# Kriegel the Perception-Cognition Divide, Final ![rw-book-cover](https://readwise-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/media/uploaded_book_covers/profile_1188016/y1X-ebESeyOMI5wd5Ja6E_wGoLQg1uojCrywDxpTFXs-cove_bE6Gmji.png) ## Metadata - Author: [[Blah Bleh]] - Full Title: Kriegel the Perception-Cognition Divide, Final - Category: #articles - Summary: insert summary - My notes: - Document Note: Take some highlights and try this prompt again. Take some highlights and try this prompt again. - Summary: The article discusses the perception/cognition divide and explores the first-personally accessible differences between perception and thought. It considers different approaches to understanding this divide, including focusing on the intentional character of perceptual experiences and occurrent thoughts. The article also examines the limitations of content-based and attitudinal-based approaches and suggests that there may be a need for a primitivist position that acknowledges distinct phenomenologies of perception and cognition. - URL: https://readwise.io/reader/document_raw_content/136301303 ## LLM Chats ## NotebookLM ## LLM Audio ## Highlights > o restrict the group of options to be considered in a principled way, I will focus on features of perceptual experiences and occurrent thoughts that pertain to their intentional character. By this I mean both (i) these states’ intentional content and (ii) the kinds of attitude they take toward these contents. (There are different views on the relationship between content and attitude. One model treats contents and attitudes as distinct features that combine together to form intentional characters; another model takes the basic intentional structure to be that of taking-attitude-Atoward-content-C and treats content and attitude as theoretical abstractions of some sort. Although I lean toward the second understanding, I will take no official stand on this question here. What matters to me is that not only content but also attitude be examined when we consider the intentional profile of mental states.) ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01hnczy8ma1g131z1kmcptxat8)) > ving-such-an ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01hncz58d88kzn8w9k8b69nr23)) > recisely why the information about the state of affairs’ obtaining is encoded into the very attitude of believing, not the belief’s content. We may put this by saying that the belief represents-as-obtaining the ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01hncz5gyr90rekm4s7458zmkv)) > the rectangle but also its redness, indeed you see the redness as being the rectangle’s redness. Presumably, perception of states of affairs ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01hncz6eac5g9zeb4w59tck9ay))