
ridiculous falsehood has it that I, Asterion, am a prisoner. Shall I
repeat that there are no locked doors, shall I add that there are no
locks? Besides, one afternoon I did step into the street; if I returned
before night, I did so because of the fear that the faces of the common
people inspired in me, faces as discolored and flat as the palm of
one\'s hand. The sun had already set, but the helpless crying of a child
and the rude supplications of the faithful told me I had been
recognized. The people prayed, fled, prostrated themselves; some climbed
onto the stylobate of the temple of the Axes, others gathered stones.
One of them, I believe, hid himself beneath the sea. Not for nothing was
my mother a queen; I cannot be confused with the populace, though my
modesty might so desire.
The fact is that I am unique. I am not interested in what one man may
transmit to other men; like the philosopher, I think that nothing is
communicable by the art of writing. Bothersome and trivial details have
no place in my spirit, which is prepared for all that is vast and grand;
I have never retained the difference between one letter and another. A
certain generous impatience has not permitted that I learn to read.
Sometimes I deplore this, for the nights and days are long.
Of course, I am not without distractions. Like the ram about to charge,
I run through the stone galleries until I fall dizzy to the floor. I
crouch in the shadow of a pool or around a corner and pretend I am being
followed. There are roofs from which I let myself fall until I am
bloody. At any time I can pretend to be asleep, with my eyes closed and
my breathing heavy. (Sometimes I really sleep, sometimes the color of
day has changed when I open my eyes.) But of all the games, I prefer the
one about the other Asterion. I pretend that he comes to visit me and
that I show him my house. With great obeisance I say to him: [Now we
shall return to the first intersection]{.italic} or [Now we shall come
out into another courtyard]{.italic} or [I knew you would like the
drain]{.italic} or [Now you will see a pool that was filled with
sand]{.italic} or [You will soon see how the cellar branches
out.]{.italic} Sometimes I make a mistake and the two of us laugh
heartily.
Not only have I imagined these games, I have also meditated on the
house. All the parts of the house are repeated many times, any place is
another place. There is no one pool, courtyard, drinking trough, manger;
the mangers, drinking troughs, courtyards, pools are fourteen (infinite)
in number. The house is the same size as the world; or rather, it is the
world. However, by dint of exhausting the courtyards with pools and
dusty gray stone galleries I have reached the street and seen the temple
of the Axes and the sea. I did not understand this until a night vision
revealed to me that the seas and temples are also fourteen (infinite) in
number. Everything is repeated many times, fourteen times, but two
things in the world seem to be only once: above, the intricate sun;
below, Asterion. Perhaps I have created the stars and the sun and this
enormous house, but I no longer remember.
Every nine years nine men enter the house so that I may deliver them
from all evil. I hear their steps or their voices in the depths of the
stone galleries and I run joyfully to find them. The ceremony lasts a
few minutes. They fall one after another without my having to bloody my
hands. They remain where they fell and their bodies help distinguish one
gallery from another. I do not know who they are, but I know that one of
them prophesied, at the moment of his death, that some day my redeemer
would come. Since then my loneliness does not pain me, because I know my
redeemer lives and he will finally rise above the dust. If my ear could
capture all the sounds of the world, I should hear his steps. I hope he
will take me to a place with fewer galleries and fewer doors. What will
my redeemer be like?, I ask myself. Will he be a bull or a man? Will he
perhaps be a bull with the face of a man? Or will he be like me?
\
The morning sun reverberated from the bronze sword. There was no longer
even a vestige of blood.
\"Would you believe it, Ariadne?\" said Theseus. \"The Minotaur scarcely
defended himself.\"
\
[For Marta Mosquera Eastman]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_023.html_calibre_pb_23 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_024.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_024.html_filepos357013 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_024.html_filepos357064 .calibre10}\
[[Deutsches Requiem]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ ]{.calibre5}
[ Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him.]{.calibre5}
[ Job 13:15]{.calibre5}
\
My name is Otto Dietrich zur Linde. One of my ancestors, Christoph zur
Linde, died in the cavalry charge which decided the victory of Zorndorf.
My maternal great-grandfather, Ulrich Forkel, was shot in the forest of
Marchenoir by franc-tireurs, late in the year 1870; my father, Captain
Dietrich zur Linde, distinguished himself in the siege of Namur in 1914,
and, two years later, in the crossing of the
Danube.[[[[23]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos607869){.calibre7}
As for me, I will be executed as a torturer and murderer. The tribunal
acted justly; from the start I declared myself guilty. Tomorrow, when
the prison clock strikes nine, I will have entered into death\'s realm;
it is natural that I think now of my forebears, since I am so close to
their shadow, since, after a fashion, I am already my ancestors.
I kept silent during the trial, which fortunately was brief; to try to
justify myself at that time would have obstructed the verdict and would
have seemed an act of cowardice. Now things have changed; on the eve of
the execution I can speak without fear. I do not seek pardon, because I
feel no guilt; but I would like to be understood. Those who care to
listen to me will understand the history of Germany and the future
history of the world. I know that cases like mine, which are now
exceptional and astonishing, will shortly be commonplace. Tomorrow I
will die, but I am a symbol of future generations.
I was born in Marienburg in 1908. Two passions, which now are almost
forgotten, allowed me to bear with valor and even happiness the weight
of many unhappy years: music and metaphysics. I cannot mention all my
benefactors, but there are two names which I may not omit, those of
Brahms and Schopenhauer. I also studied poetry; to these last I would
add another immense Germanic name, William Shakespeare. Formerly I was
interested in theology, but from this fantastic discipline (and from the
Christian faith) I was led away by Schopenhauer, with his direct
arguments; and by Shakespeare and Brahms, with the infinite variety of
their worlds. He who pauses in wonder, moved with tenderness and
gratitude, before any facet of the work of these auspicious creators,
let him know that I also paused there, I, the abominable.
Nietzsche and Spengler entered my life about 1927. An eighteenth-century
author has observed that no one wants to owe anything to his
contemporaries. I, in order to free myself from an influence which I
felt to be oppressive, wrote an article titled [Abrechnung mit
Spengler,]{.italic} in which I noted that the most unequivocal monument
to those traits which the author calls Faust-like is not the
miscellaneous drama of
Goethe[[[[24]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos608319){.calibre7}
but a poem written twenty centuries ago, the [De rerum natura.]{.italic}
I paid homage, however, to the sincerity of the philosopher of history,
to his essentially German [(kerndeutsch)]{.italic} and military spirit.
In 1929 I entered the Party.
I will say little of my years of apprenticeship. They were more
difficult for me than for others, since, although I do not lack courage,
I am repelled by violence. I understood, however, that we were on the
verge of a new era, and that this era, comparable to the initial epochs
of Islam and Christianity, demanded a new kind of man. Individually my
comrades were disgusting to me; in vain did I try to reason that we had
to suppress our individuality for the lofty purpose which brought us
together.
The theologians maintain that if God\'s attention were to wander for a
single second from the right hand which traces these words, that hand
would plunge into nothingness, as if fulminated by a lightless fire. No
one, I say, can exist, no one can taste a glass of water or break a
piece of bread, without justification. For each man that justification
must be different; I awaited the inexorable war that would prove our
faith. It was enough for me to know that I would be a soldier in its
battles. At times I feared that English and Russian cowardice would
betray us. But chance, or destiny, decided my future differently. On
March first, 1939, at nightfall, there was a disturbance in Tilsit which
was not mentioned in the newspapers; in the street behind the synagogue,
my leg was pierced by two bullets and it was necessary to
amputate.[[[[25]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos608808){.calibre7}
A few days later our armies entered Bohemia. As the sirens announced
their entry, I was in a quiet hospital, trying to lose and forget myself
in Schopenhauer. An enormous and flaccid cat, symbol of my vain destiny,
was sleeping on the window sill.
In the first volume of [Parerga und Paralipomena]{.italic} I read again
that everything which can happen to a man, from the instant of his birth
until his death, has been preordained by him. Thus, every negligence is
deliberate, every chance encounter an appointment, every humiliation a
penitence, every failure a mysterious victory, every death a suicide.
There is no more skillful consolation than the idea that we have chosen
our own misfortunes; this individual teleology reveals a secret order
and prodigiously confounds us with the divinity. What unknown intention
(I questioned vainly) made me seek, that afternoon, those bullets and
that mutilation? Surely not fear of war, I knew; something more
profound. Finally I hit upon it. To die for a religion is easier than to
live it absolutely; to battle in Ephesus against the wild beasts is not
so trying (thousands of obscure martyrs did it) as to be Paul, servant
of Jesus; one act is less than a man\'s entire life. War and glory are
[facilities;]{.italic} more arduous than the undertaking of Napoleon was
that of Raskolnikov. On the seventh of February, 1941, I was named
subdirector of the concentration camp at Tarnowitz.
The carrying out of this task was not pleasant, but I was never
negligent. The coward proves his mettle under fire; the merciful, the
pious, seeks his trial in jails and in the suffering of others.
Essentially, Nazism is an act of morality, a purging of corrupted
humanity, to dress him anew. This transformation is common in battle,
amidst the clamor of the captains and the shouting; such is not the case
in a wretched cell, where insidious deceitful mercy tempts us with
ancient tenderness. Not in vain do I pen this word: for the superior man
of Zarathustra, mercy is the greatest of sins. I almost committed it (I
confess) when they sent us the eminent poet David Jerusalem from
Breslau.
He was about fifty years old. Poor in the goods of this world,
persecuted, denied, vituperated, he had dedicated his genius to the
praise of Happiness. I recall that Albert Soergel, in his work [Dichtung
der Zeit,]{.italic} compared him with Whitman. The comparison is not
exact. Whitman celebrates the universe in a preliminary, abstract,
almost indifferent manner; Jerusalem takes joy in each thing, with a
scrupulous and exact love. He never falls into the error of enumerations
and catalogues. I can still repeat from memory many hexameters from that
superb poem, [Tse Yang, Painter of Tigers,]{.italic} which is, as it
were, streaked with tigers, overburdened and criss-crossed with
transversal and silent tigers. Nor will I ever forget the soliloquy
called [Rosencrantz Speaks with the Angel,]{.italic} in which a
sixteenth-century London moneylender vainly tries on his deathbed to
vindicate his crimes, without suspecting that the secret justification
of his life is that of having inspired in one of his clients (whom he
has seen but once and does not remember) the character of Shylock. A man
of memorable eyes, jaundiced complexion, with an almost black beard,
David Jerusalem was the prototype of the Sephardic Jew, although, in
fact, he belonged to the depraved and hated Ashkenazim. I was severe
with him; I permitted neither my compassion nor his glory to make me
relent. I had come to understand many years before that there is nothing
on earth that does not contain the seed of a possible Hell; a face, a
word, a compass, a cigarette advertisement, are capable of driving a
person mad if he is unable to forget them. Would not a man who
continually imagined the map of Hungary be mad? I decided to apply this
principle to the disciplinary regimen of our camp, and . .
.[[[[26]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos608998){.calibre7}
By the end of 1942, Jerusalem had lost his reason; on March first,
1943, he managed to kill
himself.[[[[27]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos609161){.calibre7}
I do not know whether Jerusalem understood that, if I destroyed him, it
was to destroy my compassion. In my eyes he was not a man, not even a
Jew; he had been transformed into a detested zone of my soul. I agonized
with him, I died with him and somehow I was lost with him; therefore, I
was implacable.
Meanwhile we reveled in the great days and nights of a successful war.
In the very air we breathed there was a feeling not unlike love. Our
hearts beat with amazement and exaltation, as if we sensed the sea
nearby. Everything was new and different then, even the flavor of our
dreams. (I, perhaps, was never entirely happy. But it is known that
misery requires lost paradises.) Every man aspires to the fullness of
life, that is, to the sum of experiences which he is capable of
enjoying; nor is there a man unafraid of being cheated out of some part
of his infinite patrimony. But it can be said that my generation enjoyed
the extremes of experience, because first we were granted victory and
later defeat.
In October or November of 1942 my brother Friedrich perished in the
second battle of El Alamein, on the Egyptian sands. Months later an
aerial bombardment destroyed our family\'s home; another, at the end of
1943, destroyed my laboratory. The Third Reich was dying, harassed by
vast continents; it struggled alone against innumerable enemies. Then a
singular event occurred, which only now do I believe I understand. I
thought I was emptying the cup of anger, but in the dregs I encountered
an unexpected flavor, the mysterious and almost terrible flavor of
happiness. I essayed several explanations, but none seemed adequate. I
thought: [I am pleased with defeat, because secretly I know I am guilty,
and only punishment can redeem me.]{.italic} I thought: [I am pleased
with the defeat because it is an end and I am very tired.]{.italic} I
thought: [I am pleased with defeat because it has occurred, because it
is irrevocably united to all those events which are, which were, and
which will be, because to censure or to deplore a single real occurrence
is to blaspheme the universe.]{.italic} I played with these
explanations, until I found the true one.
It has been said that every man is born an Aristotelian or a Platonist.
This is the same as saying that every abstract contention has its
counterpart in the polemics of Aristotle or Plato; across the centuries
and latitudes, the names, faces and dialects change but not the eternal
antagonists. The history of nations also registers a secret continuity.
Arminius, when he cut down the legions of Varus in a marsh, did not
realize that he was a precursor of the German Empire; Luther, translator
of the Bible, could not suspect that his goal was to forge a people
destined to destroy the Bible for all time; Christoph zur Linde, killed
by a Russian bullet in 1758, was in some way preparing the victories of
1914; Hitler believed he was fighting for a nation but he fought for
all, even for those which he detested and attacked. It matters not that
his [I]{.italic} was ignorant of this fact; his blood and his will were
aware of it. The world was dying of Judaism and from that sickness of
Judaism, the faith of Jesus; we taught it violence and the faith of the
sword. That sword is slaying us, and we are comparable to the wizard who
fashioned a labyrinth and was then doomed to wander in it to the end of
his days; or to David, who, judging an unknown man, condemns him to
death, only to hear the revelation: [You are that man.]{.italic} Many
things will have to be destroyed in order to construct the New Order;
now we know that Germany also was one of those things. We have given
more than our lives, we have sacrificed the destiny of our beloved
Fatherland. Let others curse and weep; I rejoice in the fact that our
destiny completes its circle and is perfect.
An inexorable epoch is spreading over the world. We forged it, we who
are already its victim. What matters if England is the hammer and we the
anvil, so long as violence reigns and not servile Christian timidity? If
victory and injustice and happiness are not for Germany, let them be for
other nations. Let Heaven exist, even though our dwelling place is Hell.
I look at myself in the mirror to discover who I am, to discern how I
will act in a few hours, when I am face to face with death. My flesh may
be afraid; I am not.
\
[Translated by Julian Palley]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_024.html_calibre_pb_24 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_025.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_025.html_filepos371260 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_025.html_filepos371316 .calibre10}
[[Averroe\'s Search]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[[S\'imaginant que la trag]{.italic}]{.calibre5}[é]{.calibre5}[[die
n\'est autre chose que l\'art de louer. . .]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[ Ernest Renan:]{.calibre5}
[[Averroès,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [48 (1861)]{.calibre5}
\
Abulgualid Muhammad Ibn-Ahmad ibn-Muhammad ibn-Rushd (a century this
long name would take to become Averroes, first becoming Benraist and
Avenryz and even Aben-Rassad and Filius Rosadis) was writing the
eleventh chapter of his work [Tahafut-ul-Tahafut]{.italic} (Destruction
of Destruction), in which it is maintained, contrary to the Persian
ascetic Ghazali, author of the [Tahafut-ul-falasifa]{.italic}
(Destruction of Philosophers), that the divinity knows only the general
laws of the universe, those pertaining to the species, not to the
individual. He wrote with slow sureness, from right to left; the effort
of forming syllogisms and linking vast paragraphs did not keep him from
feeling, like a state of well-being, the cool and deep house surrounding
him. In the depths of the siesta amorous doves called huskily; from some
unseen patio arose the murmur of a fountain; something in Averroes,
whose ancestors came from the Arabian deserts, was thankful for the
constancy of the water. Down below were the gardens, the orchard; down
below, the busy Guadalquivir and then the beloved city of Cordova, no
less eminent than Bagdad or Cairo, like a complex and delicate
instrument, and all around (this Averroes felt also) stretched out to
the limits of the earth the Spanish land, where there are few things,
but where each seems to exist in a substantive and eternal way.
His pen moved across the page, the arguments entwined irrefutably, but a
slight preoccupation darkened Averroes\' felicity. It was not caused by
the [Tahafut,]{.italic} a fortuitous piece of work, but rather by a
problem of philological nature related to the monumental work which
would justify him in the eyes of men: his commentary on Aristotle. This
Greek, fountainhead of all philosophy, had been bestowed upon men to
teach them all that could be known; to interpret his works as the ulema
interpret the Koran was Averroes\' arduous purpose. Few things more
beautiful and more pathetic are recorded in history than this Arab
physician\'s dedication to the thoughts of a man separated from him by
fourteen centuries; to the intrinsic difficulties we should add that
Averroes, ignorant of Syriac and of Greek, was working with the
translation of a translation. The night before, two doubtful words had
halted him at the beginning of the [Poetics.]{.italic} These words were
[tragedy]{.italic} and [comedy.]{.italic} He had encountered them years
before in the third book of the [Rhetoric;]{.italic} no one in the whole
world of Islam could conjecture what they meant. In vain he had
exhausted the pages of Alexander of Aphrodisia, in vain he had compared
the versions of the Nestorian Hunain ibn-Ishaq and of Abu-Bashar Mata.
These two arcane words pullulated throughout the text of the
[Poetics;]{.italic} it was impossible to elude them.
Averroes put down his pen. He told himself (without excessive faith)
that what we seek is often nearby, put away the manuscript of the
[Tahafut]{.italic} and went over to the shelf where the many volumes of
the blind Abensida\'s [Mohkam,]{.italic} copied by Persian
calligraphers, were aligned. It was derisory to imagine he had not
consulted them, but he was tempted by the idle pleasure of turning their
pages. From this studious distraction, he was distracted by a kind of
melody. He looked through the lattice-work balcony; below, in the narrow
earthen patio, some half-naked children were playing. One, standing on
another\'s shoulders, was obviously playing the part of a muezzin; with
his eyes tightly closed, he chanted \"There is no god but the God.\" The
one who held him motionlessly played the part of the minaret; another,
abject in the dust and on his knees, the part of the faithful
worshipers. The game did not last long; all wanted to be the muezzin,
none the congregation or the tower. Averroes heard them dispute in the
[vulgar]{.italic} dialect, that is, in the incipient Spanish of the
peninsula\'s Moslem populace. He opened the [Quitab ul ain]{.italic} of
Jalil and thought proudly that in all Cordova (perhaps in all
Al-Andalus) there was no other copy of that perfect work than this one
the emir Yacub Almansur had sent him from Tangier. The name of this port
reminded him that the traveler Abulcasim Al-Ashari, who had returned
from Morocco, would dine with him that evening in the home of the Koran
scholar Farach. Abulcasim claimed to have reached the dominions of the
empire of Sin (China); his detractors, with that peculiar logic of
hatred, swore he had never set foot in China and that in the temples of
that land he had blasphemed the name of Allah. Inevitably the gathering
would last several hours; Averroes quickly resumed his writing of the
[Tahafut.]{.italic} He worked until the twilight of evening.
The conversation, at Farach\'s home, passed from the incomparable
virtues of the governor to those of his brother the emir; later, in the
garden, they spoke of roses. Abulcasim, who had not looked at them,
swore there were no roses like those adorning the Andalusian country
villas. Farach would not be bought with flattery; he observed that the
learned Ibn Qutaiba describes an excellent variety of the perpetual
rose, which is found in the gardens of Hindustan and whose petals, of a
blood red, exhibit characters which read: \"There is no god but the God,
Mohammed is the Apostle of God.\" He added that surely Abulcasim would
know of those roses. Abulcasim looked at him with alarm. If he answered
yes, all would judge him, justifiably, the readiest and most gratuitous
of impostors; if he answered no, he would be judged an infidel. He
elected to muse that the Lord possesses the key to all hidden things and
that there is not a green or withered thing on earth which is not
recorded in His Book. These words belong to one of the first chapters of
the Koran; they were received with a reverent murmur. Swelled with
vanity by this dialectical victory, Abulcasim was about to announce that
the Lord is perfect in His works and inscrutable. Then Averroes,
prefiguring the remote arguments of an as yet problematical Hume,
declared:
\"It is less difficult for me to admit an error in the learned Ibn
Qutaiba, or in the copyists, than to admit that the earth has roses with
the profession of the faith.\"
\"So it is. Great and truthful words,\" said Abulcasim.
\"One traveler,\" recalled Abdalmalik the poet, \"speaks of a tree whose
fruit are green birds. It is less painful for me to believe in it than
in roses with letters.\"
\"The color of the birds,\" said Averroes, \"seems to facilitate the
portent. Besides, fruit and birds belong to the world of nature, but
writing is an art. Going from leaves to birds is easier than from roses
to letters.\"
Another guest denied indignantly that writing is an art, since the
original of the Koran ― [the mother of the Book]{.italic} ― is prior to
Creation and is kept in heaven. Another spoke of Chahiz of Basra, who
said that the Koran is a substance which may take the form of a man or
animal, an opinion seeming to concord with the opinion of those who
attribute two faces to the sacred book. Farach expounded at length the
orthodox doctrine. The Koran (he said) is one of the attributes of God,
as is His piety; it is copied in a book, uttered by the tongue,
remembered in the heart, and the language and the signs and the writing
are the work of man, but the Koran is irrevocable and eternal. Averroes,
who had written a commentary on the [Republic,]{.italic} could have said
that the mother of the Book is something like its Platonic model, but he
noted that theology was a subject totally inaccessible to Abulcasim.
Others who had also noticed this urged Abulcasim to relate some marvel.
Then as now, the world was an atrocious place; the daring could travel
it as well as the despicable, those who stooped to anything.
Abulcasim\'s memory was a mirror of intimate cowardices. What could he
tell? Besides, they demanded marvels of him and marvels are perhaps
incommunicable; the moon of Bengal is not the same as the moon of Yemen,
but it may be described in the same words. Abulcasim hesitated; then he
spoke.
\"He who travels the climates and cities,\" he proclaimed with unction,
\"sees many things worthy of credit. This one, for example, which I have
told only once, to the king of the Turks. It happened in Sin Kalan
(Canton), where the river of the Water of Life spills into the sea.\"
Farach asked if the city stood many leagues from the wall Iskandar Zul
Qarnain (Alexander the Great of Macedonia) raised to halt Gog and Magog.
\"Deserts separate them,\" said Abulcasim, with involuntary arrogance,
\"forty days a [cafila]{.italic} (caravan) would take to glimpse its
towers and they say another forty to reach it. In Sin Kalan I know of no
one who has seen it or has seen anyone who has seen it.\"
The fear of the crassly infinite, of mere space, of mere matter, touched
Averroes for an instant. He looked at the symmetrical garden; he felt
aged, useless, unreal. Abulcasim continued:
\"One afternoon, the Moslem merchants of Sin Kalan took me to a house of
painted wood where many people lived. It is impossible to describe the
house, which was rather a single room, with rows of cabinets or
balconies on top of each other. In these cavities there were people who
were eating and drinking, and also on the floor, and also on a terrace.
The persons on this terrace were playing the drum and the lute, save for
some fifteen or twenty (with crimson-colored masks) who were praying,
singing and conversing. They suffered prison, but no one could see the
jail; they traveled on horseback, but no one could see the horse; they
fought, but the swords were of reed; they died and then stood up
again.\"
\"The acts of madmen,\" said Farach, \"exceed the previsions of the
sane.\"
\"These were no madmen,\" Abulcasim had to explain. \"They were
representing a story, a merchant told me.\"
No one understood, no one seemed to want to understand. Abulcasim,
confused, now went from his narration to his inept explanation. With the
aid of his hands, he said:
\"Let us imagine that someone performs a story instead of telling it.
Let that story be the one about the sleepers of Ephesus. We see them
retire into the cavern, we see them pray and sleep, we see them sleep
with their eyes open, we see them grow as they sleep, we see them awaken
after three hundred and nine years, we see them give the merchant an
ancient coin, we see them awaken in Paradise, we see them awaken with
the dog. Something like this was shown to us that afternoon by the
people of the terrace.\"
\"Did those people speak?\" asked Farach.
\"Of course they spoke,\" said Abulcasim, now become the apologist of a
performance he scarcely remembered and which had annoyed him quite a
bit. \"They spoke and sang and perorated.\"
\"In that case,\" said Farach, \"twenty persons are unnecessary. One
single speaker can tell anything, no matter how complicated it might
be.\"
Everyone approved this dictum. The virtues of Arabic were extolled,
which is the language God uses to direct the angels; then, those of
Arabic poetry. Abdalmalik, after giving this poetry due praise and
consideration, labeled as antiquated the poets who in Damascus or in
Cordova adhered to pastoral images and a Bedouin vocabulary. He said it
was absurd for a man having the Guadalquivir before his eyes to exalt
the water of a well. He urged the convenience of renewing the old
metaphors; he said that at the time Zuhair compared destiny to a blind
camel, such a figure could move people, but that five centuries of
admiration had rendered it valueless. All approved this dictum, which
they had already heard many times, from many tongues. Averroes was
silent. Finally he spoke, less to the others than to himself.
\"With less eloquence,\" Averroes said, \"but with related arguments, I
once defended the proposition Abdalmalik maintains. In Alexandria, it
has been said that the only persons incapable of a sin are those who
have already committed it and repented; to be free of an error, let us
add, it is well to have professed it. Zuhair in his [mohalaca]{.italic}
says that in the course of eighty years of suffering and glory many
times he has seen destiny suddenly trample men into the dust, like a
blind camel; Abdalmalik finds that this figure can no longer marvel us.
Many things could be offered in response to this objection. The first,
that if the purpose of the poem is to surprise us, its life span would
not be measured in centuries, but in days and hours and perhaps minutes.
The second, that a famous poet is less of an inventor than he is a
discoverer. In praise of Ibn-Sharaf of Berja it has been repeated that
only he could imagine that the stars at dawn fall slowly, like leaves
from a tree; if this were so, it would be evidence that the image is
banal. The image one man can form is an image that touches no one. There
are infinite things on earth; any one of them may be likened to any
other. Likening stars to leaves is no less arbitrary than likening them
to fish or birds. However, there is no one who has not felt at some time
that destiny is clumsy and powerful, that it is innocent and also
inhuman. For that conviction, which may be passing or continuous, but
which no one may elude, Zuhair\'s verse was written. What was said there
will not be said better. Besides (and this is perhaps the essential part
of my reflections), time, which despoils castles, enriches verses.
