# Al Assertion, Responsibility Gaps, and Epistemic Blame Matt Jope Handout ![rw-book-cover](https://readwise-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/images/article2.74d541386bbf.png) ## Metadata - Author: [[read]] - Full Title: Al Assertion, Responsibility Gaps, and Epistemic Blame Matt Jope Handout - Category: #books - Summary: insert summary - My notes: - Summary: The text discusses the debate around whether AI systems can make assertions and take responsibility for their outputs. It presents three views: optimism, pessimism, and nihilism, with nihilism arguing that AI lacks the necessary properties for responsibility. Additionally, it explores the concept of responsibility gaps, where it may be unclear who to blame when AI causes harm or produces misleading information. ## LLM Chats ## NotebookLM ## LLM Audio ## Highlights > The Argument is valid only if premises 1 and 2 feature the same notion of responsibility ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jxcygscz643szb088b97gk2t)) > but premise 1 relies on a moral conception of responsibility ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jxcyh59p67q3hksdty0b01n7)) > whereas premise 2 relies on an epistemic conception of responsibility ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jxcyhpeq7ea60nvejsc2ex92))