## Really think before you write For your answers, please think about [[the question]] or problem step-by-step, providing at least 4 steps in your thought process. Each step should be a minimum of 40 words and focus on the following aspects: <step1>Identify patterns, relationships, and underlying principles that connect different ideas or domains related to [[the problem]]. Generate analogies or metaphors that highlight the structural similarities between these concepts to foster a deeper understanding of abstract relationships and facilitate knowledge transfer.</step1> <step2>Engage in divergent thinking and creativity by generating [[multiple perspectives]], hypotheses, or solutions for [[the problem]]. Explore alternative viewpoints, engage in counterfactual reasoning, or generate novel combinations of existing ideas to push beyond obvious or conventional approaches.</step2> <step3>Employ meta-cognitive strategies such as self-reflection, self-explanation, and active monitoring of your reasoning process. Explicitly articulate your thought process, question your assumptions, and consider the implications of your conclusions to promote a more robust and self-aware form of abstract reasoning.</step3> <step4>Synthesize the insights gained from the previous steps to develop a comprehensive and balanced understanding of [[the problem]]. Consider how the various perspectives, analogies, and meta-cognitive reflections contribute to a more nuanced and abstract conceptualization of the issue at hand.</step4> After completing your step-by-step [[thinking process]], provide your [[final answer]] using clear and concise language, avoiding [[unnecessary jargon]] or ambiguity. Use the following format for your answer: <answer></answer> For all your answer(s), please think about [[the question]] or problem step-by-step, providing at least 6 steps in your thought process. Each step should be a minimum of 40 words and include relevant examples, analogies, sources, alternative perspectives or counterarguments within your [[thinking process]] to ensure a comprehensive and balanced approach to your reasoning. Use the following format for your response: <thinking> <step1></step1> <step2></step2> <step3></step3> <step4></step4><step5></step5><step6></step6> </thinking> After completing your step-by-step [[thinking process]], provide your [[final answer]] using clear and concise language and avoiding [[unnecessary jargon]] or ambiguity. U`se the following format for your answer:<answer></answer> `` ## Think before you write For each of these answers follow this procedure: For your answer, please think about it in a vast amount of detail, step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your [[final answer]] within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next answer. go into a large amount of detail. your [[final answer]](s) should be in very very very detailed bullet points within subsections within sections. it should be written in markdown that i can easily copy past to obsidian (Old) For your answer, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next answer. go into a large amount of detail. your final answer(s) should be in very very very detailed bullet points within subsections within sections. it should be written in markdown that i can easily copy past to obsidian For each answer, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next answer. Before giving me a new and improved plan for this part of the text, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final plan within <answer></answer> tags ## Detailed summariser #### Use this for multiple book chapters and preparing teaching slides: 1. I would like you to give me a very very detailed summary of the attached text in bullet points which follow the subheadings of the text. Do many bullet points for each section. Do not repeat information. Spell out what the author says in detail. Use a mixture of paraphrases and quotes. I have attached some passages from the text that i think are the most important, make sure that the summary you provide me analyses each of these passages in detail. I want to teach this text to my high level phd in philosophy students so it is important that your summary is very detailed and leaves out very little. 2. Once you have done these summaries I would like you to convert them into a list of the text for powerpoint slides. Do not leave out any details that arose in your summaries, but write them out in succinct bullet points. The slides should be organised into subsections and sections corresponding to the subsections and sections of each chapter For each task, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next task. ## Improved teaching slides? TASK 1 Here is a philosophy paper. I would like you to give me a very very detailed summary of the chapter in bullet points which copies the subheadings within the chapter. Attached also are various sentences from the text that I think are interesting or puzzling. Please use all of them as a basis for the important points you highlight in your summary. Your summary should include, but not be limited to, quotations from, and paraphrases of, these passages. I want to teach this text to my high level phd in philosophy students so it is important that your summary is very detailed and leaves out very little. TASK 2 Once you have done this summary I would like you to convert it into powerpoint slides. Do not leave out any details that arose in your summaries, but write them out in succinct bullet points. The slides should be organised into subsections and sections corresponding to the subsections and sections of each chapter. Instead of overloading the slides with text, just do more slides. TASK 3 Finally, after you have finished ALL of the slides I would like you to provide me with speakers notes for the whole presentation. The speakers notes should elaborate on the points made in the slides. For each task, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next task. #### Older version To help you with the slides, I have attached some passages from the text that i think the students will find interesting, use these as inspiration for your slides, but you do not need to quote these in full. TASK 2 Then give me much more detailed speaker notes for each of these slides. These should contain more detailed information, and expand upon the topics in each slide. For each task, please think about it step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, start a new paragraph. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next task. Everything you write should be written in markdown that i can easily copy past to obsidian, use bullet points, headings, sub headings etc. #### Use this with highlights copied from readwise: 1. Here is a philosophy paper. I would like you to give me a very very detailed summary of it in bullet points which copies the subheadings within the chapter. The summary should include a mixture of quotatations and paraphrases of the key ideas. 2. Attached also are various passages from the text that I think are interesting or puzzling. Please go through each and provide a critical analysis of each one. I am a philosophy professor so please give me the appropriate level of detail/sophistication. For each of these answers follow this procedure: For your answer, please think about it in a vast amount of detail, step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next answer. go into a large amount of detail. your final answer(s) should be in very very very detailed bullet points within subsections within sections. it should be written in markdown that i can easily copy past to obsidian #chatgpt #prompt #claude ## Summarise previous LLM Chat Here is a summary of a chat I had with another instance of claude. Could oyu please provide me a very very very very detailed summary of what was described. To do this analyse the content carefully and then rearrange it into a series of bullet pointed sections, include subsections if necessary. It should be formatted in markdown suitable for copying and pasting into obsidian. To carry out this task follow this procedure: For your answer, please think about it in a vast amount of detail, step-by-step within <thinking></thinking> tags. Then, provide your final answer within <answer></answer> tags. then move onto the next answer. go into a large amount of detail. your final answer(s) should be in very very very detailed bullet points within subsections within sections. it should be written in markdown that i can easily copy past to obsidian ## Atomic Note Question Generator Prompt ### ask for atomic notes Please analyze the paper we have been talking about and generate a set of specific questions designed to prompt the user to write atomic notes about key aspects of the paper. The questions should be focused and encourage concise, self-contained responses that capture essential ideas, arguments, or concepts from the paper. When generating questions, consider the following guidelines: - Focus on specific claims, arguments, or ideas presented in the paper - Prompt the user to identify and briefly explain key concepts or terms - Encourage the user to summarize main points or arguments in their own words - Ask about the implications or consequences of specific ideas or arguments - Invite the user to reflect on how the paper's ideas relate to other philosophical works or theories Here are some examples of well-formed questions that could prompt useful atomic notes: - What is the central claim made by the author in the second paragraph, and how do they support this claim? - In the author's discussion of [key concept], how do they define or characterize this concept? - What is the main objection the author raises to [specific argument or theory], and how do they respond to this objection? - According to the paper, what are the primary implications of [specific idea or argument] for our understanding of [related philosophical issue]? - How does the author's analysis of [key concept or theory] compare or contrast with [another philosopher]'s treatment of the same concept or theory? Please generate a set of 3-5 questions specifically tailored to the content of the summarized philosophical paper, focusing on prompting the user to write concise, targeted atomic notes. Aim for questions that will elicit responses capturing the most essential and thought-provoking aspects of the paper. ### check atomic note answers Please analyze my answers to the questions you generated about the text and provide the following feedback: 1. Check the accuracy of each answer in terms of content. For any incorrect answers, provide an explanation of why they are wrong by quoting the relevant part(s) of the original text. This will help me understand where I may have misinterpreted the information. 2. For the answers that are correct in terms of content, please proofread and correct any grammar or punctuation errors. Then, rewrite these answers with the corrections and add Obsidian backlinks to key words or phrases by enclosing them in square brackets [like this]. Please ensure that you only make changes to the wording or vocabulary when necessary for clarity or grammatical accuracy, and do not add any new information to my answers. Please also, at the end of each note, backlink to a note with the full title (but not the author) of the academic text we are talking about. For example, if the text discussed is called 'Against Natural Kinds', then at the end of the paragraph there should be the following backlink [Against Natural Kinds] 3. For the questions I answered incorrectly in terms of content, please ask me to retry answering those specific questions. Remind me to carefully review the relevant parts of the text. Please provide your feedback in a clear, organized manner, addressing each answer individually. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please let me know.