Zuhair\'s verse, when he composed it in Arabia, served to confront two
images, the old camel and destiny; when we repeat it now, it serves to
evoke the memory of Zuhair and to fuse our misfortune with that dead
Arab\'s. The figure had two terms then and now it has four. Time
broadens the scope of verses and I know of some which, like music, are
everything for all men. Thus, when I was tormented years go in Marrakesh
by memories of Cordova, I took pleasure in repeating the apostrophe
Abdurrahman addressed in the gardens of Ruzafa to an African palm:
\
[[You too, oh palm!, are]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[ Foreign to this soil. . .]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
\
The singular benefit of poetry: words composed by a king who longed for
the Orient served me, exiled in Africa, to express my nostalgia for
Spain.\"
Averroes then spoke of the first poets, of those who in the Time of
Ignorance, before Islam, had already said all things in the infinite
language of the deserts. Alarmed, and not without reason, by
Ibn-Sharaf\'s trivialities, he said that in the ancients and in the
Koran all poetry is contained and he condemned as illiterate and vain
the desire for innovation. The others listened with pleasure, for he was
vindicating the traditional.
The muezzins were calling the faithful to their early morning prayers
when Averroes entered his library again. (In the harem, the dark-haired
slave girls had tortured a red-haired slave girl, but he would not know
it until the afternoon.) Something had revealed to him the meaning of
the two obscure words. With firm and careful calligraphy he added these
lines to the manuscript: \"Aristu (Aristotle) gives the name of tragedy
to panegyrics and that of comedy to satires and anathemas. Admirable
tragedies and comedies abound in the pages of the Koran and in the
[mohalacas]{.italic} of the sanctuary.\"
He felt sleepy, he felt somewhat cold. Having unwound his turban, he
looked at himself in a metal mirror. I do not know what his eyes saw,
because no historian has ever described the forms of his face. I do know
that he disappeared suddenly, as if fulminated by an invisible fire, and
with him disappeared the house and the unseen fountain and the books and
the manuscript and the doves and the many dark-haired slave girls and
the tremulous red-haired slave girl and Farach and Abulcasim and the
rosebushes and perhaps the Guadalquivir.
\
In the foregoing story, I tried to narrate the process of a defeat. I
first thought of that archbishop of Canterbury who took it upon himself
to prove there is a God; then, of the alchemists who sought the
philosopher\'s stone; then, of the vain trisectors of the angle and
squarers of the circle. Later I reflected that it would be more poetic
to tell the case of a man who sets himself a goal which is not forbidden
to others, but is to him. I remembered Averroes who, closed within the
orb of Islam, could never know the meaning of the terms
[tragedy]{.italic} and [comedy.]{.italic} I related his case; as I went
along, I felt what that god mentioned by Burton must have felt when he
tried to create a bull and created a buffalo instead. I felt that the
work was mocking me. I felt that Averroes, wanting to imagine what a
drama is without ever having suspected what a theater is, was no more
absurd than I, wanting to imagine Averroes with no other sources than a
few fragments from Renan, Lane and Asín Palacios. I felt, on the last
page, that my narration was a symbol of the man I was as I wrote it and
that, in order to compose that narration, I had to be that man and, in
order to be that man, I had to compose that narration, and so on to
infinity. (The moment I cease to believe in him, \"Averroes\"
disappears.)
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_025.html_calibre_pb_25 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_026.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_026.html_filepos390441 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_026.html_filepos390497 .calibre10}
[[The Zahir]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
In Buenos Aires the Zahir is an ordinary coin worth twenty centavos. The
letters N T and the number 2 are scratched as if with a razor-blade or
penknife; 1929 is the date on the obverse. (In Guzerat, towards the end
of the eighteenth century, the Zahir was a tiger; in Java, a blind man
from the Mosque of Surakarta whom the Faithful pelted with stones; in
Persia, an astrolabe which Nadir Shah caused to be sunk to the bottom of
the sea; in the Mahdi\'s prisons, along about 1892, it was a little
compass which Rudolf Carl von Slatin touched, tucked into the fold of a
turban; in the Mosque of Cordova, according to Zotenberg, it was a vein
in the marble of one of the twelve-hundred pillars; in the Tetuán
ghetto, it was the bottom of a well.) Today is the thirteenth of
November; the Zahir came into my possession at dawn on June seventh. I
am no longer the \"I\" of that episode; but it is still posible for me
to remember what happened, perhaps even to tell it. I am still, however
incompletely, Borges.
Clementina Villar died on the sixth of June. Around 1930, her pictures
were clogging the society magazines: perhaps it was this ubiquity that
contributed to the legend that she was extremely pretty, although not
every portrait bore out this hypothesis unconditionally. At any rate,
Clementina Villar was interested less in beauty than in perfection. The
Hebrews and the Chinese codified every conceivable human eventuality; it
is written in the [Mishnah]{.italic} that a tailor is not to go out into
the street carrying a needle once the Sabbath twilight has set in, and
we read in the [Book of Rites]{.italic} that a guest should assume a
grave air when offered the first cup, and a respectfully contented air
upon receiving the second. Something of this sort, though in much
greater detail, was to be discerned in the uncompromising strictness
which Clementina Villar demanded of herself. Like any Confucian adept or
Talmudist, she strove for irreproachable correctness in every action;
but her zeal was more admirable and more exigent than theirs because the
tenets of her creed were not eternal, but submitted to the shifting
caprices of Paris or Hollywood. Clementina Villar appeared at the
correct places, at the correct hour, with the correct appuretenances and
the correct boredom; but the boredom, the appurtenances, the hour and
the places would almost immediately become passé and would provide
Clementina Villar with the material for a definition of cheap taste. She
was in search of the Absolute, like Flaubert; only hers was an Absolute
of a moment\'s duration. Her life was exemplary, yet she was ravaged
unremittingly by an inner despair. She was forever experimenting with
new metamorphoses, as though trying to get away from herself; the color
of her hair and the shape of her coiffure were celebratedly unstable.
She was always changing her smile, her complexion, the slant of her
eyes. After thirty-two she was scrupulously slender. . . The war gave
her much to think about: with Paris occupied by the Germans, how could
one follow the fashions? A foreigner whom she had always distrusted
presumed so far upon her good faith as to sell her a number of
cylindrical hats; a year later it was divulged that those absurd
creations [had never been worn in Paris at all!]{.italic} ― consequently
they were not hats, but arbitrary, unauthorized eccentricities. And
troubles never come singly: Dr. Villar had to move to Aráoz Street, and
his daughter\'s portrait was now adorning advertisements for cold cream
and automobiles. (The cold cream that she abundantly applied, the
automobiles she [no longer]{.italic} possessed.) She knew that the
successful exercise of her art demanded a large fortune, and she
preferred retirement from the scene to halfway effects. Moreover, it
pained her to have to compete with giddy little nobodies. The gloomy
Aráoz apartment was too much to bear: on the sixth of June Clementina
Villar committed the solecism of dying in the very middle of the
Southern district. Shall I confess that I ― moved by that most sincere
of Argentinian passions, snobbery ― was enamored of her, and that her
death moved me to tears? Probably the reader has already suspected as
much.
At a wake, the progress of corruption brings it about that the corpse
reassumes its earlier faces. At some stage of that confused night of the
sixth, Clementina Villar was magically what she had been twenty years
before: her features recovered that authority which is conferred by
pride, by money, by youth, by the awareness of rounding off a hierarchy,
by lack of imagination, by limitations, by stolidity. Somehow, I
thought, no version of that face which has disturbed me so will stay in
my memory as long as this one; it is right that it should be the last,
since it might have been the first. I left her rigid among the flowers,
her disdain perfected by death. It must have been about two in the
morning when I went away. Outside, the predictable rows of one- and
two-story houses had taken on the abstract appearance that is theirs at
night, when darkness and silence simplify them. Drunk with an almost
impersonal piety, I walked through the streets. At the corner of Chile
and Tacuarí I saw an open shop. And in that shop, unhappily for me,
three men were playing cards.
In the figure of speech called oxymoron a word is modified by an epithet
which seems to contradict it: thus, the Gnostics spoke of dark light,
and the alchemists of a black sun. For me it was a kind of oxymoron to
go straight from my last visit with Clementina Villar to buy a drink at
a bar; I was intrigued by the coarseness of the act, by its ease. (The
contrast was heightened by the circumstance that there was a card game
in progress.) I asked for a brandy. They gave me the Zahir in my change.
I stared at it for a moment and went out into the street, perhaps with
the beginnings of a fever. I reflected that every coin in the world is a
symbol of those famous coins which glitter in history and fable. I
thought of Charon\'s obol; of the obol for which Belisarius begged; of
Judas\' thirty coins; of the drachmas of Laï\'s, the famous courtesan;
of the ancient coin which one of the Seven Sleepers proffered; of the
shining coins of the wizard in the 1001 Nights, that turned out to be
bits of paper; of the inexhaustible penny of Isaac Laquedem; of the
sixty thousand pieces of silver, one for each line of an epic, which
Firdusi sent back to a king because they were not of gold; of the
doubloon which Ahab nailed to the mast; of Leopold Bloom\'s irreversible
florin; of the louis whose pictured face betrayed the fugitive Louis XVI
near Varennes. As if in a dream, the thought that every piece of money
entails such illustrious connotations as these, seemed to me of huge,
though inexplicable, importance. My speed increased as I passed through
the empty squares and along the empty streets. At length, weariness
deposited me at a corner. I saw a patient iron grating and, beyond, the
black and white flagstones of the Conception. I had wandered in a circle
and was now a block away from the store where they had given me the
Zahir.
I turned back. The dark window told me from a distance that the shop was
now closed. In Belgrano Street I took a cab. Sleepless, obsessed, almost
happy, I reflected that there is nothing less material than money, since
any coin whatsoever (let us say a coin worth twenty centavos) is,
strictly speaking, a repertory of possible futures. Money is abstract, I
repeated; money is the future tense. It can be an evening in the
suburbs, or music by Brahms; it can be maps, or chess, or coffee; it can
be the words of Epictetus teaching us to despise gold; it is a Proteus
more versatile than the one on the isle of Pharos. It is unforeseeable
time, Bergsonian time, not the rigid time of Islam or the Porch. The
determinists deny that there is such a thing in the world as a single
possible act, [id est]{.italic} an act that could or could not happen; a
coin symbolizes man\'s free will. (I did not suspect that these
\"thoughts\" were an artifice opposed to the Zahir and an initial form
of its demoniacal influence.) I fell asleep after much brooding, but I
dreamed that I was the coins guarded by a griffon.
The next day I decided that I had been drunk. I also made up my mind to
get rid of the coin that had caused me so much worry. I looked at it:
there was nothing out of the ordinary about it except for some
scratches. The best thing to do would be to bury it in the garden or
hide it in some corner of the library, but I wanted to remove myself
from its orbit. I preferred to lose it. I did not go to the Pilar that
morning, or to the cemetery; I took the underground to Constitucion and
from Constitucion to the corner of San Juan and Boedo. I got off, on an
impulse, at Urquiza and walked west and south. With scrupulous lack of
plan I rounded a number of corners, and in a street which looked to me
like all the others I went into a wretched little tavern, asked for a
drink of brandy, and paid for it with the Zahir. I half closed my eyes
behind my dark spectacles, managing not to see the house-numbers or the
name of the street. That night I took a veronal tablet and slept
peacefully.
Up till the end of June I was busy writing a tale of fantasy. This
contained two or three enigmatic circumlocutions, or \"kennings\": for
example, instead of [blood]{.italic} it says [sword-water,]{.italic} and
[gold]{.italic} is the [serpent\'s bed;]{.italic} the story is told in
the first person. The narrator is an ascetic who has abjured the society
of men and who lives in a kind of wilderness. (The name of this place is
Gnitaheidr.) Because of the simplicity and candor of his life there are
those who consider him an angel; but this is a pious exaggeration, for
there is no man who is free of sin. As a matter of fact, he has cut his
own father\'s throat, the old man having been a notorious wizard who by
magic arts had got possession of a limitless treasure. To guard this
treasure from the insane covetousness of human beings is the purpose to
which our ascetic has dedicated his life: day and night he keeps watch
over the hoard. Soon, perhaps too soon, his vigil will come to an end:
the stars have told him that the sword has already been forged which
will cut it short forever. (Gram is the name of that sword.) In a
rhetoric increasingly more complex he contemplates the brilliance and
the flexibility of his body: in one paragraph he speaks distractedly of
his scales; in another he says that the treasure which he guards is
flashing gold and rings of red. In the end we understand that the
ascetic is the serpent Fafnir, that the treasure upon which he lies is
the treasure of the Nibelungs. The appearance of Sigurd brings the story
to an abrupt end.
I have said that the composition of this trifle (into which I inserted,
in a pseudo-erudite fashion, a verse or two from the
[Fáfnismál)]{.italic} gave me a chance to forget the coin. There were
nights when I felt so sure of being able to forget it that I
deliberately recalled it to mind. What is certain is that I overdid
these occasions: it was easier to start the thing than to have done with
it. It was in vain that I told myself that that abominable nickel disk
was no different from others that pass from one hand to another, alike,
countless, innocuous. Attracted by this idea, I tried to think of other
coins; but I could not. I remember, too, a frustrated experiment I made
with Chilean five- and ten-centavo pieces and an Uruguayan
[vintén.]{.italic} On the sixteenth of July I acquired a pound sterling.
I did not look at it during the day, but that night (and other nights) I
put it under a magnifying glass and studied it by the light of a
powerful electric lamp. Afterwards I traced it on paper with a pencil.
But the brilliance and the dragon and Saint George were of no help to
me: I could not manage to change obsessions.
In August I decided to consult a psychiatrist. I did not tell him the
whole of my ridiculous story; I said I was bothered by insomnia, that I
was being haunted by the image of something or other. . . let us say a
poker-chip or a coin. A little later, in a bookshop in Sarmiento Street,
I dug up a copy of Julius Barlach\'s [Urkunden zur Geschichte der
Zahirsage]{.italic} (Breslau, 1899).
In this book my disease was clearly revealed. According to the preface,
the author proposed \"to gather together in one handy octavo volume all
the documents having to do with the Zahir superstition, including four
papers from the Habicht collection and the original manuscript of the
study by Philip Meadows Taylor.\" Belief in the Zahir is of Islamic
origin, and seems to date from the eighteenth century. (Barlach rejects
the passages which Zotenberg attributes to Abulfeda). [Zahir]{.italic}
in Arabic means \"notorious,\" \"visible\"; in this sense it is one of
the ninety-nine names of God, and the people (in Muslim territories) use
it to signify \"beings or things which possess the terrible property of
being unforgettable, and whose image finally drives one mad.\" The first
irrefutable testimony is that of the Persian Lutf Ali Azur. In the
precise pages of the biographical encyclopedia entitled [Temple of
Fire]{.italic} this polygraph dervish writes that in a school at Shiraz
there was a copper astrolabe \"fashioned in such a way that whoever
looked once upon it could thereafter think of nothing else; whence the
King ordered that it should be sunk in the deepest part of the sea, lest
men forget the universe.\" The study of Meadows Taylor is more detailed
(he was in the service of the Nizam of Hyderabad, and wrote the famous
novel, [Confessions of a Thug).]{.italic} In about 1832, in the
outskirts of Bhuj, Taylor heard the unusual expression \"Verily he has
looked on the Tiger,\" to signify madness or saintliness. He was
informed that the reference was to a magic tiger which was the ruin of
whoever beheld it, even from far away, since the beholder continued to
think about it to the end of his days. Someone said that one of these
unfortunates had fled to Mysore, where he had painted the fugure of the
tiger on the walls of some palace. Years later, Taylor was inspecting
the jails of the kingdom; and in the one at Nittur the governor showed
him a cell where the floor, the walls and the ceiling had been covered,
in barbaric colors which time was subtilizing before erasing them, by a
Muslim fakir\'s elaboration of a kind of infinite Tiger. This Tiger was
composed of many tigers in the most vertiginous fashion: it was
traversed by tigers, scored by tigers, and it contained seas and
Himalayas and armies which seemed to reveal still other tigers. The
painter had died many years ago in this very cell; he had come from
Sind, or maybe Guzerat, and his original purpose had been to design a
map of the world. Indeed, some traces of this were yet to be discerned
in the monstrous image. . . Taylor told the story to Mohammed Al-Yemeni,
of Fort William; Mohammed informed him that there was no created thing
in this world which could not take on the properties of
[Zaheer,]{.italic}[[[[[28]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.italic}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos609779){.calibre7}
but that the All-merciful does not allow two things to be it at the same
time, since one alone is able to fascinate multitudes. He said that
there is always a Zahir; that in the Age of Innocence it was an idol
named Yaúq; and later, a prophet of Jorasán who used to wear a veil
embroidered with stones, or a golden
mask.[[[[29]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos609916){.calibre7}
He also said that God is inscrutable.
I read Barlach\'s monograph ― read it and reread it. I hardly need
describe my feelings. I remember my despair when I realized that nothing
could save me; the sheer relief of knowing that I was not to blame for
my predicament; the envy I felt for those whose Zahir was not a coin,
but a piece of marble, or a tiger. How easy it would be not to think of
a tiger! And I also remember the odd anxiety with which I studied this
paragraph: \"A commentator on the [Gulshan i Raz]{.italic} says that he
who has seen the Zahir will soon see the Rose; and he cites a verse
interpolated in the [Asrar Nama]{.italic} (Book of Things Unknown) of
Attar: \'The Zahir is the shadow of the Rose, and the Rending of the
Veil.\' \"
That night at Clementina\'s house I had been surprised not to see her
younger sister, Mrs. Abascal. In October one of her friends told me
about it: \"Poor Julie! She got awfully [queer,]{.italic} and they had
to shut her up in the Bosch. She\'s just going to be the
[death]{.italic} of the nurses who have to [spoon]{.italic}-feed her!
Why, she keeps on talking about a [coin,]{.italic} just like Morena
Sackmann\'s [chauffeur.\"]{.italic}
Time, which generally attenuates memories, only aggravates that of the
Zahir. There was a time when I could visualize the obverse, and then the
reverse. Now I see them simultaneously. This is not as though the Zahir
were crystal, because it is not a matter of one face being superimposed
upon another; rather, it is as though my eyesight were spherical, with
the Zahir in the center. Whatever is not the Zahir comes to me
fragmentarily, as if from a great distance: the arrogant image of
Clementina; physical pain. Tennyson once said that if we could
understand a single flower, we should know what we are and what the
world is. Perhaps he meant that there is no fact, however insignificant,
that does not involve universal history and the infinite concatenation
of cause and effect. Perhaps he meant that the visible world is implicit
in every phenomenon, just as the will, according to Schopenhauer, is
implicit in every subject. The Cabalists pretend that man is a
microcosm, a symbolic mirror of the universe; according to Tennyson,
everything would be. Everything, even the intolerable Zahir.
Before 1948 Julia\'s destiny will have caught up with me. They will have
to feed me and dress me, I shall not know whether it is afternoon or
morning, I shall not know who Borges was. To call this prospect terrible
is a fallacy, for none of its circumstances will exist for me. One might
as well say that an anesthetized man feels terrible pain when they open
his cranium. I shall no longer perceive the universe: I shall perceive
the Zahir. According to the teaching of the Idealists, the words
\"live\" and \"dream\" are rigorously synonymous. From thousands of
images I shall pass to one; from a highly complex dream to a dream of
utter simplicity. Others will dream that I am mad; I shall dream of the
Zahir. When all the men on earth think, day and night, of the Zahir,
which will be a dream and which a reality ― the earth or the Zahir?
In the empty night hours I can still walk through the streets. Dawn may
surprise me on a bench in Garay Park, thinking (trying to think) of the
passage in the [Asrar Nama]{.italic} where it says that the Zahir is the
shadow of the Rose and the Rending of the Veil. I associate that saying
with this bit of information: In order to lose themselves in God, the
Sufis recite their own names, or the ninety-nine divine names, until
they become meaningless. I long to travel that path. Perhaps I shall
conclude by wearing away the Zahir simply through thinking of it again
and again. Perhaps behind the coin I shall find God.
[ ]{.italic}
[To Wally Zenner]{.italic}
[Translated by Dudley Fitts]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_026.html_calibre_pb_26 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_027.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_027.html_filepos410813 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_027.html_filepos410869 .calibre10}
[[The Waiting]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
The cab left him at number four thousand four on that street in the
northwest part of Buenos Aires. It was not yet nine in the morning; the
man noted with approval the spotted plane trees, the square plot of
earth at the foot of each, the respectable houses with their little
balconies, the pharmacy alongside, the dull lozenges of the paint and
hardware store. A long window-less hospital wall backed the sidewalk on
the other side of the street; the sun reverberated, farther down, from
some greenhouses. The man thought that these things (now arbitrary and
accidental and in no special order, like the things one sees in dreams)
would in time, if God willed, become invariable, necessary and familiar.
In the pharmacy window porcelain letters spelled out the name
\"Breslauer\"; the Jews were displacing the Italians, who had displaced
the Creoles. It was better that way; the man prefered not to mingle with
people of his kind.
The cabman helped him take down his trunk; a woman with a distracted or
tired air finally opened the door. From his seat, the cabman returned
one of the coins to him, a Uruguayan twenty-centavo piece which had been
in his pocket since that night in the hotel at Melo. The man gave him
forty centavos and immediately felt: \"I must act so that everyone will
forgive me. I have made two errors: I have used a foreign coin and I
have shown that the mistake matters to me.\"
Led by the woman, he crossed the entrance hall and the first patio. The
room they had reserved for him opened, happily, onto the second patio.
The bed was of iron, deformed by the craftsman into fantastic curves
representing branches and tendrils; there was also a tall pine wardrobe,
a bedside table, a shelf with books at floor level, two odd chairs and a
washstand with its basin, jar, soap dish and bottle of turbid glass. A
map of the province of Buenos Aires and a crucifix adorned the walls;
the wallpaper was crimson, with a pattern of huge spread-tailed
peacocks. The only door opened onto the patio. It was necessary to
change the placement of the chairs in order to get the trunk in. The
roomer approved of everything; when the woman asked him his name, he
said Villari, not as a secret challenge, not to mitigate the humiliation
which actually he did not feel, but because that name troubled him,
because it was impossible for him to think of any other. Certainly he
was not seduced by the literary error of thinking that assumption of the
enemy\'s name might be an astute maneuver.
Mr. Villari, at first, did not leave the house; after a few weeks, he
took to going out for a while at sundown. One night he went into the
movie theater three blocks away. He never went beyond the last row of
seats; he always got up a little before the end of the feature. He would
see tragic stories of the underworld; these stories, no doubt, contained
errors; these stories, no doubt, contained images which were also those
of his former life; Villari took no notice of them because the idea of a
coincidence between art and reality was alien to him. He would
submissively try to like the things; he wanted to anticipate the
intention with which they were shown. Unlike people who read novels, he
never saw himself as a character in a work of art.
No letters nor even a circular ever arrived for him, but with vague hope
he would always read one of the sections of the newspaper. In the
afternoons, he would put one of the chairs by the door and gravely make
and drink his maté, his eyes fixed on the vine covering the wall of the
several-storied building next door. Years of solitude had taught him
that, in one\'s memory, all days tend to be the same, but that there is
not a day, not even in jail or in the hospital, which does not bring
surprises, which is not a translucent network of minimal surprises. In
other confinements, he had given in to the temptation of counting the
days and the hours, but this confinement was different, for it had no
end ― unless one morning the newspaper brought news of Alejandro
Villari\'s death. It was also possible that Villari [had already
died]{.italic} and in that case this life was a dream. This possibility
disturbed him, because he could never quite understand whether it seemed
a relief or a misfortune; he told himself it was absurd and discounted
it. In distant days, less distant because of the passage of time than
because of two or three irrevocable acts, he had desired many things
with an unscrupulous passion; this powerful will, which had moved the
hatred of men and the love of some women, no longer wanted any
particular thing: it only wanted to endure, not to come to an end. The
taste of the maté, the taste of black tobacco, the growing line of
shadows gradually covering the patio ― these were sufficient incentives.
In the house there was a wolf-dog, now old. Villari made friends with
him. He spoke to him in Spanish, in Italian, in the few words he still
retained of the rustic dialect of his childhood. Villari tried to live
in the simple present, with no memories or anticipation; the former
mattered less to him than the latter. In an obscure way, he thought he
could see that the past is the stuff time is made of; for that reason,
time immediately turns into the past. His weariness, one day, was like a
feeling of contentment; in moments like this, he was not much more
complex than the dog.
One night he was left astonished and trembling by an intimate discharge
of pain in the back of his mouth. This horrible miracle recurred in a
few minutes and again towards dawn. Villari, the next day, sent for a
cab which left him at a dentist\'s office in the Once section. There he
had the tooth pulled. In this ordeal he was neither more cowardly nor
more tranquil than other people.
Another night, returning from the movies, he felt that he was being
pushed. With anger, with indignation, with secret relief, he faced the
insolent person. He spat out a coarse insult; the other man, astonished,
stammered an excuse. He was tall, young, with dark hair, accompanied by
a German-looking woman; that night, Villari repeated to himself that he
did not know them. Nevertheless, four or five days went by before he
went out into the street.
Amongst the books on the shelf there was a copy of the [Divine
Comedy,]{.italic} with the old commentary by Andreoli. Prompted less by
curiosity than by a feeling of duty, Villari undertook the reading of
this capital work; before dinner, he would read a canto and then, in
rigorous order, the notes. He did not judge the punishments of hell to
be unbelievable or excessive and did not think Dante would have
condemned him to the last circle, where Ugolino\'s teeth endlessly gnaw
Ruggieri\'s neck.
The peacocks on the crimson wallpaper seemed destined to be food for
tenacious nightmares, but Mr. Villari never dreamed of a monstrous arbor
inextricably woven of living birds. At dawn he would dream a dream whose
substance was the same, with varying circumstances. Two men and Villari
would enter the room with revolvers or they would attack him as he left
the movie house or all three of them at once would be the stranger who
had pushed him or they would sadly wait for him in the patio and seem
not to recognize him. At the end of the dream, he would take his
revolver from the drawer of the bedside table (and it was true he kept a
revolver in that drawer) and open fire on the men. The noise of the
weapon would wake him, but it was always a dream and in another dream
the attack would be repeated and in another dream he would have to kill
them again.
