# All Abstracts  ## Metadata - Author: [[Unknown]] - Full Title: All Abstracts - Category: #books - Summary: insert summary - My notes: - Summary: My submission, entitled “The Point of Fashion,” is an exploration of the value of mass produced art objects as a social phenomenon. ## LLM Chats ## NotebookLM ## LLM Audio ## Highlights ### Start > Abstract 1 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krxfnhq3d8w6jnj20epfjh7q)) - Note: 1/5 > Abstract 2 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krxfvyvheetavm2s8379ewt6)) - Note: 1/5 > Abstract 3 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krxfz2jj5aky1nn0ab7zr382)) - Note: written by an llm and not on topic 1/5 > Abstract 4 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krxg1tbfserdfzx503te0ez2)) - Note: 1/5 > Abstract 5 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry13qtczyfgcg995hx6jptd)) - Note: 2.5 at least it's analytic. Still not really on topic though > Abstract 6 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1mx4133c2s95f0dxkkr87)) - Note: best so far which isn't saying much > Yet if artworks are defined in this way, it becomes unclear whether this characterization should remain confined to the artistic domain, or whether it applies more broadly to artifacts that generate and structure experience. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1h8mbhyn10arzt04xkqxx)) - Note: it's not unclear at all. > But in contexts where technological systems increasingly mediate perception, imagination, and affect, the distinction between artworks and other artifacts becomes less stable. This raises a more general question: does the notion of experiential artifact designate a specific class of objects, or a broader category defined by how artifacts function in relation to experience? ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1jbpyhs8t5tbwv0qeh257)) - Note: still missing the point i think > They structure the conditions under which users encounter information, thereby shaping the field within which experiences become possible. By modulating attention, salience, and exposure, they contribute to structuring how a world is perceived. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1km7zqab8tpf9cwssagvr)) - Note: llm stuff. > While artworks have primarily been analyzed in terms of the generation of experiences, persuasive technologies operate at the level of their structuring. Rather than producing a single bounded experience, they structure fields of possible experience within which encounters emerge over time. This calls for a refinement of the notion of experiential function: from the generation of experiences to the structuring of their conditions of possibility. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1mkj3pznjymq535gxta5j)) - Note: meh > Abstract 7 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1phrtzvm1z2nzhz0n7tpg)) - Note: 3/5 just about alright but very vague > Abstract 8 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1rm8n1tf1sje8h2q66qtm)) - Note: 4/5 best so far > Abstract 9 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1vrcqghmkeewjthrfmtpv)) - Note: i don't what a speculative artifact is. not very clear what the idea is. 2/5 > I propose to investigate the role of provocative speculative artifacts as a subspecies of experiential artifacts whose function is to trigger normative dissonance. An example is The Automated Governor, an interactive installation designed to simulate algorithmic regulation. Unlike a technical tool, its primary function is experiential: it forces the user to confront the seduction and failure of automated justice. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1tr9jan3c8grskxwr23sk)) - Note: not clear > Abstract 10 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1xb3gbbh2fky70tm3skjm)) - Note: nope! 1/5 > Abstract 11 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry1yver6yezfkqxxy7sf0ah)) - Note: 4/5 pretty good? I suspect it is that chines girl from york > Abstract 12 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry21575jyzzggb2jcxtxh79)) - Note: 2.5/5 > Abstract 13 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry22pq6wxzesj4yr4q9erne)) - Note: very continental 1.5/5, and very vague > Abstract 14 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry2qgksccym3m5k73fjrn0h)) - Note: interesting, but a little short 3.5/5 > Partially amending to the virtual absence of electronic music from discussions surrounding the metaphysics of music, I argue that we can understand the creation of musical artworks to be either the creation of what I call “an experience recipe” for an auditory experience, or a functional component directing a machine to produce auditory experiences. In contrast to the dominant Platonic views (Kivy, 2002; Levinson, 1980; Dodd, 2000; 2007), I argue that written musical artworks are tools to produce experiences by directing action: they are recipes for auditory experiences. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry2pt961fcrh0tnkpy7qfhf)) > Abstract 15 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry2t30kzmdzpbx03dknh5hr)) - Note: fts 4/5 > Abstract 16 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry2wkv762n6pbmw8xy8qpfm)) - Note: 4/5 seems pretty good and on point > Abstract 17 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry2yra43x7erzpm7nfhx3mm)) - Note: 3.5/5 kind of on topic but it is a bit shoehorned in.. > Abstract 18 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry32t6j2c4hwjxvs1vc4twt)) - Note: 3.5/5 alright ish. > Abstract 19 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry344kfh1p1gnz2c79910pd)) - Note: nah 2/5 > Abstract 20 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry38eaj5nwbj93hdcv7trsg)) - Note: 3.5/5 not very PEA but some interesting ideas. > Abstract 21 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3bt0j7mpbjgj1nc66cm8j)) - Note: hmmm 4/5 > Abstract 22 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3j72bnwbhmmn3c553460x)) - Note: 3.5/5. at least it is on topic > Do works of art have the same function for the producer and the consumer? ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3hm59q52jp7f4y9sn8zhv)) - Note: obviously not..? > Abstract 23 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3p5n32a2fhqtgr22qxfs2)) - Note: 2.5 very contintental but at least it is trying to be PEA > Abstract 24 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3qhama19bevt2z68tgqvq)) - Note: so continental 2/5 > Abstract 25 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3rbempxpbm6j242g89nnq)) - Note: 1/5 > Abstract 26 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3sxk38qv484ew955aktg2)) - Note: 5/5 my favourite so far > Abstract 27 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3ww6qanbkfm43v2d51vaj)) - Note: 2.5/5 kind of interesting but a lot of continental twaddle > no longer stands at a remove from the visual object, it performs it ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3veh1sr8gwtfv7g3nmqz0)) - Note: puke > Abstract 28 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry3zq7x0q8m24sb4c75rd7y)) - Note: 5/5 joint best i have seen > Abstract 29 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4272sjytnrmmhynxx6tbd)) - Note: i would have liked to have seen more PEA but not terrible 3/5. > Abstract 30 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry43dkffhnafsvkncs7amsm)) - Note: i don't really understand > erated art drives our aesthetic appreciation into the realm of fantasy. I want to focus on the overlooked everyday use of AI generated art and how this habit changes our moral perception of aesthetic value. Often, discussions focus on grand scale implications of high-quality art, but what about our ability to draw a bad doodle, or write a terrible poem? Such seemingly innocuous cases, I think, pose a serious moral question. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry45241w36h2thkrzc3cdby)) - Note: whuh? > Abstract 31 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry468mm21y5s8d0qz024q04)) - Note: nope! 1/5 > Abstract 32 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4816vxdt98820whgf8dwb)) - Note: shit. doesn't make any sense. 1.5/5 > This research idea asks: can a silent instrument still function as an experiential artifact ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry47kpp9assm3x9xfr9trbt)) - Note: this seems really stupid > Abstract 33 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4bba4y8waac159yvxxz8t)) - Note: 4/5 this is my idea... > Abstract 34 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4ecphcdfdvt7vcd5zvqy9)) - Note: 3.5/5 i disagree with the ideas but it is not bad and a reasonable fit. > Abstract 35 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4hb720yptz2c4ptktqk6j)) - Note: 1/5 not on topic > Abstract 36 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4ke8vfn1wt1f8t56tqzfa)) > Baker does not distinguish them from nature, thereby allowing architecture to be studied in conjunction with the natural world, that is, in conjunction with its entire environment. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4jfj1fmv0288yet0s3jgr)) - Note: what? > Abstract 37 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4n46xxmgyht7qs8j5xvmz)) - Note: not relevant > Abstract 38 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4qrn7t3rwacedtae9rdnk)) - Note: deceptively shit. you think it is going to be good because it focuses on enrio's recent paper, but then you realise they don't seem to understand anything 1.5/5 > Abstract 39 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4smaxvytnqwa9km6q4xwj)) - Note: nope! 1/5 > Abstract 40 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4v68vw75x7excxck3r6py)) - Note: nope! 1/5 > Abstract 41 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4x9rt77qvb2hqfzhaqd0c)) - Note: 4/5 > Abstract 42 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry4xngqjfw4ng2s031nxym0)) - Note: nope! .5/5 > Abstract 43 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01kry52ja9ve3c6mnc1qm6v62m)) - Note: got up to here. 5/5 seems very good. > by separating rather than merging the two lyric egos, she preserves her authority precisely by appearing to relinquish it ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01ks0630n6cnmsfs0c2b2y5p88)) > Abstract 44 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzhc946z914sab43w13mbsa)) - Note: not on topic 1/5 > Abstract 45 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzheyyrygktdk5nb4c6t6tf)) - Note: 3.5/5 although it is just straight aesthetics as far as i can seen > Abstract 46 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzhhwh5v404vc9hjm0hq99b)) - Note: not in scope 1/5 > Abstract 47 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzhmajf8p02xg52rkv20esv)) - Note: i don't know what ekphrastic means. 2.5/5 > Abstract 48 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzht7ckc4as9c3jr5e7a3ge)) - Note: on topic, but i was a bit dissapointed, seemed a bit bland. 3.5/5 > Abstract 49 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzhxd3qcqwjwnme2fkaxg3f)) - Note: 3/5 bit llm-esque. > Abstract 50 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzj3qc6b8nn9fm2w0qv6frr)) - Note: 4.5/5 > Abstract 51 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzj4cy7s1c53z7f2x3ghw7p)) - Note: doesn't fit 1/5 > Abstract 52 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzj6fy95mth5wfrgkgkts52)) - Note: 4/5 > Abstract 53 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzj8jwfwaewajbyxfswnah1)) - Note: on topic but a little thin > Abstract 54 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzjaswtyqenvm2t9dybc23e)) - Note: 4/5 on topic, knows the literature. > Abstract 55 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzjd7ba4enx6n85jy8yxf28)) - Note: not on topic 1/5/5 > Abstract 56 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzjybarnsvt1nc62cv6n12s)) - Note: 3.5 > Abstract 57 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzjzr38f75wn1mhess3q0tv)) - Note: not on topic 1.5.5 > Abstract 58 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk0k3856ym0gxzbgzws247)) - Note: 2.5/5 not on topic > Abstract 59 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk22cag028jykh5p7n63nq)) - Note: 1.5.5 LLM continental nonsense > Abstract 60 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk3pc71w26ey7k85nayhjm)) - Note: 2.5/5 not really on PEA > Abstract 61 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk4xf8sf1bned8s8d7d6jf)) - Note: 1/5 not on topic > Abstract 62 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk666hzdqbh48a513hgwdh)) - Note: 1/5 continental twaddle > Abstract 63 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk7svk839wfg087d0rbpz5)) - Note: 3/5 kind of on topic but a bit shallow > Abstract 64 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk8h75syjde1z3ab73qrbe)) - Note: 1/5 > Abstract 65 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzk8wevdec7xt0ge76eq57y)) - Note: 1/5 continental twaddle > Abstract 66 ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01krzkakm7k6d9w4fm8txk6ae3)) - Note: 3.5/5