One murky morning in the month of July, the presence of strange people
(not the noise of the door when they opened it) woke him. Tall in the
shadows of the room, curiously simplified by those shadows (in the
fearful dreams they had always been clearer), vigilant, motionless and
patient, their eyes lowered as if weighted down by the heaviness of
their weapons, Alejandro Villari and a stranger had overtaken him at
last. With a gesture, he asked them to wait and turned his face to the
wall, as if to resume his sleep. Did he do it to arouse the pity of
those who killed him, or because it is less difficult to endure a
frightful happening than to imagine it and endlessly await it, or ― and
this is perhaps most likely ― so that the murderers would be a dream, as
they had already been so many times, in the same place, at the same
hour?
He was in this act of magic when the blast obliterated him.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_027.html_calibre_pb_27 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_028.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_028.html_filepos420098 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_028.html_filepos420206 .calibre10}
[[The God\'s Script]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
The prison is deep and of stone; its form, that of a nearly perfect
hemisphere, though the floor (also of stone) is somewhat less than a
great circle, a fact which in some way aggravates the feelings of
oppression and of vastness. A dividing wall cuts it at the center; this
wall, although very high, does not reach the upper part of the vault; in
one cell am I, Tzinacán, magician of the pyramid of Qaholom, which Pedro
de Alvarado devastated by fire; in the other there is a jaguar measuring
with secret and even paces the time and space of captivity. A long
window with bars, flush with the floor, cuts the central wall. At the
shadowless hour \[midday\], a trap in the high ceiling opens and a
jailer whom the years have gradually been effacing maneuvers an iron
sheave and lowers for us, at the end of a rope, jugs of water and chunks
of flesh. The light breaks into the vault; at that instant I can see the
jaguar.
I have lost count of the years I have lain in the darkness; I, who was
young once and could move about this prison, am incapable of more than
awaiting, in the posture of my death, the end destined to me by the
gods. With the deep obsidian knife I have cut open the breasts of
victims and now I could not, without magic, lift myself from the dust.
On the eve of the burning of the pyramid, the men who got down from the
towering horses tortured me with fiery metals to force me to reveal the
location of a hidden treasure. They struck down the idol of the god
before my very eyes, but he did not abandon me and I endured the
torments in silence. They scourged me, they broke and deformed me, and
then I awoke in this prison from which I shall not emerge in mortal
life.
Impelled by the fatality of having something to do, of populating time
in some way, I tried, in my darkness, to recall all I knew. Endless
nights I devoted to recalling the order and the number of stone-carved
serpents or the precise form of a medicinal tree. Gradually, in this
way, I subdued the passing years; gradually, in this way, I came into
possession of that which was already mine. One night I felt I was
approaching the threshold of an intimate recollection; before he sights
the sea, the traveller feels a quickening in the blood. Hours later I
began to perceive the outline of the recollection. It was a tradition of
the god. The god, foreseeing that at the end of time there would be
devastation and ruin, wrote on the first day of Creation a magical
sentence with the power to ward off those evils. He wrote it in such a
way that it would reach the most distant generations and not be subject
to chance. No one knows where it was written nor with what characters,
but it is certain that it exists, secretly, and that a chosen one shall
read it. I considered that we were now, as always, at the end of time
and that my destiny as the last priest of the god would give me access
to the privilege of intuiting the script. The fact that a prison
confined me did not forbid my hope; perhaps I had seen the script of
Qaholom a thousand times and needed only to fathom it.
This reflection encouraged me, and then instilled in me a kind of
vertigo. Throughout the earth there are ancient forms, forms
incorruptible and eternal; any one of them could be the symbol I sought.
A mountain could be the speech of the god, or a river or the empire or
the configuration of the stars. But in the process of the centuries the
mountain is levelled and the river will change its course, empires
experience mutation and havoc and the configuration of the stars varies.
There is change in the firmament. The mountain and the star are
individuals and individuals perish. I sought something more tenacious,
more invulnerable. I thought of the generations of cereals, of grasses,
of birds, of men. Perhaps the magic would be written on my face, perhaps
I myself was the end of my search. That anxiety was consuming me when I
remembered the jaguar was one of the attributes of the god.
Then my soul filled with pity. I imagined the first morning of time; I
imagined my god confiding his message to the living skin of the jaguars,
who would love and reproduce without end, in caverns, in cane fields, on
islands, in order that the last men might receive it. I imagined that
net of tigers, that teeming labyrinth of tigers, inflicting horror upon
pastures and flocks in order to perpetuate a design. In the next cell
there was a jaguar; in his vicinity I perceived a confirmation of my
conjecture and a secret favor.
I devoted long years to learning the order and the configuration of the
spots. Each period of darkness conceded an instant of light, and I was
able thus to fix in my mind the black forms running through the yellow
fur. Some of them included points, others formed cross lines on the
inner side of the legs; others, ring-shaped, were repeated. Perhaps they
were a single sound or a single word. Many of them had red edges.
I shall not recite the hardships of my toil. More than once I cried out
to the vault that it was impossible to decipher that text. Gradually,
the concrete enigma I labored at disturbed me less than the generic
enigma of a sentence written by a god. What type of sentence (I asked
myself) will an absolute mind construct? I considered that even in the
human languages there is no proposition that does not imply the entire
universe; to say [the tiger]{.italic} is to say the tigers that begot
it, the deer and turtles devoured by it, the grass on which the deer
fed, the earth that was mother to the grass, the heaven that gave birth
to the earth. I considered that in the language of a god every word
would enunciate that infinite concatenation of facts, and not in an
implicit but in an explicit manner, and not progressively but
instantaneously. In time, the notion of a divine sentence seemed puerile
or blasphemous. A god, I reflected, ought to utter only a single word
and in that word absolute fullness. No word uttered by him can be
inferior to the universe or less than the sum total of time. Shadows or
simulacra of that single word equivalent to a language and to all a
language can embrace are the poor and ambitious human words, [all,
world, universe.]{.italic}
One day or one night ― what difference between my days and nights can
there be? ― I dreamt there was a grain of sand on the floor of the
prison. Indifferent, I slept again; I dreamt I awoke and that on the
floor there were two grains of sand. I slept again; I dreamt that the
grains of sand were three. They went on multiplying in this way until
they filled the prison and I lay dying beneath that hemisphere of sand.
I realized that I was dreaming; with a vast effort I roused myself and
awoke. It was useless to awake; the innumerable sand was suffocating me.
Someone said to me: [You have not awakened to wakefulness, but to a
previous dream. This dream is enclosed within another, and so on to
infinity, which is the number of grains of sand. The path you must
retrace is interminable and you will die before you ever really
awake.]{.italic}
I felt lost. The sand burst my mouth, but I shouted: [A sand of dreams
cannot kill me nor are there dreams within dreams.]{.italic} A blaze of
light awoke me. In the darkness above there grew a circle of light. I
saw the face and hands of the jailer, the sheave, the rope, the flesh
and the water jugs.
A man becomes confused, gradually, with the form of his destiny; a man
is, by and large, his circumstances. More than a decipherer or an
avenger, more than a priest of the god, I was one imprisoned. From the
tireless labyrinth of dreams I returned as if to my home to the harsh
prison. I blessed its dampness, I blessed its tiger, I blessed the
crevice of light, I blessed my old, suffering body, I blessed the
darkness and the stone.
Then there occurred what I cannot forget nor communicate. There occurred
the union with the divinity, with the universe (I do not know whether
these words differ in meaning). Ecstasy does not repeat its symbols; God
has been seen in a blazing light, in a sword or in the circles of a
rose. I saw an exceedingly high Wheel, which was not before my eyes, nor
behind me, nor to the sides, but every place at one time. That Wheel was
made of water, but also of fire, and it was (although the edge could be
seen) infinite. Interlinked, all things that are, were and shall be
formed it, and I was one of the fibers of that total fabric and Pedro de
Alvarado who tortured me was another. There lay revealed the causes and
the effects and it sufficed me to see that Wheel in order to understand
it all, without end. O bliss of understanding, greater than the bliss of
imagining or feeling. I saw the universe and I saw the intimate designs
of the universe. I saw the origins narrated in the Book of the Common. I
saw the mountains that rose out of the water, I saw the first men of
wood, the cisterns that turned against the men, the dogs that ravaged
their faces. I saw the faceless god concealed behind the other gods. I
saw infinite processes that formed one single felicity and,
understanding all, I was able also to understand the script of the
tiger.
It is a formula of fourteen random words (they appear random) and to
utter it in a loud voice would suffice to make me all powerful. To say
it would suffice to abolish this stone prison, to have daylight break
into my night, to be young, to be immortal, to have the tiger\'s jaws
crush Alvarado, to sink the sacred knife into the breasts of Spaniards,
to reconstruct the pyramid, to reconstruct the empire. Forty syllables,
fourteen words, and I, Tzinacán, would rule the lands Moctezuma ruled.
But I know I shall never say those words, because I no longer remember
Tzinacán.
May the mystery lettered on the tigers die with me. Whoever has seen the
universe, whoever has beheld the fiery designs of the universe, cannot
think in terms of one man, of that man\'s trivial fortunes or
misfortunes, though he be that very man. That man [has been he]{.italic}
and now matters no more to him. What is the life of that other to him,
the nation of that other to him, if he, now, is no one. This is why I do
not pronounce the formula, why, lying here in the darkness, I let the
days obliterate me.
\
[Translated by L. A. Murillo]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_028.html_calibre_pb_28 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_029.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_029.html_filepos431279 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_029.html_filepos431335 .calibre10}
[[The Argentine Writer and Tradition]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
I wish to formulate and justify here some skeptical proposals concerning
the problem of the Argentine writer and tradition. My skepticism does
not relate to the difficulty or impossibility of solving this problem,
but rather to its very existence. I believe we are faced with a mere
rhetorical topic which lends itself to pathetic elaborations; rather
than with a true mental difficulty, I take it we are dealing with an
appearance, a simulacrum, a pseudo problem.
Before examining it, I want to consider the most commonly offered
statements and solutions. I shall begin with a solution which has become
almost instinctive, which appears without the aid of logical reasoning;
it maintains that the Argentine literary tradition already exists in the
gauchesque poetry. According to this solution, the vocabulary, devices
and themes of gauchesque poetry should guide the contemporary writer,
and are a point of departure and perhaps an archetype. This is the usual
solution and for that reason I intend to examine it at some length.
This same solution was set forth by Lugones in [El payador;]{.italic}
there one may read that we Argentines possess a classic poem, [Martín
Fierro,]{.italic} and that this poem should be for us what the Homeric
poems were for the Greeks. It seems difficult to contradict this opinion
without slighting [Martín Fierro.]{.italic} I believe that [Martín
Fierro]{.italic} is the most lasting work we Argentines have written;
and I believe with the same intensity that we cannot suppose [Martín
Fierro]{.italic} is, as it has sometimes been said, our Bible, our
canonical book.
Ricardo Rojas, who has also recommended the canonization of [Martín
Fierro,]{.italic} has a page in his [Historia de la literatura
argentina]{.italic} that almost seems to be commonplace and is really
quite astute.
Rojas studies the poetry of the gauchesque writers ― in other words, the
poetry of Hidalgo, Ascasubi, Estanislao del Campo and José Hernández ―
and sees it as being derived from the poetry of the
[payadores,]{.italic} from the spontaneous poetry of the gauchos. He
points out that the meter of popular poetry is the octosyllable and that
the authors of gauchesque poetry employ this meter and ends up by
considering the poetry of the gauchesque writers as a continuation or
enlargement of the poetry of the [payadores.]{.italic}
I suspect there is a grave error in this affirmation; we might even say
a skillful error, for it is evident that Rojas, in order to give the
gauchesque poetry a popular basis beginning with Hidalgo and culminating
with Hernández, presents this poetry as a continuation or derivation of
that of the gauchos. Thus, Bartolomé Hidalgo is, not the Homer of this
poetry as Mitre said, but simply a link in its development.
Ricardo Rojas makes of Hidalgo a [payador;]{.italic} however, according
to his own [Historia de la literatura argentina,]{.italic} this supposed
[payador]{.italic} began by composing hendecasyllabic verses, a meter by
nature unavailable to the [payadores,]{.italic} who could not perceive
its harmony, just as Spanish readers could not perceive the harmony of
the hendecasyllable when Garcilaso imported it from Italy.
I take it there is a fundamental difference between the poetry of the
gauchos and the poetry of the gauchesque writers. It is enough to
compare any collection of popular poetry with [Martín Fierro,]{.italic}
with [Paulino Lucero,]{.italic} with [Fausto,]{.italic} to perceive this
difference, which lies no less in the vocabulary than in the intent of
the poets. The popular poets of the country and the suburbs compose
their verses on general themes: the pangs of love and loneliness, the
unhappiness of love, and do so in a vocabulary which is also very
general; on the other hand, the gauchesque poets cultivate a
deliberately popular language never essayed by the popular poets
themselves. I do not mean that the idiom of the popular poets is a
correct Spanish, I mean that if there are errors they are the result of
ignorance. On the other hand, in the gauchesque poets there is a seeking
out of native words, a profusion of local color. The proof is this: a
Colombian, Mexican or Spaniard can immediately understand the poetry of
the [payadores,]{.italic} of the gauchos, and yet they need a glossary
in order to understand, even approximately, Estanislao del Campo or
Ascasubi.
All this can be summed up as follows: gauchesque poetry, which has
produced ― I hasten to repeat ― admirable works, is a literary genre as
artificial as any other. In the first gauchesque compositions, in
BartoloméHidalgo\'s [trovas,]{.italic} we already see the intention of
presenting the work in terms of the gaucho, as uttered by the gaucho, so
that the reader will read it in a gaucho intonation. Nothing could be
further removed from popular poetry. The people, while versifying, ― and
I have observed this not only in the country [payadores,]{.italic} but
also in those from the outskirts of Buenos Aires ― have the conviction
that they are executing something important and instinctively avoid
popular words and seek high-sounding terms and expressions. It is
probable that gauchesque poetry has now influenced the
[payadores]{.italic} and that they too now abound in
[criollismos,]{.italic} but in the beginning it was not so, and we have
proof of this (which no one has ever pointed out) in [Martín
Fierro.]{.italic}
[Martín Fierro]{.italic} is cast in a Spanish of gauchesque intonation,
and for a long while never lets us forget that it is a gaucho who is
singing; it abounds in comparisons taken from country life; however,
there is a famous passage in which the author forgets this preoccupation
with local color and writes in a general Spanish, and does not speak of
vernacular themes, but of great abstract themes, of time, of space, of
the sea, of the night. I refer to the [payada]{.italic} between Martín
Fierro and the Negro, which comes at the end of the second part. It is
as if Hernández himself had wanted to show the difference between his
gauchesque poetry and the genuine poetry of the gauchos. When these two
gauchos, Fierro and the Negro, begin to sing, they leave behind all
gauchesque affectation and address themselves to philosophical themes. I
have observed the same while listening to the [payadores]{.italic} of
the suburbs; they avoid using the dialect of that area and try to
express themselves correctly. Of course they fail, but their intention
is to make their poetry something elevated; something distinguished, we
might say with a smile.
The idea that Argentine poetry should abound in differential Argentine
traits and Argentine local color seems to me a mistake. If we are asked
which book is more Argentine, [Martín Fierro]{.italic} or the sonnets in
Enrique Banchs\' [La urna,]{.italic} there is no reason to say that it
is the first. It will be said that in [La urna]{.italic} of Banchs we do
not find the Argentine countryside, Argentine topography, Argentine
botany, Argentine zoology; however, there are other Argentine conditions
in [La urna.]{.italic}
I recall now some lines from [La urna]{.italic} which seem to have been
written so that no one could say it was an Argentine book, the lines
which read: \". . . The sun shines on the slanting roofs / and on the
windows. Nightingales / try to say they are in love.\"
Here it seems we cannot avoid condemning the phrase \"the sun shines on
the slanting roofs and on the windows.\" Enrique Banchs wrote these
lines in a suburb of Buenos Aires, and in the suburbs of Buenos Aires
there are no slanting roofs, but rather flat roofs. \"Nightingales try
to say they are in love\": the nightingale is less a bird of reality
than of literature, of Greek and Germanic tradition. However, I would
say that in the use of these conventional images, in these anomalous
roofs and nightingales, Argentine architecture and ornithology are of
course absent, but we do find in them the Argentine\'s reticence, his
constraint; the fact that Banchs, when speaking of this great suffering
which overwhelms him, when speaking of this woman who has left him and
has left the world empty for him, should have recourse to foreign and
conventional images like slanted roofs and nightingales, is significant:
significant of Argentine reserve, distrust and reticence, of the
difficulty we have in making confessions, in revealing our intimate
nature.
Besides, I do not know if it is necessary to say that the idea that a
literature must define itself in terms of its national traits is a
relatively new concept; also new and arbitrary is the idea that writers
must seek themes from their own countries. Without going any further, I
think Racine would not even have understood a person who denied him his
right to the title of poet of France because he cultivated Greek and
Roman themes. I think Shakespeare would have been amazed if people had
tried to limit him to English themes, and if they had told him that, as
an Englishman, he had no right to compose [Hamlet,]{.italic} whose theme
is Scandinavian, or [Macbeth,]{.italic} whose theme is Scottish. The
Argentine cult of local color is a recent European cult which the
nationalists ought to reject as foreign.
Some days past I have found a curious confirmation of the fact that what
is truly native can and often does dispense with local color; I found
this confirmation in Gibbon\'s [Decline and Fall of the Roman
Empire.]{.italic} Gibbon observes that in the Arabian book [par
excellence,]{.italic} in the Koran, there are no camels; I believe if
there were any doubt as to the authenticity of the Koran, this absence
of camels would be sufficient to prove it is an Arabian work. It was
written by Mohammed, and Mohammed, as an Arab, had no reason to know
that camels were especially Arabian; for him they were a part of
reality, he had no reason to emphasize them; on the other hand, the
first thing a falsifier, a tourist, an Arab nationalist would do is have
a surfeit of camels, caravans of camels, on every page; but Mohammed, as
an Arab, was unconcerned: he knew he could be an Arab without camels. I
think we Argentines can emulate Mohammed, can believe in the possibility
of being Argentine without abounding in local color.
Perhaps I may be permitted to make a confession here, a very small
confession. For many years, in books now happily forgotten, I tried to
copy down the flavor, the essence of the outlying suburbs of Buenos
Aires. Of course, I abounded in local words; I did not omit such words
as [cuchilleros, milonga, tapia]{.italic} and others, and thus I wrote
those forgettable and forgotten books. Then, about a year ago, I wrote a
story called [\"La muerte y la brújula\"]{.italic} (\"Death and the
Compass\"), which is a kind of nightmare, a nightmare in which there are
elements of Buenos Aires, deformed by the horror of the nightmare. There
I think of the Paseo Colón and call it rue de Toulon; I think of the
country houses of Adrogue and call them Triste-le-Roy; when this story
was published, my friends told me that at last they had found in what I
wrote the flavor of the outskirts of Buenos Aires. Precisely because I
had not set out to find that flavor, because I had abandoned myself to a
dream, I was able to accomplish, after so many years, what I had
previously sought in vain.
Now I want to speak of a justly illustrious work which the nationalists
often invoke. I refer to Güiraldes\' [Don Segundo Sombra.]{.italic} The
nationalists tell us that [Don Segundo Sombra]{.italic} is the model of
a national book; but if we compare it with the works of the gauchesque
tradition, the first thing we note are differences. [Don Segundo
Sombra]{.italic} abounds in metaphors of a kind having nothing to do
with country speech but a great deal to do with the metaphors of the
then current literary circles of Montmartre. As for the fable, the
story, it is easy to find in it the influence of Kipling\'s
[Kim,]{.italic} whose action is set in India and which was, in turn,
written under the influence of Mark Twain\'s [Huckleberry
Finn,]{.italic} the epic of the Mississippi. When I make this
observation, I do not wish to lessen the value of [Don Segundo
Sombra;]{.italic} on the contrary, I want to emphasize the fact that, in
order that we might have this book, it was necessary for Güiraldes to
recall the poetic technique of the French circles of his time and the
work of Kipling which he had read many years before; in other words,
Kipling and Mark Twain and the metaphors of French poets were necessary
for this Argentine book, for this book which, I repeat, is no less
Argentine for having accepted such influences.
I want to point out another contradiction: the nationalists pretend to
venerate the capacities of the Argentine mind but want to limit the
poetic exercise of that mind to a few impoverished local themes, as if
we Argentines could only speak of [orillas]{.italic} and
[estancias]{.italic} and not of the universe.
Let us move on to another solution. It is said that there is a tradition
to which Argentine writers should adhere and that that tradition is
Spanish literature. This second recommendation is of course somewhat
less limited than the first, but it also tends to restrict us; many
objections could be raised against it, but it is sufficient to mention
two. The first is this: Argentine history can be unmistakably defined as
a desire to become separated from Spain, as a voluntary withdrawal from
Spain. The second objection is this: among us, the enjoyment of Spanish
literature ― an enjoyment which I personally happen to share ― is
usually an acquired taste; many times I have loaned French and English
works to persons without special literary preparations, and these works
have been enjoyed immediately, with no effort. However, when I have
proposed to my friends the reading of Spanish works, I have evidenced
that it was difficult for them to find pleasure in these books without
special apprenticeship; for that reason, I believe the fact that certain
illustrious Argentines write like Spaniards is less the testimony of an
inherited capacity than it is a proof of Argentine versatility.
I now arrive at a third opinion on Argentine writers and tradition which
I have read recently and which has surprised me very much. It says in
essence that in Argentina we are cut off from the past, that there has
been something like a dissolution of continuity between us and Europe.
According to this singular observation, we Argentines find ourselves in
a situation like that of the first days of Creation; the search for
European themes and devices is an illusion, an error; we should
understand that we are essentially alone and cannot play at being
Europeans.
This opinion seems unfounded to me. I find it understandable that many
people should accept it, because this declaration of our solitude, of
our loss, of our primeval character, has, like existentialism, the charm
of the pathetic. Many people can accept this opinion because, once they
have done so, they feel alone, disconsolate and, in some way or another,
interesting. However, I have observed that in our country, precisely
because it is a new country, we have a great sense of time. Everything
that has taken place in Europe, the dramatic happenings of the last few
years in Europe, have had profound resonance here. The fact that a
person was a sympathizer of Franco or of the Republic during the Spanish
Civil War, or a sympathizer of the Nazis or of the Allies, has in many
cases caused very grave quarrels and animosity. This would not occur if
we were cut off from Europe. As far as Argentine history is concerned, I
believe we all feel it profoundly; and it is natural that we should feel
it in this way, because it is, in terms of chronology and in terms of
our own inner being, quite close to us; the names, the battles of the
civil war, the War of Independence, all of these are, both in time and
in tradition, very close to us.
What is our Argentine tradition? I believe we can answer this question
easily and that there is no problem here. I believe our tradition is all
of Western culture, and I also believe we have a right to this
tradition, greater than that which the inhabitants of one or another
Western nation might have. I recall here an essay of Thorstein Veblen,
the North American sociologist, on the pre-eminence of Jews in Western
culture. He asks if this preeminence allows us to conjecture about the
innate superiority of the Jews, and answers in the negative; he says
that they are outstanding in Western culture because they act within
that culture and, at the same time, do not feel tied to it by any
special devotion; \"for that reason,\" he says, \"a Jew will always find
it easier than a non-Jew to make innovations in Western culture\"; and
we can say the same of the Irish in English culture. In the case of the
Irish, we have no reason to suppose that the profusion of Irish names in
British literature and philosophy is due to any racial pre-eminence, for
many of those illustrious Irishmen (Shaw, Berkeley, Swift) were the
descendants of Englishmen, were people who had no Celtic blood; however,
it was sufficient for them to feel Irish, to feel different, in order to
be innovators in English culture. I believe that we Argentines, we South
Americans in general, are in an analogous situation; we can handle all
European themes, handle them without superstition, with an irreverence
which can have, and already does have, fortunate consequences.
This does not mean that all Argentine experiments are equally
successful; I believe that this problem of tradition and Argentina is
simply a contemporary and passing form of the eternal problem of
determination. If I am going to touch the table with one of my hands and
I ask myself whether I should touch it with my left or my right, as soon
as I touch it with my right, the determinists will say that I could not
act in any other way and that the entire previous history of the
universe obliged me to touch it with my right hand and that touching it
with the left would have been a miracle. However, if I had touched it
with my left hand, they would have said the same: that I was obliged to
do so. The same thing happens with literary themes and devices. Anything
we Argentine writers can do successfully will become part of our
Argentine tradition, in the same way that the treatment of Italian
themes belongs to the tradition of England through the efforts of
Chaucer and Shakespeare.
I believe, in addition, that all these [a priori]{.italic} discussions
concerning the intent of literary execution are based on the error of
supposing that intentions and plans matter a great deal. Let us take the
case of Kipling: Kipling dedicated his life to writing in terms of
certain political ideals, he tried to make his work an instrument of
propaganda and yet, at the end of his life, he was obliged to confess
that the true essence of a writer\'s work is usually unknown to him. He
recalled the case of Swift, who, when he wrote [Gulliver\'s
Travels,]{.italic} tried to bring an indictment against all humanity but
actually left a book for children. Plato said that poets are the scribes
of a god who moves them against their own will, against their
intentions, just as a magnet moves a series of iron rings.
For that reason I repeat that we should not be alarmed and that we
should feel that our patrimony is the universe; we should essay all
themes, and we cannot limit ourselves to purely Argentine subjects in
order to be Argentine; for either being Argentine is an inescapable act
of fate ― and in that case we shall be so in all events ― or being
Argentine is a mere affectation, a mask.
I believe that if we surrender ourselves to that voluntary dream which
is artistic creation, we shall be Argentine and we shall also be good or
tolerable writers.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_029.html_calibre_pb_29 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_030.html}
::: {#Labyrinths_split_030.html_filepos452548 .calibre18}
:::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_030.html_filepos452658 .calibre10}
[[The Wall and the Books]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[ He, whose long wall the wand\'ring Tartar bounds. . .]{.calibre5}
[[Dunciad, II,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [76]{.calibre5}
I read, some days past, that the man who ordered the erection of the
almost infinite wall of China was that first Emperor, Shih Huang Ti, who
also decreed that all books prior to him be burned. That these two vast
operations ― the five to six hundred leagues of stone opposing the
barbarians, the rigorous abolition of history, that is, of the past ―
should originate in one person and be in some way his attributes
inexplicably satisfied and, at the same time, disturbed me. To
investigate the reasons for that emotion is the purpose of this note.
Historically speaking, there is no mystery in the two measures. A
contemporary of the wars of Hannibal, Shih Huang Ti, king of Tsin,
brought the Six Kingdoms under his rule and abolished the feudal system;
he erected the wall, because walls were defenses; he burned the books,
because his opposition invoked them to praise the emperors of olden
times. Burning books and erecting fortifications is a common task of
princes; the only thing singular in Shih Huang Ti was the scale on which
he operated. Such is suggested by certain Sinologists, but I feel that
the facts I have related are something more than an exaggeration or
hyperbole of trivial dispositions. Walling in an orchard or a garden is
ordinary, but not walling in an empire. Nor is it banal to pretend that
the most traditional of races renounce the memory of its past, mythical
or real. The Chinese had three thousand years of chronology (and during
those years, the Yellow Emperor and Chuang Tsu and Confucius and Lao
Tzu) when Shih Huang Ti ordered that history begin with him.
Shih Huang Ti had banished his mother for being a libertine; in his
stern justice the orthodox saw nothing but an impiety; Shih Huang Ti,
perhaps, wanted to obliterate the canonical books because they accused
him; Shih Huang Ti, perhaps, tried to abolish the entire past in order
to abolish one single memory: his mother\'s infamy. (Not in an unlike
manner did a king of Judea have all male children killed in order to
kill one.) This conjecture is worthy of attention, but tells us nothing
about the wall, the second part of the myth. Shih Huang Ti, according to
the historians, forbade that death be mentioned and sought the elixir of
immortality and secluded himself in a figurative palace containing as
many rooms as there are days in the year; these facts suggest that the
wall in space and the fire in time were magic barriers designed to halt
death. All things long to persist in their being, Baruch Spinoza has
written; perhaps the Emperor and his sorcerers believed that immortality
is intrinsic and that decay cannot enter a closed orb. Perhaps the
Emperor tried to recreate the beginning of time and called himself The
First, so as to be really first, and called himself Huang Ti, so as to
be in some way Huang Ti, the legendary emperor who invented writing and
the compass. The latter, according to the [Book of Rites,]{.italic} gave
things their true name; in a parallel fashion, Shih Huang Ti boasted, in
inscriptions which endure, that all things in his reign would have the
name which was proper to them. He dreamt of founding an immortal
dynasty; he ordered that his heirs be called Second Emperor, Third
Emperor, Fourth Emperor, and so on to infinity. . . I have spoken of a
magical purpose; it would also be fitting to suppose that erecting the
wall and burning the books were not simultaneous acts. This (depending
on the order we select) would give us the image of a king who began by
destroying and then resigned himself to preserving, or that of a
disillusioned king who destroyed what he had previously defended. Both
conjectures are dramatic, but they lack, as far as I know, any basis in
history. Herbert Allen Giles tells that those who hid books were branded
with a red-hot iron and sentenced to labor until the day of their death
on the construction of the outrageous wall. This information favors or
tolerates another interpretation. Perhaps the wall was a metaphor,
perhaps Shih Huang Ti sentenced those who worshiped the past to a task
as immense, as gross and as useless as the past itself. Perhaps the wall
was a challenge and Shih Huang Ti thought: \"Men love the past and
neither I nor my executioners can do anything against that love, but
someday there will be a man who feels as I do and he will efface my
memory and be my shadow and my mirror and not know it.\" Perhaps Shih
Huang Ti walled in his empire because he knew that it was perishable and
destroyed the books because he understood that they were sacred books,
in other words, books that teach what the entire universe or the mind of
every man teaches. Perhaps the burning of the libraries and the erection
of the wall are operations which in some secret way cancel each other.
The tenacious wall which at this moment, and at all moments, casts its
system of shadows over lands I shall never see, is the shadow of a
Caesar who ordered the most reverent of nations to burn its past; it is
plausible that this idea moves us in itself, aside from the conjectures
it allows. (Its virtue may lie in the opposition of constructing and
destroying on an enormous scale.) Generalizing from the preceding case,
we could infer that [all]{.italic} forms have their virtue in themselves
and not in any conjectural \"content.\" This would concord with the
thesis of Benedetto Croce; already Pater in 1877 had affirmed that all
arts aspire to the state of music, which is pure form. Music, states of
happiness, mythology, faces belabored by time, certain twilights and
certain places try to tell us something, or have said something we
should not have missed, or are about to say something; this imminence of
a revelation which does not occur is, perhaps, the aesthetic phenomenon.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_030.html_calibre_pb_31 .mbppagebreak}
:::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_031.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_031.html_filepos459131 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[[ ]{.bold}]{.calibre6}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_031.html_filepos459318 .calibre10}
[[The Fearful Sphere of Pascal]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
It may be that universal history is the history of a handful of
metaphors. The purpose of this note will be to sketch a chapter of this
history.
Six centuries before the Christian era, the rhapsodist Xenophanes of
Colophon, wearied of the Homeric verses he recited from city to city,
lashed out at the poets who attributed anthropomorphic traits to the
gods, and offered the Greeks a single God, a god who was an eternal
sphere. In the [Timaeus]{.italic} of Plato we read that the sphere is
the most perfect and most uniform figure, for all points of its surface
are equidistant from its center; Olof Gigon [(Ursprung der griechischen
Philosophie,]{.italic} 183) understands Xenophanes to speak
analogically: God is spherical because that form is best ― or least
inadequate ― to represent the Divinity. Parmenides, forty years later,
rephrased the image: \"The Divine Being is like the mass of a
well-rounded sphere, whose force is constant from the center in any
direction.\" Calogero and Mondolfo reasoned that Parmenides intuited an
infinite, or infinitely expanding sphere, and that the words just
transcribed possess a dynamic meaning (Albertelli: [Gli
Eleati,]{.italic} 148). Parmenides taught in Italy; a few years after
his death, the Sicilian Empedocles of Agrigentum constructed a laborious
cosmogony: a stage exists in which the particles of earth, water, air
and fire make up a sphere without end, \"the rounded
[Sphairos,]{.italic} which exults in its circular solitude.\"
Universal history continued to unroll, the all-too-human gods whom
Xenophanes had denounced were demoted to figures of poetic fiction, or
to demons ― although it was reported that one of them, Hermes
Trismegistus, had dictated a variable number of books (42 according to
Clement of Alexandria; 20,000 according to Hamblicus; 36,525 according
to the priests of Thoth ― who is also Hermes) in the pages of which are
written all things. Fragments of this illusory library, compiled or
concocted beginning in the third century, go to form what is called the
[Corpus Hermeticum;]{.italic} in one of these fragments, or in the
[Asclepius,]{.italic} which was also attributed to Trismegistus, the
French theologian Alain de Lille (Alanus de Insulis) discovered, at the
end of the twelfth century, the following formula, which future ages
would not forget: \"God is an intelligible sphere, whose center is
everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.\" The Pre-Socratics spoke
of a sphere without end; Albertelli (as Aristotle before him) thinks
that to speak in this wise is to commit a [contradictio in
adjecto,]{.italic} because subject and predicate cancel each other; this
may very well be true, but still, the formula of the Hermetic books
allows us, almost, to intuit this sphere. In the thirteenth century, the
image reappeared in the symbolic [Roman de la Rose,]{.italic} where it
is given as a citation from Plato, and in the encyclopedia [Speculum
Triplex;]{.italic} in the sixteenth century, the last chapter of the
last book of [Pantagruel]{.italic} referred to \"that intellectual
sphere, whose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere
and which we call God.\" For the medieval mind the sense was clear ― God
is in each one of His creatures, but none of them limits Him. \"The
heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee,\" said Solomon (I
Kings 8:27); the geometric metaphor of the sphere seemed a gloss on
these words.
Dante\'s poem preserved the Ptolemaic astronomy which for 1,400 years
reigned in the imagination of mankind. The earth occupies the center of
the universe. It is an immobile sphere; around it circle nine concentric
spheres. The first seven are \"planetary\" skies (the firmaments of the
Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn); the eighth, the
firmament of the fixed stars; the ninth, the crystal firmament which is
also called the [Primum mobile.]{.italic} This in turn is surrounded by
the Empyrean, which is composed of light. All this elaborate apparatus
of hollow, transparent and gyrating spheres (one system required 55 of
them) had come to be an intellectual necessity; [De hypothesibus motuum
coelestium commentariolus]{.italic} is the timid title which Copernicus,
denier of Aristotle, placed at the head of the manuscript that
transformed our vision of the cosmos.
For one man, for Giordano Bruno, the rupture of the stellar vaults was a
liberation. He proclaimed, in the [Cena de la ceneri,]{.italic} that the
world is the infinite effect of an infinite cause, and that divinity is
close by, \"for it is within us even more than we ourselves are within
ourselves.\" He searched for words to tell men of Copernican space, and
on one famous page he inscribed: \"We can assert with certitude that the
universe is all center, or that the center of the universe is everywhere
and the circumference nowhere\" [(Delia causa, principio ed uno,
V).]{.italic}
This phrase was written with exultation, in 1584, still in the light of
the Renaissance; seventy years later there was no reflection of that
fervor left and men felt lost in time and space. In time, because if the
future and the past are infinite, there can not really be a when; in
space, because if every being is equidistant from the infinite and the
infinitesimal, neither can there be a where. No one exists on a certain
day, in a certain place; no one knows the size of his own countenance.
In the Renaissance, humanity thought to have reached the age of
virility, and it declares as much through the lips of Bruno, of
Campanella, and of Bacon. In the seventeenth century, humanity was cowed
by a feeling of senescence; in order to justify itself it exhumed the
belief in a slow and fatal degeneration of all creatures consequent on
Adam\'s sin. (We know ― from the fifth chapter of Genesis ― that \"all
the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years\"; from
the sixth chapter, that \"there were giants in the earth in those
days.\") The First Anniversary of John Donne\'s elegy, [Anatomy of the
World,]{.italic} lamented the very brief life and limited stature of
contemporary men, who are like pigmies and fairies; Milton, according to
Johnson\'s biography, feared that the appearance on earth of a heroic
species was no longer possible; Glanvill was of the opinion that Adam,
\"the medal of God,\" enjoyed both telescopic and microscopic vision;
Robert South conspicuously wrote: \"An Aristotle was but the fragment of
an Adam, and Athens the rudiments of Paradise.\" In that dispirited
century, the absolute space which had inspired the hexameters of
Lucretius, the absolute space which had meant liberation to Bruno,
became a labyrinth and an abyss for Pascal. He abhorred the universe and
would have liked to adore God; but God, for him, was less real than the
abhorred universe. He deplored the fact that the firmament did not
speak, and he compared our life with that of castaways on a desert
island. He felt the incessant weight of the physical world, he
experienced vertigo, fright and solitude, and he put his feelings into
these words: \"Nature is an infinite sphere, whose center is everywhere
and whose circumference is nowhere.\" Thus do the words appear in the
Brunschvicg text; but the critical edition published by Tourneur (Paris,
1941), which reproduces the crossed-out words and variations of the
manuscript, reveals that Pascal started to write the word
[effroyable:]{.italic} \"a fearful sphere, whose center is everywhere
and whose circumference is nowhere.\"
It may be that universal history is the history of the different
intonations given a handful of metaphors.
\
[Translated by Anthony Kerrigan]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_031.html_calibre_pb_32 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_032.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_032.html_filepos467422 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_032.html_filepos467478 .calibre10}
[[Partial Magic in the]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[[[Quixote]{.bold}]{.italic1}]{.calibre3}
\
It is plausible that these observations may have been set forth at some
time and, perhaps, many times; a discussion of their novelty interests
me less than one of their possible truth.
Compared with other classic books (the [Iliad,]{.italic} the
[Aeneid,]{.italic} the [Pharsalia,]{.italic} Dante\'s
[Commedia,]{.italic} Shakespeare\'s tragedies and comedies), the
[Quixote]{.italic} is a realistic work; its realism, however, differs
essentially from that practiced by the nineteenth century. Joseph Conrad
could write that he excluded the supernatural from his work because to
include it would seem a denial that the everyday was marvelous; I do not
know if Miguel de Cervantes shared that intuition, but I do know that
the form of the [Quixote]{.italic} made him counterpose a real prosaic
world to an imaginary poetic world. Conrad and Henry James wrote novels
of reality because they judged reality to be poetic; for Cervantes the
real and the poetic were antinomies. To the vast and vague geographies
of the [Amadis,]{.italic} he opposes the dusty roads and sordid wayside
inns of Castille; imagine a novelist of our time centering attention for
purposes of parody on some filling stations. Cervantes has created for
us the poetry of seventeenth-century Spain, but neither that century nor
that Spain were poetic for him; men like Unamuno or Azorín or Antonio
Machado, who were deeply moved by any evocation of La Mancha, would have
been incomprehensible to him. The plan of his book precluded the
marvelous; the latter, however, had to figure in the novel, at least
indirectly, just as crimes and a mystery in a parody of a detective
story. Cervantes could not resort to talismans or enchantments, but he
insinuated the supernatural in a subtle ― and therefore more effective ―
manner. In his intimate being, Cervantes loved the supernatural. Paul
Groussac observed in 1924: \"With a deleble coloring of Latin and
Italian, Cervantes\' literary production derived mostly from the
pastoral novel and the novel of chivalry, soothing fables of
captivity.\" The [Quixote]{.italic} is less an antidote for those
fictions than it is a secret, nostalgic farewell.
Every novel is an ideal plane inserted into the realm of reality;
Cervantes takes pleasure in confusing the objective and the subjective,
the world of the reader and the world of the book. In those chapters
which argue whether the barber\'s basin is a helmet and the donkey\'s
packsaddle a steed\'s fancy regalia, the problem is dealt with
explicity; other passages, as I have noted, insinuate this. In the sixth
chapter of the first part, the priest and the barber inspect Don
Quixote\'s library; astoundingly, one of the books examined is
Cervantes\' own [Galatea]{.italic} and it turns out that the barber is a
friend of the author and does not admire him very much, and says that he
is more versed in misfortunes than in verses and that the book possesses
some inventiveness, proposes a few ideas and concludes nothing. The
barber, a dream or the form of a dream of Cervantes, passes judgment on
Cervantes. . . It is also surprising to learn, at the beginning of the
ninth chapter, that the entire novel has been translated from the Arabic
and that Cervantes acquired the manuscript in the marketplace of Toledo
and had it translated by a [morisco]{.italic} whom he lodged in his
house for more than a month and a half while the job was being finished.
We think of Carlyle, who pretended that the [Sartor Resartus]{.italic}
was the fragmentary version of a work published in Germany by Doctor
Diogenes Teufelsdroeckh; we think of the Spanish rabbi Moses of Leon,
who composed the [Zohar]{.italic} or [Book of Splendor]{.italic} and
divulged it as the work of a Palestinian rabbi of the second century.
This play of strange ambiguities culminates in the second part; the
protagonists have read the first part, the protagonists of the
[Quixote]{.italic} are, at the same time, readers of the
[Quixote.]{.italic} Here it is inevitable to recall the case of
Shakespeare, who includes on the stage of [Hamlet]{.italic} another
stage where a tragedy more or less like that of [Hamlet]{.italic} is
presented; the imperfect correspondence of the principal and secondary
works lessens the efficacy of this inclusion. An artifice analogous to
Cervantes\', and even more astounding, figures in the
[Ramayana,]{.italic} the poem of Valmiki, which narrates the deeds of
Rama and his war with the demons. In the last book, the sons of Rama,
who do not know who their father is, seek shelter in a forest, where an
ascetic teaches them to read. This teacher is, strangely enough,
Valmiki; the book they study, the [Ramayana.]{.italic} Rama orders a
sacrifice of horses; Valmiki and his pupils attend this feast. The
latter, accompanied by their lute, sing the [Ramayana.]{.italic} Rama
hears his own story, recognizes his own sons and then rewards the poet.
. . Something similar is created by accident in the [Thousand and One
Nights.]{.italic} This collection of fantastic tales duplicates and
reduplicates to the point of vertigo the ramifications of a central
story in later and subordinate stories, but does not attempt to gradate
its realities, and the effect (which should have been profound) is
superficial, like a Persian carpet. The opening story of the series is
well known: the terrible pledge of the king who every night marries a
virgin who is then decapitated at dawn, and the resolution of
Scheherazade, who distracts the king with her fables until a thousand
and one nights have gone by and she shows him their son. The necessity
of completing a thousand and one sections obliged the copyists of the
work to make all manner of interpolations. None is more perturbing than
that of the six hundred and second night, magical among all the nights.
On that night, the king hears from the queen his own story. He hears the
beginning of the story, which comprises all the others and also ―
monstrously ― itself. Does the reader clearly grasp the vast possibility
of this interpolation, the curious danger? That the queen may persist
and the motionless king hear forever the truncated story of the
[Thousand and One Nights,]{.italic} now infinite and circular. . . The
inventions of philosophy are no less fantastic than those of art: Josiah
Royce, in the first volume of his work [The World and the
Individual]{.italic} (1899), has formulated the following: \"Let us
imagine that a portion of the soil of England has been levelled off
perfectly and that on it a cartographer traces a map of England. The job
is perfect; there is no detail of the soil of England, no matter how
minute, that is not registered on the map; everything has there its
correspondence. This map, in such a case, should contain a map of the
map, which should contain a map of the map of the map, and so on to
infinity.\"
Why does it disturb us that the map be included in the map and the
thousand and one nights in the book of the [Thousand and One
Nights?]{.italic} Why does it disturb us that Don Quixote be a reader of
the [Quixote]{.italic} and Hamlet a spectator of [Hamlet?]{.italic} I
believe I have found the reason: these inversions suggest that if the
characters of a fictional work can be readers or spectators, we, its
readers or spectators, can be fictitious. In 1833, Carlyle observed that
the history of the universe is an infinite sacred book that all men
write and read and try to understand, and in which they are also
written.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_032.html_calibre_pb_33 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_033.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_033.html_filepos475400 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_033.html_filepos475456 .calibre10}
[[Valéry as Symbol]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Bringing together the names of Whitman and Paul Valéry is, at first
glance, an arbitrary and (what is worse) inept operation. Valéry is a
symbol of infinite dexterities but, at the same time, of infinite
scruples; Whitman, of an almost incoherent but titanic vocation of
felicity; Valéry illustriously personifies the labyrinths of the mind;
Whitman, the interjections of the body. Valéry is a symbol of Europe and
of its delicate twilight; Whitman, of the morning in America. The whole
realm of literature would not seem to admit two more antagonistic
applications of the word \"poet.\" One fact, however, links them: the
work of both is less valuable as poetry than it is as the sign of an
exemplary poet created by that work. Thus, the English poet Lascelles
Abercrombie could praise Whitman for having created \"from the richness
of his noble experience that vivid and personal figure which is one of
the few really great things of the poetry of our time: the figure of
himself.\" The dictum is vague and superlative, but it has the singular
virtue of not identifying Whitman, the man of letters and devoté of
Tennyson, with Whitman, the semidivine hero of [Leaves of
Grass.]{.italic} The distinction is valid; Whitman wrote his rhapsodies
in terms of an imaginary identity, formed partly of himself, partly of
each of his readers. Hence the discrepancies that have exasperated the
critics; hence the custom of dating his poems in places where he had
never been; hence the fact that, on one page of his work, he was born in
the Southern states, and on another (and also in reality) on Long
Island.
One of the purposes of Whitman\'s compositions is to define a possible
man ― Walt Whitman ― of unlimited and negligent felicity; no less
hyperbolic, no less illusory, is the man defined by Valéry\'s
compositions. The latter does not magnify, as does the former, the human
faculties of philanthropy, fervor and joy; he magnifies the virtues of
the mind. Valéry created Edmond Teste; this character would be one of
the myths of our time if intimately we did not all judge him to be a
mere [Doppelgänger]{.italic} of Valéry. For us, Valéry is Edmond Teste.
In other words, Valéry is a derivation of Poe\'s Chevalier Dupin and the
inconceivable God of the theologians. Which fact, plausibly enough, is
not true.
Yeats, Rilke and Eliot have written verses more memorable than those of
Valéry; Joyce and Stefan George have effected more profound
modifications in their instrument (perhaps French is less modifiable
than English and German); but behind the work of these eminent
artificers there is no personality comparable to Valéry\'s. The
circumstance that that personality is, in some way, a projection of the
work does not diminish this fact. To propose lucidity to men in a lowly
romantic era, in the melancholy era of Nazism and dialectical
materialism, of the augurs of Freudianism and the merchants of
[surréalisms,]{.italic} such is the noble mission Valéry fulfilled (and
continues to fulfill).
Paul Valéry leaves us at his death the symbol of a man infinitely
sensitive to every phenomenon and for whom every phenomenon is a
stimulus capable of provoking an infinite series of thoughts. Of a man
who transcends the differential traits of the self and of whom we can
say, as William Hazlitt did of Shakespeare, \"he is nothing in
himself.\" Of a man whose admirable texts do not exhaust, do not even
define, their all-embracing possibilities. Of a man who, in an age that
worships the chaotic idols of blood, earth and passion, preferred always
the lucid pleasures of thought and the secret adventures of order.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_033.html_calibre_pb_34 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_034.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_034.html_filepos479477 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_034.html_filepos479642 .calibre10}
[[Kafka and His Precursors]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
I once premeditated making a study of Kafka\'s precursors. At first I
had considered him to be as singular as the phoenix of rhetorical
praise; after frequenting his pages a bit, I came to think I could
recognize his voice, or his practices, in texts from diverse literatures
and periods. I shall record a few of these here, in chronological order.
The first is Zeno\'s paradox against movement. A moving object at A
(declares Aristotle) cannot reach point B, because it must first cover
half the distance between the two points, and before that, half of the
half, and before that, half of the half of the half, and so on to
infinity; the form of this illustrious problem is, exactly, that of [The
Castle,]{.italic} and the moving object and the arrow and Achilles are
the first Kafkian characters in literature. In the second text which
chance laid before me, the affinity is not one of form but one of tone.
It is an apologue of Han Yu, a prose writer of the ninth century, and is
reproduced in Margouliès\' admirable [Anthologie raisonnée de la
littérature chinoise]{.italic} (1948). This is the paragraph, mysterious
and calm, which I marked: \"It is universally admitted that the unicorn
is a supernatural being of good omen; such is declared in all the odes,
annals, biographies of illustrious men and other texts whose authority
is unquestionable. Even children and village women know that the unicorn
constitutes a favorable presage. But this animal does not figure among
the domestic beasts, it is not always easy to find, it does not lend
itself to classification. It is not like the horse or the bull, the wolf
or the deer. In such conditions, we could be face to face with a unicorn
and not know for certain what it was. We know that such and such an
animal with a mane is a horse and that such and such an animal with
horns is a bull. But we do not know what the unicorn is
like.\"[[[[30]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos610234){.calibre7}
The third text derives from a more easily predictable source: the
writings of Kierkegaard. The spiritual affinity of both writers is
something of which no one is ignorant; what has not yet been brought
out, as far as I know, is the fact that Kierkegaard, like Kafka, wrote
many religious parables on contemporary and bourgeois themes. Lowrie, in
his [Kierkegaard]{.italic} (Oxford University Press, 1938), transcribes
two of these. One is the story of a counterfeiter who, under constant
surveillance, counts banknotes in the Bank of England; in the same way,
God would distrust Kierkegaard and have given him a task to perform,
precisely because He knew that he was familiar with evil. The subject of
the other parable is the North Pole expeditions. Danish ministers had
declared from their pulpits that participation in these expeditions was
beneficial to the soul\'s eternal well-being. They admitted, however,
that it was difficult, and perhaps impossible, to reach the Pole and
that not all men could undertake the adventure. Finally, they would
announce that any trip ― from Denmark to London, let us say, on the
regularly scheduled steamer ― was, properly considered, an expedition to
the North Pole.
The fourth of these prefigurations I have found is Browning\'s poem
\"Fears and Scruples,\" published in 1876. A man has, or believes he
has, a famous friend. He has never seen this friend and the fact is that
the friend has so far never helped him, although tales are told of his
most noble traits and authentic letters of his circulate about. Then
someone places these traits in doubt and the handwriting experts declare
that the letters are apocryphal. The man asks, in the last line: \"And
if this friend were . . . God?\"
My notes also register two stories. One is from Léon Bloy\'s [Histoires
désobligeantes]{.italic} and relates the case of some people who possess
all manner of globes, atlases, railroad guides and trunks, but who die
without ever having managed to leave their home town. The other is
entitled \"Carcassonne\" and is the work of Lord Dunsany. An invincible
army of warriors leaves an infinite castle, conquers kingdoms and sees
monsters and exhausts the deserts and the mountains, but they never
reach Carcassonne, though once they glimpse it from afar. (This story
is, as one can easily see, the strict reverse of the previous one; in
the first, the city is never left; in the second, it is never reached.)
If I am not mistaken, the heterogeneous pieces I have enumerated
resemble Kafka; if I am not mistaken, not all of them resemble each
other. This second fact is the more significant. In each of these texts
we find Kafka\'s idiosyncrasy to a greater or lesser degree, but if
Kafka had never written a line, we would not perceive this quality; in
other words, it would not exist. The poem \"Fears and Scruples\" by
Browning foretells Kafka\'s work, but our reading of Kafka perceptibly
sharpens and deflects our reading of the poem. Browning did not read it
as we do now. In the critics\' vocabulary, the word \"precursor\" is
indispensable, but it should be cleansed of all connotation of polemics
or rivalry. The fact is that every writer [creates]{.italic} his own
precursors. His work modifies our conception of the past, as it will
modify the
future.[[[[31]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos610647){.calibre7}
In this correlation the identity or plurality of the men involved is
unimportant. The early Kafka of [Betrachtung]{.italic} is less a
precursor of the Kafka of somber myths and atrocious institutions than
is Browning or Lord Dunsany.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_034.html_calibre_pb_35 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_035.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_035.html_filepos485699 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_035.html_filepos485755 .calibre10}
[[Avatars of the Tortoise]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
There is a concept which corrupts and upsets all others. I refer not to
Evil, whose limited realm is that of ethics; I refer to the infinite. I
once longed to compile its mobile history. The numerous Hydra (the swamp
monster which amounts to a prefiguration or emblem of geometric
progressions) would lend convenient horror to its portico; it would be
crowned by the sordid nightmares of Kafka and its central chapters would
not ignore the conjectures of that remote German cardinal ― Nicholas of
Krebs, Nicholas of Cusa ― who saw in the circumference of the circle a
polygon with an infinite number of sides and wrote that an infinite line
would be a straight line, a triangle, a circle and a sphere [(De docta
ignorantia,]{.italic} I, 13). Five or seven years of metaphysical,
theological and mathematical apprenticeship would allow me (perhaps) to
plan decorously such a book. It is useless to add that life forbids me
that hope and even that adverb.
The following pages in some way belong to that illusory [Biography of
the Infinite.]{.italic} Their purpose is to register certain avatars of
the second paradox of Zeno.
Let us recall, now, that paradox.
Achilles runs ten times faster than the tortoise and gives the animal a
headstart of ten meters. Achilles runs those ten meters, the tortoise
one; Achilles runs that meter, the tortoise runs a decimeter; Achilles
runs that decimeter, the tortoise runs a centimeter; Achilles runs that
centimeter, the tortoise, a millimeter; Fleet-footed Achilles, the
millimeter, the tortoise, a tenth of a millimeter, and so on to
infinity, without the tortoise ever being overtaken. . . Such is the
customary version. Wilhelm Capelle [(Die Vorsokratiker,]{.italic} 1935,
page 178) translates the original text by Aristotle: \"The second
argument of Zeno is the one known by the name of Achilles. He reasons
that the slowest will never be overtaken by the swiftest, since the
pursuer has to pass through the place the pursued has just left, so that
the slowest will always have a certain advantage.\" The problem does not
change, as you can see; but I would like to know the name of the poet
who provided it with a hero and a tortoise. To those magical competitors
and to the series
\
{.calibre20}
\
the argument owes its fame. Almost no one recalls the one preceding it ―
the one about the track ―, though its mechanism is identical. Movement
is impossible (argues Zeno) for the moving object must cover half of the
distance in order to reach its destination, and before reaching the
half, half of the half, and before half of the half, half of the half of
the half, and before. .
.[[[[32]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos610847){.calibre7}
We owe to the pen of Aristotle the communication and first refutation of
these arguments. He refutes them with a perhaps disdainful brevity, but
their recollection served as an inspiration for his famous [argument of
the third man]{.italic} against the Platonic doctrine. This doctrine
tries to demonstrate that two individuals who have common attributes
(for example, two men) are mere temporal appearances of an eternal
archetype. Aristotle asks if the many men and the Man ― the temporal
individuals and the archetype ― have attributes in common. It is obvious
that they do: the general attributes of humanity. In that case,
maintains Aristotle, one would have to postulate [another]{.italic}
archetype to include them all, and then a fourth. . . Patricio de
Azcárate, in a note to his translation of the [Metaphysics,]{.italic}
attributes this presentation of the problem to one of Aristotle\'s
disciples: \"If what is affirmed of many things is at the same time a
separate being, different from the things about which the affirmation is
made (and this is what the Platonists pretend), it is necessary that
there be a third man. [Man]{.italic} is a denomination applicable to
individuals and the idea. There is, then, a third man separate and
different from individual men and the idea. There is at the same time a
fourth man who stands in the same relationship to the third and to the
idea and individual men; then a fifth and so on to infinity.\" Let us
postulate two individuals, [a]{.italic} and [b,]{.italic} who make up
the generic type [c.]{.italic} We would then have:
\
[a + b = c]{.italic}
\
But also, according to Aristotle:
\
[a + b + c = d]{.italic}
[a + b + c + d = e]{.italic}
[a + b + c + d + e = f. . .]{.italic}
\
Rigorously speaking, two individuals are not necessary: it is enough to
have one individual and the generic type in order to determine the
[third man]{.italic} denounced by Aristotle. Zeno of Elea resorts to the
idea of infinite regression against movement and number; his refuter,
against the idea of universal
forms.[[[[33]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos611143){.calibre7}
The next avatar of Zeno my disorderly notes register is Agrippa the
skeptic. He denies that anything can be proven, since every proof
requires a previous proof [(Hypotyposes,]{.italic} I, 166). Sextus
Empiricus argues in a parallel manner that definitions are in vain,
since one will have to define each of the words used and then define the
definition [(Hypotyposes,]{.italic} II, 207). One thousand six hundred
years later, Byron, in the dedication to [Don Juan,]{.italic} will write
of Coleridge: \"I wish he would explain his Explanation.\"
So far, the [regressus in infinitum]{.italic} has served to negate;
Saint Thomas Aquinas resorts to it [(Summa theologica,]{.italic} I, 2,
3) in order to affirm that God exists. He points out that there is
nothing in the universe without an effective cause and that this cause,
of course, is the effect of another prior cause. The world is an
interminable chain of causes and each cause is also an effect. Each
state derives from a previous one and determines the following, but the
whole series could have not existed, since its terms are conditional,
i.e., fortuitous. However, the world [does]{.italic} exist; from this we
may infer a noncontingent first cause, which would be the Divinity. Such
is the cosmological proof; it is prefigured by Aristotle and Plato;
later Leibniz rediscovers
it.[[[[34]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos612789){.calibre7}
Hermann Lotze has recourse to the [regressus]{.italic} in order not to
understand that an alteration of object A can produce an alteration of
object B. He reasons that if A and B are independent, to postulate an
influence of A on B is to postulate a third element C, an element which
in order to affect B will require a fourth element D, which cannot work
its effect without E, which cannot work its effect without F. . . In
order to elude this multiplication of chimeras, he resolves that in the
world there is one sole object: an infinite and absolute substance,
comparable to the God of Spinoza. Transitive causes are reduced to
immanent causes; phenomena, to manifestations or modalities of the
cosmic
substance.[[[[35]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos613108){.calibre7}
Analogous, but even more alarming, is the case of F. H. Bradley. This
thinker [(Appearance and Reality,]{.italic} 1897, pages 19-34) does not
limit himself to combatting the relation of cause; he denies all
relations. He asks if a relation is related to its terms. The answer is
yes and he infers that this amounts to admitting the existence of two
other relations, and then of two more. In the axiom \"the part is less
than the whole\" he does not perceive two terms and the relation \"less
than\"; he perceives three (\"part,\" \"less than,\" \"whole\") whose
linking implies two more relations, and so on to infinity. In the
statement \"John is mortal,\" he perceives three invariable concepts
(the third is the copula) which we can never bring together. He
transforms all concepts into incommunicable, solidified objects. To
refute him is to become contaminated with unreality.
Lotze inserts Zeno\'s periodic chasms between the cause and the effect;
Bradley, between the subject and the predicate, if not between the
subject and its attributes; Lewis Carroll [(Mind,]{.italic} volume four,
page 278), between the second premise of the syllogism and the
conclusion. He relates an endless dialogue, whose interlocutors are
Achilles and the tortoise. Having now reached the end of their
interminable race, the two athletes calmly converse about geometry. They
study this lucid reasoning:
\
a) Two things equal to a third are equal to one another.
b) The two sides of this triangle are equal to MN.
c) The two sides of this triangle are equal to one another.
\
The tortoise accepts the premises [a]{.italic} and [b,]{.italic} but
denies that they justify the conclusion. He has Achilles interpolate a
hypothetical proposition:
\
a) Two things equal to a third are equal to one another.
b) The two sides of this triangle are equal to MN.
c) If [a]{.italic} and [b]{.italic} are valid, [z]{.italic} is
valid.
z) The two sides of this triangle are equal to one another.
\
Having made this brief clarification, the tortoise accepts the validity
of [a, b]{.italic} and [c,]{.italic} but not of [z.]{.italic} Achilles,
indignant, interpolates:
\
d) if [a]{.italic}, [b]{.italic} and [c]{.italic} are valid,
[z]{.italic} is valid.
\
And then, now with a certain resignation:
\
e) If [a, b, c]{.italic} and [d]{.italic} are valid, [z]{.italic}
is valid.
\
Carroll observes that the Greek\'s paradox involves an infinite series
of distances which diminish, whereas in his, the distances grow.
One final example, perhaps the most elegant of all, but also the one
differing least from Zeno. William James [(Some Problems of
Philosophy,]{.italic} 1911, page 182) denies that fourteen minutes can
pass, because first it is necessary for seven to pass, and before the
seven, three and a half, and before the three and a half, a minute and
three quarters, and so on until the end, the invisible end, through
tenuous labyrinths of time.
Descartes, Hobbes, Leibniz, Mill, Renouvier, Georg Cantor, Gomperz,
Russell and Bergson have formulated explanations ― not always
inexplicable and vain in nature ― of the paradox of the tortoise. (I
have registered some of them in my book [Discusión,]{.italic} 1932,
pages 151-161). Applications abound as well, as the reader has seen. The
historical applications do not exhaust its possibilities: the
vertiginous [regressus in infinitum]{.italic} is perhaps applicable to
all subjects. To aesthetics: such and such a verse moves us for such and
such a reason, such and such a reason for such and such a reason. . . To
the problem of knowledge: cognition is recognition, but it is necessary
to have known in order to recognize, but cognition is recognition. . .
How can we evaluate this dialectic? Is it a legimate instrument of
investigation or only a bad habit?
It is venturesome to think that a coordination of words (philosophies
are nothing more than that) can resemble the universe very much. It is
also venturesome to think that of all these illustrious coordinations,
one of them ― at least in an infinitesimal way ― does not resemble the
universe a bit more than the others. I have examined those which enjoy
certain prestige; I venture to affirm that only in the one formulated by
Schopenhauer have I recognized some trait of the universe. According to
this doctrine, the world is a fabrication of the will. Art ― always ―
requires visible unrealities. Let it suffice for me to mention one: the
metaphorical or numerous or carefully accidental diction of the
interlocutors in a drama. . . Let us admit what all idealists admit: the
hallucinatory nature of the world. Let us do what no idealist has done:
seek unrealities which confirm that nature. We shall find them, I
believe, in the antinomies of Kant and in the dialectic of Zeno.
\"The greatest magician (Novalis has memorably written) would be the one
who would cast over himself a spell so complete that he would take his
own phantasmagorias as autonomous appearances. Would not this be our
case?\" I conjecture that this is so. We (the undivided divinity
operating within us) have dreamt the world. We have dreamt it as firm,
mysterious, visible, ubiquitous in space and durable in time; but in its
architecture we have allowed tenuous and eternal crevices of unreason
which tell us it is false.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_035.html_calibre_pb_36 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_036.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_036.html_filepos500008 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_036.html_filepos500173 .calibre10}
[[The Mirror of Enigmas]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
The idea that the Sacred Scriptures have (aside from their literal
value) a symbolic value is ancient and not irrational: it is found in
Philo of Alexandria, in the Cabalists, in Swedenborg. Since the events
related in the Scriptures are true (God is Truth, Truth cannot lie,
etc.), we should admit that men, in acting out those events, blindly
represent a secret drama determined and premeditated by God. Going from
this to the thought that the history of the universe ― and in it our
lives and the most tenuous detail of our lives ― has an incalculable,
symbolical value, is a reasonable step. Many have taken that step; no
one so astonishingly as Léon Bloy. (In the psychological fragments by
Novalis and in that volume of Machen\'s autobiography called [The London
Adventure]{.italic} there is a similar hypothesis: that the outer world
― forms, temperatures, the moon ― is a language we humans have forgotten
or which we can scarcely distinguish. . . It is also declared by De
Quincey:[[[[36]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos613441){.calibre7}
\"Even the articulate or brutal sounds of the globe must be all so many
languages and ciphers that somewhere have their corresponding keys ―
have their own grammar and syntax; and thus the least things in the
universe must be secret mirrors to the greatest.\")
A verse from St. Paul (I Corinthians, 13:12) inspired Léon Bloy.
[Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate: tune autem facie ad faciem.
Nunc cognosco ex parte: tunc autem cognoscam sicut et cognitus
sum.]{.italic} Torres Amat has miserably translated: \"At present we do
not see God except as in a mirror and beneath dark images; but later we
shall see him face to face. I only know him now imperfectly; but later I
shall know him in a clear vision, in the same way that I know myself.\"
49 words do the work of 22; it is impossible to be more languid and
verbose. Cipriano de Valera is more faithful: \"Now we see in a mirror,
in darkness; but later we shall see face to face. Now I know in part;
but later I shall know as I am known.\" Torres Amat opines that the
verse refers to our vision of the divinity; Cipriano de Valera (and Léon
Bloy), to our general vision of things.
So far as I know, Bloy never gave his conjecture a definitive form.
Throughout his fragmentary work (in which there abound, as everyone
knows, lamentations and insults) there are different versions and
facets. Here are a few that I have rescued from the clamorous pages of
[Le mendiant ingrat, Le Vieux de la Montagne]{.italic} and
[L\'invendable.]{.italic} I do not believe I have exhausted them: I hope
that some specialist in Léon Bloy (I am not one) may complete and
rectify them.
The first is from June 1894. I translate it as follows: \"The statement
by St. Paul: [Videmus nunc per speculum in aenigmate]{.italic} would be
a skylight through which one might submerge himself in the true Abyss,
which is the soul of man. The terrifying immensity of the firmament\'s
abysses is an illusion, an external reflection of [our own]{.italic}
abysses, perceived \'in a mirror.\' We should invert our eyes and
practice a sublime astronomy in the infinitude of our hearts, for which
God was willing to die. . . If we see the Milky Way, it is because it
[actually exists in our souls.\"]{.italic}
The second is from November of the same year. \"I recall one of my
oldest ideas. The Czar is the leader and spiritual father of a hundred
fifty million men. An atrocious responsibility which is only apparent.
Perhaps he is not responsible to God, but rather to a few human beings.
If the poor of his empire are oppressed during his reign, if immense
catastrophies result from that reign, who knows if the servant charged
with shining his boots is not the real and sole person guilty? In the
mysterious dispositions of the Profundity, who is really Czar, who is
king, who can boast of being a mere servant?\"
The third is from a letter written in December. \"Everything is a
symbol, even the most piercing pain. We are dreamers who shout in our
sleep. We do not know whether the things afflicting us are the secret
beginning of our ulterior happiness or not. We now see, St. Paul
maintains, [per speculum in aenigmate,]{.italic} literally: \'in an
enigma by means of a mirror\' and we shall not see in any other way
until the coming of the One who is all in flames and who must teach us
all things.\"
The fourth is from May 1904. [\"Per speculum in aenigmate,]{.italic}
says St. Paul. We see everything backwards. When we believe we give, we
receive, etc. Then (a beloved, anguished soul tells me) we are in Heaven
and God suffers on earth.\"
The fifth is from May 1908. \"A terrifying idea of Jeanne\'s, about the
text [Per speculum.]{.italic} The pleasures of this world would be the
torments of Hell, seen backwards, in a mirror.\"
The sixth is from 1912. It is each of the pages of [L\'Âme de
Napoléon,]{.italic} a book whose purpose is to decipher the symbol
Napoleon, considered as the precursor of another hero ― man and symbol
as well ― who is hidden in the future. It is sufficient for me to cite
two passages. One: \"Every man is on earth to symbolize something he is
ignorant of and to realize a particle or a mountain of the invisible
materials that will serve to build the City of God.\" The other: \"There
is no human being on earth capable of declaring with certitude who he
is. No one knows what he has come into this world to do, what his acts
correspond to, his sentiments, his ideas, or what his real name is, his
enduring Name in the register of Light. . . History is an immense
liturgical text where the iotas and the dots are worth no less than the
entire verses or chapters, but the importance of one and the other is
indeterminable and profoundly hidden.\"
The foregoing paragraphs will perhaps seem to the reader mere gratuities
by Bloy. So far as I know, he never took care to reason them out. I
venture to judge them verisimilar and perhaps inevitable within the
Christian doctrine. Bloy (I repeat) did no more than apply to the whole
of Creation the method which the Jewish Cabalists applied to the
Scriptures. They thought that a work dictated by the Holy Spirit was an
absolute text: in other words, a text in which the collaboration of
chance was calculable as zero. This portentous premise of a book
impenetrable to contingency, of a book which is a mechanism of infinite
purposes, moved them to permute the scriptural words, add up the
numerical value of the letters, consider their form, observe the small
letters and capitals, seek acrostics and anagrams and perform other
exegetical rigors which it is not difficult to ridicule. Their excuse is
that nothing can be contingent in the work of an infinite
mind.[[[[37]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos613609){.calibre7}
Léon Bloy postulates this hieroglyphical character ― this character of a
divine writing, of an angelic cryptography ― at all moments and in all
beings on earth. The superstitious person believes he can decipher this
organic writing: thirteen guests form the symbol of death; a yellow
opal, that of misfortune.
It is doubtful that the world has a meaning; it is even more doubtful
that it has a double or triple meaning, the unbeliever will observe. I
understand that this is so; but I understand that the hieroglyphical
world postulated by Bloy is the one which best befits the dignity of the
theologian\'s intellectual God.
[No man knows who he is,]{.italic} affirmed Léon Bloy. No one could
illustrate that intimate ignorance better than he. He believed himself a
rigorous Catholic and he was a continuer of the Cabalists, a secret
brother of Swedenborg and Blake: heresiarchs.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_036.html_calibre_pb_37 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_037.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_037.html_filepos508625 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_037.html_filepos508681 .calibre10}
[[A Note on (toward) Bernard Shaw]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
At the end of the thirteenth century, Raymond Lully (Raimundo Lulio) was
prepared to solve all arcana by means of an apparatus of concentric,
revolving discs of different sizes, subdivided into sectors with Latin
words; John Stuart Mill, at the beginning of the nineteenth, feared that
some day the number of musical combinations would be exhausted and there
would be no place in the future for indefinite Webers and Mozarts; Kurd
Lasswitz, at the end of the nineteenth, toyed with the staggering
fantasy of a universal library which would register all the variations
of the twenty-odd orthographical symbols, in other words, all that it is
given to express in all languages. Lully\'s machine, Mill\'s fear and
Lasswitz\'s chaotic library can be the subject of jokes, but they
exaggerate a propension which is common: making metaphysics and the arts
into a kind of play with combinations. Those who practice this game
forget that a book is more than a verbal structure or series of verbal
structures; it is the dialogue it establishes with its reader and the
intonation it imposes upon his voice and the changing and durable images
it leaves in his memory. This dialogue is infinite; the words [amica
silentia lunae]{.italic} now mean the intimate, silent and shining moon,
and in the [Aeneid]{.italic} they meant the interlunar period, the
darkness which allowed the Greeks to enter the stronghold of Troy . .
.[[[[38]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos614102){.calibre7}
Literature is not exhaustible, for the sufficient and simple reason that
no single book is. A book is not an isolated being: it is a
relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships. One literature
differs from another, prior or posterior, less because of the text than
because of the way in which it is read: if I were granted the
possibility of reading any present-day page ― this one, for example ― as
it will be read in the year two thousand, I would know what the
literature of the year two thousand will be like. The conception of
literature as a formalistic game leads, in the best of cases, to the
fine chiseling of a period or a stanza, to an artful decorum (Johnson,
Renan, Flaubert), and in the worst, to the discomforts of a work made of
surprises dictated by vanity and chance (Gracián, Herrera y Reissig).
If literature were nothing more than verbal algebra, anyone could
produce any book by essaying variations. The lapidary formula
\"Everything flows\" abbreviates in two words the philosophy of
Heraclitus: Raymond Lully would say that, with the first word given, it
would be sufficient to essay the intransitive verbs to discover the
second and obtain, thanks to methodical chance, that philosophy and many
others. Here it is fitting to reply that the formula obtained by this
process of elimination would lack all value and even meaning; for it to
have some virtue we must conceive it in terms of Heraclitus, in terms of
an experience of Heraclitus, even though \"Heraclitus\" is nothing more
than the presumed subject of that experience. I have said that a book is
a dialogue, a form of relationship; in a dialogue, an interlocutor is
not the sum or average of what he says: he may not speak and still
reveal that he is intelligent, he may omit intelligent observations and
reveal his stupidity. The same happens with literature; d\'Artagnan
executes innumerable feats and Don Quixote is beaten and ridiculed, but
one feels the valor of Don Quixote more. The foregoing leads us to an
aesthetic problem never before posed: Can an author create characters
superior to himself? I would say no and in that negation include both
the intellectual and the moral. I believe that from us cannot emerge
creatures more lucid or more noble than our best moments. It is on this
opinion that I base my conviction of Shaw\'s pre-eminence. The
collective and civic problems of his early works will lose their
interest, or have lost it already; the jokes in the [Pleasant
Plays]{.italic} run the risk of becoming, some day, no less
uncomfortable than those of Shakespeare (humor, I suspect, is an oral
genre, a sudden favor of conversation, not something written); the ideas
declared in his prologues and his eloquent tirades will be found in
Schopenhauer and Samuel
Butler;[[[[39]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos615257){.calibre7}
but Lavinia, Blanco Posnet, Keegan, Shotover, Richard Dudgeon and, above
all, Julius Caesar, surpass any character imagined by the art of our
time. If we think of Monsieur Teste alongside them or Nietzsche\'s
histrionic Zarathustra, we can perceive with astonishment and even
outrage the primacy of Shaw. In 1911, Albert Soergel could write,
repeating a commonplace of the time, \"Bernard Shaw is an annihilator of
the heroic concept, a killer of heroes\" [(Dichtung und Dichter der
Zeit,]{.italic} 214); he did not understand that the heroic might
dispense with the romantic and be incarnated in Captain Bluntschli of
[Arms and the Man,]{.italic} not in Sergius Saranoff.
The biography of Bernard Shaw by Frank Harris contains an admirable
letter by the former, from which I copy the following words: \"I
understand everything and everyone and I am nothing and no one.\" From
this nothingness (so comparable to that of God before creating the
world, so comparable to that primordial divinity which another Irishman,
Johannes Scotus Erigena, called [Nihil),]{.italic} Bernard Shaw educed
almost innumerable persons or dramatis personae: the most ephemeral of
these is, I suspect, that G. B. S. who represented him in public and who
lavished in the newspaper columns so many facile witticisms.
Shaw\'s fundamental themes are philosophy and ethics: it is natural and
inevitable that he should not be valued in this country, or that he be
so only in terms of a few epigrams. The Argentine feels that the
universe is nothing but a manifestation of chance, the fortuitous
concourse of Democritus\' atoms; philosophy does not interest him. Nor
does ethics: the social realm, for him, is reduced to a conflict of
individuals or classes or nations, in which everything is licit, save
being ridiculed or defeated.
Man\'s character and its variations are the essential theme of the novel
of our time; lyric poetry is the complacent magnification of amorous
fortunes or misfortunes; the philosophies of Heidegger and Jaspers make
each of us the interesting interlocutor in a secret and continuous
dialogue with nothingness or the divinity; these disciplines, which in
the formal sense can be admirable, foment that illusion of the ego which
the Vedanta censures as a capital error. They usually make a game of
desperation and anguish, but at bottom they flatter our vanity; they
are, in this sense, immoral. The work of Shaw, however, leaves one with
a flavor of liberation. The flavor of the stoic doctrines and the flavor
of the sagas.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_037.html_calibre_pb_38 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_038.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_038.html_filepos515996 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_038.html_filepos516109 .calibre10}
[[A New Refutation of Time]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[[ Vor mir war keine Zeit, nach mir wird keine
seyn,]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[ Mit mir gebiert sie sich, mit mir geht sie auch
ein.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[ Daniel von Czepko:]{.calibre5}
[[Sexcenta monodisticha sapientum,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [III, II
(1655)]{.calibre5}
\
PROLOGUE
\
[If published toward the middle of the eighteenth century, this
refutation (or its name) would persist in Hume\'s bibliographies and
perhaps would have merited a line by Huxley or Kemp Smith. Published in
1947]{.italic} ― [after Bergson]{.italic} ―, [it is the
anachronistic]{.italic} reductio ad absurdum [of a preterite system or,
what is worse, the feeble artifice of an Argentine lost in the maze of
metaphysics. Both conjectures are verisimilar and perhaps true; in order
to correct them, I cannot promise a novel conclusion in exchange for my
rudimentary dialectic. The thesis I shall divulge is as ancient as
Zeno\'s arrow or the Greek king\'s carriage in the]{.italic} Milinda
Panha; [the novelty, if any, consists in applying to my purpose the
classic instrument of Berkeley. Both he and his continuer David Hume
abound in paragraphs which contradict or exclude my thesis;
nevertheless, I believe I have deduced the inevitable consequences of
their doctrine.]{.italic}
[The first article (A) was written in 1944 and appeared in number 115 of
the review]{.italic} Sur; [the second, of 1946, is a reworking of the
first. Deliberately I did not make the two into one, understanding that
the reading of two analogous texts might facilitate the comprehension of
an indocile subject.]{.italic}
[A word about the title. I am not unaware that it is an example of the
monster termed by the logicians]{.italic} contradictio in adjecto,
[because stating that a refutation of time is new (or old) attributes to
it a predicate of temporal nature which establishes the very notion the
subject would destroy. I leave it as is, however, so that its slight
mockery may prove that I do not exaggerate the importance of these
verbal games. Besides, our language is so saturated and animated by time
that it is quite possible there is not one statement in these pages
which in some way does not demand or invoke the idea of time.]{.italic}
[1 dedicate these exercises to my forebear Juan Crisóstomo Lafinur
(1797-1824), who left some memorable endecasyllables to Argentine
letters and who tried to reform the teaching of philosophy, purifying it
of theological shadows and expounding in his courses the principles of
Locke and Condillac. He died in exile; like all men, he was given bad
times in which to live.]{.italic}
[Buenos Aires,]{.italic}
[23 December 1946]{.italic}
[J. L. B.]{.italic}
\
A
1\.
In the course of a life dedicated to letters and (at times) to
metaphysical perplexity, I have glimpsed or foreseen a refutation of
time, in which I myself do not believe, but which regularly visits me at
night and in the weary twilight with the illusory force of an axiom.
This refutation is found in some way or another in all my books: it is
prefigured by the poems \"Inscription on Any Grave\" and \"The Trick\"
from my [Fervor of Buenos Aires]{.italic} (1923); it is declared by two
articles in [Inquisitions]{.italic} (1925), page 46 of [Evaristo
Carriego]{.italic} (1930), the narration \"Feeling in Death\" from my
[History of Eternity]{.italic} (1936) and the note on page 24 of [The
Garden of Forking Paths]{.italic} (1941). None of the texts I have
enumerated satisfies me, not even the penultimate one, less
demonstrative and well-reasoned than it is divinatory and pathetic. I
shall try to establish a basis for all of them in this essay.
Two arguments led me to this refutation: the idealism of Berkeley and
Leibniz\'s principle of indiscernibles.
Berkeley [(Principles of Human Knowledge,]{.italic} 3) observed: \"That
neither our thoughts, nor passions, nor ideas formed by the imagination,
exist without the mind, is what everybody will allow. And it seems no
less evident that the various sensations or ideas imprinted on the
sense, however blended or combined together (that is, whatever objects
they compose) cannot exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving them. . .
The table I write on, I say, exists, that is, I see and feel it; and if
I were out of my study I should say it existed, meaning thereby that if
I was in my study I might perceive it, or that some other spirit
actually does perceive it. . . For as to what is said of the absolute
existence of unthinking things without any relation to their being
perceived, that seems perfectly unintelligible. Their [esse]{.italic} is
[percipi,]{.italic} nor is it possible they should have any existence,
out of the minds or thinking things which perceive them.\" In paragraph
twenty-three he added, forestalling objections: \"But say you, surely
there is nothing easier than to imagine trees, for instance, in a park
or books existing in a closet, and no body by to perceive them. I
answer, you may so, there is no difficulty in it: but what is all this,
I beseech you, more than framing in your mind certain ideas which you
call [books]{.italic} and [trees,]{.italic} and at the same time
omitting to frame the idea of any one that may perceive them? But do not
you your self perceive or think of them all the while? This therefore is
nothing to the purpose: it only shows you have the power of imagining or
forming ideas in your mind; but it doth not shew that you can conceive
it possible, the objects of your thought may exist without the mind. .
.\" In another paragraph, number six, he had already declared: \"Some
truths there are so near and obvious to the mind, that a man need only
open his eyes to see them. Such I take this important one to be, to wit,
that all the choir of heaven and furniture of the earth, in a word all
those bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world, have not any
substance without a mind, that their being is to be perceived or known;
that consequently so long as they are not actually perceived by me, or
do not exist in any mind or that of any other created spirit, they must
either have no existence at all, or else subsist in the mind of some
eternal spirit. . .\"
Such is, in the words of its inventor, the idealist doctrine. To
understand it is easy; what is difficult is to think within its limits.
Schopenhauer himself, when expounding it, committed culpable
negligences. In the first lines of the first volume of his [Welt als
Wille und Vorstellung]{.italic} ― from the year 1819 ― he formulated
this declaration which makes him worthy of the enduring perplexity of
all men: \"The world is my idea: this is a truth which holds good for
everything that lives and knows, though man alone can bring it into
reflective and abstract consciousness. If he really does this, he has
attained to philosophical wisdom. It then becomes clear and certain to
him what he knows is not a sun and an earth, but only an eye that sees a
sun, a hand that feels an earth. . .\" In other words, for the idealist
Schopenhauer, man\'s eyes and hands are less illusory or apparent than
the earth and the sun. In 1844 he published a complementary volume. In
its first chapter he rediscovers and aggravates the previous error: he
defines the universe as a phenomenon of the brain and distinguishes the
\"world in the head\" from \"the world outside the head.\" Berkeley,
however, had his Philonous say in 1713: \"The brain therefore you speak
of, being a sensible thing, exists only in the mind. Now, I would fain
know whether you think it reasonable to suppose, that one idea or thing
existing in the mind, occasions all other ideas. And if you think so,
pray how do you account for the origin of that primary idea or brain
itself?\" Schopenhauer\'s dualism or cerebralism may also be licitly
opposed by Spiller\'s monism. Spiller [(The Mind of Man,]{.italic}
chapter VIII, 1902) argues that the retina and the cutaneous surface
invoked in order to explain visual and tactile phenomena are, in turn,
two tactile and visual systems and that the room we see (the
\"objective\" one) is no greater than the one imagined (the \"cerebral\"
one) and does not contain it, since what we have here are two
independent visual systems. Berkeley [(Principles of Human
Knowledge,]{.italic} 10 and 116) likewise denied the existence of
primary qualities ― the solidity and extension of things ― and of
absolute space.
Berkeley affirmed the continuous existence of objects, since when no
individual sees them, God does; Hume, with greater logic, denies such an
existence [(Treatise of Human Nature,]{.italic} I, 4, 2). Berkeley
affirmed the existence of personal identity, \"I my self am not my
ideas, but somewhat else, a thinking active principle that perceives . .
.\" [(Dialogues,]{.italic} 3); Hume, the skeptic, refutes this identity
and makes of every man \"a bundle or collection of different
perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity\"
[(op. cit.,]{.italic} I, 4, 6). Both affirm the existence of time: for
Berkeley, it is \"the succession of ideas in my mind, which flows
uniformly, and is participated by all beings\" [(Principles of Human
Knowledge,]{.italic} 98); for Hume, \"a succession of indivisible
moments\" [(op. cit.,]{.italic} I, 2, 2).
I have accumulated transcriptions from the apologists of idealism, I
have abounded in their canonical passages, I have been reiterative and
explicit, I have censured Schopenhauer (not without ingratitude), so
that my reader may begin to penetrate into this unstable world of the
mind. A world of evanescent impressions; a world without matter or
spirit, neither objective nor subjective; a world without the ideal
architecture of space; a world made of time, of the absolute uniform
time of the [Principia;]{.italic} a tireless labyrinth, a chaos, a
dream. This almost perfect dissolution was reached by David Hume.
Once the idealist argument is admitted, I see that it is possible ―
perhaps inevitable ― to go further. For Hume it is not licit to speak of
the form of the moon or of its color; the form and color [are]{.italic}
the moon; neither can one speak of the perceptions of the mind, since
the mind is nothing other than a series of perceptions. The Cartesian
\"I think, therefore I am\" is thus invalidated; to say \"I think\"
postulates the self, is a begging of the question; Lichtenberg, in the
eighteenth century, proposed that in place of \"I think\" we should say,
impersonally, \"it thinks,\" just as one would say \"it thunders\" or
\"it rains.\" I repeat: behind our faces there is no secret self which
governs our acts and receives our impressions; we are, solely, the
series of these imaginary acts and these errant impressions. The series?
Once matter and spirit, which are continuities, are negated, once space
too has been negated, I do not know what right we have to that
continuity which is time. Let us imagine a present moment of any kind.
During one of his nights on the Mississippi, Huckleberry Finn awakens;
the raft, lost in partial darkness, continues downstream; it is perhaps
a bit cold. Huckleberry Finn recognizes the soft indefatigable sound of
the water; he negligently opens his eyes; he sees a vague number of
stars, an indistinct line of trees; then, he sinks back into his
immemorable sleep as into the dark
waters.[[[[40]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos615746){.calibre7}
Idealist metaphysics declares that to add a material substance (the
object) and a spiritual substance (the subject) to those perceptions is
venturesome and useless; I maintain that it is no less illogical to
think that such perceptions are terms in a series whose beginning is as
inconceivable as its end. To add to the river and the bank, Huck
perceives the notion of another substantive river and another bank, to
add another perception to that immediate network of perceptions, is, for
idealism, unjustifiable; for myself, it is no less unjustifiable to add
a chronological precision: the fact, for example, that the foregoing
event took place on the night of the seventh of June, 1849, between ten
and eleven minutes past four. In other words: I deny, with the arguments
of idealism, the vast temporal series which idealism admits. Hume denied
the existence of an absolute space, in which all things have their
place; I deny the existence of one single time, in which all things are
linked as in a chain. The denial of coexistence is no less arduous than
the denial of succession.
I deny, in an elevated number of instances, the successive; I deny, in
an elevated number of instances, the contemporary as well. The lover who
thinks \"While I was so happy, thinking of the fidelity of my love, she
was deceiving me\" deceives himself: if every state we experience is
absolute, such happiness was not contemporary to the betrayal; the
discovery of that betrayal is another state, which cannot modify the
\"previous\" ones, though it can modify their recollection. The
misfortune of today is no more real than the happiness of the past. I
shall seek a more concrete example. In the first part of August, 1824,
Captain Isidore Suárez, at the head of a squadron of Peruvian hussars,
decided the victory of Junin; in the first part of August, 1824, De
Quincey published a diatribe against [Wilhelm Meisters
Lehrjahre;]{.italic} these events were not contemporary (they are now),
since the two men died ― one in the city of Montevideo, the other in
Edinburgh ― without knowing anything about each other. . . Each moment
is autonomous. Neither vengeance nor pardon nor prisons nor even
oblivion can modify the invulnerable past. To me, hope and fear seem no
less vain, for they always refer to future events: that is, to events
that will not happen to us, who are the minutely detailed present. I am
told that the present, the specious present of the psychologists, lasts
from a few seconds to a minute fraction of a second; that can be the
duration of the history of the universe. In other words, there is no
such history, just as a man has no life; not even one of his nights
exists; each moment we live exists, but not their imaginary combination.
The universe, the sum of all things, is a collection no less ideal than
that of all the horses Shakespeare dreamt of ― one, many, none? ―
between 1592 and 1594. I add: if time is a mental process, how can
thousands of men ― or even two different men ― share it?
The argument of the preceding paragraphs, interrupted and encumbered
with illustrations, may seem intricate. I shall seek a more direct
method. Let us consider a life in whose course there is an abundance of
repetitions: mine, for example. I never pass in front of the Recoleta
without remembering that my father, my grandparents and
great-grandparents are buried there, just as I shall be some day; then I
remember that I have remembered the same thing an untold number of times
already; I cannot walk through the suburbs in the solitude of the night
without thinking that the night pleases us because it suppresses idle
details, just as our memory does; I cannot lament the loss of a love or
a friendship without meditating that one loses only what one really
never had; every time I cross one of the street corners of the southern
part of the city, I think of you, Helen; every time the wind brings me
the smell of eucalyptus, I think of Adrogué in my childhood; every time
I remember the ninety-first fragment of Heraclitus \"You shall not go
down twice to the same river,\" I admire its dialectical dexterity,
because the ease with which we accept the first meaning (\"The river is
different\") clandestinely imposes upon us the second (\"I am
different\") and grants us the illusion of having invented it; every
time I hear a Germanophile vituperate the Yiddish language, I reflect
that Yiddish is, after all, a German dialect, scarcely colored by the
language of the Holy Spirit. These tautologies (and others I leave in
silence) make up my entire life. Of course, they are repeated
imprecisely; there are differences of emphasis, temperature, light and
general physiological condition. I suspect, however, that the number of
circumstantial variants is not infinite: we can postulate, in the mind
of an individual (or of two individuals who do not know of each other
but in whom the same process works), two identical moments. Once this
identity is postulated, one may ask: Are not these identical moments the
same? Is not one single repeated term sufficient to break down and
confuse the series of time? Do not the fervent readers who surrender
themselves to Shakespeare become, literally, Shakespeare?
As yet I am ignorant of the ethics of the system I have outlined. I do
not know if it even exists. The fifth paragraph of the fourth chapter of
the treatise [Sanhedrin]{.italic} of the Mishnah declares that, for
God\'s Justice, he who kills one man destroys the world; if there is no
plurality, he who annihilates all men would be no more guilty than the
primitive and solitary Cain, which fact is orthodox, nor more universal
in his destruction, which fact may be magical. I understand that this is
so. The vociferous catastrophes of a general order ― fires, wars,
epidemics ― are one single pain, illusorily multiplied in many mirrors.
Thus Bernard Shaw sees it [(Guide to Socialism,]{.italic} 86): \"What
you can suffer is the maximum that can be suffered on earth. If you die
of starvation, you will suffer all the starvation there has been or will
be. If ten thousand people die with you, their participation in your lot
will not make you be ten thousand times more hungry nor multiply the
time of your agony ten thousand times. Do not let yourself be overcome
by the horrible sum of human sufferings; such a sum does not exist.
Neither poverty nor pain are cumulative.\" Cf. also [The Problem of
Pain,]{.italic} VII, by C. S. Lewis.
Lucretius [(De rerum natura,]{.italic} I, 830) attributes to Anaxagoras
the doctrine that gold consists of particles of gold, fire of sparks,
bone of tiny imperceptible bones; Josiah Royce, perhaps influenced by
St. Augustine, judges that time is made of time and that \"every
[now]{.italic} within which something happens is therefore
[also]{.italic} a succession\" [(The World and the Individual,]{.italic}
II, 139). This proposition is compatible with that of this essay.
\
2\.
All language is of a successive nature; it does not lend itself to a
reasoning of the eternal, the intemporal. Those who have followed the
foregoing argumentation with displeasure will perhaps prefer this page
from the year 1928. I have already mentioned it; it is the narrative
entitled \"Feeling in Death\":
\"I want to set down here an experience which I had some nights ago: a
trifle too evanescent and ecstatic to be called an adventure, too
irrational and sentimental to be called a thought. It consists of a
scene and its word: a word already stated by me, but not lived with
complete dedication until then. I shall now proceed to give its history,
with the accidents of time and place which were its declaration.
\"I remember it as follows. The afternoon preceding that night, I was in
Barracas: a locality not visited by my habit and whose distance from
those I later traversed had already lent a strange flavor to that day.
The evening had no destiny at all; since it was clear, I went out to
take a walk and to recollect after dinner. I did not want to determine a
route for my stroll; I tried to attain a maximum latitude of
probabilities in order not to fatigue my expectation with the necessary
foresight of any one of them. I managed, to the imperfect degree of
possibility, to do what is called walking at random; I accepted, with no
other conscious prejudice than that of avoiding the wider avenues or
streets, the most obscure invitations of chance. However, a kind of
familiar gravitation led me farther on, in the direction of certain
neighborhoods, the names of which I have every desire to recall and
which dictate reverence to my heart. I do not mean by this my own
neighborhood, the precise surroundings of my childhood, but rather its
still mysterious environs: an area I have possessed often in words but
seldom in reality, immediate and at the same time mythical. The reverse
of the familiar, its far side, are for me those penultimate streets,
almost as effectively unknown as the hidden foundations of our house or
our invisible skeleton. My progress brought me to a corner. I breathed
in the night, in a most serene holiday from thought. The view, not at
all complex, seemed simplified by my tiredness. It was made unreal by
its very typicality. The street was one of low houses and though its
first meaning was one of poverty, its second was certainly one of
contentment. It was as humble and enchanting as anything could be. None
of the houses dared open itself to the street; the fig tree darkened
over the corner; the little arched doorways ― higher than the taut
outlines of the walls ― seemed wrought from the same infinite substance
of the night. The sidewalk formed an escarpment over the street; the
street was of elemental earth, the earth of an as yet unconquered
America. Farther down, the alleyway, already open to the pampa, crumbled
into the Maldonado. Above the turbid and chaotic earth, a rose-colored
wall seemed not to house the moonlight, but rather to effuse an intimate
light of its own. There can be no better way of naming tenderness than
that soft rose color.
\"I kept looking at this simplicity. I thought, surely out loud: This is
the same as thirty years ago. . . I conjectured the date: a recent time
in other countries but now quite remote in this changeable part of the
world. Perhaps a bird was singing and for it I felt a tiny affection,
the same size as the bird; but the most certain thing was that in this
now vertiginous silence there was no other sound than the intemporal one
of the crickets. The easy thought \'I am in the eighteen-nineties\'
ceased to be a few approximate words and was deepened into a reality. I
felt dead, I felt as an abstract spectator of the world; an indefinite
fear imbued with science, which is the best clarity of metaphysics. I
did not think that I had returned upstream on the supposed waters of
Time; rather I suspected that I was the possessor of a reticent or
absent sense of the inconceivable word [eternity.]{.italic} Only later
was I able to define that imagination.
\"I write it now as follows: That pure representation of homogeneous
objects ― the night in serenity, a limpid little wall, the provincial
scent of the honeysuckle, the elemental earth ― is not merely identical
to the one present on that corner so many years ago; it is, without
resemblances or repetitions, the very same. Time, if we can intuitively
grasp such an identity, is a delusion: the difference and inseparability
of one moment belonging to its apparent past from another belonging to
its apparent present is sufficient to disintegrate it.
\"It is evident that the number of such human moments is not infinite.
The elemental ones ― those of physical suffering and physical pleasure,
those of the coming of sleep, those of the hearing of a piece of music,
those of great intensity or great lassitude ― are even more impersonal.
Aforehand I derive this conclusion: life is too poor not to be immortal
as well. But we do not even have the certainty of our poverty, since
time, which is easily refutable in sense experience, is not so in the
intellectual, from whose essence the concept of succession seems
inseparable. Thus shall remain as an emotional anecdote the
half-glimpsed idea and as the confessed irresolution of this page the
true moment of ecstasy and possible suggestion of eternity with which
that night was not parsimonious for me.\"
\
B
\
Of the many doctrines registered by the history of philosophy, perhaps
idealism is the oldest and most widespread. This observation was made by
Carlyle [(Novalis,]{.italic} 1829); to the philosophers he alleges it is
fitting to add, with no hope of completing the infinite census, the
Platonists, for whom the only reality is that of the archetype (Norris,
Judas Abrabanel, Gemistus, Plotinus), the theologians, for whom all that
is not the divinity is contingent (Malebranche, Johannes Eckhart), the
monists, who make the universe an idle adjective of the Absolute
(Bradley, Hegel, Parmenides). . . Idealism is as ancient as metaphysical
restlessness itself; its most acute apologist, George Berkeley,
flourished in the eighteenth century; contrary to what Schopenhauer
declares [(Welt als Wille und Vorstellung,]{.italic} II, i), his merit
cannot be the intuition of that doctrine but rather the arguments he
conceived in order to reason it; Hume applied them to the mind; my
purpose is to apply them to time. But first I shall recapitulate the
diverse stages of this dialectic.
Berkeley denied the existence of matter. This does not mean, one should
note, that he denied the existence of colors, odors, tastes, sounds and
tactile sensations; what he denied was that, aside from these
perceptions, which make up the external world, there was anything
invisible, intangible, called matter. He denied that there were pains
that no one feels, colors that no one sees, forms that no one touches.
He reasoned that to add a matter to our perceptions is to add an
inconceivable, superfluous world to the world. He believed in the world
of appearances woven by our senses, but understood that the material
world (that of Toland, say) is an illusory duplication. He observed
[(Principles of Human Knowledge,]{.italic} 3): \"That neither our
thoughts, nor passions, nor ideas formed by the imagination, exist
without the mind, is what everybody will allow. And it seems no less
evident that the various sensations or ideas imprinted on the sense,
however blended or combined together (that is, whatever objects they
compose) cannot exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving them. . . The
table I write on, I say, exists, that is, I see and feel it; and if I
were out of my study I should say it existed, meaning thereby that if I
was in my study I might perceive it, or that some other spirit actually
does perceive it. . . For as to what is said of the absolute existence
of unthinking things without any relation to their being perceived, that
seems perfectly unintelligible. Their [esse]{.italic} is
[percipi,]{.italic} nor is it possible they should have any existence,
out of the minds or thinking things which perceive them.\" In paragraph
twenty-three he added, forestalling objections: \"But say you, surely
there is nothing easier than to imagine trees, for instance, in a park
or books existing in a closet, and no body by to perceive them. I
answer, you may so, there is no difficulty in it: but what is all this,
I beseech you, more than framing in your mind certain ideas which you
call [books]{.italic} and [trees]{.italic} and at the same time omitting
to frame the idea of any one that may perceive them? But do not you your
self perceive or think of them all the while? This therefore is nothing
to the purpose: it only shows you have the power of imagining or forming
ideas in your mind; but it doth not shrew that you can conceive it
possible, the objects of your thought may exist without the mind. . .\"
In another paragraph, number six, he had already declared: \"Some truths
there are so near and obvious to the mind, that a man need only open his
eyes to see them. Such I take this important one to be, to wit, that all
the choir of heaven and furniture of the earth, in a word all those
bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world, have not any
substance without a mind, that their being is to be perceived or known;
that consequently so long as they are not actually perceived by me, or
do not exist in any mind or that of any other created spirit, they must
either have no existence at all, or else subsist in the mind of some
eternal spirit. . .\" (The God of Berkeley is a ubiquitous spectator
whose function is that of lending coherence to the world.)
The doctrine I have just expounded has been interpreted in perverse
ways. Herbert Spencer thought he had refuted it [(Principles of
Psychology,]{.italic} VIII, 6), reasoning that if there is nothing
outside consciousness, consciousness must be infinite in time and space.
The first is certain if we understand that all time is time perceived by
someone, but erroneous if we infer that this time must necessarily
embrace an infinite number of centuries; the second is illicit, since
Berkeley [(Principles of Human Knowledge,]{.italic} 116;
[Siris,]{.italic} 266) repeatedly denied the existence of an absolute
space. Even more indecipherable is the error into which Schopenhauer
falls [(Welt als Wille und Vorstellung,]{.italic} II, i) when he shows
that for the idealists the world is a phenomenon of the brain; Berkeley,
however, had written [(Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous,]{.italic}
II): \"The brain therefore you speak of, being a sensible thing, exists
only in the mind. Now, I would fain know whether you think it reasonable
to suppose, that one idea or thing existing in the mind, occasions all
other ideas. And if you think so, pray how do you account for the origin
of this primary idea or brain itself?\" The brain, in fact, is no less a
part of the external world than is the constellation of the Centaur.
Berkeley denied that there was an object behind our sense impressions;
David Hume, that there was a subject behind the perception of changes.
The former had denied the existence of matter, the latter denied the
existence of spirit; the former had not wanted us to add to the
succession of impressions the metaphysical notion of matter, the latter
did not want us to add to the succession of mental states the
metaphysical notion of self. So logical is this extension of Berkeley\'s
arguments that Berkeley himself had already foreseen it, as Alexander
Campbell Fraser notes, and even tried to reject it by means of the
Cartesian [ergo sum.]{.italic} \"If your principles are valid, you your
self are nothing more than a system of fluctuating ideas, unsustained by
any substance, since it is as absurd to speak of a spiritual substance
as it is of a material substance,\" reasons Hylas, anticipating David
Hume in the third and last of the [Dialogues.]{.italic} Hume
corroborates [(Treatise of Human Nature,]{.italic} I, 4, 6): \"We are a
bundle or collection of different perceptions, which succeed each other
with an inconceivable rapidity. . . The mind is a kind of theatre, where
several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, re-pass,
glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and
situations. . . The comparison of the theatre must not mislead us. They
are the successive perceptions only, that constitute the mind; nor have
we the most distant notion of the place, where these scenes are
represented, or of the materials, of which it is compos\'d.\"
Once the idealist argument is admitted, I see that it is possible ―
perhaps inevitable ― to go further. For Berkeley, time is \"the
succession of ideas in my mind, which flows uniformly, and is
participated by all beings\" [(Principles of Human Knowledge,]{.italic}
98); for Hume, \"a succession of indivisible moments\" [(Treatise of
Human Nature,]{.italic} I, 2, 2). However, once matter and spirit ―
which are continuities ― are negated, once space too is negated, I do
not know with what right we retain that continuity which is time.
Outside each perception (real or conjectural) matter does not exist;
outside each mental state spirit does not exist; neither does time exist
outside each present moment. Let us take a moment of maximum simplicity:
for example, that of Chuang Tzu\'s dream (Herbert Allen Giles: [Chuang
Tzu,]{.italic} 1889). Chuang Tzu, some twenty-four centuries ago, dreamt
he was a butterfly and did not know, when he awoke, if he was a man who
had dreamt he was a butterfly or a butterfly who now dreamt he was a
man. Let us not consider the awakening; let us consider the moment of
the dream itself, or one of its moments. \"I dreamt I was a butterfly
flying through the air and knowing nothing of Chuang Tzu,\" reads the
ancient text. We shall never know if Chuang Tzu saw a garden over which
he seemed to fly or a moving yellow triangle which no doubt was he, but
we do know that the image was subjective, though furnished by his
memory. The doctrine of psycho-physical parallelism would judge that the
image must have been accompanied by some change in the dreamer\'s
nervous system; according to Berkeley, the body of Chuang Tzu did not
exist at that moment, save as a perception in the mind of God. Hume
simplifies even more what happened. According to him, the spirit of
Chuang Tzu did not exist at that moment; only the colors of the dream
and the certainty of being a butterfly existed. They existed as a
momentary term in the \"bundle or collection of perceptions\" which,
some four centuries before Christ, was the mind of Chuang Tzu; they
existed as a term [n]{.italic} in an infinite temporal series, between
[n-]{.italic}1 and [n]{.italic}+1. There is no other reality, for
idealism, than that of mental processes; adding an objective butterfly
to the butterfly which is perceived seems a vain duplication; adding a
self to these processes seems no less exorbitant. Idealism judges that
there was a dreaming, a perceiving, but not a dreamer or even a dream;
it judges that speaking of objects and subjects is pure mythology. Now
if each psychic state is self-sufficient, if linking it to a
circumstance or to a self is an illicit and idle addition, with what
right shall we then ascribe to it a place in time? Chuang Tzu dreamt
that he was a butterfly and during that dream he was not Chuang Tzu, but
a butterfly. How, with space and self abolished, shall we link those
moments to his waking moments and to the feudal period of Chinese
history? This does not mean that we shall never know, even in an
approximate fashion, the date of that dream; it means that the
chronological fixing of an event, of an event in the universe, is alien
and external to it. In China the dream of Chuang Tzu is proverbial; let
us imagine that of its almost infinite readers, one dreams that he is a
butterfly and then dreams that he is Chuang Tzu. Let us imagine that, by
a not impossible stroke of chance, this dream reproduces point for point
the master\'s. Once this identity is postulated, it is fitting to ask:
Are not these moments which coincide one and the same? Is not one
repeated term sufficient to break down and confuse the history of the
world, to denounce that there is no such history?
The denial of time involves two negations: the negation of the
succession of the terms of a series, negation of the synchronism of the
terms in two different series. In fact, if each term is absolute, its
relations are reduced to the consciousness that those relations exist. A
state precedes another if it is known to be prior; a state of G is
contemporary to a state of H if it is known to be contemporary. Contrary
to what was declared by
Schopenhauer[[[[41]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}]{.calibre5}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos616079){.calibre7}
in his table of fundamental truths [(Welt als Wille und
Vorstellung,]{.italic} II, 4), each fraction of time does not
simultaneously fill the whole of space; time is not ubiquitous. (Of
course, at this stage in the argument, space no longer exists.)
Meinong, in his theory of apprehension, admits the apprehension of
imaginary objects: the fourth dimension, let us say, or the sensitive
statue of Condillac or the hypothetical animal of Lotze or the square
root of minus one. If the reasons I have indicated are valid, then
matter, self, the external world, world history and our lives also
belong to this same nebulous orb.
Besides, the phrase \"negation of time\" is ambiguous. It can mean the
eternity of Plato or Boethius and also the dilemmas of Sextus Empiricus.
The latter [(Adversus mathematicos,]{.italic} XI, 197) denies the
existence of the past, that which already was, and the future, that
which is not yet, and argues that the present is divisible or
indivisible. It is not indivisible, for in such a case it would have no
beginning to link it to the past nor end to link it to the future, nor
even a middle, since what has no beginning or end can have no middle;
neither is it divisible, for in such a case it would consist of a part
that was and another that is not. [Ergo,]{.italic} it does not exist,
but since the past and the future do not exist either, time does not
exist. F. H. Bradley rediscovers and improves this perplexity. He
observes [(Appearance and Reality,]{.italic} IV) that if the present is
divisible in other presents, it is no less complicated than time itself,
and if it is indivisible, time is a mere relation between intemporal
things. Such reasoning, as can be seen, negates the parts in order then
to negate the whole; I reject the whole in order to exalt each of the
parts. Via the dialectics of Berkeley and Hume I have arrived at
Schopenhauer\'s dictum: \"The form of the phenomenon of will . . . is
really only the [present,]{.italic} not the future nor the past. The
latter are only in the conception, exist only in the connection of
knowledge, so far as it follows the principle of sufficient reason. No
man has ever lived in the past, and none will live in the future; the
[present]{.italic} alone is the form of all life, and is its sure
possession which can never be taken from it. . . We might compare time
to a constantly revolving sphere; the half that was always sinking would
be the past, that which was always rising would be the future; but the
indivisible point at the top, where the tangent touches, would be the
extensionless present. As the tangent does not revolve with the sphere,
neither does the present, the point of contact of the object, the form
of which is time, with the subject, which has no form, because it does
not belong to the knowable, but is the condition of all that is
knowable\" ([Welt als Wille und Vorstellung,]{.italic} I, 54). A
Buddhist treatise of the fifth century, the [Visuddhimagga]{.italic}
(Road to Purity), illustrates the same doctrine with the same figure:
\"Strictly speaking, the duration of the life of a living being is
exceedingly brief, lasting only while a thought lasts. Just as a chariot
wheel in rolling rolls only at one point of the tire, and in resting
rests only at one point; in exactly the same way the life of a living
being lasts only for the period of one thought\" (Radhakrishnan: [Indian
Philosophy,]{.italic} I, 373). Other Buddhist texts say that the world
annihilates itself and reappears six thousand five hundred million times
a day and that all men are an illusion, vertiginously produced by a
series of momentaneous and solitary men. \"The being of a past moment of
thought ― the [Road to Purity]{.italic} tells us ― has lived, but does
not live nor will it live. The being of a future moment will live, but
has not lived nor does it live. The being of the present moment of
thought does live, but has not lived nor will it live\" [(op.
cit.,]{.italic} I, 407), a dictum which we may compare with the
following of Plutarch [(De E apud Delphos,]{.italic} 18): \"The man of
yesterday has died in that of today, that of today dies in that of
tomorrow.\"
[And yet, and yet. . .]{.italic} Denying temporal succession, denying
the self, denying the astronomical universe, are apparent desperations
and secret consolations. Our destiny (as contrasted with the hell of
Swedenborg and the hell of Tibetan mythology) is not frightful by being
unreal; it is frightful because it is irreversible and iron-clad. Time
is the substance I am made of. Time is a river which sweeps me along,
but I am the river; it is a tiger which destroys me, but I am the tiger;
it is a fire which consumes me, but I am the fire. The world,
unfortunately, is real; I, unfortunately, am Borges.
\
FOOTNOTE TO THE PROLOGUE
There is no exposition of Buddhism that does not mention the [Milinda
Panha,]{.italic} an apologetic work of the second century, which relates
a debate whose interlocutors are the king of Bactriana, Menander, and
the monk Nagasena. The latter reasons that just as the king\'s carriage
is neither its wheels nor its body nor its axle nor its pole nor its
yoke, neither is man his matter, form, impressions, ideas, instincts or
consciousness. He is not the combination of these parts nor does he
exist outside of them. . . After a controversy of many days, Menander
(Milinda) is converted to the Buddhist faith.
The [Milinda Panha]{.italic} has been translated into English by Rhys
Davids (Oxford, 1890-1894).
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_038.html_calibre_pb_39 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_039.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_039.html_filepos558921 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_039.html_filepos558977 .calibre10}
[[Inferno, 1, 32]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
From the twilight of day till the twilight of evening, a leopard, in the
last years of the thirteenth century, would see some wooden planks, some
vertical iron bars, men and women who changed, a wall and perhaps a
stone gutter filled with dry leaves. He did not know, could not know,
that he longed for love and cruelty and the hot pleasure of tearing
things to pieces and the wind carrying the scent of a deer, but
something suffocated and rebelled within him and God spoke to him in a
dream: \"You live and will die in this prison so that a man I know of
may see you a certain number of times and not forget you and place your
figure and symbol in a poem which has its precise place in the scheme of
the universe. You suffer captivity, but you will have given a word to
the poem.\" God, in the dream, illumined the animal\'s brutishness and
the animal understood these reasons and accepted his destiny, but, when
he awoke, there was in him only an obscure resignation, a valorous
ignorance, for the machinery of the world is much too complex for the
simplicity of a beast. Years later, Dante was dying in Ravenna, as
unjustified and as lonely as any other man. In a dream, God declared to
him the secret purpose of his life and work; Dante, in wonderment, knew
at last who and what he was and blessed the bitterness of his life.
Tradition relates that, upon waking, he felt that he had received and
lost an infinite thing, something he would not be able to recuperate or
even glimpse, for the machinery of the world is much too complex for the
simplicity of men.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_039.html_calibre_pb_40 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_040.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_040.html_filepos560851 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_040.html_filepos560964 .calibre10}
[[Paradiso, XXXI, 108]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Diodorus Siculus relates the story of a broken and scattered god; who of
us has never felt, while walking through the twilight or writing a date
from his past, that something infinite had been lost?
Men have lost a face, an irrecoverable face, and all long to be that
pilgrim (envisioned in the Empyrean, beneath the Rose) who in Rome sees
the Veronica and faithfully murmurs: \"My Lord, Jesus Christ, true God,
and was this, then, the fashion of thy semblance?\"
There is a stone face beside a road with an inscription saying \"The
True Portrait of the Holy Face of the God of Jaén\"; if we really knew
what it was like, the key to all parables would be ours and we would
know if the carpenter\'s son was also the Son of God.
Paul saw it as a light which hurled him to the ground; John saw it as
the sun when it blazes in all its force: Teresa of León saw it many
times, bathed in a tranquil light, and could never determine the color
of its eyes.
We have lost these features, just as one may lose a magic number made up
of customary digits, just as one loses forever an image in a
kaleidoscope. We may see them and be unaware of it. A Jew\'s profile in
the subway is perhaps that of Christ; the hands giving us our change at
a ticket window perhaps repeat those that one day were nailed to the
cross by some soldiers.
Perhaps some feature of that crucified countenance lurks in every
mirror; perhaps the face died, was obliterated, so that God could be all
of us.
Who knows whether tonight we shall not see it in the labyrinths of our
dreams and not even know it tomorrow.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_040.html_calibre_pb_41 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_041.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_041.html_filepos563081 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_041.html_filepos563137 .calibre10}
[[Ragnarök]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
In our dreams (writes Coleridge) images represent the sensations we
think they cause; we do not feel horror because we are threatened by a
sphinx; we dream of a sphinx in order to explain the horror we feel. If
this is so, how could a mere chronicle of its forms transmit the stupor,
the exaltation, the alarm, the menace and the jubilance which made up
the fabric of that dream that night? I shall attempt such a chronicle,
however; perhaps the fact that the dream was composed of one single
scene may remove or mitigate this essential difficulty.
The place was the School of Philosophy and Letters; the time, toward
sundown. Everything (as usually happens in dreams) was somewhat
different; a slight magnification altered things. We were electing
officials: I was talking with Pedro Henríquez Ureña, who in the world of
waking reality died many years ago. Suddenly we were stunned by the
clamor of a demonstration or disturbance. Human and animal cries came
from the Bajo. A voice shouted \"Here they come!\" and then \"The Gods!
The Gods!\" Four or five individuals emerged from the mob and occupied
the platform of the main lecture hall. We all applauded, tearfully;
these were the Gods returning after a centuries-long exile. Made larger
by the platform, their heads thrown back and their chests thrust
forward, they arrogantly received our homage. One held a branch which no
doubt conformed to the simple botany of dreams; another, in a broad
gesture, extended his hand which was a claw; one of the faces of Janus
looked with distrust at the curved beak of Thoth. Perhaps aroused by our
applause, one of them ― I no longer know which ― erupted in a victorious
clatter, unbelievably harsh, with something of a gargle and of a
whistle. From that moment, things changed.
It all began with the suspicion (perhaps exaggerated) that the Gods did
not know how to talk. Centuries of fell and fugitive life had atrophied
the human element in them; the moon of Islam and the cross of Rome had
been implacable with these outlaws. Very low foreheads, yellow teeth,
stringy mulatto or Chinese mustaches and thick bestial lips showed the
degeneracy of the Olympian lineage. Their clothing corresponded not to a
decorous poverty but rather to the sinister luxury of the gambling
houses and brothels of the Bajo. A carnation bled crimson in a lapel and
the bulge of a knife was outlined beneath a close-fitting jacket.
Suddenly we sensed that they were playing their last card, that they
were cunning, ignorant and cruel like old beasts of prey and that, if we
let ourselves be overcome by fear or pity, they would finally destroy
us.
We took out our heavy revolvers (all of a sudden there were revolvers in
the dream) and joyfully killed the Gods.
[ ]{.italic}
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_041.html_calibre_pb_42 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_042.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_042.html_filepos566326 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_042.html_filepos566382 .calibre10}
[[Parable of Cervantes and the]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[[[Quixote]{.bold}]{.italic1}]{.calibre3}
\
Tired of his Spanish land, an old soldier of the king sought solace in
the vast geographies of Ariosto, in that valley of the moon where the
time wasted by dreams is contained and in the golden idol of Mohammed
stolen by Montalbán.
In gentle mockery of himself, he imagined a credulous man who, perturbed
by his reading of marvels, decided to seek prowess and enchantment in
prosaic places called El Toboso or Montiel.
Vanquished by reality, by Spain, Don Quixote died in his native village
in the year 1614. He was survived but a short time by Miguel de
Cervantes.
For both of them, for the dreamer and the dreamed one, the whole scheme
of the work consisted in the opposition of two worlds: the unreal world
of the books of chivalry, the ordinary everyday world of the seventeenth
century.
They did not suspect that the years would finally smooth away that
discord, they did not suspect that La Mancha and Montiel and the
knight\'s lean figure would be, for posterity, no less poetic than the
episodes of Sinbad or the vast geographies of Ariosto.
For in the beginning of literature is the myth, and in the end as well.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_042.html_calibre_pb_43 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_043.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_043.html_filepos568057 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_043.html_filepos568113 .calibre10}
[[The Witness]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
In a stable which is almost in the shadow of the new stone church, a man
with gray eyes and gray beard, lying amidst the odor of the animals,
humbly seeks death as one would seek sleep. The day, faithful to vast
and secret laws, is shifting and confusing the shadows inside the poor
shelter; outside are the plowed fields and a ditch clogged with dead
leaves and the tracks of a wolf in the black mud where the forests
begin. The man sleeps and dreams, forgotten. He is awakened by the bells
tolling the Angelus. In the kingdoms of England the ringing of bells is
now one of the customs of the evening, but this man, as a child, has
seen the face of Woden, the divine horror and exultation, the crude
wooden idol hung with Roman coins and heavy clothing, the sacrificing of
horses, dogs and prisoners. Before dawn he will die and with him will
die, and never return, the last immediate images of these pagan rites;
the world will be a little poorer when this Saxon has died.
Deeds which populate the dimensions of space and which reach their end
when someone dies may cause us wonderment, but one thing, or an infinite
number of things, dies in every final agony, unless there is a universal
memory as the theosophists have conjectured. In time there was a day
that extinguished the last eyes to see Christ; the battle of Junín and
the love of Helen died with the death of a man. What will die with me
when I die, what pathetic or fragile form will the world lose? The voice
of Macedonio Fernández, the image of a red horse in the vacant lot at
Serrano and Charcas, a bar of sulphur in the drawer of a mahogany desk?
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_043.html_calibre_pb_44 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_044.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_044.html_filepos570036 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_044.html_filepos570092 .calibre10}
[[A Problem]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Let us imagine that in Toledo a paper is discovered containing a text in
Arabic which the paleographers declare to be in the handwriting of the
Cide Hamete Benengeli from whom Cervantes derived the
[Quixote.]{.italic} In this text we read that the hero (who, as is
famous, wandered over the roads of Spain, armed with sword and lance,
and challenged anyone for any reason at all) discovers, after one of his
many combats, that he has killed a man. At that point the fragment ends;
the problem is to guess or conjecture how Don Quixote would react.
As far as I know, there are three possible answers. The first is of a
negative nature: nothing particular happens, because in the
hallucinatory world of Don Quixote death is no less common than magic
and having killed a man should not perturb a person who fights, or
believes he fights, with fabulous monsters and sorcerers. The second
answer is of a pathetic nature.
Don Quixote never managed to forget that he was a projection of Alonso
Quijano, a reader of fabulous tales; seeing death, understanding that a
dream has led him to the sin of Cain, awakens him from his pampered
madness, perhaps forever. The third answer is perhaps the most
plausible. Once the man is dead, Don Quixote cannot admit that this
tremendous act is a product of delirium; the reality of the effect makes
him presuppose a parallel reality of the cause and Don Quixote will
never emerge from his madness.
There is another conjecture, which is alien to the Spanish orb and even
to the orb of the Western world and requires a more ancient, more
complex and more weary atmosphere. Don Quixote ― who is no longer Don
Quixote but a king of the cycles of Hindustan ― senses, standing before
the dead body of his enemy, that killing and engendering are divine or
magical acts which notably transcend the human condition. He knows that
the dead man is illusory, the same as the bloody sword weighing in his
hand and himself and all his past life and the vast gods and the
universe.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_044.html_calibre_pb_45 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_045.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_045.html_filepos572487 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_045.html_filepos572543 .calibre10}
[[Borges and I]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
The other one, the one called Borges, is the one things happen to. I
walk through the streets of Buenos Aires and stop for a moment, perhaps
mechanically now, to look at the arch of an entrance hall and the
grillwork on the gate; I know of Borges from the mail and see his name
on a list of professors or in a biographical dictionary. I like
hourglasses, maps, eighteenth-century typography, the taste of coffee
and the prose of Stevenson; he shares these preferences, but in a vain
way that turns them into the attributes of an actor. It would be an
exaggeration to say that ours is a hostile relationship; I live, let
myself go on living, so that Borges may contrive his literature, and
this literature justifies me. It is no effort for me to confess that he
has achieved some valid pages, but those pages cannot save me, perhaps
because what is good belongs to no one, not even to him, but rather to
the language and to tradition. Besides, I am destined to perish,
definitively, and only some instant of myself can survive in him. Little
by little, I am giving over everything to him, though I am quite aware
of his perverse custom of falsifying and magnifying things. Spinoza knew
that all things long to persist in their being; the stone eternally
wants to be a stone and the tiger a tiger. I shall remain in Borges, not
in myself (if it is true that I am someone), but I recognize myself less
in his books than in many others or in the laborious strumming of a
guitar. Years ago I tried to free myself from him and went from the
mythologies of the suburbs to the games with time and infinity, but
those games belong to Borges now and I shall have to imagine other
things. Thus my life is a flight and I lose everything and everything
belongs to oblivion, or to him. I do not know which of us has written
this page.
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_045.html_calibre_pb_46 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_046.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_046.html_filepos574622 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_046.html_filepos574678 .calibre10}
[[Everything and Nothing]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
There was no one in him; behind his face (which even through the bad
paintings of those times resembles no other) and his words, which were
copious, fantastic and stormy, there was only a bit of coldness, a dream
dreamt by no one. At first he thought that all people were like him, but
the astonishment of a friend to whom he had begun to speak of this
emptiness showed him his error and made him feel always that an
individual should not differ in outward appearance. Once he thought that
in books he would find a cure for his ill and thus he learned the small
Latin and less Greek a contemporary would speak of; later he considered
that what he sought might well be found in an elemental rite of
humanity, and let himself be initiated by Anne Hathaway one long June
afternoon. At the age of twenty-odd years he went to London.
Instinctively he had already become proficient in the habit of
simulating that he was someone, so that others would not discover his
condition as no one; in London he found the profession to which he was
predestined, that of the actor, who on a stage plays at being another
before a gathering of people who play at taking him for that other
person. His histrionic tasks brought him a singular satisfaction,
perhaps the first he had ever known; but once the last verse had been
acclaimed and the last dead man withdrawn from the stage, the hated
flavor of unreality returned to him. He ceased to be Ferrex or Tamerlane
and became no one again. Thus hounded, he took to imagining other heroes
and other tragic fables. And so, while his flesh fulfilled its destiny
as flesh in the taverns and brothels of London, the soul that inhabited
him was Caesar, who disregards the augur\'s admonition, and Juliet, who
abhors the lark, and Macbeth, who converses on the plain with the
witches who are also Fates. No one has ever been so many men as this
man, who like the Egyptian Proteus could exhaust all the guises of
reality. At times he would leave a confession hidden away in some corner
of his work, certain that it would not be deciphered; Richard affirms
that in his person he plays the part of many and Iago claims with
curious words \"I am not what I am.\" The fundamental identity of
existing, dreaming and acting inspired famous passages of his.
For twenty years he persisted in that controlled hallucination, but one
morning he was suddenly gripped by the tedium and the terror of being so
many kings who die by the sword and so many suffering lovers who
converge, diverge and melodiously expire. That very day he arranged to
sell his theater. Within a week he had returned to his native village,
where he recovered the trees and rivers of his childhood and did not
relate them to the others his muse had celebrated, illustrious with
mythological allusions and Latin terms. He had to be someone; he was a
retired impresario who had made his fortune and concerned himself with
loans, lawsuits and petty usury. It was in this character that he
dictated the arid will and testament known to us, from which he
deliberately excluded all traces of pathos or literature. His friends
from London would visit his retreat and for them he would take up again
his role as poet.
History adds that before or after dying he found himself in the presence
of God and told Him: \"I who have been so many men in vain want to be
one and myself.\" The voice of the Lord answered from a whirlwind:
\"Neither am I anyone; I have dreamt the world as you dreamt your work,
my Shakespeare, and among the forms in my dream are you, who like myself
are many and no one.\"
\
[Translated by J. E. I.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_046.html_calibre_pb_47 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_047.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_047.html_filepos578607 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
[ ]{.italic}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_047.html_filepos578720 .calibre10}
[[Elegy]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
Oh destiny of Borges
to have sailed across the diverse seas of the world
or across that single and solitary sea of diverse names,
to have been a part of Edinburgh, of Zurich, of the two Cordobas,
of Colombia and of Texas,
to have returned at the end of changing generations
to the ancient lands of his forbears,
to Andalucia, to Portugal and to those counties
where the Saxon warred with the Dane and they mixed their blood,
to have wandered through the red and tranquil labyrinth of London,
to have grown old in so many mirrors,
to have sought in vain the marble gaze of the statues,
to have questioned lithographs, encyclopedias, atlases,
to have seen the things that men see,
death, the sluggish dawn, the plains,
and the delicate stars,
and to have seen nothing, or almost nothing
except the face of a girl from Buenos Aires
a face that does not want you to remember it.
Oh destiny of Borges,
perhaps no stranger than your own.
\
\(1964\)
[Translated by D. A. Y.]{.italic}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_047.html_calibre_pb_48 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_048.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_048.html_filepos581125 .calibre1}
\
[ ]{.italic}
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_048.html_filepos581181 .calibre10}
[[Chronology]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
[1899]{.bold1} Born August 24 in Buenos Aires
[1914]{.bold1} Travels with his family to Europe. At the outbreak of
the war, the Borgeses settle in Switzerland where Jorge finishes his
secondary education.
[1919-21]{.bold1} Travel in Spain ― Majorca, Seville, Madrid.
Association with the [ultraist]{.italic} literary group (Rafael Cansinos
Assens, Guillermo de Torre, Gerardo Diego, etc.). His first poem
published in the magazine [Grecia.]{.italic}
[1921]{.bold1} Returns to Argentina. Publication with friends (González
Lanuza, Norah Lange, Francisco Piñero, etc.) of the \"mural\" magazine
[Prisma ―]{.italic} pasted in poster fashion on fences and walls of the
city.
[1923]{.bold1} Family travels again to Europe. Publication at home of
his first book of poetry, [El fervor de Buenos Aires.]{.italic}
[1924]{.bold1} Contributes to the reincarnated [Proa]{.italic} and
[Martín Fierro,]{.italic} two important literary magazines of the time.
[1925]{.bold1} Appearance of his second book of poetry, [Luna de
enfrente,]{.italic} and his first book of essays,
[Inquisiciones.]{.italic}
[1926]{.bold1} Another collection of essays: [El tamaño de mi
esperanza.]{.italic}
[1928]{.bold1} [El idioma de los argentinos,]{.italic} essays.
[1929]{.bold1} [Cuaderno San Martín,]{.italic} his third volume of
verses.
[1930]{.bold1} [Evaristo Carriego,]{.italic} an essay which honors this
Buenos Aires poet, plus other pieces. Borges meets Adolfo Bioy Casares,
with whom he will collaborate on various literary undertakings during
the next three decades.
[1932]{.bold1} [Discusión,]{.italic} essays and film criticism.
[1933]{.bold1} Begins to contribute to the literary supplement of the
newspaper [Crítica,]{.italic} which he will later edit.
[1935]{.bold1} [Historia universal de la infamia,]{.italic} a
collection of some of his first tentative efforts at writing prose
fiction.
[1936 ]{.bold1} [Historia de la eternidad,]{.italic} essays.
[1938]{.bold1} His father dies. Borges is appointed librarian of a
small municipal Buenos Aires library.
[1941]{.bold1} [El jardín de los senderos que se bifurcan,]{.italic} an
anthology of his short stories.
[1944]{.bold1} [Ficciones,]{.italic} his most celebrated collection of
stories.
[1946]{.bold1} For purely political reasons, he is relieved of his post
as municipal librarian.
[1949]{.bold1} [El Aleph,]{.italic} a collection of his stories written
during the preceding five years.
[1952]{.bold1} [Otras inquisiciones,]{.italic} his most important
collection of essays.
[1954]{.bold1} The first three volumes of Borges\'s [Collected
Works]{.italic} are published by Emecé in Buenos Aires. The first book
of literary criticism dedicated exclusively to his work and its
influence appears: [Borges y la nueva generación]{.italic} by Adolfo
Prieto.
[1955 ]{.bold1} With the overthrow of the Peronist regime, Borges is
named Director of the National Library in Buenos Aires.
[1956]{.bold1} Assumes the chair of English and North American
Literature at the University of Buenos Aires.
[1958-59]{.bold1} Period of reduced literary productivity, marked by a
return to poetic composition and the cultivation of extremely short
prose forms.
[1960]{.bold1} [El hacedor,]{.italic} his most recent collection to
date of new pieces (prose and poetry). . .
[1961]{.bold1} [Antología personal,]{.italic} Borges\'s selection of
his own preferred prose and poetry. He shares with Samuel Beckett the
\$10,000 International Publishers\' Prize. In the fall he leaves for the
University of Texas on an invitation to lecture on Argentine literature.
[1962 ]{.bold1} Lectures at universities in eastern United States.
Returns to Buenos Aires and the University where he offers a course in
Old English. First book publication in English: [Ficciones]{.italic}
(Grove Press) and a selection of his best prose writings,
[Labyrinths]{.italic} (New Directions).
[1963]{.bold1} Leaves for a brief tour of Europe (Spain, Switzerland,
and France) and England where he lectures on English and Spanish
American literary topics. Travels later to Colombia to lecture and
receives an honorary degree from the University of Los Andes.
[1964]{.bold1} Occasionally publishes poetry in Buenos Aires
newspapers. Now blind, he dedicates much of his energy to his classes at
the University.
[1966]{.bold1} Receives the Annual Literary Award of the Ingram Merrill
Foundation, which includes a prize of \$5,000.
[1971]{.bold1} Made an honorary member of the American Academy of Arts
and Letters and the National Institute of Arts and Letters. Awarded
honorary degrees by Columbia University and the University of Oxford. To
date, his most recent books are [Aleph and Other Stories]{.italic}
(Dutton) and [The Book of Imaginary Beings]{.italic} (Avon).
[1972]{.bold1} [Doctor Brodie\'s Report]{.italic} is to be published in
January.
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_048.html_calibre_pb_49 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_049.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_049.html_filepos587543 .calibre1}
\
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_049.html_filepos587563 .calibre10}
[[Bibliography]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
\
\
[PRINCIPAL WORKS OF BORGES]{.bold1}
\
All works were published in Buenos Aires unless otherwise noted. Those
marked with an asterisk are now volumes in Borges\'s [Obras
completas.]{.italic}
\
[POETRY]{.calibre15}
[El fervor de Buenos Aires]{.italic} (Imprenta Serantes, 1923)
[Luna de enfrente]{.italic} (Proa, 1925)
[Cuaderno San Martín]{.italic} (Proa, 1929)
[Poemas, 1922-1943]{.italic} (Losada, 1943)
\* [Poemas, 1923-1953]{.italic} (Emecé, 1953)
\* [Poemas, 1923-1958]{.italic} (Emecé, 1958)
\* [El hacedor]{.italic} (in part) (Emecé, 1960)
[Antología personal]{.italic} (in part) (Sur, 1961)
\
[ESSAYS]{.calibre15}
[Inquisiciones]{.italic} (Proa, 1925)
[El tamaño de mi esperanza]{.italic} (Proa, 1926)
[El idioma de los argentinos]{.italic} (Gleizer, 1928)
\* [Evaristo Carriego]{.italic} (Gleizer, 1930; Emece, 1955)
\* [Discusion]{.italic} (Gleizer, 1932; Emece, 1957)
\* [Historia de la eternidad]{.italic} (Viau y Zona, 1936; Emecé,
1953)
> [Aspectos de la literatura gauchesca]{.italic} (Número, Montevideo,
> 1950) [Antiguas literaturas germánicas]{.italic} (Fondo de Cultura
> Económica, Mexico City, 1951)
\* [Otras inquisiciones, 1931-1952]{.italic} (Sur, 1952; Emecé,
1960)
[El \"Martín Fierro\"]{.italic} (Columba, 1953)
[Leopoldo Lugones]{.italic} (Troquel, 1955)
[Antología personal]{.italic} (in part) (Sur, 1961)
\
> The booklets [Las Kenningar]{.italic} (Colombo, 1933) and [Nueva
> refutatión del tiempo]{.italic} (Oportet Haereses, 1947) were later
> incorporated into [Historia de la eternidad]{.italic} and [Otras
> inquisiciones,]{.italic} respectively.
\
[FICTION AND IMAGINATIVE PROSE]{.calibre15}
\* [Historia universal de la infamia]{.italic} (Tor, 1935; Emecé,
1954)
\* [Ficciones]{.italic} (Sur, 1945; Emecé, 1956)
[\* El Aleph]{.italic} (Losada, 1949, 1952; Emecé, 1957)
\* [El hacedor]{.italic} (in part) (Emecé, 1960)
[Antología personal]{.italic} (in part) (Sur, 1961)
\
> The narrative collection [El jardín de los senderos que se
> bifurcan]{.italic} (Sur, 1941) was later incorporated into
> [Ficciones.]{.italic} The anthology [La muerte y la brújula]{.italic}
> (Emecé, 1951) contains a selection of stories from all the earlier
> volumes.
\
> In collaboration with Adolfo Bioy Casares, using the joint
> pseudonyms of H. Bustos Domecq or B. Suárez Lynch, Borges has
> published the detective narratives [Seis problemas para don Isidro
> Parodi]{.italic} (Sur, 1942) and [Un modelo para la muerte]{.italic}
> (Oportet Haereses, 1946), and the stories [Dos fantasías
> memorables]{.italic} (Oportet Haereses, 1946). With Bioy Casares he
> has also published two film scripts: [Los orilleros]{.italic} and [El
> paraíso de los creyentes]{.italic} (Losada, 1955). Also with Bioy,
> Borges has edited two detective short story anthologies: [Los mejores
> cuentos policiales]{.italic} (Emecé, 1943) and [Los mejores cuentos
> policiales, segunda serie]{.italic} (Emecé, 1951) as well as the
> anthology [Libra del cielo y del infierno]{.italic} (Sur, 1960). In
> collaboration with Adolfo Bioy Casares and Silvina Ocampo he edited
> [Antología de la literatura fantástica]{.italic} (Sudamericana, 1940).
\
\
[OTHER TRANSLATIONS OF BORGES\'S WORKS]{.bold1}
\
[IN ENGLISH]{.calibre15}
> [Ficciones,]{.italic} New York, Grove Press, 1962 (translated by
> Anthony Kerrigan, Helen Temple, Ruthven Todd, Anthony Bonner, and
> Alastair Reid).
> [Dreamtigers,]{.italic} Austin, Univ. of Texas Press, 1964 (prose
> translated by Mildred Boyer; poetry, by Harold Moreland). An English
> edition of [El hacedor.]{.italic}
> \"Investigation of the Writings of Herbert Quain,\" [New
> Directions 11,]{.italic} 1949, pp. 449-53 (translated by Mary Wells).
> \"On the Classics,\" [Panorama,]{.italic} Washington, D. C., May
> 1942 (translator anonymous).
\
Translations of Borges\'s early poems may be found in the
following anthologies:
\
> Dudley Fitts (ed.), [Anthology of Contemporary Latin
> American]{.italic} [Poetry,]{.italic} New Directions, 1942, pp. 64-73
> (translated by Robert Stuart Fitzgerald).
> Patricio Gannon and Hugo Manning (eds.), [Argentine
> Anthology]{.italic} [of Modern Verse,]{.italic} Buenos Aires, 1942,
> pp. 66-71 (translated by the editors).
H. R. Hays (ed.), [Twelve Spanish American Poets,]{.italic}
New Haven, 1943, pp. 120-37 (translated by the editor).
Harriet de Onís (ed.), [The Golden Land,]{.italic} New York,
1948, pp. 222-23 (translated by the editor).
\
> Certain of the selections in the foregoing volume, here
> translated by the Editors, have been published in other English
> translations in periodicals and books, as follows:
\
\"The Garden of Forking Paths\" translated by Anthony Boucher,
[Ellery Queen\'s Mystery Magazine,]{.italic} August, 1948.
\"The Circular Ruins\" translated by Mary Wells, [New Directions
11,]{.italic} 1949.
\"Funes the Memorious\" translated by Anthony Kerrigan, [Avon
Modern Writing No. 2,]{.italic} 1954.
> \"The Shape of the Sword\" translated by Angel Flores, [Spanish
> Stories]{.italic} (Bantam Books, 1960) and translated by Harriet de
> Onís, [New World Writing No. 4,]{.italic} 1953.
\"Death and the Compass\" translated by Anthony Kerrigan, [New
Mexico Quarterly,]{.italic} Autumn 1954.
\"Three Versions of Judas\" translated by Anthony Kerrigan,
[Noonday No. 3,]{.italic} 1959.
\"The Immortal\" translated by Julian Palley, [Portfolio and Art
News Annual No. 2,]{.italic} 1960.
\"Emma Zunz\" translated by E. C. Villicana, [Partisan
Review,]{.italic} September 1959.
\
[IN OTHER LANGUAGES]{.calibre15}
> [Enquêtes, 1937-1952,]{.italic} Paris, Gallimard, 1957 (translated by
> Paul and Sylvia Bénichou). A somewhat abridged version of [Otras
> inquisiciones.]{.italic}
[Fictions,]{.italic} Paris, Gallimard, 1951 (translated by Néstor Ibarra
and Paul Verdevoye).
[Labyrinthes,]{.italic} Paris, Gallimard, 1953 (translated by Roger
Caillois). Contains four stories from [El Aleph.]{.italic}
[ L\'Aleph,]{.italic} Milan, Feltrinelli, 1959 (translated by
Francesco Tentori Montalto).
> [Labyrinthe,]{.italic} Munich, Carl Hanser Verlag, 1959 (translated by
> Karl August Horst, Eva Hesse, Wolfgang Luchting and Liselott Reger).
> Contains all stories from [Ficciones]{.italic} and [El
> Aleph.]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
[ ]{.italic}
\
[CRITICAL WRITINGS ON BORGES]{.bold1}
\
> There have been few serious considerations of Borges\'s work
> written in English. Of interest are \"The Labyrinths of Jorge Luis
> Borges, An Introduction to the Stories of [El Aleph\"]{.italic} by L.
> A. Murillo [(Modern Language Quarterly,]{.italic} Vol. 20, No. 3,
> September, 1959), and \"Borges on Literature,\" [(Américas,]{.italic}
> December, 1961). Readers of Spanish may consult the books by Issac
> Wolpert [(Jorge Luis Borges,]{.italic} Buenos Aires, 1961), Ana María
> Barrenechea [(La expresión de la irrealidad en la obra de Jorge Luis
> Borges,]{.italic} Mexico City, 1957), Marcial Tamayo and Adolfo
> Ruiz-Díaz [(Borges, enigma y clave,]{.italic} Buenos Aires, 1955) and
> Rafael Gutiérrez Girardot [(Jorge Luis Borges, ensayo de
> interpretatión,]{.italic} Madrid, 1959). The essays by Enrique Pezzoni
> (\"Approximatión al último libro de Jorge Luis Borges,\"
> [Sur,]{.italic} Buenos Aires, nos. 217-18, Nov.-Dec. 1952, pp. 101-23)
> and Emir Rodríguez Monegal (\"Borges: teoría y práctica,\"
> [Número,]{.italic} Montevideo, no. 27, Dec. 1955, pp. 124-57) are of
> particular interest. Readers of French may consult the essays by Paul
> Bénichou (\"Le monde de José \[sic\] Luis Borges,\"
> [Critique,]{.italic} Paris, nos. 63-64, Aug.-Sept. 1952, pp. 675-87,
> and \"Le monde et l\'esprit chez Jorge Louis Borges,\" [Les Lettres
> Nouvelles,]{.italic} Paris, no. 21, Nov. 1954, pp. 680-99), Marcel
> Brion (\"J. L. Borges et ses Labyrinthes,\" [Le Monde,]{.italic}
> Paris, Aug. 9, 1954) and René Etiemble (\"Un homme a tuer: Jorge Luis
> Borges, cosmopolite,\" [Les Temps Modernes,]{.italic} Paris, no. 83,
> Sept. 1952, pp. 512-26, and in Etiemble\'s [Hygiène des
> lettres,]{.italic} II, Paris, 1955, pp. 120-41). In German, the brief
> pieces by Karl August Horst (\"Die Bedeutung des Gaucho bei Jorge Luis
> Borges,\" [Merkur,]{.italic} Stuttgart, no. 143, Jan. 1960, pp. 78-84)
> and Helmut Heissenbüttel (\"Parabeln und Legenden,\" [Neue Deutsche
> Hefte,]{.italic} Gütersloh, March 1960, pp. 1156-57) are valuable.
\
\
\
\
[Scan Notes, v3.0:]{.bold1} Proofed carefully, italics and special
characters intact.
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_049.html_calibre_pb_50 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos599263 .calibre1}
\
\
\
\
[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos599283 .calibre10}
[[Notes]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[[ ]{.bold}]{.calibre6}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos599447 .calibre10}
[1]{.calibre5} [Haslam has also published]{.calibre5} [[A General
History of Labyrinths.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos599632 .calibre10}
[2]{.calibre5} [Russell]{.calibre5} [[(The Analysis of
Mind,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1921, page 159) supposes that the planet
has been created a few minutes ago, furnished with a humanity that
\"remembers\" an illusory past.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos599949 .calibre10}
[3]{.calibre5} [A century, according to the duodecimal system, signifies
a period of a hundred and forty-four years.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos600147 .calibre10}
[4]{.calibre5} [Today, one of the churches of Tlön Platonically
maintains that a certain pain, a certain greenish tint of yellow, a
certain temperature, a certain sound, are the only reality. All men, in
the vertiginous moment of coitus, are the same man. All men who repeat a
line from Shakespeare]{.calibre5} [[are]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [William
Shakespeare.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos600604 .calibre10}
[5]{.calibre5} [Buckley was a freethinker, a fatalist and a defender of
slavery.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos600766 .calibre10}
[6]{.calibre5} [There remains, of course, the problem of the]{.calibre5}
[[material]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [of some objects.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos600985 .calibre10}
[7]{.calibre5} [An hypothesis both hateful and odd. The Prussian spy
Hans Rabener, alias Viktor Runeberg, attacked with drawn automatic the
bearer of the warrant for his arrest, Captain Richard Madden. The
latter, in self-defense, inflicted the wound which brought about
Runeberg\'s death. (Editor\'s note.)]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos601372 .calibre10}
[8]{.calibre5} [Madame Henri Bachelier also lists a literal translation
of Quevedo\'s literal translation of the]{.calibre5}
[[Introduction]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [[à la vie
dévote]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [of St. Francis of Sales. There are no
traces of such a work in Menard\'s library. It must have been a jest of
our friend, misunderstood by the lady.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos601824 .calibre10}
[9]{.calibre5} [I also had the secondary intention of sketching a
personal portrait of Pierre Menard. But how could I dare to compete with
the golden pages which, I am told, the Baroness de Bacourt is preparing
or with the delicate and punctual pencil of Carolus
Hourcade?]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos602178 .calibre10}
[10]{.calibre5} [I remember his quadricular notebooks, his black
crossed-out passages, his peculiar typographical symbols and his
insect-like handwriting. In the afternoons he liked to go out for a walk
around the outskirts of Nîmes; he would take a notebook with him and
make a merry bonfire.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos602554 .calibre10}
[11]{.calibre5} [The original manuscript does not contain digits or
capital letters. The punctuation has been limited to the comma and the
period. These two signs, the space and the twenty-two letters of the
alphabet are the twenty-five symbols considered sufficient by this
unknown author.]{.calibre5} [[(Editor\'s note.)]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos602972 .calibre10}
[12]{.calibre5} [Before, there was a man for every three hexagons.
Suicide and pulmonary diseases have destroyed that proportion. A memory
of unspeakable melancholy: at times I have traveled for many nights
through corridors and along polished stairways without finding a single
librarian.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos603343 .calibre10}
[13]{.calibre5} [I repeat: it suffices that a book be possible for it to
exist. Only the impossible is excluded. For example: no book can be a
ladder, although no doubt there are books which discuss and negate and
demonstrate this possibility and others whose structure corresponds to
that of a ladder.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos603727 .calibre10}
[14]{.calibre5} [Letizia]{.calibre5} [Álvarez de Toledo has observed
that this vast Library is useless: rigorously speaking,]{.calibre5} [[a
single volume]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [would be sufficient, a volume of
ordinary format, printed in nine or ten point type, containing an
infinite number of infinitely thin leaves. (In the early seventeenth
century, Cavalieri said that all solid bodies are the superimposition of
an infinite number of planes.) The handling of this silky vade mecum
would not be convenient: each apparent page would unfold into other
analogous ones; the inconceivable middle page would have no
reverse.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos604457 .calibre10}
[15]{.calibre5} [Borelius inquires mockingly: \"Why didn\'t he renounce
his renunciation? Or renounce the idea of renouncing his
renunciation?\"]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos604680 .calibre10}
[16]{.calibre5} [Euclides da Cunha, in a book unknown to Runeberg, notes
that for the heresiarch of Canudos, Antonio Conselheiro, virtue \"was
almost an impiety.\" The Argentine reader will recall analogous passages
in the work of Almafuerte. In the symbolist sheet]{.calibre5} [[Sju
insegel,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [Runeberg published an assiduous
descriptive poem,]{.calibre5} [[The Secret Waters;]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[the first stanzas narrate the events of a tumultuous day; the last, the
discovery of a glacial pond; the poet suggests that the permanence of
those silent waters corrects our useless violence and in some way allows
and absolves it. The poem ends as follows: \"The waters of the forest
are good; we can be evil and suffer.\"]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos605531 .calibre10}
[17]{.calibre5} [Maurice Abramowicz observes:]{.calibre5} [[\"Jesus,
d\'après ce scandinave, a toujours le beau rôle; ses déboires, grâce à
la science des typographes, jouissent d\'une réputation polyglotte; sa
résidence de trente-trois ans parmi les humains ne fut, en somrne,
qu\'une villégiature\"]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [Erfjord, in the third
appendix to the]{.calibre5} [[Christelige
Dogmatik,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [refutes this passage. He notes that the
crucifixion of God has not ceased, for what has happened once in time is
repeated ceaselessly in eternity. Judas,]{.calibre5}
[[now,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [goes on receiving his pieces of silver,
goes on kissing Christ, goes on throwing the coins into the temple, goes
on making a noose in the rope on the field of blood. (Erfjord, in order
to justify this affirmation, invokes the last chapter of the first
volume of Jaromir Hladik\'s]{.calibre5} [[Vindication of
Eternity.)]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos606608 .calibre10}
[18]{.calibre5} [There is an erasure in the manuscript; perhaps the name
of the port has been removed.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos606792 .calibre10}
[19]{.calibre5} [Ernesto Sabato suggests that the \"Giambattista\" who
discussed the formation of the]{.calibre5} [[Iliad]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[with the antique dealer Cartaphilus is Giambattista Vico; this Italian
defended the idea that Homer is a symbolic character, after the manner
of Pluto or Achilles.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos607194 .calibre10}
[20]{.calibre5} [In the Runic crosses the two contrary emblems coexist
entwined.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos607356 .calibre10}
[21]{.calibre5} [Also Gibbon]{.calibre5} [[(Decline and
Fall,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [XLV) transcribes these verses.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos607567 .calibre10}
[22]{.calibre5} [The original says]{.calibre5}
[[fourteen,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [but there is ample reason to infer
that, as used by Asterion, this numeral stands for]{.calibre5}
[[infinite.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos607869 .calibre10}
[23]{.calibre5} [lt is significant that the narrator has omitted the
name of his most illustrious ancestor, the theologian and Hebraist
Johannes Forkel (1799-1846), who applied the Hegelian dialectic to
Christology, and whose literal version of several books of the Apocrypha
merited the censure of Hengstenberg and the approval of Thilo and
Gesenius. (Editor\'s note.)]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos608319 .calibre10}
[24]{.calibre5} [Other nations live innocently, in themselves and for
themselves, like minerals or meteors; Germany is the universal mirror
which receives all, the consciousness of the world]{.calibre5} [[(das
Weltbewusstsein).]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [Goethe is the prototype of that
ecumenic comprehension. I do not censure him, but I do not see in him
the Faust-like man of Spengler\'s thesis.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos608808 .calibre10}
[25]{.calibre5} [It has been rumored that the consequences of this wound
were very serious. (Editor\'s note.)]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos608998 .calibre10}
[26]{.calibre5} [It has been necessary to omit a few lines here.
(Editor\'s note.)]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos609161 .calibre10}
[27]{.calibre5} [We have been unable to find any reference to the name
of Jerusalem, even in Soergel\'s work. Nor is he mentioned in the
histories of German literature. Nevertheless, I do not believe that he
is fictitious. Many Jewish intellectuals were tortured at Tarnowitz
under orders of Otto Dietrich zur Linde; among them, the pianist Emma
Rosenzweig. \"David Jerusalem\" is perhaps a symbol of several
individuals. It is said that he died March first, 1943; on March first,
1939, the narrator was wounded in Tilsit. (Editor\'s note.)]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos609779 .calibre10}
[28]{.calibre5} [Such is Taylor\'s spelling of the word.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos609916 .calibre10}
[29]{.calibre5} [Barlach observes that Yaúq is mentioned in the Koran
(71, 23) and that the Prophet is Al-Mokanna (the Veiled One), and that
no one except Philip Meadows Taylor\'s surprising informant has
identified them with the Zahir.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos610234 .calibre10}
[30]{.calibre5} [Nonrecognition of the sacred animal and its opprobrious
or accidental death at the hands of the people are traditional themes in
Chinese literature. See the last chapter of Jung\'s]{.calibre5}
[[Psychologie und Alchemie]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(Zürich, 1944), which
contains two curious illustrations.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos610647 .calibre10}
[31]{.calibre5} [See T. S. Eliot:]{.calibre5} [[Points of
View]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [(1941), pp. 25-26.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos610847 .calibre10}
[32]{.calibre5} [A century later, the Chinese sophist Hui Tzu reasoned
that a staff cut in two every day is interminable (H. A.
Giles:]{.calibre5} [[Chuang Tzu,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1889, page
453).]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos611143 .calibre10}
[33]{.calibre5} [In the]{.calibre5} [[Parmenides]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[― whose Zenonian character is irrefutable ― Plato expounds a very
similar argument to demonstrate that the one is really many. If the one
exists, it participates in being; therefore, there are two parts in it,
which are being and the one, but each of these parts is one and exists,
so that they enclose two more parts, which in turn enclose two more,
infinitely. Russell]{.calibre5} [[(Introduction to Mathematical
Philosophy,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1919, page 138) substitutes for
Plato\'s geometrical progression an arithmetical one. If one exists, it
participates in being: but since being and the one are different,
duality exists; but since being and two are different, trinity exists,
etc. Chuang Tzu (Waley:]{.calibre5} [[Three Ways of Thought in Ancient
China,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [page 25) resorts to the same
interminable]{.calibre5} [[regressus]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [against the
monists who declared that the Ten Thousand Things (the Universe) are
one. In the first place ― he argues ― cosmic unity and the declaration
of that unity are already two things; these two and the declaration of
their duality are already three; those three and the declaration of
their trinity are already four . . . Russell believes that the vagueness
of the term]{.calibre5} [[being]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [is sufficient to
invalidate this reasoning. He adds that numbers do not exist, that they
are mere logical fictions.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos612789 .calibre10}
[34]{.calibre5} [An echo of this proof, now defunct, resounds in the
first verse of the]{.calibre5} [[Paradiso:]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[[La gloria di Colui che tutto move.]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos613108 .calibre10}
[35]{.calibre5} [I follow the exposition by James]{.calibre5} [[(A
Pluralistic Universe,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1909, pages 55-60). Cf.
Wentscher:]{.calibre5} [[Fechner und Lotze,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1924,
pages 166-171.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos613441 .calibre10}
[[36]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [[Writings,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [1896, Vol.
I, page 129.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos613609 .calibre10}
[37]{.calibre5} [What is a divine mind? the reader will perhaps inquire.
There is not a theologian who does not define it; I prefer an example.
The steps a man takes from the day of his birth until that of his death
trace in time an inconceivable figure. The Divine Mind intuitively
grasps that form immediately, as men do a triangle. This figure
(perhaps) has its given function in the economy of the
universe.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos614102 .calibre10}
[38]{.calibre5} [Thus Milton and Dante interpreted them, to judge by
certain passages which seem to be imitative. In the]{.calibre5}
[[Commedia (Inferno,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [I, 60; V, 28) we
have:]{.calibre5} [[dogni luce muto]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[and]{.calibre5} [[dove il sol tace]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [to signify
dark places; in the]{.calibre5} [[Samson Agonistes]{.italic}]{.calibre5}
[(86-89):]{.calibre5}
[ The Sun to me is dark]{.calibre5}
[ And silent as the Moon]{.calibre5}
[ When she deserts the night]{.calibre5}
[ Hid in her vacant interlunar cave.]{.calibre5}
[Cf. E. M. W. Tillyard:]{.calibre5} [[The Miltonic
Setting,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [101.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos615257 .calibre10}
[39]{.calibre5} [And in Swedenborg. In]{.calibre5} [[Man and
Superman]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [we read that Hell is not a penal
establishment but rather a state dead sinners elect for reasons of
intimate affinity, just as the blessed do with Heaven; the
treatise]{.calibre5} [[De Coelo et Inferno]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [by
Swedenborg, published in 1758, expounds the same doctrine.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos615746 .calibre10}
[40]{.calibre5} [For the convenience of the reader I have selected a
moment between two periods of sleep, a literary moment, not a historical
one. If anyone suspects a fallacy, he may substitute another example,
one from his own life if he so chooses.]{.calibre5}
[]{.calibre10}[]{#Labyrinths_split_050.html_filepos616079 .calibre10}
[41]{.calibre5} [And, earlier, by Newton, who maintained: \"Each
particle of space is eternal, each indivisible moment of duration is
everywhere\"]{.calibre5} [[(Principia,]{.italic}]{.calibre5} [III,
42).]{.calibre5}
[ ]{.italic}
\
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_050.html_calibre_pb_51 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::
[]{#Labyrinths_split_051.html}
::::: {#Labyrinths_split_051.html_filepos616473 .calibre1}
[[Table of Contents]{.bold}]{.calibre3}
[[[Preface]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_004.html#filepos13074){.calibre7}
[[[Introduction]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_005.html#filepos26126){.calibre7}
[[[Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis
Tertius]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_006.html#filepos46148){.calibre7}
[[[The Garden of Forking
Paths]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_007.html#filepos83577){.calibre7}
[[[The Lottery in
Babylon]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_008.html#filepos108448){.calibre7}
[[[Pierre Menard, Author of the
Quixote]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_009.html#filepos122836){.calibre7}
[[[The Circular
Ruins]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_010.html#filepos144332){.calibre7}
[[[The Library of
Babel]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_011.html#filepos157509){.calibre7}
[[[Funes the
Memorious]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_012.html#filepos175602){.calibre7}
[[[The Shape of the
Sword]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_013.html#filepos194048){.calibre7}
[[[Theme of the Traitor and the
Hero]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_014.html#filepos206162){.calibre7}
[[[Death and the
Compass]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_015.html#filepos215123){.calibre7}
[[[The Secret
Miracle]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_016.html#filepos242459){.calibre7}
[[[Three Versions of
Judas]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_017.html#filepos258156){.calibre7}
[[[The Sect of the
Phoenix]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_018.html#filepos269613){.calibre7}
[[[The
Immortal]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_019.html#filepos276650){.calibre7}
[[[The
Theologians]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_020.html#filepos309789){.calibre7}
[[[Story of the Warrior and the
Captive]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_021.html#filepos328518){.calibre7}
[[[Emma
Zunz]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_022.html#filepos338051){.calibre7}
[[[The House of
Asterion]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_023.html#filepos351033){.calibre7}
[[[Deutsches
Requiem]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_024.html#filepos357013){.calibre7}
[[[Averroe\'s
Search]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_025.html#filepos371260){.calibre7}
[[[The
Zahir]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_026.html#filepos390441){.calibre7}
[[[The
Waiting]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_027.html#filepos410813){.calibre7}
[[[The God\'s
Script]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_028.html#filepos420098){.calibre7}
[[[The Argentine Writer and
Tradition]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_029.html#filepos431279){.calibre7}
[[[The Wall and the
Books]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_030.html#filepos452548){.calibre7}
[[[The Fearful Sphere of
Pascal]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_031.html#filepos459131){.calibre7}
[[[Partial Magic in the
Quixote]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_032.html#filepos467422){.calibre7}
[[[Valéry as
Symbol]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_033.html#filepos475400){.calibre7}
[[[Kafka and His
Precursors]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_034.html#filepos479477){.calibre7}
[[[Avatars of the
Tortoise]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_035.html#filepos485699){.calibre7}
[[[The Mirror of
Enigmas]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_036.html#filepos500008){.calibre7}
[[[A Note on (toward) Bernard
Shaw]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_037.html#filepos508625){.calibre7}
[[[A New Refutation of
Time]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_038.html#filepos515996){.calibre7}
[[[Inferno, 1,
32]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_039.html#filepos558921){.calibre7}
[[[Paradiso, XXXI,
108]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_040.html#filepos560851){.calibre7}
[[[Ragnarök]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_041.html#filepos563081){.calibre7}
[[[Parable of Cervantes and the
Quixote]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_042.html#filepos566326){.calibre7}
[[[The
Witness]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_043.html#filepos568057){.calibre7}
[[[A
Problem]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_044.html#filepos570036){.calibre7}
[[[Borges and
I]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_045.html#filepos572487){.calibre7}
[[[Everything and
Nothing]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_046.html#filepos574622){.calibre7}
[[[Elegy]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_047.html#filepos578607){.calibre7}
[[[Chronology]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_048.html#filepos581125){.calibre7}
[[[Bibliography]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_049.html#filepos587543){.calibre7}
[[[Notes]{.calibre15}]{.calibre14}](../Text/Labyrinths_split_050.html#filepos599263){.calibre7}
::: calibre1
:::
::: {#Labyrinths_split_051.html_calibre_pb_52 .mbppagebreak}
:::
:::::